Lets settle this once and for all

Adolf Hitler speaks to Americans
bitchute.com/video/DfQZXx71J6MV/

Attached: 1503090254361.jpg (922x482, 150K)

Only the truly most ungodly horrible books.

Wtf

Attached: A2D07586-446F-434F-84B5-CB9A5C60CE25.jpg (328x225, 17K)

>burning tranny literature
Wtf i love the nahtzees now

Attached: 454353543534.jpg (800x711, 66K)

Your question is too broad. If you are freezing to death in a library....there.

Attached: Books Suck.jpg (568x335, 54K)

In my opinion, it is okay to burn books if everything in the book is potentially harmful to your people.
Something like, "Timmy's First Dilation" I am okay with not existing in any school in the nation. If not burning it, I'd keep copies in some sort of vault for academic study on Jewish subversion to prevent future instances of it.

Absolutely.
Books arent fucking sacred.

The Romans burned down an entire library and it cost us nearly a thousand years of scientific advancement, if they didn't burn books, you would be in the ethnostate on Mars, fucking your synthetic aryan waifu.

BIGBRAIN

Christians did that, retard.

Attached: 1558840261410.png (856x1578, 371K)

I believe as a principle that there is a time and a place for everything, and if it seems otherwise, you're just not being very imaginative.

This guy:
has the right idea.

The Nazis fucking banned Otto Dix, a WWI veteran and painter, and put all his shit in the Museum of Degenerate Art because he was against that war.

This guy fought in the Somme, Russia, Flanders, he was a true war hero and when he came back he made paintings about disfigured veterans and how shittily they were treated by the government and the people.

And the Nazis pretty much called him a jew because he hated that war.

FUCK the Nazis.

the more it goes, the more books are to be burnt.
preferably with their authors

No, but the burning of degenerate books was justified and so I feel little remorse for the loss of valuable 'history'.

What are you in the day after tomorrow?

Trans "research' sure burn it.

>war hero
An oxymoron. How about u go suck some dix u warloving trailer trash

No it's censorship

Only if you burn the writers aswell

Wtf. Honorary american. Books are for fags. Its americsn culture to think this. If you say different most likely youre not american or you went to (((college))) and were taught dude books are based here read this diary of this girl.

Also to add. Every book we read in class had lessons of diversity or finding common grounds with different people. Books are a tool used by THEM to brainwash americsns at a young age. Fuck books I'll choose radio every time. The only way to hear a story and use your immagination is to listen to listen to some classic rock about a hard day at work but a woman in the kitchen is the best thing.

I regularly go to local "pop up libraries" and burn the degenerate stuff that Jews leave there and you should too

Only pornography

Is the world better off today? I mean, the Nazis lost n shit.

So why do we have so much faggotry and pedophilia today after they lost? Shouldn't we be living in some type of paradise?

Attached: jews_money.jpg (500x490, 67K)

Its ok to burn faggots thats for sure

this guy gets it.
gender, sex and reproduction are all scientifically different things, though in history gender and sex were used interchangeably because of the human condition of concrete gender (unlike many fishes)

reproduction is the act of reproducing oneself, be it through budding or sex or cloning or whatever else have you.

sex is the ACT of exchanging genetic information FOR THE PURPOSE of reproduction. genetic information is oft exchanged for other reasons, especially in the microbial and botanical worlds.

GENDER is the mode of higher animals by which gametes they produce. males produce sperm, exclusively, and females produce eggs, exclusively.

agian, on the fishes: some fish can switch gender during their lifetime. once an aggressive female becomes male after the death of the older male for example, it stops producing sperm and begins producing eggs. the process in non reversible.

in some salmonids, there ate other "types" of male that appear to be female to sneak in on mating pairs and deposit his milt onto the females eggs. again, this fish is male, not female, because it produces sperm.

these are rock-solid, scientific terms that are not up for interpretation. it's measurable and objective. fuck everyone that thinks otherwise: they're just flat wrong.

>Is it ever okay to burn books?

Only the books of leftists.

Attached: 1555147038256.png (1200x905, 1.52M)

absolutely

Attached: hack lit.jpg (1600x1242, 318K)

It's better than burning coal, that I can tell you.

What the jews never tell you is that the Nazi's where burning pornography and Communist literature.

