Why do retards love democracy?

why do retards love democracy?

Attached: deaddemon.png (1440x1080, 747K)

What do you suggest?

It avoids dictators there hirohito.

Because I didn't roll being a King or a Dictator myself.

Kritarchy is worse.

I suggests "one language many kingdoms".

good. but Abe came

there are somewhat competent dictators, especially in countries rich in natural resources that do not really need to have major economy of their own to pay for infrastructure and social programs, that being said there are bad dictatorships and their only recourse to quell the unrest is first to accuse the opposition for the ills of society, after that the only people left to accuse are the other countries - dictatorships are bound to go to war with one another, see there are poor democratic governments - however their mandate is 4 years or so, even if the democracy in question is flawed it is highly unlikely for such country to go to civil or offensive war

it's not about the choice or even well being of the people democracy is good, it's for the sake of not burning down your material infrastructure every few decades

Attached: 1296503297319.jpg (444x322, 22K)

Dictatorship

The bourgeois brainwash the NPCs to love pay-to-win-ocracy with capeshit movies about intelligent strong men with power.

Attached: penis face man.jpg (1200x800, 97K)

You don't burn down your infrastructure, there can be a peaceful transition of power under a dictator.

Fashy bashy Hugo boss

Because morons think that simply participating in the system means that the system is an extension of the people's desire, which they perceive as being tantamount to their own, which in reality it isn't, and for that very purpose, for the very purpose that everyone votes in their own interests, voting should not exist, you give power to the feeble minded, those who think for themselves rather than for the greater good of the nation and its people at large.

>even if the democracy in question is flawed it is >highly unlikely for such country to go to civil or offensive war

do you know Iraq war and Libyan Civil War and Syrian Civil War?

Because they no longer need to make decisions anymore

To be honest it would be pretty cool being a member of the SS and fighting for a based and redpilled dictator.

Liberal democracy lead us here. Fuck it all, limited electorate now

brainwashed by jews

Attached: 1547864924177.jpg (783x2472, 573K)

This is basically a spawning pool for the opinion of inbreds.

How about voting but the media is either banned or forced to remain neutral forever. By controlling the media scumbags can override the freedoms of the people by having them vote for issues without realizing it

Monarchy is the only true form of government

"Democracy" name something that exists in name only

based and redpilled

Whay we should want, being slaves without any voice? Even when corrupted, it's better than alternative.

Democracy is pretty dumb
But there should be systems in place to remove bad leaders if you don't have democracy.
And those systems must remain untouchable by the leadership.
Nations that act tyrannical and don't have a system to remove that tyranny are are straight trash.

no, the average person is still incapable of making good long term decisions, even if they are given all the requisite information.

there is always a system to remove tyranny

Democracy should only be for those who are invested in the country. ie, land owners, families, etc. I think they had something similar in ancient greece for awhile, until they got run over by women and turned into cucks like everyone other great nation. Not sure what it's called.

>there can be a peaceful transition of power under a dictator.

well it "could" do so.. few cases in the -stan republics show it but... often the transition is bloody and violent

well, I am alive and have connection to the internet so I know about them... now how those wars disprove anything I said ?

>And those systems must remain untouchable by leadership
This is not easy to do in a system without a ton of leaders all at once. A constitution won't work unless you have a militia to enforce it. The closest anyone has to that are American citizens

If you can't remove a leader without destroying the nation, that isn't much of a sytem.
That's a crap system and just means it's a crappy nation to start with.

The reason why monarchy is superior over democracy is simple.

In a monarchy, kings come to power either through intrigue, birthright, or if they conquer the land. The last two are legit reasons.
In a democracy, however, there is only one legit reason for someone to come into power, which is voting. The problem is that in most cases, the people will vote for a stupid leader, so this is not even fully legit either.

yeah and how has that enforcement gone?

politicians have amended the constitution to the point it would be unrecognizable to the founding fathers, yet that masses have done nothing. the only thing the second amendment has done is protect us from niggers

define "destroying the nation"

A revolution destroys the state, not the people. Violent revolution usually sucks, but its not the end of the world. I'd rather have a good inflexible system than a flexible bad one.

Because only genius communists can figure out how to starve millions. Dindu nuffin!

based

Make Tennou great again!
大日本帝国万歳

sorry, sir
Meiji Tennou is maybe a fake Tennou
because Meiji restoration is an intrigue of Jews and Brits

If they used logic and quietly marked down what they wanted and the state actually enforced it (cough, Prop 187) or publicly apologized when it didn't, and then DID retroactively support the will of the people, okay.

They don't. They form mobs and get co-opted when doing so, or actually believe absurdities through reinforcing one anothers confirmation bias.

