Hey bros. Redpill me on socialism and why it's a bad idea

Hey bros. Redpill me on socialism and why it's a bad idea.

Attached: 1552464177858.gif (500x281, 473K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=x2s0HmC-1-0
youtube.com/watch?v=D3N2sNnGwa4
quora.com/Why-did-hippie-communes-fail
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Socialism is untenable since economic calculation in a socialist commonwealth is impossible.
Read the works of Ludwig von Mises.

Do you like food?

Eventually, you run out of other people's money.

This, additionally it smothers natural human creativity.

There's a fun story about how Silly Putty would have never been invented in the USSR because "It serves no purpose".

>implying

youtube.com/watch?v=x2s0HmC-1-0

I dunno about terms to define the undefinable mass guided by the invisible hand of the nature of systems

socialism is a double PSYOP on poor clueless dupes and narcissistic intelligentsiya, to make a vote vending machine and a permanent political class.

Marxism is the bait for all this (social revolution) and Leninism is what they get in its place ( cynical totalitarianism)

Governance is largely an illusion in and of that it promotes the idea that law restrains wicked action.

A good man requires no law and I would like to think most men are good.

If the scale moves and more participate in wicked action

we must ask what is the root and cause

Is it that too many are born without intention of solid and good upbringing? As a celebration of life and not a "burden"?

Just watch the free to choose series.

Link to episode 1:
youtube.com/watch?v=D3N2sNnGwa4

There are 10 episodes, all of them are on YouTube. These are extended editions with a debate afterwards. You don't have to watch the debates, but they are educational.

Socialism with nationalism is okay. Its like some sort of...... national socialism

>what is the root and cause
greedy ambition is the cause of all evil

If you mean socialism in the Marxist sense, then because it is ultra-violent

well

love and friendship find their etymological root in Free

based and thatcherpilled

If, on the other hand, you mean social democracy, then it is neither good or bad objectively, it just has winners and losers (although some ideologues might argue this point)

literally no incentive to start a business or get rich in a socialist society

Ok. Give me your money. You don’t need it, but I do, I can’t even afford basic necessities. I work 10 hours a week at a basic job.
What, you think I should work harder? Why? You’re wrong, I have a right to these things. You have too much, and that’s not fair. I’m going to vote in people who will force you to give me your things at gunpoint, because fuck you, I have a right to it.
And that is how socialism works.

Attached: CF304B9C-D8FE-4A9B-9816-BDFA9DFBBCD7.jpg (819x1024, 127K)

And I guess the third major type is libertarian socialism. If you're curious about that, you can check out this: quora.com/Why-did-hippie-communes-fail

Attached: arisz' favourite.png (1080x1234, 730K)

It’s a good idea for workers to have control over the fruits of their labor and for production of goods to be driven by what’s needed in society, rather than profit

Socialism sucks. National Socialism is perfect.

Working so I can feed Tyrone and his 60 cousins doesn't sound so great desu senpai

Fuck off lolberg.

Attached: Screenshot_20190818-082303_Firefox.jpg (1080x1164, 382K)

the workers never do money discipline to buy their own field, alone of cooperatively, that's the eternal problem

a galician jew, one of the worst types of jews

please do tell the story

>socialism
It's not this bad when it's done it a racially homogenous nation, but otherwise it's bad because shitskins profit most

You have been visited by the Laura of not great, not terrible threads.

This thread is currently reading 28 replies (not great, not terrible).

Attached: Laura.jpg (1275x637, 108K)

Attached: 1387254979052.png (398x482, 170K)

Jews created it, to benefit Jews and make them wealthier.

'Sup, you bolshevik. workers generate absolutely no value if capital is not allocated so as to efficiently meet demand of the consumer economy. The fruit of the laborer is whatever they are able to negotiate in the marketplace.

If we were to gear production to some commissar's idea of need, rather than market signals, we would end up with a soviet style collapse.

There is no incentive for anyone to create anything that will further our standard of living under socialism, because there is no profit to be gained. The government has a monopoly on all industries and thus the whole market stagnates. People get lazy because their job and income is guaranteed regardless of their performance. What happens then? You get bread shortages, or shortages of any essential item. What happens then? Well then the state will use violence to force you to work harder. Socialism inevitably results in totalitarianism and oppression of the people.

And that's not even mentioning how the centralisation of power is very easily corrupted and you will find that the (((party members))) or other higher ups will still find themselves eating all the bread they need, while the workers get nothing.

Capitalism, or a market economy in general, is a good thing. There should definitely be some regulations to stop jews getting a monopoly over certain industries and to stop them preying on the common man, but in general it works well. People point to the current state of America as an example of how bad capitalism is, but the reality is we are basically a corporatist country and I think something like 45% of jobs are government jobs.

Attached: 1565286304358.jpg (960x539, 100K)