Homophobia doesn't exist. So called "homophobes" don't fear faggots. They're repulsed by faggots. It's disgust. Not fear. However, faggots keep pushing this narrative that you're a coward if you refuse to taste the rainbow. This is just another way faggots try to force their agenda on heterosexual men.
Look at it this way...
If you happen to think hotdogs are fucking disgusting, do you fear them? Hell no. You're disgusted by them. Disgust is not fear. It's a normal response to something that is contrary to your preferences, especially if that something if nasty, offensive, and revolting.
Face it, faggots. You are all nasty, offensive, and revolting. Heterosexual people don't fear you. They are instinctively repulsed by you degeneracy because it goes against the laws of nature and is an aberration. Faggotry is not normal. It doesn't matter how much you try to normalize it. It will never be normal. It's sick and wrong and you faggots should all be treated as the mentally ill freaks you are.
Homophobia doesn't exist. So called "homophobes" don't fear faggots. They're repulsed by faggots. It's disgust...
Other urls found in this thread:
yahoo.com
en.m.wikipedia.org
reddit.com
hindawi.com
twitter.com
I'd beat pic related if you KNOW what I mean
inb4 >her
FUCK ALL HOMOPHOBES
SHUT THIS THREAD DOWN
GO GIVE IT 5 STARS IN THE RATING YOU BIGOT
LEARN FROM THOSE PEOPLE BIGOT INCEL
HAVE SEX
HEHE WE ARE COMING FOR YOU
I love how people here associate ostentatious manifestation of unrepentant masculinity with supposedly deplorable homosexuality, failing to see their own hypocrisy and actually supporting the gynocentric form of the current society. Homosexuality divorced from the current LGBT paradigm has always been the gist of masculine expression and the ultimate celebration of male identity. The ascent of romanticism and the acclamation of femininity has prompted the society to shun overt manifestations of masculine beauty and to embrace the puerile sexualization of plebeian female body. There has never been anything beautiful about morbid curvatures of a female body replete with odd, repugnant exudations and inevitably slavish adherence to female's inextricably biological significance. No female can dream of the kind of naturalistic excellence the male body is the ultimate expression of. Women are ineluctably a function of reproductive necessities and do not play any inherently imperative role in the larger scheme of things. Therefore, the chastisement of masculine sexuality, including homosexuality, constitutes a radical act of drifting from the patriarchal society predicated upon the recognition of male beauty, ergo superiority, as well as reinforces the subversive nature of female apotheosis. Male body is the ultimate expression of naturalistic excellence and male homoerotic expressions divorced from the emasculate stereotypes perpetuated by fag pansies are part and parcel of any patriarchal society. In order to revert to the bygone excellence of human societies, we need to acknowledge the conception of a masculine sexuality unavoidably emanating from homoeroticism whilst advocating for regular heterosexual encounters grounded in the reality of procreation and familial prosperity.
Families are a consequence of a heterosexual duty of a man to procreate and to sustain his nation, whereas homoeroticism itself needs to be seen as the ultimate expression of male eroticism, removed from the insipid reproductive deliberations and actually capable of fufilling romantic conceptions. Once heterosexual sensuality is stripped of its laughably romantic semblance, which essentially springs from a number of misconceptions established by weak-willed men incapable of recognizing female's veritable nature, the gynocentric society will cease to exist, which is precisely why homoeroticism is so important in arriving at this conclusion. One cannot exist without the other, nevertheless, the reactionary homosexuality of tomorrow should not spring from some degenerate leftist self-indulgence, but from profoundly philosophic calculations. The reason why so many men yearn to become women themselves stems from the warped glorification of the femininity and the apotheosis of the female body. In order to remedy this misplaced sense of beauty, we need to further the aesthetic counter-proposal in the form of the exaltation of masculinity and start to regard the male body as the paragon of bodily beauty. The elevation of the male form to the stature of utter aesthetic excellence will inevitably encompass certain homoerotic elements, but that cannot obfuscate our ultimate goal which is to situate masculinity at the center of aesthetic and erotic discourse. It is imperative to assert masculinity through its multiple facets: independence, autonomy, valor, strength, aggression and yes, homosexuality among all other traits inextricably intertwined with the masculine constitution. Homoeroticism is the vanguard of the future right-wing movements and we finally need to realize this.
Last but not least, we have to recognize the phallus as the epicenter of cosmic power and the immanent symbol of fascism in order to prompt the cultural shift to occur. Our societies need to become phallocentric again and in order to institute such an order, the form of phallus has to be elevated to the status of an entity most perfectly corresponding to the higher plane of reality and embodying the highest aesthetic ideal. Masculinity needs to become the center of public attention and one way of achieving this is through the quasi-deification of the phallus as the ultimate symbol of fertility and cosmic power, which is inherently masculine in nature.
No such thing, faggot. Stop spreading your degeneracy.
Faggots detected. Time to buy some faggot-eliminators. You sick, mentally ill degenerates really need to stop spreading. You all were created by pedophiles and are all pedophiles yourselves. That's how fags reproduce.
