Also remember

Sigh.. destroying business and carbon taxing 20 years ago would have prevented this?

No.

holy shit what

This.

If the future has not white people like we are told then I don't get a fuck about what happens to this shit earth.

so a supervolcano would reverse all of this

so what one are we blowing up with a nuke

>then I don't get a fuck about what happens to this shit earth.
That's not true, I'd love nothing more for it to go down the drain.

>and we can save the earth by buying my new product!!!!
>We need to stop breeding so we can lower our carbon tracks but we also need to import migrants because we need to keep the economy growing forever! Haha.

Burning is part of forest cycles you morron

this
the globalists are keeping our eyes away from a much bigger issue (xenoestrogen contamination of our water via plastic waste) and tax us on CO2 emissions instead, shipping more jobs to developing countries in the process; and these countries dump even more plastic in the water

If the oceans were boiling, there would be more rain.
So how would the earth turn into a desert.

Global warming is a globalist sham.

And? I’m constantly told in record cold that “weather isn’t climate.” We have myriad problems, many man made. Adjusting to the climate is something we’ve always done. Dealing with the destruction of the biosphere through plastic production/consumption/waste, massive gene editing of the food we literally need in order to survive, the fact that we are on track to be sterile in a couple of generations, these are the issues to focus on. They are more visceral than changing weather.

go bait elsewhere leaf

>quick! better raise tax on the poor or all the babys are going to die!! You dont want to pay 70% of your wage, goy? This guy wants to kill babys! Lets get him!!!

Fuck off, econigger. I hope the planet implodes

Don't care. There's nothing we can do at this point. Stop being a faggot and worrying about it. Go enjoy your life and don't bring any kids into what's left of hospitable human life on this planet

>climate change
isn't it just a better word for:
boomers / corporates shitting up the planet for lulz + profits, keep shilling shell studies

This is almost all due to exploding brown ghoul shithole populations.

Pic related.

Attached: Real Green Policy.png (713x912, 251K)

The nig-spic cycle to enrich the Jews. Fuck the Boomers too tho.

This

I'm sure global warming is just a distraction from the Epstein case.

Who cares?
The west needs a major crisis in order to get back on track anyway and the sooner it comes the better.

Doesnt your country whine about having children to reduce carbon footprint yet import migrants that have 8 children per woman?

Its a scam to make you pay more taxes and to make grant money

>the young cucks

>TYT
Fuck off kike.

what do you want though? what are you asking the common person to do?

To indulge in the day of the rope and bring it to Africa and China

>Just pay your carbon tax to the governments and corporations and the planet will be saved

Only a fool is this deluded and doubts his own strength

Only the first one is true.

God hates Brazil, land of the sodomite damned.
The fag infested land of Brazil is burning. The fire of God's wrath is sending hundreds of those filthy Brazilian beasts, straight to hell.
We at Westboro Baptist Church are rejoicing, and we are praying for the dear Lord to burn many more Brazilians alive.

Attached: IMG_20190821_113702.jpg (300x400, 119K)

>niggers will get hit hardest by all this

Let it happen guys

1. Forest fires add nitrate which is natural fertilizer google the pine barrens.
2. Melting ice sends water into the soil adding to new growth.
3. melting ice cools down boiling water.
4. recent discovery with coral being broken into smaller pieces allows it to be regenrated google it.
5. Melting allows for new growth in exposed soil new trees = more oxygen good for the enviroment.
6 Same thing.
7 Same thing
8 Ecosystems are changing there is no such thing as crashing
9 same thing
10 more people = more emissions etc
climate change = climate change things change thats what life is dummy welcome to nature

why would anybody make us believe it's fake?

Attached: plant.jpg (561x1024, 38K)

I dunno was watching tv yesterday some documentary about super nove and then suddenly out of no where, they said that, there was a super nova not that far from earth and that now the earth is surrounded by a cloud of newly formed iron particles.
And then I started to wonder if this could impact temperatures in the atmosphere, or alter solar radiation.

They are just jealous that we are better than them. Can’t even have a population above 20 millions, fags.

>The amazon is burning
Barely. Way to fall for propaganda blowing it out of proportion.
>The artic's on fire
Fake news.
>The oceans are boiling
Retarded.
>Coral reefs are dying
Fake news.
>Greenland is melting
Fake news.
>Permafrost is collapsing
Retarded.
>Antarctica is heating
Fake news just like nearly everything about antarctica that you hear or know.
>Ecosystems are crashing.
Retarded.
>Earth is turning to a desert
Retarded
>Emissions are accelerating
Fake news.

