How often do you succeed at things you try?

30

Attached: me IRL.jpg (650x497, 47K)

Attached: 1560157755961.jpg (700x665, 30K)

no because succeeding in new things often requires to "unlearn" old paradigms/ways of thinking. In that sense people who have average IQs and have't gone to college or even dropped out of school have an advantage in succeeding in business over somebody who has already been infoctrinated by the system to becoming a wageslave

the answer is: undefined

now you've gone and spoiled it for the brainlet OP
your reward is either whats in my meme folder or whats in my pocket, you can pick

Attached: 1551135757159.jpg (485x820, 73K)

Tesla had most of his ideas stolen or scuttled and ended up penniless. Was his IQ low? Sage.

If you try defecating and succed in it, it doesn't mean you are intelligent

give epic funny maymay from folder user

Attached: fagadhaearg.jpg (480x480, 22K)

Here's the real intelligence test. 50% of people get this wrong. You're not a virgin, are you?

Attached: Untitled.png (791x275, 91K)

Attached: 1545466240753.webm (1280x720, 2.64M)

seen this before but thankyou

Attached: 1544124986270.gif (500x402, 378K)

How a out all these institutional intellectuals that tried to vote Hillary into office?

outstanding. any more info on where this is? a church? the utter shamelessness. what a degenerate.
you know porn made him that way

Boots = 10
Man = 5
Air blower = 2

Final question
10 + 5 x 2
= 30

Actually wait
Final question is 5 + 5 x 2 so the answer is 20

Attached: 456322.png (500x622, 154K)

I'm going with B, final answer, that nigger is using moth trickery and does not fit with the other two

Attached: 1557582931788.gif (400x224, 2.76M)

19

Shoes = 5 per shoe
Man = 3
Whistle = 2 per whistle

Final
2 x 3 + 5 = 11

x goes before +

Attached: 1565009155330.gif (179x173, 788K)

sorry, 60, didnt see the "x" multiplicator

Attached: 1562172343018.gif (220x190, 1.65M)

30

>nigger shoes = 10
>nigger = 5
>whistle? = 4

nigger shoes + nigger x half whistle(2) = 30

Attached: duhhhh.png (645x729, 51K)

oh no, far be it from me to leave you unsatisfied, you earned it

Attached: 1536395238413.webm (400x400, 1.26M)

Shoe=10
Asian =5
Whistle = 4
10+5×4
Multiply first- 5×4=20
10+20=30
The answer is 30 you idiots.

The answer is 14.
10 + 10 + 10 = 30
10 + 5 + 5 = 20
5 + 4 + 4 = 13
10 + 1 x 4 = 14

Im the smartest, kneel before me peasants

3x=30
x+ 2(y+z) = 20
(y+z) +4z = 13
.5x + y + z =

Actually no, im retarded

lol you're wrong faggot

been busy alot, eh bhutanposter?

read

Attached: iq.png (703x911, 76K)

my shitpost in mighty bursts

Attached: 1550656414880.jpg (822x901, 85K)

It's 10 + 5 x 2

fuck i'm wrong too, didnt notice that sneaky half shoe at the end

Attached: 1555905650409.png (394x360, 144K)

oh wait I didn't notice it was one shoe

what is that thing anyway?
>inb4 bug girl
I mean the thing she's holding that's spraying her with juice

No it's, 2 shoes = 10 but in the final question it's 1 shoe.

I got it, its 11

10 + 10 + 10 = 30
10 + 5 + 5 = 20
5 + 4 + 4 = 13
5 + 3 x 2 = 11

I actually am the smartest, so kneel before me peasants

>the thing she's holding that's spraying her with juice

big jappu cocku

Never heard of nepotism eh?
Pick up a dictionary sometime

R A R E

nice, is that yours user?

>when you not only manage to make OP look like a fool to the point he leaves
but also derail the thread in general

Attached: 1551842859005.png (239x211, 41K)

>Man = 3
He ironically thinks he's right. The absolute madman you're so fucking adorable

Attached: d89.gif (600x580, 472K)

a mistake was made, chill your tits.

Everything I try works out ok but just not the way I expected.

i am tard, count the whistle on his hoodie too, in the last row his whistle is missing from the hoodie

5 + 5 x 2 = 15

>isn't that supposed to be the measure of "intelligence" ?
You're ignorent. If that was the case, everbody would get better at baseball.

IQ is your ability to learn.

Attached: lambright_technology.jpg (3000x3600, 1.38M)

The solution is to not try. You're not going to win so don't sabotage yourself by trying.

