Why Do You Care About Palestine?

>Let them genocide muzzies. Why not?
Rules and laws are made to protect yourself, NOT you enemies. You agree to not torture, so your troops don't get tortured and you don't knowingly allow genocide because then you can justify genociding anybody for any reason. So it's a hard no. This shouldn't have to be explained.

>Why Do You Care About Palestine?
It is important to have an active second front against the kikes. Every bit of energy that the kikes spend fighting Palestinians is energy which was diverted from fighting European nationalists.

Attached: palestine.jpg (2835x1860, 418K)

White betas are too busy hating on jews while muslim cucks are gangraping their children in europe

>the palestinian sandniggers are not flooding our borders, raping our women and children or bombing our civilians;
They use all of those tactics in their war with Israel, literally hiding behind women and children and launching attacks from elementary schools. In addition, I'm fairly sure they're sending just as many rapefugees as Somalia and all the rest to European countries and America, so yes they are doing that to us.
>they are staying on the land that they have lived on for centuries and fighting their occupiers the best that they can
Israel existed for thousands of years before being driven out by the Palestinians. Why shouldn't they "fight their occupiers?"

I suppose that makes sense, but giving the Muslims another foothold sounds liek a bad idea to me.
I'm having trouble interpreting what you've written there.
Let us see your flag, schlomo.

i guess some people think being a nationalist means everyone should rule their land with no outside intervention, and they consider the post war UN-western policy a violation of the principle of sovereignty

>I'm having trouble interpreting what you've written there.
Genocide shouldn't be allowed because you might find someone genociding YOU and you have made genocide acceptable to commit, so you are fucked.

>Genocide shouldn't be allowed
If a minority group of people causes sufficient problems for all others, then yes it should be. Both Jews and Muslims seek to destroy all others that aren't in their group. The Jews do this through subversion, and the Muslims through outright war and terror attacks.

If these people have their rifles trained on us and our families, why should we not fire back?

>Israel existed for thousands of years before being driven out by the Palestinians. Why shouldn't they "fight their occupiers?"
Wut?
>I suppose that makes sense, but giving the Muslims another foothold sounds liek a bad idea to me.
I definitely want Muslims to have a foothold in their own countries.

Attached: PalestinianDavidActivated.jpg (2835x1860, 695K)

>I definitely want Muslims to have a foothold in their own countries.
I don't want Muslims to have a foothold when all they do is send people to attack us. Besides, the more destabilized they are, the easier the next Crusades will be.
>Wut?
Israel was born at probably about the same time as Palestine, and eventually they were driven out by all of the angry Muslims around them. This would make them "oppressed" by the Palestinians.

>They use all of those tactics in their war with Israel, literally hiding behind women and children and launching attacks from elementary schools.
"...fighting their occupiers the best that they can". if a Red Dawn situation were to occur in the USA we would do the same.
> I'm fairly sure they're sending just as many rapefugees as Somalia and all the rest to European countries and America, so yes they are doing that to us.
get back with me when you are more than "fairly sure" and can provide reliable sources. i have yet to see a city anywhere in the western world turned into a Minneapolis because of Palestinians
>Israel existed for thousands of years before being driven out by the Palestinians.
70AD. 136AD. you historically ignorant ignoramus

Attached: israel expansion.jpg (809x539, 87K)

>t. absolute retard
we side with European nationalists and

Attached: file.png (1446x968, 990K)

there isn't even a slight touch of historical accuracy in the map.
not even a single frame is accurate

