Common Sense Gun Control

Post common sense gun control Jow Forums can agree on. I'll start
>Universal background check
>Federal firearm database
>End the gun show loophole
>Military style assault weapon ban
>High capacity magazine ban
>Mandatory psychological evaluation to purchase a firearm
>Social media evaluation before purchasing a firearm
>Expand the waiting period to at least one week
>Tax firearm related purchases to fund the new programs
Feel free to post anymore ideas!

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/subject/Common sense gun control/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

MOSSAD FALSE FLAG TOMORROW

>bigger government
>common sense
Pick one.

Oh wow this sure isn't a slide thread. Good thing sage exists.

>Military style assault weapon ban
Oh those are already banned, assault rifles can not be purchased legally
>Tax firearm-related purchases to fund the new programs
GIBS GIBS GIBS

No

Do research or die .

Mandatory military service so people who are afraid of guns can learn how to properly use and store guns.

Attached: 1566108850630.jpg (440x239, 107K)

Fuck off and die

sure pass whatever laws you need to make yourself feel good

Attached: byebyebigpussy.jpg (584x380, 45K)

Buy a gun before spouting more of this nonsense.

I'm coming to the USA to suicide yourself

where's her penis

Attached: nofilter.jpg (660x480, 95K)

Attached: 34.jpg (1920x1080, 448K)

Any form of gun control is unconstitutional. Fuck off Jew, and take your dancing nigger with you.

The only gun control that will work is making sure everyone has an FN on their hip.

>Oh those are already banned, assault rifles can not be purchased legally
They absolutely can it just costs a fuckload for a 60 year old shitty gun and you have to let the ATF crawl inside your asshole

Fuck no, fuck off
>mandatory psycheval
>tax firearms
>assault weapon ban
>high cap mag ban
>SOCIAL MEDIA EVAL
No fuck off bootlicker

you do not need anything bigger than a handgun for self-defense

We don't want to take your abortions we just want common sense abortion control.

>Universal background check
>Federal abortion database
>End the morning-after-pill loophole
>Military style late term abortion ban
>High capacity uterus (twins, triplets) abortion ban
>Mandatory psychological evaluation to get an abortion
>Social media evaluation before aborting a fetus
>Expand the waiting period to at least one week
>Tax abortion related purchases to fund the new programs

Feel free to post any more ideas!

Not one thing u posted is true, show me a gun show that I can just buy anything, you can’t brcsuse you’re lying

Exactly. Anything else is unnecessary and should be regulated

>Post common sense gun control Jow Forums can agree on.
Repeal the NFA and open the registry.

>fuck off bootlicker
says the communist.

Attached: The ultimate goyim.jpg (888x499, 165K)

Its sad how wrong you are

shall not be infringed, etc

Look at this magnificient couples of fucking homos. I hope aids will take you to hell than a bullet from a concerned citizen.

Handguns are hard as fuck to get up here because we let retards write the laws.

archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/subject/Common sense gun control/
Is this a bot?

>national """"socialist""""
>talking shit about anyone else
It's depressing to see someone aware of societal problems posed by systematic ills and then turn around and fall for ruling class divide and conquer tactics

You guys should try the second amendment up there

Most people dont support any of those, once you move past the soundbite or buzzword

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.
Period

fuck you faggot

Repeal all gun laws.
Imprison all gun grabbers.

fuck you bootlickers.

Attached: ancap pepe.jpg (340x568, 50K)

Gun control isn't about guns. It's about control.

As a cucked bong, go fuck yourself

Its the only way to fight off Zionist tyranny like you. Mr. foreskin muncher. There was a reason why you fuckers were banned from 109 countries.

Attached: Gtposting+is+even+worse+gteinstein+is+a+traitor+_ communists tried to take over germany.jpg (1000x612, 185K)

Stop responding to one post by this ID threads already you Retards.

actually two, get owned boomer

>gun control
Ill shoot anyone in the face who tries

This

Just ban them

nobody likes you ancap. sorry.

Attached: nobody likes ancaps.jpg (1280x720, 109K)

Not going to happen. Our populace are made up of fucking cowards. I heard a while ago that we have roughly 12 million guns as it is. If most people here knew that they wouldnt be able to sleep at night. Now imagine if the rcmp didnt have the ability to anally rape gun owners at will. We might god forbid actually have people defend themselves from niggers who for some reason decide to shoot all bystanders when they chimp out and attack their rival niggers for stepping on their drug turf.

Also the politicians will never vote for it because any leftist rep with a brain knows that they will end up with several
308 bullets in their skull the next time they call for increased gibs for economically unproductive immigrants

Attached: 1566089417061.jpg (436x536, 51K)

While this country has a problem with mass shootings, and that draws a lot of attention to assault weapons, the larger issue with gun violence is actually the prevalence of cheap second hand weapons.

