Did He Ever Regret it?

Well he did say that "if Hitler invaded hell he'd side with the devil"

In hindsight aiding the soviets was a mistake that was blindingly obvious when stalin's t-34's were attacking them just a few years later

>Do you think he ever had a moment of clarity where he thought
"I buggered it all up"

Probably as he did not get reelected

Attached: CZgJq7BWAAI9UQJ.jpg (1200x834, 270K)

Jewchill was a freemason jewish puppet

In a speech long after the war, he said, “We slaughtered the wrong pig.”

He was the one who as soon as the war ended wanted to go invade russia

He was a complete retard to boot. Germany offered him peace multiple times after the fall of France, but he continuously refused. What did he think would happen? That Britain could wing it against the entirety of Western and Central Europe? There was no expectation of Soviet intervention at the time

Attached: britain gave up its empire.png (1257x848, 108K)

>be churchill
>be american
>ruin europe
What the fuck is wrong with americans?

blaming all of America for FDR's slimey kike tactics is a lot like blaming the British for Churchill's slimey kike tactics

>That Britain could wing it against the entirety of Western and Central Europe?

That quite literally was what happened, Germany was not winning the air war

>>Gave the whole of Eastern Europe over to Marxism
Nigger that was FDR, Churchill warned him about Stalin

>brits
>regret

Yeah. People will talk up him working with the banker Jews. But its not that he didn't know Jews were bad news, he gave plenty of talks about how bad the Bolshevik Jews were for example. He just didn't realize that there are no "Patriotic" Jews and whoever you sided with, even pragmatically, you still lose.

His quote about "Hitler's only crime was challenging the international banks" came after the war. 20/20 hindsight.

Attached: 1445997564653.jpg (720x618, 51K)

Attached: Churchill.png (703x329, 298K)

I wasnt talking about president hotwheels your fucking retard.

He's from Kent, too, which is supposed to be peak Anglo-Saxon territory, kek.

They won the Battle of Britain over England's home turf, but they weren't getting anywhere with bombing raids over German-controlled Europe. That means that they had no way of damaging Germany's industrial capacity, while, while Germany was able to cripple Britain's through U-boat campaigns. And remember that Germany's industrial capacity wasn't being fully utilized at the time, either, so a war of attrition in the air would've inevitably gone in favor of the Axis. There is no realistic scenario where Britain is able to win against Germany single-handedly.

He thought only Bolsheviks wanted to destroy the West, and was an alcoholic with a lifestyle funded by a Jewish group called “the Focus”
m.youtube.com/watch?v=WY9LkGg45g8

He was a drunk, bipolar, speed addict.

Imagine if he saw Britain now.

>And remember that Germany's industrial capacity wasn't being fully utilized at the time, either, so a war of attrition in the air would've inevitably gone in favor of the Axis. There is no realistic scenario where Britain is able to win against Germany single-handedly

And it never was, they didn't surpass British production alone until 1944,

Attached: main-qimg-e253472327806bf41991bd196ea4f96f.png (500x465, 48K)

They covered his cigar bills. He was broke towards the end.

He was a moronic drunk who only cared about his own career.

Drunks only care about their next drink.

Yes, that's my point. Berlin still acted like a city at peace until 1944, because the Germans were slow to mobilize their society for total war. Even then, they didn't lag that far behind British aircraft production. Now imagine that Germany isn't busy fighting on the Eastern Front and can focus all of its industrial energy on U-boat and aircraft production for the Western theater. How can Britain win? Even if the British pulled off a few miracles, a fully mobilized German-occupied Europe would swamp them

>financed by Jews
Also, his mother was jewish

Matrilineal. So that makes Churchill jewish

>How can Britain win?

Stuff like this isn't exactly a "miracle"

youtu.be/1yXxc4ApxmQ

Attached: Screenshot_2019-08-25-14-37-15.png (1280x720, 963K)

Churchill was such drunken tool, he probably wasn't aware of much anything, desu.

test

Are you implying everything didn't go down exactly according to plan?

Attached: 587.gif (400x225, 1.26M)

Clementine was a handsome woman. Id fuck her

Attached: hello i am huwhite25.jpg (560x597, 63K)

Churchill and Hitler were both prescribed amphatemines. Goddamn speed junkies

he was a faggot a pedo a liar a coward a drunk a junkie etc etc.

greatest brit of all time

Attached: 1566729416390.jpg (1254x1787, 553K)

No. He did the best he could. In fact, he drew up plans to take on the USSR at the end of WWII. Called opperation unthinkable. Major Problem is the Soviet Army was massive. A war with them would have resulted in us getting kicked out of Europe. We would Nuke USSRs cities with Strategic bombers, but the whole affair would have been a mess. No there was nothing we could have done except immiately subject the world to WWIII. And that would have been horrific.