>I don't want Muslims to have a foothold when all they do is send people to attack us. Besides, the more destabilized they are
You are clearly a particularly stupid kike. Stable Muslim countries are the least likely to send out refugees.
>the easier the next Crusades will be.
The crusades were a military campaign to secure Christian pilgrimage routes in the holy land. Most European nationalists aren't even serious Christians, and the ones that are mostly adhere to Positive Christianity which largely negates the importance of the Holy Land. Even if we were traditional Christians and wanted a crusade to retake the holy land, Israel would be our main opponent, as it is the Zionist regime which currently controls the Holy Land.
>Israel was born at probably about the same time as Palestine, and eventually they were driven out by all of the angry Muslims around them. This would make them "oppressed" by the Palestinians.
Palestinians are the descendants of ancient Judeans who converted to Islam. "Jews" are a bunch of mystery-meat merchants from around the world who dubiously claim to follow the religion of the ancient Judeans.
>we side with European nationalists
>t. retarded Mizrahi

Attached: resist.png (933x350, 442K)

i'm ashkenazi, stupid goy

Attached: file.png (850x878, 652K)

>Red Dawn situation were to occur in the USA we would do the same.
No we wouldn't. And if we did, we would deserve to lose. Using women and children as human shields is barbaric and disgusting. One could argue that guerilla "hit-and-run" tactics are legitimate, but launching Missiles from from buildings filled with civilians, not to mention CHILDREN is stupid.
>. i have yet to see a city anywhere in the western world turned into a Minneapolis because of Palestinians
Best case scenario is that they aren't sending anyone over to take our cities because they are too busy fighting the kikes. I(f they aren't already, then I would bet my left nut that they would the second they won against Israel.
>70AD. 136AD. you historically ignorant ignoramus
Israel existed long before Christ you stupid mong. If it didn't then there would be no way that he traveled through there in his life. Besides that, Israel/Judea was the first home of the Jewish people. Muslims sprang up around them as a splinter from the original religion.

>why do you care about palestine?
why do you care about 6 million jews 80 years ago?

>Stable Muslim countries are the least likely to send out refugees.
Absolutely untrue. Muslims are called upon by their religion to subjugate, kill, or convert all non-Muslims. The only reason that any of their countries are unstable (besides Palestine) is because they take to this belief so radically that they kill others who they think don't Muslim hard enough. Were all the Islamic countries to achieve stability, they would not hesitate in trying to destroy us
>Kike
I'm a Scottish-Germanic-Saxon, with possible Jew blood somewhere down the line. I think the Holocaust is a farce and am currently weighing extreme libertarianism and National Socialism as my dominant political beliefs.
>The crusades were a military campaign to secure Christian pilgrimage routes in the holy land
They were also a retaliation to the Arab slave trade, wherein the sandniggers raided white countries and killed men so that they could steal women and children to sell as sex slaves. Besides that, once we get rid of the Kikes I'm sure traditional Christianity will take dominance again.
>Israel would be our main opponent
To my knowledge, Christians are allowed into Jerusalem for holy pilgrimages.

>"Jews" are a bunch of mystery-meat merchants from around the world who dubiously claim to follow the religion of the ancient Judeans.
I'll give you that one. Most modern Jews are Talmudists or Atheists who claim genetic ties to the old Hebrews. However, I still believe that Israel should be allowed to exist as a Jewish state by those who at least claim to follow the religion or have heritage so as to get them out of our countries until such a time as we find a good enough plan of attack.

I'm Ashkenazi too.

They need too much gibs to exist:

msutoday.msu.edu/news/2017/msu-scholars-find-21-trillion-in-unauthorized-government-spending-defense-department-to-conduct/

And jews are cancer, even if they survived on their own.