We have, by far, the cheapest second hand and black market gun prices on Earth. We need to drive this prices up, so that guns aren't a disposable commodity to criminals. We also need to consider where placing our efforts in doing so can be the most effective. We don't want to have to go searching through innocent people's homes to make sure they aren't breaking the law. We need to make laws that give incentives to follow them.

Along with a registry. Limit new gun purchases to 2 per person. If you can hold a gun in each hand, your right to bear arms is not infringed. Between 2006 and 2016, the number of times a lawful defensive shooter had to reload their weapon, and were subsequently successful in taking out their aggressor was 1, and that was an escaped lion.

This doesn't mean you cannot own more than 2 guns, it just creates an incentive to buy pre-owned guns. And not as many new guns will be introduced into the market.

3% of gun owners, own 50% of all guns. People who hoard weapons will be competing with criminals for pre-owned weapons, the and the price of all weapons will increase. Taking many weapons out of the hands of criminals.

You belong in a cell.

Shall not be infringed.
sage.

>Common Sense Gun Control
Only white people get guns

>military style
what if I style a squirrel hunting rifle to look like an m2 browning

Why, because I don't like to ignore suffering and death?

Seriously, I didn't suggest any limits on the type of weapons you can own, nor any overall limit on their number, so how does my proposal in any way limit you in fighting the tyrannical boogeyman you're so afraid of?

oh look a concern-troll thread
SAGE

Because you're mentally ill and subverting the constitution. Sedition is still illegal.

Here's a common sense law I agree with
>My bullets in your head

Attached: 1556584336006.jpg (300x300, 26K)

>mandatory insurance (like for cars)
>mandatory registration (like California, only federal)
>semi-auto weapon ban instead of "military style" (that's what you are going for anyway)
>all ammunition and reloading equipment must go through a FFL

How am I subverting the constitution, when you could own the same type and number of whatever weapons you want, as you can now?

>Any crime requiring jail time is a permanent dis-qualifier instead of just felonies.
>Yearly "property tax" on all firearms
>Limits on ammunition purchases
>Any firearm part (barrels, slides, triggers, etc.) must go through an FFL.

Shall not be infringed nigger, and all the things you propose are infringement.

You called for the registration of guns and limits on their purchase. Blatant infringements.

You're illiterate, subversive, and mentally ill. I'm sorry society has failed you, but that doesn't give you license to infringe on the rights of anyone else. People who can't function in society should be removed from it. You are a prime example.

How do they infringe?

common sense gun control .... no
common sense gun safety ... yes

Here is my list of to do's:

(1) All high schools have mandatory firearms safety courses, taught by local police.
(2) All high schools offer "Firearms Ownership course" ... taught by military. Sixteen years of age, minimum. Children taken to military base for one month in summer ... a bootcamp, dedicated to safe firearms pratices. After successful completion of course, and upon reaching 18 birthday, they may purchase rifles and shotguns.
(3) pistol ownership courses, taught by military, and open to all citizens over the age of 21, to be completed prior to purchase of pistols.

Anyone who is convicted of a felony criminal offence, and who has not received a pardon, may not own firearms. Anyone who is diagnosed as "mentally ill", by aminimum of three physicians, may not own a firearm, or be in possession of one.

Any private property owner can make it a offence to carry a firearm onto thier property, they must post signs clearly stating that. Ditto for all public areas, let individual municipalities decide.

Any concealed firearm is a felony. Open carry only. (imo a concealed firearm is the tool of an assassin, a weapon carried openly is the right of a free person).

A safe storage law to be determined again by local municipalities, what degree of safe storage is neccessary is determined by local police or sheriffs. It is only a misdeameanor offence though. So gunsafes, cabinets, trigger locks ... whatever ... determined by local LEO's. (Different areas need thier own solutions). A firearm not in possession of its owner, needs to be stowed safely though (that is a reasonable expectation of your neighbours).

and last, but not least,

anyone ever convicted of commiting a felony offence while in possession of a firearm, the automatic penalty is death by hanging, no exceptions. Armed robbers need to be hung.

Attached: gunbanc0.jpg (480x355, 74K)

Stop me.

Attached: 1565887737972.jpg (480x360, 12K)

You can't tax a right.

Where in the second amendment do you see anything about limiting the number of purchases?

Sure they can. Ask California.

> Paying an average $120 for a transfer isn't a form of tax

You just love taxes and big government, dont you?
I say no.
No to more bureaucracy.
No to more taxes.