>trying to defend the Treaty of Versailles
Kek, and you're forgetting that Germany never would've invaded Western Europe if the Brits and Frogs hadn't declared war on them first. Without that declaration, the Germans would've been content to satisfy their lebensraum autism in the East without bothering French or English interests. And just to nitpick,
>we want you to surrender and demobilize and let us do whatever we want
Hitler offered the Brits white peace numerous times after the fall of France

>A war with them would have resulted in us getting kicked out of Europe.
Part of this meme gives Patton's thoughts on a possible war with the USSR. Whether he's right or not is up for debate, but it worth noting that the Soviet army in Central Europe wasn't as massive as it might first appear. A lot of their divisions had been reduced to half strength by that point, unsurprisingly

Attached: patton we lost.jpg (1018x4799, 2.94M)

True. Hitler would have cut a deal with someone sober and judicious.

>signs munchen agreement which promises not to invade czechoslovakia
>invades it anyway
>sets his sights on poland
>poland, britain and france sign an alliance to stop him from invading the world
>invade poland
>britain and france declare war
>80 years later
MUH JOOOS AND CHURCHILL SUCH WARMONGERS, HITLER ONLY WANTED PEACE DON'T YOU SEE?
>show him evidence on the contrary
OMG YOU SHILL YOU'RE SO BRAINWASHED BY THE JOOOS, DON'T YOU KNOW POLAND KILLED GERMANS??
>Bloody Sunday was a sequence of events that took place between 3 and 4 September 1939. WW2 started on the 1st of september
NUH UH HITLER AND GOEBBELS THE GREATEST TRUTH TELLERS SAID POLISH KILLED LIKE 1 MILLION GERMANS BRO
>Show him that all historians unanimously say that it is Nazi propaganda and that nothing really happened, while also showing evidence that the germans created a false-flag event at the border, to deceive media and germans to believe polish started the war.
BRO YOURE JUST TOO BRAINWASHED BY THE JOOOOS OBVIOUSLY, SORRY I DON'T DEBATE SHILLS, DON'T YOU KNOW CHURCHILL HATED GERMANY???

Attached: 88c.png (700x566, 60K)

This cartoon would be a lot more compelling if Churchill hadn't first rejected Mussolini's offers of alliance prior to the war (yes, you read that correctly) and then Hitler's offers of peace at the war's outset.

Why did Shitler look like a jew too?

Fuck off jungle bunny

If the war had begun with a surprise drive deep into the Soviet Union what makes you think that they wouldn't (correctly) assume that they could also do the same to France?

Yes and had churchill not remained in war with hitler FDR wouldnt have been able to give it to stalin in the first place.
What exactly IS your argument?
>Video
kek.
Supposed "Salt" about causing the rape of millions of pubescent german girls and giving eastern Europe over to Bolshevism.
>(lol why would you be mad about that goy)
Staying in the war with germany long term was on objectively bad decision for england.
Had they joined forces they could have crushed marxims once and for all and probably ended up with an EXPANDED empire in the middle east (Iran, Saudi Arabia, russian caucuses)
And probably new colonies in the far east as well.
Instead of you know litterally loosing your whole damn empire and becoming the bitch of the US.

Attached: 809c69057ab730d10393db832ab5b29c (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1).jpg (3000x1688, 737K)

Eh.
I think people over estimate the russian bear at the end of the war in most of these analsis.
The truth is the russians had lost tens of millions of men in the war and the US had only lost a half a million.
More over even at the BEGINING of the war the US had about 1/3 more population then the USSR.
It would have been ugly
But if our governments hadnt been covertly wanting marxism to spread in the first place.
We could have beat the russians.

>Hitler was bad so that means Churchill must have been good
???

>being bluepilled about the kikes
Don't worry, enough time on this board will cure you of that. Your pasta is pretty shit, though. I haven't said anything about supposed Polish killings of Germans or whatever, but I guess leftists need a script no matter the debate. If you really want me to talk about Poland for some reason, though
>invades it anyway
...then it's worth reminding that Poland participated in the partition of Czechoslovakia. Unsurprising, since Czechoslovakia was a multicultural abomination with the kind of disregard for nationality and ethnicity that characterized much of Versailles.
>poland, britain and france sign an alliance to stop him from invading the world
"Hitler wanted to conquer the world" is one of the most brainlet takes on WW2 out there. I'm surprised it's still repeated even in a pasta like this.
Even in 1940, Hitler personally expected about a million Germans to die in a campaign against France. It's not a question of whether the Germans were confident of being able to defeat France, but a question of why they would want to go to war in the first place? Hitler's ideas for "living space" were focused entirely on the East

>Show him that all historians unanimously say that it is Nazi propaganda
Are you honestly so dim as to believe any major western government, armed with the blood thristy and huge intelligence appartuses they currently have, are going to allow mainstream decent from the literal propaganda that justifies the state?
They dont even allow the holocaust to be questioned in all of central europe.
Get the fuck over yourself.

Attached: countrieswhereholocaustdenitalisillegal.png (1280x650, 161K)

Oof.

Attached: The nazis were trying to take over the world.png (1182x788, 100K)