Was colonization bad?

backwards culture will always lose

Attached: oy.png (670x974, 1.14M)

this pic is redpilled

damn

Attached: IMG_20190714_043507_238.jpg (848x725, 126K)

NOICE

The British Empire was the best thing that ever happened to the world.

>Then endgame of multiculturalism is a population of clean cut white people.
No, slavery is the endgame...

We should have waited for all of the primitives to die off before we left Europe. Assuming we didn't kill each other over small ethnic (implying Irish, implying white) and linguistic differences before then.

why is the snake worshiped in the east as a great flying dragon, and feared in the west as a beast to be fought by a knight and the personification of the devil?

let's say you and i user are space travelers and we are tasked with flying about the galaxy detecting planets with humanoid intelligent species (because we are also humanoid) and our major job is to accelerate their development into a sufficiently modern age of technology and culture so that they can be considered for selection to some larger group we both belong to that has this civilizing galactic mission.

we might have a loose guidebook on how to proceed, maybe based on our own history. this history might read something like this -

>at first there were many different small groups of people
>over time these groups united into one large group
>at which point they were approached by a supervising group that introduced them to some type of space confederation of species

so naturally you would want to groups to unite, and there isn't a better way to do this than the lock and key method. you give one geographic group a lock, and a very distant group a key, and then you watch as they slowly use these tools over many centuries to develop themselves, make contact, then eventually unite to unlock their present.

so ur china, japan or korea? europe as early adopters of all their innovations completely erased the older culture in the process.

the blame here lies squarely on the ancient greeks who influenced the romans and led to the mass conversion of europeans to christianity, (the project began much earlier when the romans tried to reconcile their pantheon of gods with the pagan one) which led to 1400 years of inner conflict until the religions were rejected by the 1700s - of course by then the pagan root religions had been forgotten, and you had more innovations like socialism and nationalism emerge to cause even more tension and conflict that is still felt today.

What if the planet start to fight for "independance"?

>europe as early adopters of all their innovations completely erased the older culture in the process.
Evolution doesn't care if lower cultures were wiped out. Only the fittest survive.
>who influenced the romans and led to the mass conversion of europeans to christianity,
Constantine was Greek?

yeah seems like that's the issue with earth so far. the axial tilt (which was probably an accidental collision with our moon during formation) caused us to have different temperate zones and evolve a lot of variation. this extreme variation might be very unique and rare, but it makes us as people so different from each other before we get to the unification stage we can't get over the - fuck off you are different from me stage.

imagine an earth with no tilt and therefore the seasons are less pronounced and everyone is an asian. how much sooner would we have reached a global empire with a homogenous uniform world population.

romanization was an attempt at the roman empire to copy alexander's hellenisation of the ancient world. it morphed into christianity as the vehicle of cultural conquest later.

Explain why

No shit... nigger

I don't know, maybe war is a part of evolution so far

>was X thing bad?
Jesus you're a literal child
Sage

It was hard to believe that it would become the quicksand that it did.

I.K.R.

This, unironically.

>romanization was an attempt at the roman empire to copy alexander's hellenisation of the ancient world.
Agreed. Indeed, this "copying" process by succeeding civilizations has been going on for a long time. Before the Greeks, it was the Mycenean empire that was closer to the Levant and the Mesopotamian cradle of civilizaiton. Once the Mycenean's fell, the Greeks used their ideas to build their empire. Rome was simply a small trading post which accepted immigrants without any question. When Greece fell, the immigrants coalesced around Rome and built the Roman empire. When the Roman empire fell, the Church took over the technology and influenced the Holy Roman Empire. The Normans, influenced by the Holy Roman Empire, conquered England and so on.

All civilizations seem to have borrowed something from those who came before them.
That seems to be the pattern that humans are following.

Colonization was just an attempt to uplift the lesser races. It was the white man's burden, the affirmative action of the past. It's about time people saw it as this.
Whites have always been willing to try and help others. They used resources that the brown man wasn't using.

Because there was a lot of world to grab and little capable of defending it.

>the meat mince is turning into whites
No way this never happens

youtube.com/watch?v=o4i4Rr7XJzo

VEY

3 hours damn

It was a good idea with poor delivery

You guys certainly fucked up.

tl;dw

Watched a bit, fun stuff about origins of men, god and shit.