>jesus was a jew

to this I have to say: "so what?"
does being jewish automatically make you wrong? that's the type of thinking that made the natsocs turn their back against "jewish science" in the 1930s and 40s as according to EMJ. Should truth be subjective depending upon whom it's uttered from and to whom it touches? don't be stupid Jow Forums, truth is truth anywhere, regardless if a kike said it or if it was some afro-american like thomas-sowell
pull your head out of your asses you dumbfuck stormniggers

Attached: 1557635363113.jpg (675x864, 74K)

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=SHnaBBbgMPY
ichthus.info/CaseForChrist/Archeology/intro.html
amazon.com/Beyond-Bomb-Werner-Heisenberg-Science/dp/179408987X
cds.cern.ch/record/807927/files/0411246.pdf?version=1
rense.com/general96/JesusIsraelite.html
youtube.com/watch?v=mD_WuRZkbCQ
google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5499911/amp/Richard-Dawkins-claims-eat-lab-grown-human-meat.html
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/212567867/
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazarene_(sect)
twitter.com/AnonBabble

also STOP being lazy and walk your dog.

>does being jewish automatically make you wrong?
Yes except in unbelievably rare circumstances
/thread

Attached: 1560231927984.jpg (682x515, 23K)

You are a dog.

What do you know?

All I care about is keeping our countries white, that's it. I'm also Traditional Catholic, really good for my spirit and finding a trad woman to create a happy family.

stop licking your balls

jesusneverexisted.com

jesus wasn't

Pol is so ignorant about the Bible and it's context, what you call "jews" are a sect of jews after the second temple and the ones Jesus said to follow "men's laws" (talmud) but not God's law (Torah)
You don't even know that the jews are just one of the 13 tribes of israel and that they stole the name for political reasons
m.youtube.com/watch?v=SHnaBBbgMPY

>You are a dog.
>What do you know?
Jews in Jesus’ day sometimes referred to Gentiles as “dogs.” In Greek, this word is kuon, meaning “wild cur” (Matthew 7:6; Luke 16:21; Philippians 3:2). Non-Jews were considered so unspiritual that even being in their presence could make a person ceremonially unclean (John 18:28). Much of Jesus’ ministry, however, involved turning expectations and prejudices on their heads (Matthew 11:19; John 4:9–10). According to Matthew’s narrative, Jesus left Israel and went into Tyre and Sidon, which was Gentile territory (Matthew 15:21). When the Canaanite woman approached and repeatedly asked for healing, the disciples were annoyed and asked Jesus to send her away (Matthew 15:23).
At this point, Jesus explained His current ministry in a way that both the woman and the watching disciples could understand. At that time, His duty was to the people of Israel, not to the Gentiles (Matthew 15:24). Recklessly taking His attention from Israel, in violation of His mission, would be like a father taking food from his children in order to throw it to their pets (Matthews 15:26). The exact word Jesus used here, in Greek, was kunarion, meaning “small dog” or “pet dog.” This is a completely different word from the term kuon, used to refer to unspiritual people or to an “unclean” animal.

>jesusneverexisted.com
>jesus wasn't
Sure heathen
ichthus.info/CaseForChrist/Archeology/intro.html

A jew is a jew is a jew. Only a jew would try to muddy the waters
Eat a dick banana nigger

Attached: 1560841387657.jpg (750x591, 48K)

>does being a jew automatically make you wrong?
yes, same with being a dirty spic rat.

chieeellloooooooossssssss

>A jew is a jew is a jew. Only a jew would try to muddy the waters
>Eat a dick banana nigger
It's a shame you think that way, at least 80% of the world population are israelites, descendants of Jacob, mostly from Ephraim and Manasseh
>And his father refused, and said, I know it, my son, I know it: he also shall become a people, and he also shall be great: but truly his younger brother shall be greater than he, and his seed shall become a multitude of nations.
>nations, plural

>hey pagan, remember how you place an emphasis on race?
>well, stop doing that, mmmkay?

Wrong

Attached: 7667876867.jpg (790x987, 168K)

Attached: 67876876.jpg (804x801, 155K)

It means Christians are actually Jews.

>Jacob's brother, Esau, was a chad hairy ginger that was a master hunter and ancestor of conquerors that was such a rockstar he gave up his birthright and still became wealthy af
>Jacob was a sneaky jew and decieved his father into getting a blessing and fucked Esau out of his birthright
A JEW
IS A JEW
IS A FUCKING JEW
NIGGER

Attached: 1523592452839.gif (500x382, 167K)

As a fellow jew I think we should shut our fucking mouths before the goyim shut them for us

Attached: 45654.jpg (1276x715, 93K)

