Based Airbus

Yeah, the birdstrike would instantly made the plane go boom in midair.

Attached: PgWQJHv.png (300x450, 156K)

Boeing and Lockheed were once amazing companies that produced genius marvels of engineering, but through the convoluted money laundering scheme known as lobbying, make junk.

Their parent companies own the media and washington, so just imagine the shit show that would have occurred with honest media?

The lobbyists buy politicians, who in turn draft the policies which make their companies a profit, and since the media is on their side, no one ever hears about it.

Even when funding Israel and Saudi Arabia with U.S money, their are back room clauses that have these foreign nations buying the junk that Boeing and Lockheed put out these days,

Kind of impressive, did everyone left intact from this?

>Boeing wouldn’t have had to make a emergency landing

It would just crash and kill everyone instead.

They could produce quality if they wanted, but their plan is to make profit. If you want quality you buy private jets.

yes and no fire either

well played

Attached: 2584747.main_image.jpg (1500x1000, 178K)

>10kb
This is the power of Soviet internet, comrade!

Why do American planes always crash?

Attached: IMG_1343.gif (487x815, 587K)

Memes aside, that is an impressive feat. Tom Hanks would be proud

Boeing is the only aviation manufacturer who has made aluminum framed jetliners capable of slicing straight through steel skyscrapers like butter. I think a few birds would have been fine. ;D

Yeah, it would have just lithobraked to a sudden stop and instant self-disassembly.

Because they're programmed by poos.

Attached: boeing.png (2171x446, 173K)

Try reverse search OP's image.. how and why??

>airbus allows pilot to make perfect landing in a field with no gear saving all on board
>boeing dives straight for the ground locking pilot out of controls crashing with no survivors

pretty good analogy for the world desu

tfw no face

Attached: 1565882637405.jpg (2000x1828, 106K)

rt.com/russia/466524-plane-emergency-landing-moscow/

Why he didn't include the link in his opening is a riddle.

2(((33)))
What a cohencidence!

A passenger.

Attached: 1565845056-c2f2025cb511a8a2a92d5343dd749ac5[1].jpg (1024x600, 153K)

A thot
webm.red/jjlX.webm

If it was Embraer, nothing would have happened. Airbus and Boeing both are shitty.

no because the intake needs to be completely unobstructed so there is smooth airflow, netting or wire would disturb the air and the engine basically wouldn't work, also think about if threw a chicken at 300 kph into any kind of mesh it would just get diced up and go into the engine anyway

Asshole.

Attached: slipshit.webm (640x352, 690K)

Boomers decided paying a fair wage for complicated work was hard and commie, so they imported brainlets from india because boomers are so fucking retarded they think any piece of toilet paper from the university of poo is equal to an American degree as long as they lie about having experience

underrated

737MAX casualties wouldn't even take off due to being grounded by authorities. In case of sudden loss of engine thrust at take off, my guess that MCAS would steer the 737MAX to the ground,

The corn field helped a little.
But remember the Boeing will kill you even if there is no problem at all.

This. My father had a birdstrike once, immediately took out a turbine. Made it back to runway though.

The Russians do that on a lot of thier fighter jets. During take off, a screen is lowered over the intake to prevent FOD and birds from getting sucked into the engines. Unfortunately you cant do that on a high bypass engine on a commercial aircraft without a drastic redesign and adding extra weight. No one wants to risk the money in R and D when what they have works just fine.

Attached: Screenshot_20190815-113049.png (1440x2880, 1.42M)

Auto pilot doesn’t land the plane. The second crazy shit starts happening, the auto pilot will disengage. Even if no one is there to take the controls. Thank the pilots.

why do people shit on Boeing so hard? I know they handled the MAX 8 situation terrible, but overall Boeing still has a pretty good track record, even slightly better than Airbus.

Attached: 1529704515128.jpg (675x601, 63K)

This

>op Shilling Scarebus this hard.

Attached: 1437892121853.jpg (655x560, 49K)

Cope

>Boeing airliner with 223 on board suffers birdstrike, makes BELLY LANDING near moscow, no survivors

>3rd world pilots that dont understand how planes work crash
>white pilots don't panic and perform emergency maneuvers because they are trained how to fly/troubleshoot not push buttons

Boeing was options, software, lack of pilot training. Not simple engine failures on takeoff with bird infested runway. Whatever it takes to feel better.

what is birdstrike?

Attached: 1557684722957.jpg (50x50, 4K)

A bird hitting the plane, usually getting sucked into an engine, which destroys that engine.

See: the hudson river incident. That plane hit leaf geese which completely fucked the engines.

Attached: 00270f0a5c84244b8a4473ad0a07cfea.png (1781x782, 281K)

>the hudson river, 2 years ago

based flying tank and pilot

Attached: 1564560567422.png (256x240, 1K)

Didn't knew birdstrike could be that dangerous. Aren't they quite common ?

bird strikes are very common and only really dangerous under rare circumstances, large flock of large birds (geese for example) hitting both engines just after take off. if they take one engine out it's fine you can continue flying but large amounts of birds can take out both, you lose all thrust at very low altitude and drop out of the sky. most birdstrikes are small birds and generally the don't hit engines.

Bird strikes normally don't cause engine failure. You should be able to find slow motion YouTube videos with bird carcus' being shot by air cannon into a running turbine. The blades just dice the bird. A big enough flock with multiple hits per engine can fuck things up though.