Why do conservatives DENY science by claiming climate change is false?

Even if there is a huge environmental problem, the government is not who you should look to to fix it.

because most conservatives are morons and the ones who aren't are religious.

I'm pretty sure the Aral was destroyed because of a failed Russian farming scheme, but thanks for playing

No one denies the climate changes, it always has, its agw that is a lot of crap.

Because the baby Jesus wouldn't allow the Earth to change in a way that would harm gods creation

Is that way you wanted it hear? faggot...

Conservative do not deny climate change. Actually you progressive are those who believe that climate should be immutable.

We'll have a tenth of a dyson ring around our star, and be re positioning material and new Earths around our star before half of the doomsday predictions of the EPA climate people come true.

Climate science is money-grab and power-grab science. Give me the right to tax you for exhaling.

Encourage climate change people to understand that to stop climate science we have to stop producing more humans, which lead to more pollution, so ask them to lead the way and not to breed, thus creating more pollution.

We'll be right behind you, following your lead.

Attached: carbon_cycle_percentages_perspective.jpg (386x951, 141K)

i think massive cotton farming killed it. that shit needs tons of water. tho i am not completely sure, but i am to lazy to google.

Inb4 it's the Aral Sea

The climate caused the Soviet Union to divert rivers that drain into the Aral Sea?

Why do jews lie about spraying shit in the sky every say and using satellite based microwave tech to dissipate storms?

Stop spraying me and maybe I'll listen to your arguments, but probably not because ur a fucking retard.

Sage and reported for low quality

>godless communists drain a fucking sea to grow crops
>still starve

Who is denying climate change? No one. I am happens, has happened and will continue to happen whether or not we were here.

haha nice

Global warming is a hoax

The Aral Sea is drying because the rivers that feed it have been diverted for irrigation purposes. Why are you lying?

I believe in climate change. I just think we have a lot of nerve to claim it's us doing it when a relatively small volcanic eruption releases more CO2 into the atmosphere in 10 minutes than we do in 20 years.

nice bait

Aral Sea? Never heard of it.

climate hoax is bunk youtube.com/watch?v=1zrejG-WI3U

This scientist from MIT says your a faggot.
>youtube.com/watch?v=pwvVephTIHU

Was the ice age the best age?

No one is denying climate change, they are just denying your ability to make a profit off it.
Get a job you fucking loser.

>Why do conservatives DENY science by claiming climate change is false?

how do you climate fuckng libtards explain all the wild climate changes, both cold and hot, hat occurred before MAN even came onto the scene? you cant even blame dinosaur farts, it was happening before dinosaurs. My dirt bike "emissions" dont mean JACK SHIT compared to volcanic emissions of greenhouse gasses. One decent volcano just venting, not even erupting? can and does emit more greenhouse gasses than a fucking century of man made. HEY i thought new york was supposed to be under water by several yeara ago already? guess what... wrong again. You fuckers are doing a large circle jerk, and any scientific evidence that points otherwise gets de-funded and shit on. go fuck yourselves.

Smart Bait.

Attached: boged.png (680x407, 180K)

Because climate science is flawed, totally ignoring solar forcing on the Earths climate as if the sun doesn't even exist tells me everything I need to know. Video related
youtu.be/NYoOcaqCzxo

>inland sea destroyed by communism
>blame American drivers
This is the effect of brainwashing.

DO YOU DENYYYYY?
DO YOU DENY?!

>main basin nearly dry
>top basin nearly identical
Shopped

for anyone that doesn't know, the Aral Sea was drained by a soviet era, manmade irrigation engineering failure.

>Why do faggots DENY science by claiming climate change is anything but false?

youtube.com/watch?v=VWfyJw_vXGc

why do scientists deny cold fusion
then we'll talk

By presenting a strawman you are proving that you aren't interested in a debate.

Climate change is caused by pole shifting. Not man-made CO2 emissions.

Going "green" is good for removing pollution from our local environment, but it has fuck-all to do with preventing the worst climate disasters known to man-kind.

This. Why do they deny all sorts of shit only to get contradicted by FOIA releases and military contractors?

Fucking faggots OP didn't ask about Aral.

The truth is climate change is real. The lie is that humans are to blame. The effect we've had so far on the earths climate is negligible.

Climate Change is real faggot, and I am a conservative. Now, climate change has occurred since the dawn of time, and will continue till its end. Man's affect on the climate and / or change thereof cannot be proved or quantified. Any taxation for carbon is pure bullshit and fucking Al Gore 1990s fag speak. Water rises and falls, storms come and go, and hopefully Muh Climate Fags go next.

Anyone paying anything for climate changed is being fucking robbed!

Prove me wrong, and show your numbers.

My nigga, we just said the same thing, you just used fewer words.

Attached: Pepe Welfare Nigger.jpg (552x809, 107K)

>kafkatrap

Attached: 1556659839907.jpg (709x346, 53K)

Because we are Deniars who deny climate change science.