>Absolutely untrue. Muslims are called upon by their religion to subjugate, kill, or convert all non-Muslims. The only reason that any of their countries are unstable (besides Palestine) is because they take to this belief so radically that they kill others who they think don't Muslim hard enough. Were all the Islamic countries to achieve stability, they would not hesitate in trying to destroy us
Arabs are harmless 90 IQ third world people. Once we retake our countries from the kike international central banking syndicate and we have control over our borders and naturalization system, Arabs could never again pose a threat to Europeans.
>I'm a Scottish-Germanic-Saxon, with possible Jew blood somewhere down the line. I think the Holocaust is a farce and am currently weighing extreme libertarianism and National Socialism as my dominant political beliefs
Do you understand race and IQ? If you did you would know that Arabs are no inherent threat to Europeans.
>To my knowledge, Christians are allowed into Jerusalem for holy pilgrimages.
And they were allowed by the Muslims rulers as part of the post-crusades peace deal.
>However, I still believe that Israel should be allowed to exist as a Jewish state by those who at least claim to follow the religion or have heritage so as to get them out of our countries until such a time as we find a good enough plan of attack.
Bad idea. Dealing with Jews is much more difficult if they have a nuclear-armed base of operations with a powerful military-intelligence complex which is funded by international Jewish subversion of Aryan countries. If Israel were overrun by Arabs or Persians, the power of international Jewry would be massively diminished. This is why we must treat any Palestinian or Muslim to fights Israel as our brothers.

Attached: 1519082712538.png (848x800, 91K)

>Arabs are harmless
Are you braindead, user? Tell that to Paris, or all Sweden, or Germany. Sweet Jesus.
>Once we retake our countries from the kike international central banking syndicate and we have control over our borders and naturalization system, Arabs could never again pose a threat to Europeans.
They're still a militaristic and barbaric group with almost two billion followers. They are a threat, user.
>Do you understand race and IQ
Yes, but someone doesn't have to be smart to be dangerous. Just look at niggers and violent crime rates.
>And they were allowed by the Muslims rulers as part of the post-crusades peace deal.
So you're admitting that we had to fight for it? Besides that, I have to wonder how many Christian pilgrims to Jerusalem under the control of the Muslims suffered persecution from the native population...
> If Israel were overrun by Arabs or Persians, the power of international Jewry would be massively diminished
What is: The Samson Option?
Besides that, if we gain footholds in the ME by destroying the Muslims (Easier targets) it would help us gain a foothold against the Jews and allow us better military operations against thim. This of course, would need to come after developing countermeasures to nuclear warfare so as to ensure that the entire world doesn't end up as radioactive glass.
> This is why we must treat any Palestinian or Muslim to fights Israel as our brother
I will never, NEVER consider a disgusting sandnigger to be a brother of the white people, and especially not as a brother to Christianity. If you were smart, you wouldn't either.

>>If a minority group of people causes sufficient problems for all others, then yes it should be.
Nope. Justice is blind. Who died and made you god?

I see it similarly. I hate Jews, but if the entire Middle East became Greater Israel, so be it, as long as it meant that all the kikes went or stayed there and euthanized all Arabs. If that's what would stop them from meddling in European and American politics and society, be my guest.

>Are you braindead, user? Tell that to Paris, or all Sweden, or Germany. Sweet Jesus.
The only reason that there are Arabs in those places is because Europeans have no control over their finance, media or politics. If we had Sovereign Aryan national Socialist states these Arabs would simply be repatriated.
>They're still a militaristic and barbaric group with almost two billion followers. They are a threat, user.
No they aren't. Shiites are in fact pro-white. Iran often hosts conferences which invite white-nationalist speakers.
>Yes, but someone doesn't have to be smart to be dangerous. Just look at niggers and violent crime rates.
Niggers are in the same category as Arabs. If we had control over our governments, we just wouldn't feed niggers and they would all die.
>So you're admitting that we had to fight for it? Besides that, I have to wonder how many Christian pilgrims to Jerusalem under the control of the Muslims suffered persecution from the native population...
Jews in Israel spit on Christians in the streets, what is your point?
>What is: The Samson Option?
The kikes are going to exterminate us all anyway. Some Europeans will survive the Samson attack, unless kikes have developed a doomsday weapon which will extinguish all life on earth.
>Besides that, if we gain footholds in the ME by destroying the Muslims (Easier targets) it would help us gain a foothold against the Jews and allow us better military operations against thim.
Destroying Israel would be easier and more helpful to Europeans than attacking random third-world brown people for no reason.
>I will never, NEVER consider a disgusting sandnigger to be a brother of the white people, and especially not as a brother to Christianity. If you were smart, you wouldn't either.
Then you truly do not understand the magnitude of the Jewish threat to European civilization. We must support an undivided Arab Palestine from the river to the sea.