Just enjoy the ride.

Oh nvm half a pair of shoes at the end.
5+5×4
5+20

25 is the answer

Oh for fucks sake he has a whistle in the first one

100% of the time

see

its 10 you fucking mongoloids

lmao he got you good

Wat? no, that makes no sense
> 3 shoes -> 30: 3 = 10 = 1 shoe
> 1 shoe + 2 Asians = 20 -> 20-1 shoe = 2 Asians -> 20-10 = 2 Asians = 10 -> 1 Asian = 5
> 1 Asian + 2 whistles = 13 -> 2 whistles = 13 - 1 Asian = 13 - 5 = 8 -> 1 whistle = 4
> 1 shoe + 1 Asian x 1 whistle = 10 + 5x4 = 30
If there are no brackets, you multiply what can be multiplied first.

16 I mean

Its 16 if you cant do this In your head just fucking off yourself please

It's not 16 dipshit

Single shoe is 5
Guy without whistle is 3
Single whistle is 2

5+3×2
5+6

11?

There is a strong correlation between succeeding with your attempts and IQ, so intelligence is at least indirectly defined this way.

I have lost ~20 IQ points (after a trauma), and I had a Mensa certificate. Before my trauma, I didn't see myself as having strong abilities, because I was born with them, but after my trauma I realized a sudden inability to do things, and you could generally say that I stopped succeeding with things, which I succeed with before.

As a developer/architect in IT, I noticed that I would be classified as a so-called 'great developer' according to the below guy's assessment technique, but after my trauma I would no longer be eligible.

youtube.com/watch?v=XYDbq5YfoqI

It's ironic that the only way to learn what intelligence 'is' for me, is to have experienced two different perspectives on the scale.

why don't you use that viscious energy to go save your country, cuck

It's not man. It's man with one whistle.
The whistles are two.
The shoe at the end is single. Meaning five.
Man without single whistle is three

I'm pre sure the answer is 11

amerimutts finally got it

Attached: pizza.png (366x366, 201K)

3 shoes = 30; shoes = 10
10 + 2 heads = 20; head = 5
5 + 2 whistles = 13; whistle = 4
shoe + head + whistle = 19

An easier method is to simply meet and interact with someone smarter than you. I mean vastly smarter. Have you met such a person? I've been lucky enough to do so.

There's always going to be someone smarter than you. Always. Arrogant bastards always make me laugh, because their arrogance bespeaks a lack of humility due in great part to their inexperience in dealing with people.

I try to always be humble.

OOPS... missed the "x", saw all addition, LMAO
answer is 30... 10 + (5 * 4)... 10+20= 30

Before my trauma, I didn't view myself as "smart". I would jokenly be called "the professor" and the like, but I never compared my intelligence with others, because I was not convinced about the model of a one-dimensional hierarchical measurement of cognitive abilities. Rather, I saw other people with other behavior as people, who simply were different by a lot of other means. Ex. if you weren't good at math, I didn't necessarily see this as a lack of intelligence, but rather a personal preference (how dumb it may sound).

But after my trauma, I definitely feel dumber than a lot of people, and I appreciate intelligent people a lot more now. I can clearly distinguish intelligent people from dumb people, and the model of IQ correlates really nicely with what I would call "intelligence".

Still, listening to smarter people than I now makes me beyond depressed and want to kill my self, because I once had these sort of abilities. I also felt carried forward in every aspect of my life, and in retrospect, this is what happens to intelligent people. Life is so unfair..

The kid loses the whistle around his neck. It's just a trick question. God I hate all these newfaggots.

>attention to detail, lol dat uh trick nuffin about IQ

Attached: 1551919970038.gif (512x807, 469K)

Well, I don't consider myself "smart". I don't view intelligence as this all encompassing indicator. I feel certain that people will be born with various natural talents, some will discover them and some wont. Those who do go on to do great things with these natural talents, and often incorrectly mistake their natural talent as an indicator of how smart they are.

I personally always speak to other people as if they will fully understand whatever it is I'm talking about. I never look down on anyone, because I wouldn't like that done to me either. Golden rule, etc.

This unfortunately does not often work in my favor, and ultimately people just don't want to talk to me because they think I'm difficult to understand or they don't want to reveal they have no idea what I'm talking about, but I remain fair and persist in my method, regardless of their reaction. Something of annoyance; I've gotten negative reactions for trying to be detailed in my explanations of the mechanics involving whatever it is I'm trying to explain. You would think someone would appreciate the breakdown of the subject, but it's the opposite; many just want the solution and not the equation explained.