The defining quality of America is avoidant personality disorder. It's unlikely to change through the ballot box and should it ever hit their comfortable little lives, I too will laugh at them.

It's tacit complicity or profound ignorance to go on in this vein. Nothing more, nothing less. It's already illustrated, multiple times over, it's not legitimate. Whether incompetence or negligence is pointless to quibble over.

Democracy allows the people to change policy inside the system without influencing the direction society is taking. People like it because it gives them choices in their life.

All in all no true democracy exists as America has lobbying.

They subconsciously realize they're powerless and inferior and thus utilize whatever they think gives them leverage, not realizing they're being fooled utterly. They relish the tiny modicum of power they wield so they ignore the obvious truth.

It's okish system you're ambitious yourself and want to get political power.

Communism doesn't exist such as neither does democracy. No matter what system of government you are under the ruling class decides the direction you are taking.

Its said that in a democracy people make war but the reality is never has this been the case.

Who was the best Tennou in Japanese history?

>I like being a slave long as i feel good
>I like being blue pilled
>I like happy lies

That's why i hate America as the nation has a fake freedom facade but the reality is this nation is an empire and needs to act like it.

People like the idea of being equal, but not having to put it any work.

THE USA IS A FUCKING REPUBLIC YOU GODDAMN FUCKING RETARDS. JEWS WANT YOU TO WANT ((DEMOCRACY)) FUCKING HELL. reeeeeeeeeeeeeeee fuck kikes ride bikes fuck feminist dikes. FREE. robert.

Democracy doesn't exist as even local laws voted on are lobbied. The first time i ever voted in my life was 2016 hedging on Trump(because why not) it was funny. But all the propositions i voted on my state that passed or didn't pass followed the lobbying money trail.

Nintoku Tennou is the best Tennou
he achieved tax free Japan

Jews dont want democracy as they already control America. What they want however is communism more power to the top and everyone else equally shit.

democracy is "demon racy".
it's just satanism. not OK

Kikes told them so.
Kikes love democracy becouse they can manipulate people in to shit.

Based

based

because it was design specifically for them. the ignorant masses. Democracy is the best liar wins over the most stupid people. that's the system.

because they don't want to suck off authoritarian dindoos faggot

In a democracy, you don't even know who you're sucking off, you don't know the source because the corruption level is so high
If things go wrong in a monarchy, you know the king is wrong and needs to be replaced

based

May he rest in peace
I hope Japan will glory again like in ancient times

Yeah democracy is great. You get to be retarded with other people in a morass of shit.

It lets them feel important and in charge once every few years.

cuck mentality
go live in China dipshit

Founding fathers never intended for a continental union to happen. Republics were meant only for states. American elections are shitstorms due to its vast scale.

The (((media))) tells them to.
national socialism

Attached: commies_hate_CPC.jpg (720x1280, 74K)

thanks bro

China doesn't have a king you dimwit
All communist countries are authoritarian, but they're not legit monarchic

That's why America has lobbying aka legal corruption. The people are too stupid to recognize this however as the happy facades cover the truth.

The illusion of choice.

what's the difference? same job, different titles.

Np bro we need to restore the 日独伊 alliance

Communism is a perversion, it has nothing to do with monarchy

Yup, same here. People think "the corruption problem is not so bad, be happy you get to live in a democracy, just think about countries like XYZ" and they think that just because we have high standards means we don't need to fix our system

Illusions are dangerous as society can only take so many bad decisions.

They both have same objective. Only leaders intentions are varaible here. Any system can work if the leadership is good.

Because it feels like the most fair and just system. It isnt the most efficient system. Depends on what you value.

It is opposite of efficient system. May be in an ethnostate where everyone love each other it can be the case.

The human species is built to be dictatorial. We are hierarchical by nature and that natural affinity should be followed, not ignored.

Even under democracies we are quickly discovering that we've had secret dictatorships the entire time.

The trouble is that dictators are being allowed to proliferate under unnatural conditions where they hide their existence and thus prevent the natural feedback loops.

Dictators give people someone to point at and blame for everything going wrong, that's part of the entire point of them. Leaders have to be responsible for their people and modern dictators are not, which is why the west is going through these paradoxyical and suicidal spasms right now. The people who should not be running things are running things and instead of being punished are being allowed to continue running everything into the dirt.

Yea but that's exactly the point. There are different forms, good and bad forms of authoritarianism. Just because China is an authoritarian state doesn't mean monarchies are bad

Yeah i agree and the only binding force holding up the west is the ponzi economy which is why every time the stock market dips everyone freaks out. If the economy crashes what do we have?

Based and redpilled

It allows for a peaceful transference of power. So if the latest leader turns out to be a dud, you don't need to assassinate them.

