Can someone explain this please? I am confusion.
youtube.com
Russian Nuke?
Other urls found in this thread:
your mom fell down
sheeeesss running out agaaaaain
munition storage explosion.. go to Jow Forums for information, not to the schizos here that have no idea how weapons and ammunition works. if it were a nuke, it would blind the camera for a short time, and it would not produce this amount of black smoke.
daaaaaaamn daawwg
hmmm
HMMMMMMMM
(OP)
Its a conventional explosion (i.e fuel).
What ever blew up also had fissile material in it (i.e. uranium or plutonium).
The explosion scattered those radioisotopes into the atmosphere.
Result: radioactive vodka for the next 20 years or so.
fuck off
Scott Manley is a bit of a douche soifag, but his ideas regarding this event are insightful
youtube.com
buttmad knowledgelet
>thinking all subatomic particles travel at the same speed during a half life
It's like you don't understand particle physics.
russia perfected alchemy
that aint a nuke
It was estimated that the observer was close to 15 miles away.
The explosions' expulsion traveled faster than the speed of sound and created a plasma discharge whenever it went off.
To deny it was nuclear ANYTHING is fucking ignorant. It was an ammo depot so therefore there was depleted uranium. They are messing with nuclear warheads, but are testing the capabilities of different isotopes to use. Not all radiated fallout would be immediate because of the fluctuations of the specific isotope breaking, so this person more than likely is going to die due to radiation sickness as well as the majority of the people that were evacuated (over 100k, including the hospitals) in which it was said they were suffering from Chernobyl like burns.
It isn't the explosion that kills people in a nuke but the radiation. So it doesn't have to be a huge explosion, just something that can spread the radioactive decay. Millions would die to radiation compared to the 100k that would die from the initial explosion.
>retards think all nuclear capable bombs are the same
>QRD: their nuclear powered rocket motor blew up setting off a lot of other ordinance in the building, unknown if the payload was also nuclear. It's not Chernobyl tier but it's also not just another normal explosion
This may or may not be true but it's the general consensus I've heard
Straight from the mouth of russian state media
If it was a nuke, it'd have killed thousands from the fallout downwind, plus there would have been thermal radiation to begin with. The initial gamma rays would also have created radiation deaths and injuries, probably in the thousands too.
Different event
The Skyfall test was another event days later
It was a nuclear warhead explosion. Not the mini reactor like Kremlin clams it was.
The only explanation is that you're lost and need to go back
But it did, and has. Russia has been trying REALLY hard to censor all of this.
And the radiation was what? Imaginary?
>Presenting the explosion of an ammo depot in Siberia as a nuclear blast.
Try harder shill / brainwashed idiot.
A nuclear air or surface burst produces a blinding white flash -- actually a double flash. Initially the reaction is producing only X-Rays, which superheat the air around the reaction to blinding white. That superheated air expands and cools, while at the same time the actual fireball has cooled down to radiating in the visible spectrum, creating another blinding flash. That massive release of energy is what makes nukes so powerful and it is just impossible to have a fission or fusion explosion in an atmosphere without the double flash.
A nuke big enough to produce that size of a mushroom cloud would be in at least the 10 kiloton range, which would produce a flash of at least 5 seconds. If it were inside a building, in about a hundredth of a second that building would have ceased to exist and the camera would be recording the flash.
None of these things happened, so it's just a warehouse full of a couple thousand tons of explosives and the like going up.