Attached: David Duke Iran.jpg (497x303, 26K)

>Nope. Justice is blind. Who died and made you god?
Your argument is bad and you should feel bad. Either explain why you feel this way or shut up.

>I don't like Jews, and I would like to see them ousted from positions of power outside of their own country.
Good post Shlomo

Attached: JIDF life.jpg (777x2696, 618K)

>Israel existed for thousands of years before being driven out by the Palestinians. Why shouldn't they "fight their occupiers?"
Imagine that someone here actually believes this isn't a kike.

Attached: jew fanatic.jpg (620x413, 62K)

>these Arabs would simply be repatriated.
And then we would see the spark of a new war because the Sandniggers don't like to lose.
>Shiites are in fact pro-white
Do you have ANY evidence for this? I can tell you a lot of things about Shariah Law, the Qua'ran, and the Sirat, and none of them are pro-white or por-anything that isn't Islam.
> If we had control over our governments, we just wouldn't feed niggers and they would all die.
And they'll fight back, assumedly killing plenty of whites in the process. Dangerous doesn't exactly mean that we would instantly lose to them, it means that the war would be costly. Add too many of those together (sucha s trying to fight the kikes, nigs, and towelheads) all at once and we just might crumble under the pressure.
>Jews in Israel spit on Christians in the streets
I haven't heard any stories of this since biblical times. Got anything to back that up?
>The kikes are going to exterminate us all anyway.
Over time, and killing the Muslims will deal a serious blow to their plans and give us more time to recover and build ourselves up enough to survive whatever they have planned for us. If we war with Israel however, the Muslims will instantly capitalize on any weakness we have from sweeping social change and war with an extremely capable and tenacious nuclear-armed ethnostate to take a bunch of our territory and outbreed and destroy us.
Some Europeans will survive the Samson attack, unless kikes have developed a doomsday weapon which will extinguish all life on earth.
It is theorized that just a few powerful nukes could send us into planet-wide radiation poisoning, nuclear winter, heat death, or God-knows what else. Even if some Europeans survived there's no guarantee we could pick up the pieces at that point.
>Destroying Israel would be easier and more helpful to Europeans than attacking random third-world brown people
Oil, wealth, land, nearby military installations, etc...

>Destroying Israel would be easier and more helpful to Europeans than attacking random third-world brown people
Besides resource gains, Israel is incredibly well-fortified and has some of the best tacticians and troops in the world. The war would be costly, and I can bet that the Arabs will sit back and let us tire ourselves out before (like I said earlier) coming in and attacking the exhausted remnants of our countries.
>Then you truly do not understand the magnitude of the Jewish threat to European civilization
You do not understand the magnitude of the threat that Islam poses to Western Civilization, Christians, and all others who do not wholeheartedly support Islam.
> We must support an undivided Arab Palestine from the river to the sea.
I would rather see the whole of the middle East turned to ash.
>Imagine that someone here actually believes this isn't a kike.
>Good post Shlomo
Nice non-arguments, faggots.