Civil war/revolution

We know there's going to be a recession within the next 1-2 years. Is it going to get bad enough to cause a civil war/revolution?

I don't think we're at the breaking point yet, but we're definitely fucking close to it. Something is going to snap soon, I can fucking feel it.

>doesn't mean monarchies are bad
yeah, ask Saudis, Thais and Bhutanese about it. And no, not the retards from Jow Forums or Jow Forums. Ask real people.

if Japanese government die, that is possible.
Japanese government is corruption government now.

democracy has never existed. It has always been an oligarchy with a good marketing campaign. The commies should learn from us

Here's an important thing:

The japanese government can die, but you cannot kill the japanese people by destroying their government.

The people matter more than anyone in power cares to admit right now. We are going to see some serious fucking happenings in the future of america, I'm absolutely certain. I don't think the United States is going to be very United going forward into the next century, and likewise with every other white nation suiciding its population right now.

Evil Jews convinced retards that its good so that people whos ancestors have lived in a country for thousands of years will have the same power to vote as Jews and other outsiders.

Also because it costs a lot of money

Also because it inherently divides the population and keeps a people from unifying

Also because nothing can ever get done and authority cannot be executed

democracy is a joke , there is no real democracy.
in real democracy all the peiople get a say in everything.. all we do is choose a talking head that then betrays us

LIES LIES LIES

Democracy can work on long as those who are eligible to vote pay a net positive in taxes. You need skin in the game and a stake in the republic, otherwise the voter just votes for more handouts and bloated government.

because theyre force fed propaganda since infancy
democracy doesnt work if the people dont agree with each other. there are too many seperate political interests for anything meaningful to ever happen
add to that the out of control corruption and its basically the political equivalent of behavioral sink

Because it gets slammed into our brains K-12.

In the case of rigged election?

What makes you think the commies aren't behind it in the first place?

To put it another way: When the USSR and Germany invaded Poland, the allies only declared war on Germany. They then immediately began supplying the USSR. It frankly makes it look like there was already an established world order and Germany was bucking that system.

Commies is a bit of a misnomer. It seems to me that there's just been a few different faces/propaganda masks worn by what are ultimately all the same kinds of people. In all honesty what is even different about the communist rulers of the USSR vs the capitalist rulers of America? How they achieved the sequestration of wealth?

Okay, but they still both sequestered wealth and power in the hands of a minority at the expense of their wider populations. Different names for the same end result. Why even bother giving them different names? It's like arguing that it matters whether someone was killed by gunshot wound or strangulation.

Dictators only work when there's an effective "Sword of Damocles" hanging over their head; something to force them to be a good king and not to be decadent or neglectful in their position. If they fuck up, they should die. The next guy who takes over has the same sword hanging over his head: uneasy lies the head that wears a crown.

Same principle should be applied to all positions of power, but with appropriate punishment. If the rich don't generate wealth with their capital for a nation, then it should be taken from them. If the police don't effectively curb crime, then they should be disarmed and replaced. If politicians can't govern and legislate, then they should be barred from public office. If judges can adjudicate, then they should be disbarred. The technocrat that blunders should be stripped of their credentials. Etc.

It's not just that "with great power comes great responsibility", but also "great punishment".

>why do retards love democracy?
it stops nazis

Attached: 1552498923370.jpg (543x373, 19K)

bait

it was just a dividi et impera move... first remove the evil nazis financing the commies, then remove the evil commies using the now docile Italy and Germany. WW2 was just the same imperialism seen in WW1 with a better marketing campaign. Still today we remember only WW2 even though WW1 was far more brutal for the soldiers. But hey, WW2 had a holy purpose, we defeated the evil natzeees!!!!!!!

I'm thinking more depression at least in America anyway. For other countries we all know revolutions are all too common when trade breaks down.

This is where the jewish conspiracies come from as communism was really the greater evil why didn't the west team up with the fascists to remove them? That is because communists and capitalists are 2 sides of the same coin.
That's false as once the fascist powers were defeated did the western powers push on to defeat the communists? Nope. In fact America trades with a communist China today and only recently started demonizing Russia because of their fascistic government. The entire western economy is built on communist slave labor you must be blind not to see it.

relentless quasi-religious propaganda

things have changed with nukes. They went from full scale wars to small local wars fought by proxies (Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan...). China is a particular case: they have always seen them as a third world country to exploit. A country close in her isolationism. They simply didn't pose a threat. Now things have changed. Same for the Russia: in the 90s they were seen as a state in disarray easy to exploit. Now Russia is becoming a regional power and it scares the hell out of them. The EU has never been a menace, they are their castrated dog.