Will the US be governable in the future?

Politicians will have to be even more politically correct than ever to maintain their voter base. At the same time, voters, especially those on the right, will get more and more disappointed with the performance of their candidates. People are waking up from the hypnosis that the media and other institutions have pushed for the last century. How do these forces interact with other forces to shape national stability in 20 years? 50 years? A century?

Attached: F70673D9-BC3B-4C0D-B0F5-5C6A6DDFB522.jpg (1600x900, 250K)

Other urls found in this thread:

rawstory.com/2019/08/trump-allies-have-been-reading-a-bizarre-fascist-manifesto-that-encourages-young-men-to-prepare-for-military-rule/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

It isn't now.

use a heavy enough boot and they'll fall right in line.

It'll be more difficult to govern a population of 330,000,000 people - which continues to grow due to an immigration policy gone absolute retard - in the United States, especially urbanized areas...

Get ready now

We’re WAY over 300m in the US right now.

The UK government is similar to the US government in this aspect

It's not perfect but it's not an oppressive dictatorship
Politicians will say what they think will pass well with the public. If the public gradually becomes very dissappointed in them and wants stronger action on politically incorrect issues, the politicians will pick up on it and campaign for it, and it will become less politically incorrect.

People are still very shy to talk about things like immigration and race, not because they think they'll get arrested, but because they're not sure if the other person will share the same view, (and if they don't it's gonna be trouble)
but if the situation with immigration becomes so much worse that virtually everyone in the country has had first hand experience with violence and murder as a result of it, they will be more open about it being something they don't like, and as a result, politicians will too

The big media and corporations and law makers are only powerful when situations aren't serious, but when shit hits the fan, the public takes charge

>it’s not a dictatorship
That’s all about perspective. I think the US has strong left authoritarian traits and I see the UK being more extreme. “XRW” propaganda, knife bans and literal censors on the web
Are you sure the politicians will bend to the will of voters? In the US the politicians are still cucked on race. They pretend it’s a non issue. That’s representative democracy for you.

after empire us will become dictatorship

Attached: Screenshot from 2019-08-26 00-45-11.png (429x533, 112K)

Live free, or die.

there are at least 3 different people that predicted the end of the us in the last ten years
one guy from mit

guy who predicted the end of the soviet union
explained it was too many contradictions between what people believed /wanted and reality

Attached: Screenshot from 2019-08-26 01-10-32.png (628x830, 126K)

Igor Panarin

Attached: Screenshot from 2019-08-26 01-17-59.png (593x358, 32K)

Attached: Screenshot from 2019-08-26 01-19-55.png (443x582, 173K)

Yascha Mounk, The People Vs. Democracy

Attached: Screenshot from 2019-08-26 01-27-24.png (638x726, 418K)

Attached: Screenshot from 2019-08-26 01-08-30.png (638x337, 76K)

All massive nations in history either split apart into smaller ones or become totalitarian

Attached: image.jpg (598x894, 153K)

>right-wing protesters with the star of david and suspiciously large noses

Attached: 1566224100650.jpg (739x581, 444K)

Democracy is inherently the worst system of government and by its nature is ungovernable at such large populations; take the monarchy pill.
>rulers with a vested interest in the prosperity of their people, rather than caretaker officials
>each elected official has a limited time-span in which he can rob his citizens before another robber baron does the same and hastily makes near-sighted decisions; a king's lifetime is dedicated to increasing the value of his country and the quickest way to this is a prosperous community of subjects.

>but muh lord-protector of an infant king
Yeah we already have those, and elections are held for them every 4 years

Attached: Louis_XIV_of_France.jpg (1390x1975, 2.38M)

probably ends up stressed for resources to a degree where old fashioned state law takes over, but in districts with warlords.

Attached: Screenshot from 2019-08-26 02-04-55.png (633x783, 348K)

rawstory.com/2019/08/trump-allies-have-been-reading-a-bizarre-fascist-manifesto-that-encourages-young-men-to-prepare-for-military-rule/

Political allies of President Donald Trump have been reading a bizarre fascist manifesto that encourages young right-wing men to join the military and then use the knowledge in combat they gain to prepare for military rule.

>People are waking up from the hypnosis that the media and other institutions have pushed for the last century

This right here is the reason why there are so many niggers now in advertisements, and why they’re replacing white roles in Hollywood.

Alaska going to Russia? I though it would be Japan or Philippines at lest.

You can govern any society so as long as you demoralize them without them knowing they are demoralized. Pump their diet full of sugar, give them a plethora of porn, provide a wide selection of alcohol and drugs and you've basically enslaved an entire population without firing a single bullet.