Only when you are otherwise going to die from hypotermia and you are already burned the bookshelf.

they didn't burn books by the thousands all around the country, it was just a symbolic act.
this

Feminazis did it two years ago.
If you're a socialist, ultimately, it's your duty.

Yes. Pic related.

Attached: 76E204CD-733C-43F6-92D3-24A0C9880026.jpg (1600x1150, 115K)

BURNING BOOKS. THEY ARE DOING THAT ALREADY, DUMMY

DELETING ENTIRE YOUTUBE CHANNELS

The war has already begun. by the time this is over, no one will no what a conservative viewpoint even looks like.

Yes

They took all the copies of those books. Trust me

yes if the books are yours

Attached: institute of sex research.jpg (540x493, 51K)

There is an exception to every rule.

We shouldnt ever tolerate the burning of books because it allows power to erase the evidence of their own guilt

Lmfao

Otto Dix is based though

No.

Ideas behave as living things, that use humans for hosts. Ideas have more reproductive ability the closer they get to truth. Obviously, propaganda can artificially advance ideas. The reason people burn books is because they don't believe that their own propaganda + advantage of truth is enough to defeat contradictory, harmful ideas. To burn a book is to admit your idea is too weak to stand on its own. Reprehensible books are good arguments against their own ideas, to any sane person. If you disagree, maybe your ideas are weak, and should be culled from society.

That's the only good answer.
Man I wish.
I just read 'Red Mars' (a sci-fi novel, written by woman no less) and it's depressing that I can see the colonisation of Mars going exactly that route.

>Hirschfeld was targeted by the right-wing for being Jewish...
>co(founder of the first homosexual emancipation in the world
>pioneer advocate for transgender people
every single time

No all books should be allowed to exist

Of course it is. Every single regime burns books. Commies and nazies alike. Democrats too (well, they ban them and jail the authors or the librarians who sell them instead, like the owner of Librería Europa).
If the enemy burns your books and you let theirs be distributed it puts you in quite a pickle, fren.
The common folk is just cattle. Politicians know this and act accordingly. Some have been bold enough to admit it publicly.
If you put garbage on Tv people will watch garbage and become garbage. If you put more sane stuff on Tv people will watch sane stuff and will become more sane.

if you are freezing

Germans had more freedom of speech under the NS government than they have today.

It's correct. That institute is where the first sexual reassignment surgery was conducted. They also houses marxist leaders. Also when he fled germany he helped organize world sexual congresses which were the origins of things like the abortion movement and the free love movement that gave birth to the "sexual revolution" in the 60s.

All modern day sexual degeneracy can be traced back to Hirschfeld. He even coined the term trans. You know those drag queen story times? Thats not original. Weimar Germany used to take kids on field trips to his institute to be indoctrinated.

He's a huge redpill. Also, guess his ethnicity

okay to burn anything owned by the state

Yes but only modern literature

Jews aren’t Roman

Some things need to be cleansed with fire. Why would such a universal purifier exist if we weren't supposed to use it?

Attached: 1556814667572.png (660x495, 308K)

It was a mistake. Had the books been available people would have been ready for the tricks earlier.

The romans didnt burn the library of Alexandria. Do you know who is accused of burning it? Julius fucking Caesar. Think that through. Caesar adopted and modified the Egyptian calendar. He deified himself taking after what Egyptian pharoahs did. Rome became an empire and entered the pax romana under augustus. They would end up expanding to their farthest reaches under trajan.

Now think that through. A man notorious for learning and adapting to his enemies, one who already copied quite a bit of Egyptian culture and science, and an empire that became one of the greatest the world has ever known shortly afterwards. Do you really think that Caesars burned those books? Really?

They stole them. They wouldnt advertise it though because knowing romes success came off the knowledge of the greeks and Egyptians (two subjugated peoples responsible for the library of Alexandria) would be bad for propaganda

Rome was accused of burning Alexandria decades before jesus was ever born. They didnt burn it though. Someone like caesar wouldnt have all that knowledge at his fingertips and destroy it. Hed steal it

This was their mistake. Most of what they destroyed was pornography and this pseudopsychology/sexual wissenschaft garbage. With the evidence completely gone, they're open to accusations of just being against knowledge so most people's ideas of the book burnings come from propaganda like Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade.

>looks around at clown world
the masses are easily manipulated fools so the answer is obvious