Is Brazil a scapegoat? Europe, India, China and even Niggers did much worse

Not sure what “original” is, but we’ve seen more forests in the last 4 decades because of the warming

Before humans, the only tree consuming species on Earth, existed.

makes no sense if you look at MENA

"care"

again, what's the date on that then? 4k years BC?

Why not tear down the cities and farms and let the forests regrow?

Europe is overpopulated as shit and they still bring in foreign hordes, look at that.

Don't forget beavers

>there are no trees in the UK

who made this horseshit?

A very long time ago looking at Europe. Definitely before Columbus Europe has way more forest now than it has had for centuries.

I'd say before any form of civilization, so probably 7000 BC.

This map has a really poor projection, as the Congo rainforest is the size of Europe, and the Amazon is the size of the United States of America

More like stone age or in that direction.

Brazil cultivates 8% of its usable soil, feeding 2,5billion people. We have the heaviest regulations against pesticides and other poisons and pest controls, so we are the ones who use it the least.
Europe is trembling before the possibility of a brazilian government allowing the agropecuary sector to expand. If we double our production we'll feed more than half of the world, erradicating every competition on the market with better and cheaper food. To save your local expensive shitty farmers they're trying to print an "Brazil is ruled by Nero" image t boycott us and our economy. Amazonia IS NOT endangered and will keep existing long before Europe decides to kill itself again in some nonsense fratricidal war.
FUCK OFF and leave us alone, we're ver far away from the days you had colonial relevance and power.

Attached: 1537069081701.png (512x476, 133K)

so you get to destroy your forests to develop... and we don't... very fair shlomo

Mercator is more usefull for conserving travel path, Goode homolosine projection is way better for correctly mapping surface area. But normies are more used to Mercator and it looks prettier than an orange peel.

Yep, Don't fall for macron bait, he's making a move for political gain, my bet? the recent EU-Mercosul deal. he saw a easy exit after the backlash from the Euro-agro sector.
See how 1 day after the fires started trending. all the leaders affected by the deal were eager to talk about how they were tricked by Brazil and how they will not sign the deal to save the enviroment? do you really believe them?

>63% of Brazil's territory is made of forest
meanwhile Netherlands and Britain which saw it's forest area drop to as low as 2 percent in the 1900's has been able to increase said areas to nothing more than 10-12 percent as of 2010 data
>Amazon alone covers a forest area of more than 5.500.000 km2.
>Amazon as the forest not the state spreads itself to over nine diferent countries all of them saw fires this season yet who do you see on the news?

Attached: brazil_annual_co2-nc.png (2666x1875, 92K)

>Brazil cultivates 8% of its usable soil, feeding 2,5billion people
>feeding 2,5billion people
you are retarded

They don't have a retard purposedly burning the jungles on behalf of corporations so their country can sell more beef to Mcdonalds

Bolsonara is a fucking degenerate old faggot. his rise to power was a coup.

If you are right wing you should protect the environment, it aint called CONSERVatism for nothing.

Absolute disgrace he should be hung

>brazil will feed half the world

you must be some brazillian state agent on this level of retardation

>amazon is not endangered
it is made almost entirely of wood and is on fire.

literally the old old old tired meme where the house burns around the dog sitting at the table and the thought bubble says "this is fine"

>wooo based corporations burning a large contributor to the worlds oxygen supply

>maga

Maybe its also because we reclaimed a lot of land mass from the sea where previously no tree had grown and that this country was more of a marshland than a forrested area, but now that reclaimed land also contributes to our countries size. Also no shit that our country can't go much higher tha 10-12 procent have you seen our population density compared to your countries? Learn to make proper comparisons.

>Amazonia IS NOT endangered and will keep existing long before Europe decides to kill itself again in some nonsense fratricidal war.
*long after
and btw you onions gmo ridden asses can forget about any intervention or whatever you guys think you're still able to do. You'll lose millions on our soil, and we'll profit some Guianas on the process

we cultivate 8% of our usable soil, and produce enough food to sell for more than 2,5billion people. which part you don't get? go fast on your hamadan Bjormuhammed
literal non argument
showproofs.jpeg

Attached: bolsoriso.gif (480x264, 3.69M)

Were not going to eat more of your crickets and wombats no matter how cheap they are. You'll just end up destroying your forests for no reason and no benefit and it'll fuck up the rest of the world as well.