In the end it's always better to simply not bother, unless asked. I dislike this mentality because it feels lazy, but such are the minds at work around us.

you fucking nigger
derailed the thread like a true low IQ nigger

anyways, the answer is indeterminate with the given info. pair of shoes cost 10, why would 1 shoe cost 5 dumb nigger? have you seen a single shoe being sold?

also why would the whistle not worn count dumb faggot

fagggggggggggggggggggggggggot

I'm getting some sleep, enjoy your thread, try not to seethe too must mister "high IQ"

Attached: 1558642128630.gif (200x180, 868K)

Yea but there is nothing to say what the whistle alone is and the man alone is. Together they = 5 but for all we know the whistle could be a 4 and the man a 1 etc.. to say it's a 3 can be objectively right as any number from 1-4

My IQ is around 75.

>Was in the bottom sets for everything in school

>No qualifications

>Failed every test during my educational years

>Have never worked a day in my life.

Today, im a 31 yo virgin still living with my parents.

Attached: why.png (645x773, 58K)

Made my first six figures with Ethereum first year out of college and currently making $74k/yr in defense acquisitions. I think if you're over 107, you've got an edge. But if you're in the hell zone of the 120s like me you realize you'll never quite make it as someone 132+. I'll never accomplish anything worthwhile besides being slightly better at business than your average manager.

Attached: 1565587842388.jpg (959x1080, 291K)

>31 y/o virgin

lol what, impossible. also a neet? I refuse to believe this type of person exists. you've gotta be some tavistock institute shill trying to spread the meme / social engineering memetic / demoralization tactic.

You know.
Man and single whistle is 5
Man w whistle pulse double whistle double whistle is 13.
Meaning 13-5 is double whistle + double whistle.
Meaning 4=double whistle.
Single whistle is 2

Retard.

i used to fail at all exams in school too user, but i now would probably be in the top 10 high income earners in my class user

dont give up, school is for suckers

At least your parents let you hang around. Mine threw me out at 20 and I spent 3 of those years couch surfing/homeless.

This is correct.

I would definitely classify myself as "lazy", and I would even contribute this to being smart, because I didn't have to read stuff to understand math etc. So I don't think that lacking smarts necessarily correlates with lazyness, and I might even consider the opposite to be the case.

>In the end it's always better to simply not bother
Or "feel for the situation". We always assess each other as part of being social creatures, so if you want to do the other part a favor, you should align both your level of arguments and field of interest towards your subject.

>Well, I don't consider myself "smart"
I think the words "smart" and "intelligence" are very hard to use objectively, because everyone wants to have it - and everyone wants to display. So even though you don't say that you are smart, you still write your texts in a way that displays, that you have some kind of ability, and I believe that you are motivated to yield this. Is this true? Like we humans always want to shine in some sort.

>I don't view intelligence as this all encompassing indicator. I feel certain that people will be born with various natural talents, some will discover them and some wont.
What I actually have learned is that you "either have everything or nothing", and that IQ is the best indicator of this. I believe science also says this. Though I didn't excel in, say, football, I still had the foundation to improve upon. Great motoric, rhythmic skills etc. Now one side of my body is crippled, and there are a multitude of things, I will never be able to achieve physically.

Sry for wall of text

Nah, he (and you) missed an important trick at the end.

Oh fuck lads. He doesn't have a whistle on his shirt in the last row.

Attached: 1564719392558.jpg (585x629, 66K)

U are right :)

It's just my writing style. I've always been a great communicator, or at least I enjoy the effort and moment that it gives me to express myself. We're all good at something, and monetary success does not always come from whatever natural gifts we discover. No need to apologize for typing long, this site is a modicum for exactly that, despite what the kids here will tell you.

Sorry for your physical disposition. I don't suffer anything in particular myself, just a decidely poor level of motivation. Life has turned me into a nihilist of sorts, but I recognize my role and continue to play along anyways. Suicide is never an option. We're all here to learn something or we wouldn't be here, even if that lesson is nothing but suffering.

16

try again

missed. 11 is right

>We're all good at something
It depends on what you mean by "good".

I have learned that predisposed abilities / intelligence
- greatly varies between us
- is a constant throughout life (unless damaged like me)
- they are a key in understanding our behavior and who we turn out to be

You can be good at what you do - you can be a caring and loving person (which I would consider to be "good") - but your IQ will most accurately determine your acceleration and speed towards "being good" at some new dimension.