Sure humans are affecting the climate but it's china's fault and i will continue to paradoxically be opposed to funding...

LMFAO YET ANOTHER STRAWMAN
good stuff dumbshits.

So what are more studies going to get us? We’ve known about this for decades. Nothing happens. The world keeps warming up. No one will do anything because we’re animals and we are greedy. Adapt or die faggot

>Screenshot where you proved me wrong
Pick a post. Is this the best you have? Flimsy argument followed up with >fite me

Jeeze no wonder a swedish retard is the head of your "movement". Ask me how I knew you were from Reddit.
>Inb4 ad hominem that's not a valid argument against the one OP failed to make

>smug liberal faggot makes strawman thread
>responses are strawmen
>absolutely seething

You are a waste of carbon.

I didn't ask to live on a shitty "pollutable" dumb retarded gravity ridden fucking dumb stupid gay planet in the first place

you misquoted me as saying something i didn't. do you really not understand that?

>your "movement"
i'm not part of that. i'm part of the movement of people with IQ above 130 who can interpret the logical conclusion of the evidence.

>smug liberal faggot makes strawman thread
>there are only two sides and if you're not on my side you're on the other side
see pic related. feel free to tell me what """strawman""" i made as well. you wont because you have no idea what you're talking about and you just say random shit on a 5th grade level of composition.

>absolutely seething
go back to r.eddit you utter faggot

Attached: 1522629482513s.jpg (247x250, 6K)

Making statements without supporting evidence, and just appealing to the authority of some scientists without name or face is akin to being a religious zealot.

When is the human sacrifices to appease the scientists?

>t. flat earther

>i will continue to paradoxically
Oh lawdy where is the strawman I can't seem to find it.

did you think you just pointed out a strawman with this post?

Prove to me that climate change is caused by humans. I can prove to you that the birth rate in Denmark is dependent on the number of stork breeding pairs.

robertmatthews.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/RM-storks-paper.pdf

youtube.com/watch?v=j0kSwAe8r8w

>Cherry picks less than 1% of accumulated data and misinterprets to fit a narrative
Sounds like reddit to me, but sorry you were talking about your high IQ while simultaneously trying to insult me in lue of a retort?

>prove
>correlation does not imply causation but i have no idea what does
i take it epistemology is not your strong suit

Attached: 1507571512347.png (645x773, 12K)

Why do you think this isn't a fallacy in itself? Can you tell when you're being retarded or do other have to point it out to you?

I still don't give a shit about your climate change hysteria cult. Seethe harder you brainwashed NPC.

Attached: nword animated.gif (607x609, 754K)

Americans are fucking cancer.
The literally Top 1 emittant of Co2 was the US since approximatly 1943.
Thats 60! years dominating with a wide margin the in front of anybody else.
They lost the first place few years ago and suddenly i must hear fromAmericans:
>LOL WHY SHOULD WE DO ANYBODY WE ARENT EVEN MAIN POLLUTANT
Thats why everybody hates the Us. You guys dont care, you behave like niggers.
You fuck up badly, than you say:
>DINDU NUFFIN

>Shit out most Co2 in human history as a nation
>DINDU NUFFIn

>Ruin countless states since the Korea War and destablize every single region except for europe
>DINDU NUFFIN

I hope for tze Yellowstone vulcano to errupt and take your godforsaken country in the shitter where it belongs

No one is opposed to funding for actual climate research. Just not leftist propaganda. It's one of the few genuine black holes of knowledge in science. Unfortunately, the very gay politicization of science just makes science shitty and full of lies, which then makes it useless, so how about stop being a faggot and just let scientists ask questions and try to find answers like they've always done before you niggers started paying for intellectual-endorsement of political stances

This is highly upsetting for you as everyone in this thread has pointed out. I can't imagine this level of inferiority combined with existential frustration over your impressions of what's going on on the planet. Usually shame acts as the primary deterrent for such acts of public humiliation, but self awareness seems to have skipped over your bloodline entirely. Sperging out on an anime basket weaving forum about how the world is going to come to an end unless people adopt your degenerate lifestyle won't make you feel any better about yourself than makes us laugh in pity at your inability to grasp simple concepts. We can all sit here holding your hand explaining how your assertions are not the equivalent of a cohesive argument but I'm sure most people are aware this wasn't a conversation you brought to the table that had any sort of conclusion in mind.