Well i mean it kinda is. Europe and East Asia got rid of forests for farmland and construction developing their countries and other tribe tier continents remained untouched and now when we already have set farmlands we also demand other countries to stop touching forests. Other thing they destroy forests so we can get supply of palm oil, onions beans and whatever is in demand because we dont want to destroy our own lands or they are just not fertile enough for these types of plants

Funny thing is, many parts of the developed world are actually REforesting overall... America is a leading country for this, and Israel too, actually

this

heard about cattle farming and bruning the forest in brazil?

> hung

It’s HANGED when execution is being referenced, you filthy bong. Geez, I thought you dudes invented this damned language...

Because people start to eat exotic things more now so we can afford expanding our forests while random developing countries have to destroy forests for farmland so some libcuck in california can eat avocado tost and drink onions milk after that. The worst part is that only Europe East Asia and US ahve high demand for that. Imagine if Africa started to develop rapidly like Asia and they start to demand these things too theres is simply too many humans to make everyone afford avocados and other types of food without turning every inch of forest into farmland

>We cut down all of our shit
>Hey, you can't do that. . .

Fucking gay euroscum

funny thing is, i'm yet to see anyone pestering China about their environmental morals.
everyone fears to lose their iphones.

Attached: 1513103122615.png (1984x1708, 114K)

Before Colombo? ahaha dude before history probably.

>but now that reclaimed land also contributes to our countries size.
The data was based on original forest areas.
>you seen our population density compared to your countries?
we're talking about about overal deforestation. be it cities in europe or farms in brazil still is deforestation your density only contributes to factor.

Ye its the same mentality. I want 1k iphone eco friendly and done by well paid workers while China alone probably pollute earth more than US/EU combined because all production went there and job is done by literal slaves and sometimes even kids. Seems people dont care about these things as long as tehy can get their avocado and iphone

Brazilian agriculture will barely be feeding it's own population in 20 years, the infinite pool of capital nessacary to mass dump lime and fertilizer to make the cerrado arable won't be around much longer.

How "original" is that? Because Ireland's trees were cut down by Britain to make ships, which was centuries ago. But also this is bullshit, because just because Europe is less forested now doesn't excuse Brazil for destroying their forests to plant fucking sóy, which just so happens to contain the greatest biodiversity on the planet.

Brazil cultivates ALL of its usable soil tard. everything north of Sao Paulo is useless acidic trash that had to constantly have billions of tonnes of lime dumped on it to even be remotely productive

Who fucking cares. Fuck nature. Turn Earth into an ecumenopolis already.

do you now that our larger producer zones are north of São Paulo, righ ?

the true white privilege is standing in cosmopolitan center without true wild nature in sight and lecturing other, less developed, people to protect theirs

cerrado is a only able to be worked due recent tech
breakthroughts and are in no circunstance critical for any future projections. it expands dues its internal demand and not due its export capacity.
amazonic soil is also very shitty for any kind of agropec because its very high maintenance costs.
i don't think you really know our geography besides some wiki maps, but records of production and profitability when compared to rest of the world speaks against your fort lauderdale ass you fucking expat.

Attached: b8c.jpg (950x632, 36K)

What a fucking retarded picture

Thanks god we still have a lot of forest. Russia sure is big.

Attached: 1556504384840.png (444x444, 22K)

make it bigger

pre agriculture that's for sure
probably at least 10k years ago in europe, probably even longer in the levant and north africa

and you have nukes. that's why no one says any bullshit when you detonate a nuke missile near the poles or destroy siberia. keep producing them.

Attached: 1514298224527.jpg (940x626, 179K)

the people that protest china's lack of environmental policies by blocking the M25 and London ring road

>Is Brazil a scapegoat?
Yes, the Jews are attacking Brazil because it is a white country and they want to flood it with Venezuelan and Haitian refugees.

The NPC, indoctrinated since his birth, will reply to this post saying Brazil is not white

You don't have to hide your flag Hue

>77
checked, we can into ethnostate now.