>And then we would see the spark of a new war because the Sandniggers don't like to lose.
Arabs have an average IQ of 80. Europeans ruled the entire Muslim world 100 years ago, how exactly are Arabs a threat to us? Non-whites can't even feed themselves.
>Do you have ANY evidence for this? I can tell you a lot of things about Shariah Law, the Qua'ran, and the Sirat, and none of them are pro-white or por-anything that isn't Islam.
Shia Islam is less Semitic and more open to tribal identities. David Duke is one of the most prominent American white-nationalists and he has met with the President of Iran.
>And they'll fight back, assumedly killing plenty of whites in the process. Dangerous doesn't exactly mean that we would instantly lose to them, it means that the war would be costly. Add too many of those together (sucha s trying to fight the kikes, nigs, and towelheads) all at once and we just might crumble under the pressure.
This is not an old-fashioned war of arms against arms. No people can threaten Europeans militarily, especially not Arabs, niggers or kikes. This is an ideological battle to reclaim Europeans identity and sovereignty. It is not Arabs or niggers which are keeping us from reclaiming our heritage and sovereignty, but an international kike financial and media apparatus.
>I haven't heard any stories of this since biblical times. Got anything to back that up?
youtube.com/watch?v=rkbwUyycop8
>Over time, and killing the Muslims will deal a serious blow to their plans and give us more time to recover and build ourselves up enough to survive whatever they have planned for us.
Are you seriously advocating that Europeans try to kill off 2 billion irrelevant low IQ Muslims peasants who live in their own countries?

Attached: 1534361174040.png (1491x838, 1.79M)

>If we war with Israel however, the Muslims will instantly capitalize on any weakness we have from sweeping social change and war with an extremely capable and tenacious nuclear-armed ethnostate to take a bunch of our territory and outbreed and destroy us.
We will fight the kikes in our own countries, Muslims will fight on the second front in Israel. Everybody wins.
>Besides resource gains, Israel is incredibly well-fortified and has some of the best tacticians and troops in the world.
Israel is completely dependent on foreign imports of food and fuel, a simply blockade will be enough to bring them down. Ashkenazi Israelis are some of the absolute worst troops on the planet, they are all effeminate manlets, the Mizrahi troops are just regular stupid Arabs. Israeli military strength is an absurd Jewish media meme.
>The war would be costly, and I can bet that the Arabs will sit back and let us tire ourselves out before (like I said earlier) coming in and attacking the exhausted remnants of our countries.
lol, the Arabs won't be able to get into our countries because our nationalist border police will stop them at the border and tell them to go home.
>You do not understand the magnitude of the threat that Islam poses to Western Civilization, Christians, and all others who do not wholeheartedly support Islam.
Please explain. How are a bunch of low IQ third worlders a threat to space-age European civilization?

Attached: Screen_Shot_2014-06-23_at_5.07.38_PM2.png (1271x845, 261K)

the reason you support israel and you being ok with kikes stealing land and killing natives is the same reason why your country is gone to shit, like most.

Because I don't give a fuck about the middle east in general.
Fuck that desert shithole.

>how exactly are Arabs a threat to us?
How are you not understanding this? If we are weakened by tremendous societal change and a large-scale war with the most fortified country on the planet, then the TWO BILLION MUSLIMS of the world would be able to cause serious damage to us, and maybe even KILL US ALL.
>Shia Islam is less Semitic and more open to tribal identities
Or they are practicing the doctrine of taqiyya so as to be able to manipulate and subvert us, just like the Jews
>David Duke is one of the most prominent American white-nationalists and he has met with the President of Iran.
That doesn't mean anything. Islamic culture encourages their people to lie and convince the non-believers that they are friendly before striking when their guard is down. Read up on Taqiyya and Kitman, and talk to some ex-Muslims. Islam is barbaric, no matter the sect. They still all draw from the same source.
>No people can threaten Europeans militarily
>China's 100 million man army
>TWO BILLION angry Muslims who are willing to suicide bomb us to the last man because of their radical belief systems
Okay.
>This is an ideological battle to reclaim Europeans identity and sovereignty
And during the growing pains we will be weak to outside forces, especially if we are trying to fight a war at the same time.
>It is not Arabs or niggers which are keeping us from reclaiming our heritage and sovereignty, but an international kike financial and media apparatus.
They work as one, user. Nigs and Arabs are tools used by the kikes, but they have their own reasons to want us dead anyways, resentment and religious fervor respectively.
>Are you seriously advocating that Europeans try to kill off 2 billion irrelevant low IQ Muslims peasants who live in their own countries?
I am suggesting that we take care of this threat before it has a chance to grow any larger and be used against us further. Killing the Jews will only allow the Muslims to grow.

palestinians support Trump

>Killing the Jews will only allow the Muslims to grow.
Lol. If we controlled our own countries we could stop food aid to the third world. 90% of the brown people in the world would starve to death. Muslims are not a serious threat to us. It is our subjugation to the Jews which compels us to subsidize the population growth racial aliens at home and abroad.

