Can anyone refute this?
This has a point
saying death to all blacks is protected.
saying "I'm going to kill [person] at [place] at [time]" is not protected.
The sanctimonious salt is delicious.
Sure. The guy with the flag flatly rejects their 90 IQ, Steven Spielberg take on what that symbol means.
But, Dismantle whiteness and demographics are destiny.
Fuck that and fuck him. Bring on the edits.
(((justice))) and (((free society)))
trash thread
>left can't meme
>saying death to all blacks is protected.
No it isnt. Its just not really a crime, yet. I dunno what you think words mean but 'protected' is a stupid comment.
It means it's legal to say therefore free speech you dumb dumb kikeoid
Who else but a glownigger flies a Nazi flag these days?
Why doesn't OP's comic mention the plethora of leftists who fly the soviet flag? Communism has a death toll much higher than Nazism, yet it's symbols are completely normalized by the left.
The swastika flag is a device used to highlight the cognitive dissonance of left wing philosophy. Leftists feign disgust for what the flag represents, while simultaneously harboring a desire to soft genocide white Christians.
>1 post by this ID
thats literally socialism... Is the left not trying to take over America no matter what the people actually want? By any means necessary?
Swastika = DNC donkeys
Its always funny when leftists pretend to care about free speech, as if they are making some big sacrifice by "bashing the fash" pretending that they dont have wet dreams about putting everyone who disagrees with them into a gulag
"Tantamount to incitement!"
If you're looking for a serious counter that's the lynchpin of the arguement. The flag is a symbol of an ideology, a reprehensible ideology to most, but it's only representing the ideology, and doesn't actually call for anything. The people holding it may call for things, but that's an entirely different game.
Pretending that the presentation of a worldview is the same as an active call to violence is a false equivalency. At best the flag can correlate to people who engage in encitement, but this is the first step in an insidious process. If we can ban a flag, even the Nazi flag, then we can ban any symbol we want. No Confederate flag, no public display of the Kekistani flag. Gadsten flag? Anti-governmental terrorist threat. The American flag is seen as an oppressive symbol to some, we had better stop flying that.
That's the kicker to the comic. Seeing a Nazi flag doesn't mean we need to oppose these people politically. It means we have to punch them. God forbid they defend themselves or THEY'RE the violent extremists, I'm just taking the position that political discourse takes a backseat to assault when I see something I don't like. That's how we get to Maxine Waters telling people to harass federal agents and elected officials in public, it's how we eventually get to dehumanizing political opposition to where re-education camps and gulags are lauded suggestions.
Well, there's a couple of things wrong with the image itself. One is that it makes the common mistake of equating fascism with National Socialism, which is a common error. The second is that it seems to be implying that the eventual goal of Nazis/fascists (again, two different things, but we'll set that aside for now) is to achieve dominance or supremacy. This is also false; in fact, the struggle between races for dominance is actually a byproduct of leftism. Leftism promotes diversity, and with diversity instead of a single unified nation of people working together, you get different interest groups sniping each other and vying for dominance over each other. Basically this image is wrong because it simultaneously lumps multiple branches of right-wing thought into a single boogeyman, calls it a Nazi, and then puts words in its mouth.
However, it does get one thing right: free speech is at this point a self-defeating goal. If you support free speech you must also support things that actively work against you, in this case a Nazi (Nazi in this case being used in a leftist context, not in the sense of what it actually means). Alternately, if you are in favor of suppressing "Nazis", you support the repression of groups that intend to do you harm, which means that you are arguing for the dominance of your group over all others. This basically makes you a Nazi by your own definition.
Wow, all of this circular logic is already giving me a headache. Wouldn't it be easier if every group just had their own nation state and could run things according to their own goals and interests?
I want to be able to live in a country just for my people. The entire comic is a massive strawman designed to poison the well and appeal to the crowd for mob justice.
/thread
If you're a Nazi you have forfeited your membership in civilized society. It's laws and protections no longer apply to you. You can't eat the cookie and still have it.
is this lefty humour? Not gonna read this wall of text
>"flags are calls to action and not symbols now"
going by this logic, anytime a commie come at you wearing a shirt with a hammer and sickle they are advocating for another genocide against armenians, and you are within your right to hit them because its protecting said armenians.