>‘Two nations are in your womb, and two peoples from within you will be separated; one people will be stronger than the other, and the elder will serve the younger.’
Second, Rivka had watched the twins grow up. She knew that Esau was a hunter, a man of violence. She had seen that he was impetuous, mercurial, a man of impulse, not calm reflection. She had seen him sell his birthright for a bowl of soup. She had watched while he “ate, drank, rose and left. So Esau despised his birthright” (Gen. 25: 34). No one who despises his birthright can be the trusted guardian of a covenant intended for eternity.
Third, just before the episode of the blessing we read: “When Esau was forty years old, he married Judith daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and also Basemath daughter of Elon the Hittite. They were a source of grief to Isaac and Rivka”(Gen. 26: 34). This too was evidence of Esau’s failure to understand what the covenant requires. By marrying Hittite women he proved himself indifferent both to the feelings of his parents and to the self-restraint in the choice of marriage partner that was essential to being Abraham’s heir.
The blessing had to go to Jacob. If you had two sons, one indifferent to art, the other an art-lover and aesthete, to whom would you leave the Rembrandt that has been part of the family heritage for generations? And if Isaac did not understand the true nature of his sons, if he was “blind” not only physically but also psychologically, might it not be necessary to deceive him? He was by now old, and if Rivka had failed in the early years to get him to see the true nature of their children, was it likely that she could do so now?

As always you talk with your ignorance
Isaac fully understood the nature of his two sons. He loved Esau but this did not blind him to the fact that Jacob would be the heir of the covenant. Therefore Isaac prepared two sets of blessings, one for Esau, the other for Jacob. He blessed Esau (Gen. 27: 28-29) with the gifts he felt he would appreciate: wealth and power: “May God give you heaven’s dew and earth’s richness – an abundance of grain and new wine” – that is, wealth. “May nations serve you and peoples bow down to you. Be lord over your brothers, and may the sons of your mother bow down to you” – that is, power. These are not the covenantal blessings.
The covenantal blessings that God had given Abraham and Isaac were completely different. They were about children and a land. It is this blessing that Isaac later gave Jacob before he left home (Gen. 28: 3-4): “May God Almighty bless you and make you fruitful and increase your numbers until you become a community of peoples” – that is, children. “May He give you and your descendants the blessing given to Abraham, so that you may take possession of the land where you now reside as a foreigner, the land God gave to Abraham” – that is, land. This was the blessing Isaac had intended for Jacob all along. There was no need for deceit and disguise.

he was & yahweh was worshiped long before jews did which means he's a pagan god.

>does being jewish automatically make you wrong?
No, there must be 4-5 good jews out there somewhere.

Why do I care? Jacob is still a sneaky Jew that needed handouts, lies, God and his mummy in order to succeed and Esau didn't. Also:
>But when you grow restless, you will throw his (Jacob's) yoke from off your neck.

>But when you grow restless, you will throw his (Jacob's) yoke from off your neck.
kind of puts everything into perspective, doesn't it?

Attached: 1566694671260.jpg (600x604, 99K)

remember when the natsocs thought nuclear physics was jewish science and exiled every scientist kike out of their country?

no, please remind me with sources

amazon.com/Beyond-Bomb-Werner-Heisenberg-Science/dp/179408987X
Beyond the Bomb: Werner Heisenberg and Jewish Science

>E Michael Jones
Isn't he the guy who called Hitler a homosexual, and he used Idra as a source ?

Jesus fulfilled the entire codex of Judaism, though. Therefore, in denying His place, Khazarians have destroyed their ancestors, as they have destroyed themselves.

why are you implying that Jesus is Judaism incarnate?

cds.cern.ch/record/807927/files/0411246.pdf?version=1
go to page 4

lol no

"no" what? unfortunately EMJ shoah'd (hid) his own channel so I can't extract the exact names of these german scientists that started making a fool out of themselves by calling nuclear physics jewish science

it's funny how no one besides the pedophile prophet came up with these names before, despite the entire jewish aparatus being geared toward smearing national socialists.

btw, why does EMJ focus so much on nazis? Is there an ulterior motive here?

>no one besides the pedophile prophet
what the fuck are you even talking about? is it possible for you stop acting like a retard for one second and say exactly what you mean?

there must be another source besides EMJ, fuentes, surely. This is a pretty big claim

yes it's called looking at the bibliographic sources and searching each name cited on the paper I shared, you fucking retard

so share them if you want to prove a point.
so far all we have is EMJ, a rabid christcuck who said that Hitler was a homosexual

A.D. Beyerchen: Scientists under Hitler – Politics and the Physics Community in the Third
Reich. Yale University Press, New Haven, London (1977), ISBN 0-300-01830-4.
U. Deichmann: Chemists and Biochemists during the National Socialist Era.
Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 41 (8) 1310-1328 (2002).
K. Fischer: Changing Landscapes of Nuclear Physics – A scientometric Study on the social
and cognitive Position of German-speaking Emigrants within the Nuclear Physics.
Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York (1993), ISBN 0-3875-6480-2.
K. Hentschel (Editor): Physics and National Socialism - An Anthology of Primary Sources.
Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Boston, Berlin (1996), ISBN 3-7643-5312-0, 0-8176-5312-0.
J. Medawar, D. Pyke: Hitler´s Gift - Scientists who fled Nazi Germany.
Judy Piatkus Publishers, London (2001), ISBN 0-7499-2239-7.