Climate change has been happening for as long as the Earth has had a climate, and it will continue to happen until the Earth no longer has one. Whether this change was sped up by humans is the cause of concern, and the thing people disagree on. You'd better hope the current warming trend isn't man made, because if it is, the entire Earth is already fucked. China alone emits more than the entire world did when the trend began, and unless you can stop them (which you can't) it isn't slowing down anytime soon. Either it's man-made and we're all already fucked, or it's natural and we might have a chance to adapt.

Red-pilled.

Attached: 1559155655900.jpg (646x720, 19K)

I'm not conservative
I like change

To destroy climate change we must destroy climate itself

Attached: 5D3D201B-2977-4B9A-84D1-09F80448124F.gif (320x240, 59K)

WOAH CLIMATE FLUCTUATES. WHO KNEW.

Attached: 1566284742766.jpg (640x360, 71K)

I'm playing with my dick right now

Because its bullshit you fucking NPC.

>Posting the Aral Sea.
>It was killed by Communists

Attached: 1408810803240.jpg (1064x983, 194K)

Economics and greed, pic related. Btw photo has nothing to do with climate change that was autistic commies fucking up the environment on a grand scale for agriculture. To be fair the leftists, in general, are pretty retarded in regards to climate change as well, take nuclear power arguably the best feasible solution to climate chnage, yet they condemn it. So much for ecological lefties, combined with the greed of people I have concluded that we are completely fucked.

Attached: abstract.jpg (516x519, 18K)

except the trumpanzee doesnt believe in climate - how ironic.

the change that is happening is faster and more sever than in the entire history of the galaxy - there is a reason to be concerned ! even if you don’t believe it , why dose having a clean environment bother you ? !

Anthropogenic is 100% false. Climate change "science" is a death cult.

>Aral Sea
>climate change

More like communism.

Attached: 1547325624077.jpg (540x726, 191K)

Why was there a lake in the desert in the first place?

it wasn't failed, it was succes but it destroyed lake

Why don't eco terrorists blow up the dams that diverted the rivers to restore the aral sea?

because rivers have to go somewhere

wait, why don't we just build walls around the icecaps so when they melt all of the water will be contained in a reservoir?
We could even submerge pipes and shit to pump all of the heat back into space

>implying that pic is a result of climate change
More like soviet ingenuity.

>1 post by this ID
this is all the proof I need

For those who don’t know: communists are retarded and accidentally got rid of an entire sea in Kazakhstan

>lake destroyed

Ex-commie doesnt see this as a failure

if they called it land reclamation you would consider it succes too. Also american done same with Colorado river

The drying up of the Aral sea had noting to do with climate change retard.

But they didnt call it that...

wtf why don't we do this? we could take all the climate change money and just build a wall, I'm sure if the whole world chipped in it would work...
however then they wouldn't be able to completely reshape the worlds economy and convert us into a socialist world so we can just assume it won't happen

Because the Aral Sea did not vanish because of your Climatehoax retard XD

Educate yourself

Same reason that lefty faggots deny that asians and whites are smarter than niggers because of divergent evolution.

This. The Russians just drank it all

why do liberals ignore reality by lying about black crime statistics

It was the filthy albino namekians which drank all our planets water

Hrvoje it was a failure because they destroyed the lake I. E. No longer able to plant anything.

no, they used water from syr and amu darya rivers. Those rivers used to feed lake with water, but now are used for agriculture and almost no water comes into lake so it vaporized overtime

because whether climate change is or isn't happening (don't respond to me by saying it is or isn't happening (that's why i said that first clause)) you're not going to stop china/india or nature, respectively.

so continue your life until the universe/god determines the end of worldly human existence in here.

this is the very best explanation is existence of this topic.

fuck you if you're black or brown -skinned

I don't deny that climate can change.

I deny that man is causing it in any noticeable fashion, however.

Aral sea sehydration is communists fault though. Specifically the failed USSR irrigation and terraforming projects.

It's worse, the salt laden dust was blown by the wind into the newly irrigated farmland, making it unfarmable.

Because the basis of your theory is that CO2 is pollution - which is retard level "science"

Attached: greening_of_the_earth_from_CO2.png (1003x850, 477K)

>223839688
Can you prove it?
Why do you deny there are 2 genders only?

think it through...

Attached: simple_concept.png (746x817, 42K)

What level of CO2 in ppms do you want and why?

Attached: CO2_chart.png (1851x1082, 58K)

Attached: kangaroo-blizzard.png (630x521, 421K)

Attached: CO2_should_not_be_regulted.png (1490x1392, 425K)

>science
There you go, using words you don’t understand. Please stop, you look retarded.

Attached: B54D2E48-9BD8-4814-B96E-6A266A418F9E.jpg (415x600, 58K)

Holy shit, greatest post I have seen in a week!

Because right wing politicians are being paid by very powerful oil company lobbies to create doubt and uncertainty around the facts so that they can keep profiting at the expense of the environment for a few more decades.

We don't. The debate lies in whether or not climate change is human made - and how bad it is.

old idea, but a well used one

Attached: 1Never_believe_masses_2.jpg (1768x600, 317K)

Climate Change is something that has existed since the birth of Earth
Fuck off