If you're a nigger you have forfeited your membership in civilized society. It's laws and protections no longer apply to you. You can't drink the grape soda and still have it.
They are enemies of liberalism sure. But a flag is not incitement, you only fear nazis because they killed so many liberal plutocrats and jews that they actually threaten your existence.
Pic very much related.
This is now an anti-nazi thread
Anytime a leftist retard says it is ok to punch nazis because it is inciting violence to show that flag, the follow up should always be so how should we treat people that disrespect the US flag or kneel during the national anthem as those are symbols of freedom and they are inciting violence the same as the Nazis.
Then they just splutter and back track and try to explain why they are retarded.
Careful pole. That attitude is what created the nazis in the first place. Push people out of the political process, and they'll resort to other means to get what they want.
>wordy lefty drivel
>1 post by this ID
I would but you're not here to listen.
saged
Based on who's authority? You don't get to make up the rules about who you can punch just because you disagree, we don't go around swinging at people because that's not how political discourse works in a civilized society. Everybody is equal under the law, even people you don't like.
You are wrong. Here's why:
1. Diversity.
You can't know what will be successful until it is, and you can't know it will remain unless it is challenged. Therefore, the ability for lots of different ways is mandatory for all ways to continue.
Homogeneity is the enemy. It fools you into thinking it is right simply because it cannot make what is going wrong.
2. Where is the line between the groups that are diverse? Everyone is different otherwise you couldn't tell us apart. At what place to you put that line, with your side and their side?
It is pure exploitation and manipulation to move the line where you want it and change what is "ours" to what is "different". Besides redefining truth to what side of the line you are on, it misdirects from the real problem: Exploitation itself.
3. What you are blaming on difference is the fault of what is the same. The one exploiting you looks like you and talks like you, and that is why he is able to fool your stupid ass. If you are white and exploited, it is ALWAYS at the hands of a white male. The fact that you can't see it is why it works.
It really is time to wake up folks. The enemy is within the gates, and he is standing right next to you, and he looks exactly like you.
I for one hope antifa pummels as many flag waving patriots as they can. Burns down their buildings, marches through their streets, cracks skulls. It worked out so well for you last time, and it will have the same result this time.
this would be funny if it werent for the shrieking journalists screaming about racism when a new overwatch character has any skin lighter than el goblino
>flying a flag is the same as incitement
What legally illiterate moron made this bullshit?
I agree. We must oppose La Raza (the race). The US Census Bureau classifies Mestizos and Arabs as white. La Raza by definition is a white nationalist/supremacist movement that must be eradicated.
Nice speed limit IQ strawposts, faggot.
>calling for ethnic cleansing and the death or oppression of millions
Those are just libcucks. Real breadpilled lefties(commies, anarchists) don't care about identity politics.
All fucking niggers must fucking hang.
>stealing Jow Forums memes
Reminder leftists cant meme.
neo-nazis are controlled opposition you dumbfuck
Jesus Christ the left truly can't meme
The LGBT rainbow flag represents child rape, HIV, prolapsed assholes, frankenstein-tier genital mutilation, etc.
If you're going to punch nazis you should probably punch faggots too, no?
The explanation for this that I've seen, is that the 1949 census was using a different years estimates, or some shit like that and that later years updated the real numbers.
True or nah?
The left cant meme.
>always at the hand of a white male
Jews aren't white.
Other than literally everyone?
P.S. you faggots use symbols under which far more were killed than the entirely fictional 6 gorillion. Guess it's okay to kill you on sight?
We know what is successful. Look around. What makes you commies think that you know better and that the answer is diversity for diversities sake?
The successful dont care about lines. You do.
Im already awake... I really wish I could just go back to sleep.
>it's not protected
>it's just not a crime
Top kek. Why are all commies retarded?
why would they do that?
>t. Shlomo Goldberg
As always, fpbp. This is the correct answer.
Why are Nazis and genocide even correlated? Is there any proof they want to genocide and entire group of people?
