The most viable policy to combat athropogenic climate change is closing the borders and ending all migration to high...

The most viable policy to combat athropogenic climate change is closing the borders and ending all migration to high carbon footprint Western nations with declining populations.

Why do retarded science-denying leftists want to destroy our planet so much with their idiotic migration policies?

Attached: 1552140140119.jpg (750x1251, 643K)

everyone is just confused all the time in this reality

Attached: 1544489160942.png (517x476, 42K)

truth is, they dont actually care about preventing it from becoming a bigger problem. they only care about climate "solutions" as long as 1) white people pay the price because "they are the ones that caused it" and 2) western nations finally give up the franchise to the legions of brown savages

YES

I keep saying this. They wont want to hear it but we need to promote this. Create pro Extintion Rebellion twitters pushing this narrative, force them to embrace it.

until all jews are gone this will remain the pain

Attached: monkey hug.gif (309x200, 548K)

There is no such thing as athropogenic climate change, though, so...


But closing the borders to migration is always a great idea, yeah.

Attached: 1489744865784.jpg (203x353, 21K)

>that fucking adorable gif
user you must be a big ol softie

Attached: 1540215824769.png (409x436, 164K)

Sauce? Genuinely curious.

How stupid are you

Looks more like he was getting ready to shoot heroin and his dad went over and hugged him and said, "Don't do it son, daddy loves you."

And he was like, "Sheeeeeeeit".

god I hate costhots so fuking much.

But our emissions are making life impossible in those poorer countries. So they have to come and live with us. Understand? Good.

Attached: 5ce46ngunguecngedhnh.jpg (495x495, 26K)

It is kinda weird how we’re told to not have kids (to save the planet) but then are told that because we didn’t have kids we now have to import millions of people from the third world. Do we need less people, or more?

Idiotic, apparently, because googling only nets me results of the migration that climate change is going to cause, I can't find any studies that talk about how limiting immigration would lower global carbon emissions.

Could you enlighten me, Ameribro?

She isnt even fat why does she has stretchmarks?

RARE FLAG.

Pic is true, stretch marks and cellulite don't make her ugly, being a vapid. selfie taking cosplay whore does though.

Attached: 1552936726077.png (700x900, 282K)

>daddy loves you

Attached: 1554319404576.gif (267x260, 1.91M)

back in the 90s we had public campains to control birthrates, they were succesful.. now the gorvernment tell us we need inmigrants to keep the population...

Attached: 1984.jpg (500x791, 65K)

Attached: 1541190829392.png (437x407, 12K)

She may has lost some weight since puberty. My sister has it too and she is quite thin.

>high carbon footprint Western nations
White nations consume more carbon dioxide than they produce via large scale industrial agriculture. It's the shitskin countries that are net CO2 producers.