Attached: 1513489175583.jpg (600x678, 83K)

Looks like a map of nigger infestation. Where grey marks non-whites

As long as the Brazilians promise to only raise high quality beef on the cleared forest to push down the price, I'm on board. Sick of paying out the ass to get something with even shitty marbling. I want this shit on my plate every single day. Get to it.

Attached: imageService.jpg (1200x1200, 185K)

The forests of Europe are growing back though.

Fuck Bolsonaro. The right-wing in the rest of the world having been infected by (((American Conservatism))) is probably the worst thing that has happened. The true right-wing is about conservatism, not bending over for (((business)))

Attached: 1556299229330.jpg (1484x1414, 223K)

those farms are being sent overseas instead

Reject both the right and left, and embrace the Third Position.

>orginal forest
please neck yourself

Attached: World-Jan-9 1.jpg (3500x4148, 3.4M)

>oh no the forests are going away
brainless sheeps actually believe this

neo.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/view.php?datasetId=MOD15A2_M_LAI

Attached: change_in_leaf_area.jpg (1920x1080, 922K)

Brazilian agribusiness' supposed profitablility is based entirely on cheap capital and low oil prices. Either goes away and it's going fold overnight. As for those production numbers, any daytrader knows their horseshit. Weirdly specific insult, must be a story there.

Overcapitalized, unsustainable, production zones.

Hmmbullshit mate you see India and China now have more forest cover than ever before

>cheap capital and low oil prices
some subsides here and there, more than some places.. way less than anothers
>low oil prices
>low
>oil
>prices
>Hueland.
yeah, sure, buddy. tell that to my accountant.

Attached: huehuehue.gif (270x138, 1.71M)

Nice Brazilian steak comes from the south in the pampas. The only breed suited to the amazon is Nelore which is trash, pic related. Slick angus may change that but that's a few years off.

Attached: cortes-especiais-de-wagyu.jpg (450x450, 47K)

Great post.

Attached: 1411423704545.jpg (500x375, 37K)

Attached: 1556055603426.jpg (2250x1456, 368K)

Brazillian gas prices are incredibly cheap given the fact that brazil doesn't have a freight rail network or a functioning refining base. Prepare to be raped when global oil prices triple.

what is the pampas steak?

if oil prices triple Brazil out be able to tap in to our reserves

wow nice, you guys are improving, before you had one tree, now you have two. You are doubling your forests.

You already tap into your reserves dum dum. The current relatively low prices are due to massive government subsides and domestic production (which also is over capitalized btw). Gas prices may not rise concomitantly but they will at least double

not at all, the cost of "pre-sal" (pre-salt) is massive for current prices, if they were to go up however...

Criticism of what Africa has done would be racist. India and China have nukes. So yes Brazil is a scapegoat.

you're clearly retarded. almost all onions and sugar cane production happen north of são paulo.
it's too acidic naturally, but we started fixing this in the 70's
>infinite pool of capital nessacary
we've always done it resourceless and its going to stay that way.
accurate
>be brazilian
>living in the countryside
>everyone white, a few mutts stride around cleaning shit
>walk to the bakery
>see haitian nigger washing plates
>day ruined
>ask for a salgado
>haitian serves me
>plate is barely clean at all, salgado tastes like shit
>get aids

he thinks we use our petroleum, when in fact we sell it all and buy shit already refined at rotterdam prices. give him 45 more minutes to research more deeply and come up with a better answer

Attached: ekiça.gif (360x414, 2M)

don't talk shit on nelore, though. when well raised that shit's fine
i work with Angus-Nelore crossing and it's great
northern meat tastes like shit because the cows have to walk daily a few kilometers to find a remotely eatable field of grass
very redpilled
even r*ddit is starting to realise how just is just big beetroot propaganda to try to clamp us
FUCK EUROPE

don't act as if Brazilian oil is anywhere the same quality (octanage) as the one we import

>he thinks we use our petroleum
No I fucking don't
Dumbass if you can't refine it yourselves what's going to happen when global prices go up, Petrobras may make enough to partially offset the price increase with subsidies but not nearly enough. It won't matter how supposedly efficient the sector is If product can't even make it to port.

Did you even read my post, lime is what's dumped on the soil to raise the ph

Does this correlate with the increase of shitskins?

Between 1830 and today, French forest doubled in size, covering now a third of the country. How wiping forest help development?