>90% of rain contains plastic particles
How can you people be so fucking stupid? Anti-gravity plastic just floating around in the clouds now.

Cite proof. Big braned scientists study shit like this

Can very small microplastics “float” on hot air? Birds can fly why not plastic too

Would you agree that we need to immediately cut off all food aid to the 3rd world and begin sterilization programs for them since they breed the most?

multiply like R A B B I T S

what? no. that's racist.

Attached: Civil_Rights_Caused_Global_Warming_2.jpg (1085x787, 144K)

Ok, but is the economy growing? Or are you a filthy communist hippie retard? What kind of world would it be without money, you schizo?

Isn't it (((convenient))) that the real environmentalist movement has disappeared since the global warming/climate change fantasy took over out of nowhere?

>muh (((scientists))) wouldn't lie
Show proof any of that shit is real, and no pictures and written statements by "experts" is not proof. The media already makes political crowds seem bigger or smaller than they are and ecological catastrophe scaremongering propaganda has existed for decades. "save the rainforest" scams existed 30 years ago when I was a child and dumb enough to believe the book I was buying at a school book fair was saving the rainforest. Here is the same sort of scam only dialed up to 11.
>birds fly so why not rocks too
You do know acid rain was a scaremongering fraud decades ago that never existed, right? No of course not, you believe all that horseshit. The only real dangerous pollution is chemicals being dumped into water supplies or put in people's food, but environmentalists rarely talk about that shit. They only talk about shit that will actually lower the quality of life for people to stave off made up disasters. You have to be retarded to believe plastic is floating in the clouds and falling with the rain.

Attached: 1566150564096.jpg (480x480, 21K)

>earth is turning into a desert
Lol the global temperatures won’t be 45c in 100 years

Bro Rick and Morty said nothing matters dude, its cool.

>written statements by “experts” is not proof
Nigga the entire scientific community (big words, means “people that get paid to be smarter than you”) is based on getting your shit vetted by everybody else. If those brainy fucks all agree about something, odds are pretty good it’s legit. They didn’t fuck up when agreeing that black holes exist, it’s very unlikely that almost all the smart people in the world are wrong about this shit

Dumb ass Amerifag, want to know how you can make a difference? Organize an anti climate change rally, then waddle in there with guns blazing like you fat fucks do and take out some morons. Save oxygen for people who need it

Checked and true.: earthobservatory.nasa.gov/global-maps/TRMM_3B43M

Also the coral reefs are recovering: scientificamerican.com/article/coral-reefs-show-remarkable-ability-to-recover-from-near-death/

>the entire scientific community
The scientific method isn't supposed to work based on consensus, but you wouldn't know that. You only know scientism.
>people that get paid to be smarter than you
People who get paid because they have a certificate of indoctrination and spout the appropriate lines for grant money.
>is based on getting your shit vetted by everybody else
Pic related
>If those brainy fucks all agree about something, odds are pretty good it's legit
Yeah, man, that is how science works. Ascribe to the dogma of the key organizations (we know nobody ever (((infiltrates))) those.)
>it's very unlikely that almost all the smart people in the world are wrong about this shit
You mean the people who get (((published))) can never be wrong and you better believe that if you too want to be handed your piece of paper while wearing a mason's board hat like a good goy.
>Organize an anti climate change rally
Why would I support a tax scheme "fighting" a problem that has absolutely zero proof of human involvement?
>waddle in there with guns blazing
You also believe in hoax shootings while I do not.
This is all beside the point anyway. There isn't a scientific study saying the Amazon is burning down. There are just pictures of tiny portions of the forest on fire and written lies about how much has been burned. You fell for propaganda or you are just shilling it. Probably the latter.

Attached: 1565838706988.jpg (208x326, 15K)

The world is turning in to a desert because of mono crops killing soil with pesticides and other chemicals. You can solve this by eating meat only meat and supporting grass fed farms.

Science is based on concensus, and on how good the material corresponds with what is already known. It's concensus+correspondence.

This

This.
And with so much controversy (see: this thread) over the topic, the original material has been reviewed many times to ensure accuracy.