Have you noticed how in all your gay comics, the """"Nazi""" looks like the goblino meme? So... I appreciate the free propaganda, retard.
>apply for job
>most qualified
>goes to fat negress for diversity (yes, the Supreme Court said this was a good enough reason for anti white discrimination)
>somehow this is the fault of another white man
Retard
Lol. It's literally all (((you))) care about.
The error in the cartoon is that nazis will use any means necessary to achieve their goals. The vast majority will not, and the errant few who will are mostly disavowed.
I believe this particular embrace of classically liberal values (e.g. free speech) is borne more out of opportunism than principle. As things stand now, communists and proto-communists greatly outnumber white nationalists and their sympathizers, causing them to hide behind liberal defenses to avoid the overwhelming use of force upon them. As an anti-communist liberal myself, I see this and I don't mind: arguing for the correct thing (liberal values) for disingenuous reasons is preferable to not arguing for it at all.
A flag is not incitement. It IS an indication of a desired end goal, but not of the means to achieve it (e.g. BAMN).
See what I mean? Is your boss Jewish? Of all the bosses in the capitalist west, how many are Jewish and how many are Christian?
If I thought like you, but was more observant, I would see that of all the bosses it is the Christians that exploit the most; therefore I would put my line as us on one side and the White Christians on the other, and would make up stories of White Christian conspiracies and my solutions would be to eliminate the White Christians.
But I am not stupid. I make my line between those who steal from me and us who are the exploiters and those who just work with me (and without whom we could never have this world) and share the results.
Racism is a plot by the exploiters, regardless of what they look like, and if you are white and christian, your exploiters are white and christian.
The answer isn't to get rid of the white people and the Christians; the answer is to recognize that it is that our system rewards exploitation at the expense of cooperation.
That is not going to occur with punishment or socialism, but there are simple ways of changing our economic system so that there is no longer a reward for exploitation...
>his "speech" is effectively calling
Stopped right there. Every adult person is responsible for himself, no-one else (well, except parents with underaged kids).
If I say "kill yourself, fagcunt" - and you actually do that - I am not responisble for your death. That is on you.
Wow. So you think nothing is wrong, then why are you trying to change the system? Why are you blaming the "other?"
The first step is to admit there is a problem. Are you saying there is no problem? Then you must be satisfied with the foreign workers, and the women in business, and the loss of manufacturing, and everything else?
I don't think you are.
So try again...
Unless you do it over the phone and assholes on social media demand you to be held accountable for the person killing themselves spurring a national movement that grows so loud a court will actually unjustly charge you for murder.
>You can't know what will be successful until it is,
So how long do we have to flood traditionally homogeneous countries and cause irreversible damage (which is already apparent). Your logic is circular to an extreme degree, because you are already conducing homogeny is the enemy when you have not basis other than your subjective opinion to say otherwise. You have made no argument for "diversity" that can be considered to be strong.
>It is pure exploitation and manipulation to move the line where you want it and change what is "ours" to what is "different". Besides redefining truth to what side of the line you are on, it misdirects from the real problem: Exploitation itself.
Define exploitation. Who says anybody is moving the line that you speak of? There are millions of people who are being exploited at the hands of liberal politicans who tell them flooding their countries with people who do not speak the languge or share the culture is an inherently good thing with no reason whatsoever to back this conclusion. Why is diversity inherently good? Why should I share the same country with people who look like me, talk like me, act like me? Why am I not allowed to do this? It seems to me "diversity" is a cosmopolitan issue focused on by
>The one exploiting you looks like you and talks like you, and that is why he is able to fool your stupid ass. If you are white and exploited, it is ALWAYS at the hands of a white male. The fact that you can't see it is why it works.
Again, define exploitation. You are making assumptions, which is also a terrible argument. You are seeing things that are not there because you have been convinced that they exist.
>The enemy is within the gates, and he is standing right next to you, and he looks exactly like you.
But he thinks like (you). An internet marxist who thinks he has all the answers and repeats every line he is fed by his corporate and political masters. I have woken up.