Attached: Food imports.jpg (2048x1178, 278K)

>Are you seriously advocating that Europeans try to kill off 2 billion irrelevant low IQ Muslims peasants who live in their own countries?
Allowing the Muslims to grow will only increase the size of the brown horde as they attempt to destroy us, as they are called to do fundamentally by their religion.

>We will fight the kikes in our own countries, Muslims will fight on the second front in Israel. Everybody wins.
That's a fine plan, but most people want military intervention from European countries in order to assist the Muzzies.
>Israel is completely dependent on foreign imports of food and fuel, a simply blockade will be enough to bring them down.
I'm not sure about that one, but if it works then why not.
> Israeli military strength is an absurd Jewish media meme.
I don't think the six day war was a meme, if you have anything to back it up then show me something. Besides, you can't deny that they have nice guns.
>Galil. Uzi, Desert Eagle, etc...
>lol, the Arabs won't be able to get into our countries because our nationalist border police will stop them at the border and tell them to go home.
Not if they send armed invasion forces. There's a lot of these disgusting sandniggers out there.
> How are a bunch of low IQ third worlders a threat to space-age European civilization?
Paris, Sweden, Canada, Germany. Besides that, Two billion of them worldwide, called by their religion to kill or convert all Muslims, and willing to die for that cause. Even complete idiots are dangerous when they are willing to fight and die to the last man and armed with AKs.
Trump is a Jew puppet.

I don't give a fuck about them anymore. After they inflicted Tlaib on us, I hope Israel steamrolls those cunts.

> If we controlled our own countries we could stop food aid to the third world
That would affect the Africans mostly. Besides, I'm sure the Arabs could start growing their own food if need be. They're just lazy from all the oil money.
>Muslims are not a serious threat to us
See
Second to last line
> It is our subjugation to the Jews which compels us to subsidize the population growth racial aliens at home and abroad.
That is a problem in its own, and one that we need to confront as well. We don't need to let the Muslims grow though.
Never heard of that. Care to enlighten me?

>Allowing the Muslims to grow will only increase the size of the brown horde as they attempt to destroy us, as they are called to do fundamentally by their religion.
My food aid map in the previous post addresses this.
>That's a fine plan, but most people want military intervention from European countries in order to assist the Muzzies.
We should definitely provide the Iranian-led anti-Israel military alliance with any aid that we can spare. The destruction of Israel would benefit all of human kind.
>I don't think the six day war was a meme, if you have anything to back it up then show me something.
It has a sneak attack. In 1973 they needed their American puppets to openly supply them. The Israeli military lost to the brave guerilla warriors of Hezbollah only a few years ago.
>Not if they send armed invasion forces. There's a lot of these disgusting sandniggers out there.
European police forces have more combat potential than any existing Muslim army.
>Paris, Sweden, Canada, Germany
The Muslims there are living like literal zoo animals, completely dependent on the state to food, clothe and house them. They are no threat once National Socialists seize our states.
>That would affect the Africans mostly. Besides, I'm sure the Arabs could start growing their own food if need be. They're just lazy from all the oil money.
You are a retard. Most Arab countries have neither oil nor arable land. Their population growth is entirely supported by food provided by our illegitimate zionist occupation regimes.

Attached: horsey chosen.jpg (600x449, 341K)

>We should definitely provide the Iranian-led anti-Israel military alliance with any aid that we can spare
"We should give our enemies weapons just because we are fighting our other enemies"
Are you an idiot?
>The Israeli military lost to the brave guerilla warriors of Hezbollah only a few years ago
I don't really know anything about this, so I'll say you might have this one.
>European police forces have more combat potential than any existing Muslim army.
They held their own against the US military for years.
>They are no threat once National Socialists seize our states.
They will still cause civil unrest and potentially will be able to firebomb important places and kill thousands of Europeans in the process unless we enforce martial law and send the military into Muslim majority areas.