>it'll never snow again
>somehow this is a problem
GET REKT

>Science is based on concensus
No, scientism is, memeflag. Science is based on the scientific method which requires experimentation, observation of results, and repeat ability of the experiment. Anything that can't fit that criteria isn't science. This also applies to claims about discoveries made with billion dollar installations/equipment as the results can't be verified. Such "discoveries" are akin to translating gold tablets by peering into a hat and telling everyone else what the writing says. "Science" based on concensus can be politically motivated, religiously motivated, or economically motivated and any conflicting results of that "science" is labeled anti-science and discarded.

Attached: scientificmethod2.png (800x600, 22K)

Sure, but that's just some tautology. Correspondence includes research and scientific methods, obviously.

>be American
>spend all my money on fast food and healthcare
>have no money left to put towards higher education
>have to come up with schiz paranoid reasoning to justify not getting degree
>”mUh dOgMa”
>probably believes Nature is ran by the Jews
Imagine being so salty over living in the shittiest country in the world that you shitpost on Jow Forums to try and upset people that were fortunate enough to get educated at an “(((institution)))” and live in a decent place that cares about its inhabitants

Don't forget number eleven.
OP is faggot.

>Be Canadian
>Suck
that is all.

>correspondence
Yes, absolutely, correspondence means you have to be (((published))) or it isn't science. That's how we know how things work, because a circlejerk allowed one to be (((published))).
I do not eat fast food and I haven't visited a doctor in 20 years. The medical industry worldwide creates more sickness than it cures as it rarely cures anything and instead "treats" sickness and then "treats" the side effects of the "treatments." I know as I watch this sad collection of events happen with my mother who buys into every medicine doctors prescribe and has only gotten more issues with each one.
>have no money left to put towards higher education
I actually have a visual programming degree.
>have to come up with schiz paranoid reasoning to justify not getting a degree
Way to out yourself glownigger.
>probably believes Nature is ran by the Jews
No, I can witness nature anytime I wish outside of my home. I don't trust shit that is said about nature by the jews in the media or "scientific" bodies as I have seen enough of them turn out to be hoaxes.
>Imagine being so salty over living in the shittiest country in the world that you shitpost on Jow Forums to try and upset people that were fortunate enough to get educated at an "(((instituion)))" and live in a decent place that cares about its inhabitants
This coming from a leaf that pays several times as much money for food. Yeah, your government really cares about you. That isn't to say the US government cares about me either, but I don't buy into the whole kabuki theater that our governments are not working toward the same goal. The differences in our countries as they currently stands is based on how much they can get away with in a particular country, but the end goal is the same. I am done replying to you though. You weren't worth my time in the first place and I should have known since you think clouds can rain plastic while sanctimoniously touting the virtues of the scientific community

>The Arctic's on fire
>The Oceans are boiling
You expect me to believe this shit?

>If those brainy fucks all agree about something, odds are pretty good it’s legit.
Applying this to climate change is actually pretty funny. There is a well known climate scientist who was found out to be changing Wikipedia articles since the early 2000s. His changes included trying to hide the little ice age that we had just come out of.

I don't believe very many people will deny the fact that the Earth is a dynamic system that changes based on a variety of inputs. However, the amount of misinformation that has been spread by both sides is fairly ridiculous and seems as if no one really wants to get to the bottom of the issue.

It actually means to which extent the the findings correspond with the existing (scientific) knowledge.

>loxism
I thought Jews loved lox

Fuck off, Shlomo. The fact the elites that cry about global warming want a gorillion more shitskins flooding into our countries means they're not serious.

The Arctic is on fire. Part of Alberta, at least: usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/08/21/wildfires-july-hottest-month-ever-fires-rage-across-globe/2070418001/

idgaf. The word's going to hell in a handbasket. Let it burn.

what's with the mental retardation of many posters in here? i mean i don't even care about all these disaster, indeed i want moar , but it's obviously because of us and not muh earth cycles, are you all seriously retarded, lulzposters or just shills?

And when the solution becomes stop shipping stuff and stop flying ill get behind it. So when ever rich people choose to actually fix the problem it will get fixed

Peat soils were ignited, although the article says fires aren't uncommon.

All facts point towards it.
The elites only don't care because they'd have to give up their shekels if anything is done towards salvation. But they have to pretend they care so they do little kiddie meetings, like they do here in yurop.
Eventually two things can happen. Either the Earth is destroyed, or humanity becomes extinct and nature reclaims everything.
Unless ((((something)))) happens to the elites.