More pedofags trying to reproduce by harming innocent children.
She is pretty hot.
...
I've become a fag by simply sucking a dick, schizo. What is more, there is nothing remotely wrong with sucking a dick if the other party consents. Try it yourself or stop talking about shit you haven't got the faintest idea about.
nothing wrong with killing gays
Faggots deserve to be thrown off of buildings.
Only women are supposed to suck dicks. Anyone else is a degenerate when they even think about it.
Homonausea.
Definitely far more accurate. ...and lacks the thinly veiled gay agenda of homo"phobia".
Also...gays seem very violent. Just look at their faggy, outraged (that we Heteros dare call them on their bullshit) posts.
I agree.
>not natural
Is absolutely is.
en.m.wikipedia.org
queers are gay
Homomisos doesn't sound good though.
WTF is up with these forums... how aren't they shut down?
IS THIS REAL
Dude, it's no big deal. Have you ever been to Asia? It's like eating a fish that's still alive, you basically put it in your mouth, crunch it and you can feel how it writhes in your mouth. The same applies to cocks, except they throb instead of worming like a dying fish, but they taste pretty much the same. Suck dicks if it floats your boat, just don't be an obnoxious gay cunt.
daily reminder tolerance for faggots is on the decline
we are winning
Jews are afraid of Conservative Gays.
>suck dicks
>eat dicks
there's a slight difference there user
as much as we have evolved sexual attraction, we have also evolved species-survival avoidance and disgust behaviors. Attraction is hard coded. So is dis-attraction.
>2 million years of evolution as hominids
>homo-promoters demand we override that with just 5 years of 'tolerance' pushing
"Natural" or "Un-Natural" under the loose casual verbal definition in this context refers to perfected natural states. Disease is natural. Decay is natural. Bodily mutilation and how it attempts to cope and it's reaction to medications is natural. Everything that can possibly physically happen in the material universe is natural.... Including Death. DEATH, is, NATURAL... However, it's common and moral sense that Death is not a prefered state, and all the conditions forementioned in this paragraph often lead to it, so we refer to it as it's non prefered state using the term "un-natural" or "not natural".
So FAGGOTRY, is NOT NATURAL, under that obvious context.
fag
Disgust is considered a phobia, but I have to admit with you on this one I really fucking hate faggots not really gay people in general but people who just say/post random gay shit I just really want to fucking murder them.
There are two human emotions: love and fear. Disgust comes from a love of the good, the beautiful and the true. Real homophobia comes from the left who fears hurting the sodomites feelings. that is their problem, they are anti-hate, not pro-love. (eg. antifa)
>being Catholic pedo priest is ok tho
“In June 2016, several readers raised concerns about this article. At that time, we evaluated the article’s peer review process and brought several concerns to the handling editor’s attention. These included: the study’s small sample of same-sex parents, the lack of discussion of other influences such as family breakup on the wellbeing of the children included in the study, the implied causation in the title “Invisible Victims,” and the potential conflict of interest implied by the author’s position as a Catholic priest.“
If I had a Honk for each Gender...
Honk Honk
I'm not an ant user...
Listen, honey;
It’s fine for anyone to be disgusted by it,
and no non-NPC is trying to push any of that on you. There’s just (((them))) and what you’re supposed to think about other people.
I hate this degeneracy as much as you, probably more, but please stop posting pictures for ants
XD this is a good one,
I remember seeing this pop up on Netflix and thinking “oh Jow Forumss gonna lose their mind”
OPS A GOD
Faggots want to infect everyone else with their degeneracy. Also remember they are collectivists, and there goal is to normalize it because by doing that, they feel like they will receive validation for their ideologies and sins...It's quite understandable with even a basic idea of human psychology.
Tldr
You know how many fags are helpless narcotics addicts? Or Homeless? They’re mostly not powerful enough to do anything more than walk in a straight line, let alone telepathically brainwash those around them.
Well said, it's a marxist term like "transphobic", "Islamophobic", etc etc.
No one is "deathly afraid" of these things, lmfao.
So called "homophobes" are fags in the closet who want to suck dick but are afraid to.
/thread
Why are they scared to schlop schlongs? Aren't they already outright gay? I makes me uneasy about if I'd let a girl blow me or what it's supposed to be like.
How is this legal?
I don't know, i understand the hate for the hollywood liberal media sjw fag propaganda but i don't get why someone gets mad about the fuct that some men are gay as long as they don't push some agenda.
I'm not even disgusted. I just think that shit should stay private.
It's just a weird feitish, and just as I wouldn't want BDSM weirdos walking around town dressed up, or cartoons encouraging kids to get fursuits, I don't want to see that gay stuff.
Unless it's porn, explicately meant for fags (Think Brokeback Mountain), or comedy, there really shouldn't be any faggotry in media.
It's a funny feeling when gay guys hit on you but you're not in to that stuff. A blow job died for this.
It's called sodomaidia
I’ll bet you really liked Brokeback Mountain.