Attached: 1560209972294s.jpg (125x64, 2K)

Here's how to make a bomb.

Attached: 24463b_2370763.jpg (1235x1173, 175K)

Registering a gun infringes on your right to bear arms the same as registering a car infringes on your right to travel. i.e. it doesn't.

The Government can regulate commerce you faggot. No where in the constitution does it say guns should be free. The militia act of 1792 called for people to supply their own weapons, that they had to pay for themselves.

Same thread. Copy and pasted almost exactly the same every day. No one's convinced. No one is going to change their mind. Fuck off.

It doesn't limit the number of purchases, it limits the source of purchases, and government can regulate commerce.

The only common sense gun control is to not have any at all.

In alaska I get to legally kill you if you try. H.B.69

Attached: 1560738136172.png (684x1110, 408K)

Not in alaska.
I get to legally kill gun grabbers up here.

Attached: 1560170597410m.jpg (1024x1024, 152K)

No where in the constitution does it say fags can get married either, it never addresses marriage

The government has no reason to know who owns guns or what guns they own. Cars shouldn't be registered any more than guns are. Previous infringements on one right aren't a blanket pass to infringe on others in the future.

The government can't regulate commerce in firearms. The amendment says shall not be infringed, not shall not be infringed except for here and here because it makes this crazy person feel better.

That's right fags, how can you disarm a state that legally gets to kill you?
We even let felons have any kind of hunting rifle (including semi autos) for hunting and self defense purposes.

But it's not regulating any type of firearms, its regulating commerce. You can still own all the same weapons. And I don't care if you want to make bombs. It takes a lot more time and effort to learn how to make explosives and construct explosive devices than it does to buy a gun from an asshole down the street for $25 and shoot someone because they called you out for fucking your mother. The issue isn't about a capacity for violence in this country, its a capacity for impulsive violence.

You're infringing because to keep and bear you need to aquire and you're infringing on that.

Where in the second amendment does it say that the government knowing about weapons is an infringement on your ability to bear them?

I'm not even a faggot, but whether you are a man or woman i dont give a fuck, I'd marry you just because we need Americans like you here.

Attached: 1549424494805.png (545x409, 236K)

This is called projection. A hundred million gun owners didn't shoot someone for calling out their mother today. The fact that you're having trouble understanding this simply underscores the fact that you're too dangerous to be roaming free.

FOPA, the same law that closed the machine gun registry, prevents registries of any non NFA firearm.

The 2a doesn't but FOPA does. Repealing that would open the machine gun registry. Your move faggot.

Right here

Attached: 1564821274066.jpg (854x1024, 86K)

Those are two completely separate issues. What does the government having a list of gun owners and what they own do to improve the general welfare of the nation?

Then money is also infringing on your ability to acquire. And yet, guns aren't handed out for free. But how about this, what if, my proposed law gave everyone one free gun if they wanted it? How about that?

No, fuck off, no more infringement, and no free shit to entice people to allow it.

You're asking me how improving the government's ability to track down people who commit crimes improves the general welfare?

But you basically implied that money is infringing on your ability to own a gun.

Then ide still kill your entire family in minecraft for posting here in the way you are.

Attached: 5eb0f04647150fd29a88f3a1dbc9ed3116085affc0567e20619902926efd2291.jpg (1062x4086, 1.25M)

How does the government having a list of gun owners and what guns they own improve its ability to track down people who commit crimes?

It remains ok to kill this anons entire family in minecraft.

Attached: 1559570911203.jpg (720x701, 37K)

No, you implied that. I stated that laws that restrict the ability to purchase are infringement.

Weapons training in schools, starting in second grade. Mandatory carry for anyone who is qualified out of the high school training program.

Limit gun ownership to landowners.

>>Universal background check
We already have that.
>>Federal firearm database
Absolutely not.
>>End the gun show loophole
Doesn’t exist. You were lied to.
>>Military style assault weapon ban
No.
>>High capacity magazine ban
No.
>>Mandatory psychological evaluation to purchase a firearm
Only if it can be administered in an unbiased manner, so most likely gonna “no” on this, too.
>>Social media evaluation before purchasing a firearm
Yes, look for leftist posts and other radical affiliations like antifa.
>>Expand the waiting period to at least one week
Fuck no. That’s arbitrarily inconvenient.
>>Tax firearm related purchases to fund the new programs
NOOOOOO!

shall not infringe

But the effect of my proposed law is an increase of the price of guns on the second hand and black market. It's not restricting your ability to purchase.

Yes it is, it limits what I can purchase at one time, which is a limit and an infringement.

How does limiting what law abiding citizens can own stop people from stealing guns?