Don't worry evolution will fix it.

>Alberta has a humid continental climate with warm summers and cold winters.
>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberta

Yeah, we get forest fires in our forests in America, too. The Amazon gets thousands per year, too. I bet there are forest fires in Siberian forests, too. I wonder how a 53,540 degree lightning bolt can manage to ignite trees when there's snow on the ground. It really seems like the snow should magically prevent physics to make things easier for brainlets.

Also, your article doesn't have the words Canada or Alberta. Because you have you to see a lot of things that aren't there to believe the global warming crusaders are more than 20% correct on any of their talking points.

>china and india are overpopulated

Why no mention??

>Be American
>be too intelligent to come up with an insult of any substance

>95% of ocean pollution comes from Asia and Africa
AND THAT'S WHY WE NEED THE PARIS ACCORD TO GIVE THEM A FREE PASS FOR ANOTHER 20 YEARS! (Cause we'll be dead in 12).

You just highlighted the circlejerk. When "existing scientific knowledge" relies on claims from groupings of scientists with a platform and expels those without said platform it just becomes a means of propagating a party line. This can indeed include "new discoveries" overturning old ones such as CERN which is completely unverifiable without your own LHC. Scientists reviewing the data from LHC are not completing the scientific method with repeatable observations and results. They are looking at the claimed results of a group. One of the biggest modern delusions is that multi-billion dollar research is for the good of man kind and the pursuit of science.
>it's obviously because of us
Yeah, sure, obvious. Although it is obvious that the temperatures where I live haven't deviated at all in decades from my own experience, my experience doesn't matter (even though that's how you would base something being "obvious") and I should just believe the people who want to solve the climate changing by taxing me and getting me to eat bugs.

>I can witness nature anytime I wish
Probably a good time to take an L and realize that Nature is a very well established and accredited scientific journal. Next time, like all your other claims, i’d do some quick research by pretending you know so much.
>I watch this sad collection of events happen with my mother
Bet you get a good view of your mother from the basement, poorfag. Sure did a whole lot with your visual programming degree eh. Next time learn some real science, not made up computer shit a drugged out hippie wrote in the 70s.

>Scientists reviewing the data from LHC are not completing the scientific method with repeatable observations and results
True, but the scientific foundation on which the technology was built is tried and true and ready to find for anyone who looks. Science is based on truths and logic - of which you are missing the latter - laid down by previous discoveries and scientists. The repeatability of an experiment such as CERN is absolutely preposterous, but if you are implying that CERN is putting out fake science then there is a body of researchers working there who would beg to disagree, on grounds that spreading misinformation is the antithesis of their life’s work.

>well (((established)))
>(((accredited)))
Says the user who believe clouds are raining plastic.

Also
>Africa’s population is exploding

>on which the technology was built is tried and true and ready to find for anyone with billions of dollars to set up an independent control experiment decades after the "discoveries" have already been taught as truth and firmly cemented into the (((scientific))) community

But scientific knowledge doesn't rely on claims from groups - only -.

I don't know what to Believe anymore

These people realize the Ice Age has been slowly ending for thousands of years right?

Earth was once a jungle world. This is actually a return to norm.

youtube.com/watch?v=7nqcL0mjMjw

Also based AND redpilled anons above pointed out WHY Earth was a jungle world, and will never, and can never, be a desert world - we have too much water. As heat rises, so does rain, and then greenery, and then a reverse.

Liberals, hipsters and environmentalists are so fucking dumb it’s honestly hard to grasp

what an amazing coincidence that brazils rainforest is currently on fire while ms greta is on her way to pitch her crazy views

nice larp faggot, forests burn and desertification is inevitable, the sahara desert was created during human history

>Can very small microplastics “float” on hot air? Birds can fly why not plastic too

If you read my own post - and my only mention of flying plastic - again, you will see that not once do I assert my belief in this postulate. I asked a question which I do not know the answer to, then poorly phrased a statement that still does not imply I believe in lighter-than-air-microplastics, but suggests it as a possibility. And you never did provide proof to contradict that microplastics cannot float in evaporating water, on rising hot air and steam. Again, not that I am stating that. I haven’t looked into shit because I’m having too much fun berating a boomer who doesn’t believe in the same concepts of science that built his computer.