>wall of text.
kys
DOWN WITH SYMBOLOGY!
i didn't even read it, too long
Based and redpilled
Brandenburg vs Ohio
See, the problem with Jow Forums is that you confuse stupid 'cultural appropriation' libshits with the real far left, who don't care about race and who we should fuck with. Your strawmaning is top notch, faggot.
Not really
Also here's another meme i made about 5 minutes ago
>incitement
>has to be specific and actionable
durp
I dont want the system changed. I want to "conserve" what we have and what we know works. What made American #1.
I dont want jews changing the system be bussing foreign workers into America and encouraging migrant hoards gathering at the border.
Im not blaming them, Im blaming you.
The problem, is, you!
>has a point
Can it get to it?
>accuses others of strawmanning
>posts that comic
Top kek. Of course, it's not surprising. If (((you))) had a 3 digit IQ, (((you))) wouldn't be a commie. Go cry more about how your chimp pets are poor because "muh raycisms".
this comic is attempting to disenfranchise others via the incorrect application of law, which is illegal
Same could be said about Islam, communism, black power groups etc.
Then why is feminism allowed when it calls for oppression of men and for genocide of the white race?
Why is communism allowed when it calls for slavery and impoverishment of the wealthy?
Check your double standards OP.
(((meming this hard)))
Well anyways, keep coping you sad sack of shit. Heil your dead loser hero like he's still alive and then cry yourself to sleep.
The strawman is that nazis "hope to achieve something"
The truth is most storm fags know their beliefs wont fit in society right now so they keep them to themselves and mind their own buisness, and hold on to natsoc as a form of identity,rather than a set of goals. Almost like a culture, but its oneof the taboo cultures that leftism disallows because it goes against NWO and one world government garbage.
Retard found.
why hasnt OP refuted this? Is op a gay nigger faggot kike?
1. All change even Evolution works because the mutation CREATES its purpose, not because the purpose is somehow a priori in the world. You can’t even make a story that your story is wrong unless another story comes along to show you your story is wrong. If you don’t believe something is wrong, then why all the worry about immigrants and the left and all the other dog whistles that fool you?
2. Cooperation gives us more than we could by ourselves. It is not just that the sum of individual work is greater; it is that the work cannot even be done unless we work together. Exploitation is when someone gains in terms of win/lose instead of win/win when they couldn't have had the win/win without the cooperation. That is betrayal, and capitalism is set up to hide the win/lose of exploitation inside the win/win of cooperation so as to fool us into thinking we are comparatively better off. What you are talking about is bullshit because you are confused. Change is not exploitation. You are just afraid of your own shadow.
3. and 4. I AM NOT A COMMUNIST OR A MARXIST. Jesus, how biased (and stupid) do you have to be to think that all criticisms of Capitalism are automatically communism? This is also an exploitation, by your White Christian exploiters you call your friends. They won’t allow you to expose their game so they say, “well at least we aren’t communists!” and “All criticism of capitalism (and my exploitation!) are communist!”
You can have a market based decentralized economy without it being Capitalism, and without all the rewards for exploiters, and at the same time eliminate taxes and actually have a democracy that has power. But you never will even be able to entertain that story when you have (Their) - Christian white people scare brackets - story of immigrants, the other, and that all forms of criticism against their scam is communism..
>nazis are bad because the advocate violence
>communists advocating violence is totally fine
there is nothing more amusing than leftists gleefully upholding double standards
Fascism doesn't want everyone to think and act the same, it just prohibits certain actions which are harmful to everyone.
I can't help you.
If it works then why did it change? It changed because it didn't work. This is the problem with conservatism. It is the self-lie that everything was fine in the past and worked and we just have to go back.
There is nothing in all of our stories of humanity that would ever make me think that. Everything changes. If it didn't, nothing would be a difference and nothing would be distinguishable from randomness.
I admit that exploitation "works" for the exploiter, the same way that being a parasite works for the parasite - - - up to the point that it kills its host.
If nothing was wrong, you wouldn't be able to say something is wrong so let's go back to the past where things were right. But if things were right, then they wouldn't have gone wrong.
I will never convince conservatives of this because you simply will not allow yourselves to make the story that isn't self-contradictory.