>Arab countries have neither oil nor arable land
I'm fairly sure that most oil exports in the world come from Alaska, SA, and the ME. I don't know much about arable land, but I know that civilization existed there long before Europe or Asia came into their own.
> Their population growth is entirely supported by food provided by our illegitimate zionist occupation regimes.
Then how did they exist for thousands of years before Europe and Asia were civilized?

>"We should give our enemies weapons just because we are fighting our other enemies"
>Are you an idiot?
How are Iranians, Shia Arabs and Palestinians our enemies?
>I don't really know anything about this, so I'll say you might have this one.
Israel has been trying to annex Lebanese territory up to the Litani river for many decades, but the brave warriors of the Hezbollah Shia militia have repeatedly repelled the Jews. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Lebanon_War
>They held their own against the US military for years.
Where?
>They will still cause civil unrest and potentially will be able to firebomb important places and kill thousands of Europeans in the process unless we enforce martial law and send the military into Muslim majority areas.
It will not require any military action. Police and immigration authorities will be sufficient to resolve the issue. Most will probably go home voluntarily once their state subsidies are withdrawn.
>Then how did they exist for thousands of years before Europe and Asia were civilized?
They have a few fertile river valleys which are easy to farm, but they have far outstripped their carrying capacity. Since Europeans lost WWII, our illegitimate kike occupation regimes have been funneling food aid to the third world, the population of brown people has increased by multiples in only the last few decades.

Attached: worlds-most-important-graph-2017-f.png (896x708, 80K)

Two billion of them worldwide, called by their religion to kill or convert all Muslims, and willing to die for that cause. Even complete idiots are dangerous when they are willing to fight and die to the last man and armed with AKs. Two billion of them worldwide, called by their religion to kill or convert all Muslims, and willing to die for that cause. Even complete idiots are dangerous when they are willing to fight and die to the last man and armed with AKs. Two billion of them worldwide, called by their religion to kill or convert all Muslims, and willing to die for that cause. Even complete idiots are dangerous when they are willing to fight and die to the last man and armed with AKs.

>Where?
Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan...
>Most will probably go home voluntarily once their state subsidies are withdrawn
You know nothing at all about Muslims.
> the population of brown people has increased by multiples in only the last few decades.
Sounds possible. You got any sources?

Christians are also called to conquer and convert the world and we don't take it any more seriously than most Muslims do. Muslims are an extremely diverse bunch of low IQ brown people with a vague spiritual loyalty to an Arab called Mohamed. They are not an organized monolithic threat to anybody.
>Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan...
We easily defeated the Iraqi and Afghani militaries. The only reason that we suffer casualties in those places is because our zionist regime requires white men to stand around in the desert surrounded by hostile tribespeople in order to make sure they don't try to threaten Israel. We have never fought with Iran, we are only hostile to them because our Jew masters have ordered our politicians to be so.
>You know nothing at all about Muslims.
I know more than you. Zionist media has agitated you into an insane and irrational anti-Muslim frenzy. Brown people are stupid and harmless, they can be managed just like other wildlife. The Jews are the only real threat to European civilization.
>Sounds possible. You got any sources?
The graph is from UN population projections. The civic-nationalist conservative journalist Steve Sailer keeps track of global demographics, if you are interested you can take a look at his work.
unz.com/isteve/2019-most-important-graph-in-the-world/

Attached: UN population forecast.png (643x438, 19K)