You make an ass out of yourself, we point it out, than your lack of nuance prevents the conversation from progressing past that point.

Attached: 1565976443921.png (802x631, 86K)

>No one is opposed to funding for actual climate research.
yes they literally are. get your head out of your ass.

>The literally Top 1 emittant of Co2 was the US
C H I N A

If you niggers actually won the war you'd be number one, but we bombed all your shit and turned you into a pussy nation who worries about carbon dioxide while your heritage and country is being destroyed

>t. flat earther

tldr

this is the level of reading comprehension deniers are on. i will allow you to shamefully not respond do this post mocking you after you realize your error.

Source for this "no we don't even want to know" niggerdom
Citing actual climate studies is part of what makes climate change alarmism very easy to expose and prove retarded

science:
politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/jun/18/environmental-protection-agency/are-greenhouse-emissions-down-under-donald-trump-e/

No matter. When I remove this thread don't put another one up or it will be a 3 day ban with no appeal. You'll only get one warning.

You don't have an iq over 130

If you recognize that China is polluting much more than us, then why should we spend more to limit our industries and not address the fact that China isn’t doing the same thing? Do you want more of our manufacturing jobs to be outsourced to chinks and factories leave the US? Because that’s basically saying you want our economy to go to shit

LMFAO

>Citing actual climate studies is part of what makes climate change alarmism very easy to expose and prove retarded
no shit climate alarmism is retarded. it's propagated by retarded leftist politicians and not high IQ white male climate scientists, and the retarded rightists are unable to distinguish between the two.

>Correlation doesn't imply causation
>But it does if we're talking about global warming specifically

Neck yourself

>then why should we spend more to limit our industries
screenshot the part where i suggested this.

>Tldr
>Didn't read the most coherent post in the thread
>130+

Lay down in traffic mate

im sorry honey but that is not a logical implication of my post. 3/10 for reading comprehension.

>if you don't read this paragraph of nonsense you're le stupid and can't read xD
baiting retards into making this fallacy is one of my favorite things to do

>Humans cause global warming
>Only evidence or argument presented is based off of correlation of statistics
>Me so smart you so dumb
>Posting brainlet memes rather than addressing points made
>Using obvious bait words like honey

You don't have a 130iq
You are wrong
You don't belong here

I guess he really struck a nerve with that paragraph you claim to have not read

he didn't make any points. literally all evidence that exists is correlative. i regret that you're so stupid that i had to spell this out.

oh, you don't think literally all evidence is correlative? tell me what does imply causation then, and give examples. i can gaurantee you that anything you come up with will be correlative, because it's an epistemological fact.

when you realize the set of all evidence is correlative, pointing out that an individual element is correlative is a vacuous truth. asking for "causal" evidence goes beyond moving the goalpost, you've effectively moved it into the realm of mathematical impossibility. congratulations if you think that's actually an argument that needs addressing, that makes you one of the dumbest armchair scientists on the planet.

>You don't have a 130iq
you're right. it's well above that. don't tell me you're not even that high? the 130iq man is like a nigger among academic circles.

If those two guys who sit at the top would go down to help the rest, the boat would sink much faster beocuse all the weight would be located in one spot

>climate only changes because of humans

Nobody has ever said or thought that only humans affect climate.

>All evidence is correlation
>Made fun of user for correlative evidence

>Still claims big brain iq

Look, you are right about the nature of 'evidence' bit, but you're still a larping spastic

Also
>Tldr

in what degree do human actions affect climate change? Do you have any measure for that?

>Made fun of user for correlative evidence
???. Screenshot please. I don't get why there's so many people in this thread accusing me of saying things I didn't say.

>Still claims big brain iq
Why wouldn't I?

>Look, you are right about the nature of 'evidence' bit
And if you addressed me earnestly instead of like a tribal little brainlet who instantly assumes I'm a leftist you would find I'm right about a great deal many other things.

whole boat would just flip probably

>Actually wanting this gay earth to survive

Attached: 1562721503904.gif (450x234, 1000K)

it doesn't matter. mass extinction events have occurred in the past and there's no reason to assume they won't occur again. what we need is an attitude of encouraging technological advancement, which conservatives block.

The guy is trying to argue from a semantics point of view that the only way to be right is by diving out to make assertions before anyone else does. Screw the topic of climate change, this guy is mentally handicapped.