Attached: braindrain.jpg (1060x1652, 519K)

Did you know the name Jesus literally translates to "salvation" in Hebrew?
Don't beleive me? Just translate ישועה on google translate and see for yourself

as far as I know, the nuclear bomb was made possible by discoveries made in 1938 in laboratories in Berlin. But what I'm really interested in is your claim, which as a christcuck, I'm sure you want to leave implicit. Are you claiming that a nation cannot survive without jewish people?

Jesus wasn't a Jew.

rense.com/general96/JesusIsraelite.html

Attached: 3c4589d96b9fdeb59d1c25637772e93a1ae7959f.jpg (1400x1400, 792K)

Yes, and, according to EMJ, not little thanks to Heisenberg who despite being harrassed endlessly by gestapo still stood within his country even during the post-war years.
To the rest of your post, I'll simply dismiss it as image-board binging retardation.
"as a christcuck" as if being a christcuck mattered in my argument in the OP
"leave implicit" aka YOU bringing a strawman cause you cannot make a successful counter-argument to what I said in the OP
>Are you claiming that a nation cannot survive without jewish people?
said strawman you're trying to bring out here. I can only say what I can say, afterwards it's up to you to take it or to extrapolate from thin air what was never said to satisfy your ego

these too are also part of the problem. I'd respect it if it were only for the sake of history and indeed to any historian this should be owed it's due diligence, but if you're trying to defend the message this way you're still doing it on a racial basis and not on what was said itself

No, heisenberg had nothing to do with the discoveries of 1938. But that's neither here nor there.
The real issue is the latter part of my post. Can the West survive without jewish people?

the west was wrecked by jews, what do you think?

it's a simple yes or no question. I know you want to slime, but it's pretty straightforward.

spics are the perfect brown mutt slaves for christianity. Youre fucking bipedal great apes. Your ancestors walked on 4 legs. Your book is fake and gay and youre a faggot for pushing your brainwashing cult on everyone. Youre villains. Satanists who dont even realize it.

are you retarded?
can the west survive without jews? yes
are we done now?

youtube.com/watch?v=mD_WuRZkbCQ

[other guy here]
The West can't survive WITH Jews

He was not a jew because jewness was not passed down matrilinearly at that point. jesus' true father was pantera the arian, and his mother was mary the jewess
1

>Your ancestors walked on 4 legs.
according to english science so did yours
>Your book is fake and gay and youre a faggot for pushing your brainwashing cult on everyone. Youre villains. Satanists who dont even realize it.
Then so be it, let christianity be a message of cult brainwashing, but at the very least, judge it by its own merit and not because a kike was pushing it (or galilee )

Kikes are literally the opposite of Christ.

Attached: Jews - Kikes.jpg (686x679, 102K)

you stupid spic, I thought you were OP. fuck you

you're all missing the point, hotdamn I wonder if anyone will ever understand in this board and this is euro-time Jow Forums when the posters are noticeably less retarded
can anyone understand what I'm trying to say in the OP?

>Can the West survive without jewish people?
That question doesn't make sense since we don't know if you're talking about some sect of judaism or the people from the tribe of Judah
In any case you're probably an israeliste yourself, so I don't understand the self hate

>does being jewish automatically make you wrong?

Attached: 155248739648494.jpg (600x315, 21K)

the aussies are back in town

Attached: memes.jpg (360x396, 21K)

>Youre villains
Yet the whole NWO elite hates us
Nice try shill, the satanic cunts are you "evolutionist" atheists (well, part of, there's also the trannies, commies, etc)
google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5499911/amp/Richard-Dawkins-claims-eat-lab-grown-human-meat.html

non-whites need not reply

Jesus was anti-Judaism. Why do you think he was killed? And who do you think killed him? Remember he started an entirely different religion and had so many believers that pretty much nobody believed in Judaism anymore. From the fact that our time system is based entirely around His birth to the fact that the entire western world, including secular people celebrates Christian holidays (like Christmas and Easter) but not Jewish ones (like Hanukah and Yom Kippur), to the fact that there is only one nation in earth that exists as a Jewish nation, it eats them alive that nobody is paying attention to their Jewish bullshit, and it’s all because of a man named Jesus, who had the courage to call them out for exactly what (((they))) are. Remember that the next time some faggot pagan shill tries to say you “worship a kike”. Remember where the word “kike” comes from.

Attached: 4AE3FE63-329E-469F-8BA3-2B214C408776.jpg (686x679, 83K)

>can anyone understand what I'm trying to say in the OP?
They can't, 90% of pol is composed of retards and ignorants
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/212567867/

>Jesus was anti-Judaism
Meh, that's debatable, Jesus did say he didn't come to abolish the law and the prophets, and there were the Nazarenes in the beginning (the jews that accepted jesus teachings but still followed the old testament or at least most of it)
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazarene_(sect)

Well he opposed it enough to start Christianity. Otherwise why wouldn’t he say “don’t follow me, I am not a god lets just be good little Jews!”? He obviously saw very deep problems in Judaism that couldn’t be resolved so he had to basically start over with a new faith (and the New Testament) And while the New Testament doesn’t completely obsolete the Old Testament (Jewish texts), particularly the Ten Commandments, it does change a great number of things