>Christians are also called to conquer and convert the world
Citation needed, friendo. I have seen absolutely zero passages in the Bible about killing and destroying all non-Christian peoples in the world.
>What are the Charlie Hebdo attacks
>what are the laws against apostates and denouncing Mohammad according to Shariah law
>What is the Qua'ran and Sirat
Jesus Christ you don't know anything about Muslims.
>They are not an organized monolithic threat to anybody.
>Even complete idiots are dangerous when they are willing to fight and die to the last man and armed with AKs.
>We easily defeated the Iraqi and Afghani militaries
After years of war, thousands of casualties, etc...
> zionist regime requires white men to stand around in the desert surrounded by hostile tribespeople
What are you talking about, user?
>Zionist media has agitated you into an insane and irrational anti-Muslim frenzy
The media doesn't report anything hostile to Muslims because they want us to accept them and think that they are a peaceful religion. What I know, I know from reading their books and talking to ex-Muslims who grew up around them and in their cultures before being disillusioned by their disgusting and barbaric beliefs and customs.
> Even complete idiots are dangerous when they are willing to fight and die to the last man and armed with AKs
> Even complete idiots are dangerous when they are willing to fight and die to the last man and armed with AKs
> Even complete idiots are dangerous when they are willing to fight and die to the last man and armed with AKs

>After years of war, thousands of casualties
The actual state militaries of Iraq and Afghanistan were defeated within days.
>What are you talking about, user?
The reason that our troops are in Iraq is to prevent a strong Iraqi nationalist state from threatening Israel. Iraq had a secular nationalist government which we toppled at the order of the Jews. We were then commanded to occupy Iraq forever to make sure that they can never recover and become a threat to Israel again.
>The media doesn't report anything hostile to Muslims because they want us to accept them and think that they are a peaceful religion.
All that Fox news, Breitbart and the counter Jihad media does is agitate stupid goyim to fight wars against Israel's neighbors, while at the same time advocating that all of Israel's neighbors be imported into our countries.
>What I know, I know from reading their books and talking to ex-Muslims who grew up around them and in their cultures before being disillusioned by their disgusting and barbaric beliefs and customs.
I have absolutely no problem with Islam and have no issue with Europeans who follow the Muslim religion, as long as their first loyalty is the the European race. Islam is not the problem, it is the fact that Muslims have converted the lowest races and the lowest castes, creating a religious community of very low racial quality. Focus less on which bronze-age fairy tales someone believes and more on their innate racial characteristics.

Attached: 1558931440588.jpg (500x637, 107K)

>then the TWO BILLION MUSLIMS of the world would be able to cause serious damage to us, and maybe even KILL US ALL.
>Allowing the Muslims to grow will only increase the size of the brown horde as they attempt to destroy us
>They will still cause civil unrest and potentially will be able to firebomb important places and kill thousands of Europeans in the process unless we enforce martial law and send the military into Muslim majority areas.
Imagine being a seething kike and shilling this hard.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Terror_(Spain)
>The Red Terror in Spain (Spanish: Terror Rojo)[3] is the name given by some historians to various acts of violence committed from 1936 until the end of the Spanish Civil War "by sections of nearly all the leftist groups".[4][5] News of the rightist military coup in 1936 unleashed a social revolutionary response, and no republican region escaped revolutionary and anticlerical violence, but it was minimal in the Basque Country.[6] The violence consisted of the killing of tens of thousands of people (including 6,832[7] members of the Catholic clergy, the vast majority in the summer of 1936 in the wake of the military coup) as well as attacks on landowners, industrialists, and politicians as well as the desecration and burning of monasteries and churches.[7]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Brigades
>The International Brigades represented Comintern and Joseph Stalin's commitment to provide assistance to the Spanish Republican cause (with arms, logistics, military advisers and the NKVD), just as Fascist Italy, Corporatist Portugal and Nazi Germany were providing assistance to the opposing Nationalist insurgency.[3] The largest number of volunteers came from France (where the French Communist Party had many members) and communist exiles from Italy and Germany. A large number of Jews from the English-speaking world and Eastern Europe also participated.[4]

Attached: Jews.jpg (1276x1920, 394K)