Ethnic cleansing is not a plank or pillar of the National Socialist platform anymore than giving blankets to Indians is a plank or pillar of the democratic platform in America. We do advocate for the arrest and prosecution of communist agitators and for the definitions of treason to be broadened to encapsulate any act which is committed with the intention of subverting or undermining the National well-being; we advocate that the penalty for treason is death.
If you believe, by this definition that we advocate for ethnic cleansing then you may wish to consider changing how your ethnicity behaves.
>1 post by this ID
>text wall
You don't even need to click on it to know it's some convoluted pilpul Marxist drivel.
>1. All change even Evolution works because the mutation CREATES its purpose, not because the purpose is somehow a priori in the world. You can’t even make a story that your story is wrong unless another story comes along to show you your story is wrong. If you don’t believe something is wrong, then why all the worry about immigrants and the left and all the other dog whistles that fool you?
So your logic is still circular. Alright. So how is flooding nations with people who do not share language or culture for leftist political dogmas purpose? To me it seems like underhanded political motives. I ask this because your logic continues to be circular and you have not addressed any of my points. The fact we are having this discussion indicates I think something is very wrong.
>2. Cooperation gives us more than we could by ourselves. It is not just that the sum of individual work is greater; it is that the work cannot even be done unless we work together.
This is true to a certain degree. However, cooperation for the sake of it is not a justification. Not all work is equal, and not all people are equal. Working together with people who suck is counter productive.
>Exploitation is when someone gains in terms of win/lose instead of win/win when they couldn't have had the win/win without the cooperation.
So people competing is exploitation? Interesting. Is an athlete preparing for competition more than his opponent exploitation? You cannot have winners without losers.
>This is also an exploitation, by your White Christian exploiters you call your friends.
This and your focus on "exploitation" is what screams communist to me. What you called biased and stupid is actually called close reading and picking up implied arguments, dipshit.
>You can have a market based decentralized economy without it being Capitalism
I have never stated or implied otherwise.
>a democracy that has power.
Oh, you're one of those.
1/2
>But you never will even be able to entertain that story when you have (Their) - Christian white people scare brackets - story of immigrants, the other, and that all forms of criticism against their scam is communism..
So you're implying that my life experiences, world travels, and meeting immigrants that has informed me flooding my nation with them is a terrible idea is actually not my own view, but the views of others, and inherently wrong. Yet you have all the answers and we should trust what you say because you put things in overly simplified terms and couldn't address an argument if someone put a gun to your head. How fucking arrogant are you? Serious question.
2/2
It literally proves that tolerance is self contradictory, the nazi punchers are hypocrites, and that they have no claim to moral high ground
>free society
>except for opinions lmao
I wonder why memeflag are only on Jow Forums.
> I AM NOT A COMMUNIST OR A MARXIST
But you sure sound like a homo
Racism is not a plot by exploiters and more than restaurants are. Evolutionarily speaking, genes that show behavioral preference for like genes are adaptive relative to genes that do not. If genetics is reality, racialism is like the shadows that reality casts upon the wall in Plato's Allegory of the Cave: it's an arbitrary interpretation of actual existance based upon limited ability to perceive it. While the evolved traditions and practices of racialism and its relative success (or lack thereof) to be adaptive are subject to critique, the core value of genetic self-preservation is as natural and undeniable as the value of not starving.
Love how the argument is always framed this way
>What we're against Nazis, if you're against us then you support Nazism and murdering 6 million Jews. You a fuckin nazi!?
And then translated to use on cuckservatives and faggy libertarians who literally just want to debate.
>effectively
In other words... technically not by any quantifiable metric... but it totally is trust me.
>Incitement
A bullshit precedent that doesn't apply when it's used against us so fuck off.
>Punchig nazis is OK
>This person is a nazi
This is incitement whether or not I am actually a nazi.
>Calling for... the oppression of millions
The standards people use to qualify "oppression" would easily justify nazis claims of anti-white oppression if it weren't for the naked double standard wedged into the definition that explicitly just comes out and states "it doesn't count if you target white people." By the logic laid out here, nazis are justified in using physical violence.