Nah, you're a cunt mate

Also, I'm 144 ;)

Attached: Screenshot_20190824_115811_com.android.chrome.jpg (1080x1920, 768K)

Exacly, that comic does not make sence

>I don't know why I'm the center of ridicule in my own thread
Can't imagine why

Attached: 1566545584922.gif (200x186, 720K)

i don't see the part where i "made fun of user for correlative evidence"

so you you're a dumb tribal brainlet you just see words and interpret them as completely different words because of cognitive dissonance?

Pretty much the mistake you've been making this entire thread.

Here's your screenshot before you ask

what words did i misinterpret? screenshot

Yeah so you're gonna wanna click on the pound next to the word OP, it'll link you to a collage of screenshots.

what pound i dont see one

...

i misinterpreted my own words?

the problem is that climate science is incredibly pozzed right now. You cannot expect objectivity from it since so much interests of wealthy are funneled in it. Even if your science agency personally funded by all wealth of Trump came with ANY results, they would be drowned in sea of "97% of scientists agree that global warming is real". It's less about science and more about control over narrative.

i'm not unwilling to believe this, but obviously i can't believe it just because you said it. also, scientists have been warning of global warming since the 50's, and i'm doubting it was pozzed then.

>1977
Nah man, they are "warning" about things they are told to "warn" about.

Attached: 91nTSJhcBpL[1].jpg (1920x2560, 766K)

why did you quote 1977 as if i said that? i said the 50's.

I wonder why "flat earth" is always used as a strawman against anybody who questions the system.

what makes you believe that in 50s climate science wasnt pozzed?

guilt by association

1. that's not what a strawman is. a false equivalency, maybe.
2. it's pretty obvious why. truth always prevails, and high IQ white males are pretty good at figuring out what the truth is. some time from now, climate science will be nearly universally accepted, with only a few fringe retards clinging to moronic anti-science theories. it's used as an example to show where you on the timeline of truth acceptance. both climate denial and flat earthism are fundamentally anti-scientific, and they both are essentially retards trying to argue with the high IQ white males who outrank them and whom they have no business trying to argue with.

because i haven't seen any evidence suggesting it was. have you?

Show me the scientific proof of Anthropogenic climate change and I'll cough up the dough.

I don’t need to
That’s where every “stop da pollution” push ends up going.
>gotta limit our pollution
>no factory or manufacturer wants to work here because the same guidelines that limit our production quantity don’t exist in China so they just fuck off to China and don’t pay taxes
Again it’s asking to destroy our economy so left wing retards can pretend they’re doing good while they clear entire acres of land for avocado trees

>oy vey goyim it's because they're scientific goyim
>my arguments are still just water rising
>fall for my tax scam goyim

screenshot the part where i suggested to "stop da pollution"

i said high IQ white males not jews
also, screenshot the part where i called for a tax hike

boards.Jow Forums.org/pol/thread/224205422#bottom

the fuck is this

>Strawmanning this hard

>Accept the source of the problem and the problem solvers belong to different demographics
>But somehow still accept that it's better to do "something" even if it's useless and costs a lot of money and QoL detriments just because that problem exists and the cause is being ignored
Guh-guh-dah-dah.
If there's man made climate change and it happens to be because there's chinks and niggers having access to polluting services en masse but your solution is that I stop using my car and we do nothing about them I'm going to call you a moron, hands down.
If the problem is that a company is throwing its wastes to a river so the fishes die and the animals that drink from it too and your solution is that I don't fart in my private pool is exactly the same level of moronic nonsense you're spewing right now.

Your entire original post
You can read right? Or did you forget what you posted already?

>even if it's useless
advancing technology is useless?

which part specifically

>Entire post
>What part
>ENTIRE
>POST
being this retarded

Ask Mengele or be more specific.

ok. real convincing. i don't know why you bother having a discussion when the only argument you can hear is the one that you find easy to destroy. i never said "stop da pollution".

Tldr

i don't know how to be more specific. you said anything the west could do would be pointless, even though the west could advance technology.

>funding for climate-related research that could save us all
lmao

Never says that or even uses those words. Screenshot the part where he said that

congratulations on being emotionally satisfied. you're still wrong.
>being this disingenuous

>Only semblance of an argument is pure misrepresentation
Screenshot where I said that