I'm making an animated film about the life of Alexander the Great. How many blacks should I put in it?

*was

Why do Americans always do this?
The story of Alexander the Great is so fantastical in itself, if you do your research and tell it right.
It is like if George Washington, after winning the Civil War, just didn’t stop and continued to conquer all of South America. And then more crazy shit happens.

All of them

>Why do Americans always do this?
Because we are the only culture capable of producing good films.

Attached: DE0AE52D-C140-45BF-AA5C-3B34042674B0.png (548x384, 11K)

this, but make them also 100% faggots, make sure Ptolemy is disabled, Antigonus is transgender, Cassander is a zoophile, Antipater is a weed smoker

Attached: 1503586384390.jpg (477x931, 77K)

make it all black.
set it in haiti, 1800s.

Attached: dns.png (600x400, 399K)

Make it 100% black but never mention it or play it up.

Depends how many slaves u will show in the film.

You are the only culture with no culture of your own so you steal and mend from others. You're all coping faggs

Because you're the only culture that's so hollow and fake. When your niggers say shit like "whyppypo have no cultcha" they think of you typical americans. Imagine having your culture questioned by literal niggers (not to mention sharing blood with them)

Nice job missing the point.

That said in Egypt you have a lot of opportunities to include blacks. Often as slaves.

Look at this fucking retard

Have the only blacks as slaves of Arabs who themselves appear only once.That is the only historically appropriate place to have them.

Ok Michael Bay.

Actually if an Alexander movie was made today it would be from te perspective of Darius and portray Alexander as a genhhis Khan like figure

Knowing them people like Ptolemy, Antipater and Antigonus themselves will be niggers

I like, your car.

This. Also make sure to put in lots of trans* people and give Alexander a furry fetish.

I'd unironically pay to watch this piece of comedy gold.

A movie focusing on Alexander vs Darius and all the political scheming and battles would be kinda kino, with the end being Darius fleeing in the desert or somewhere and *spoiler* finally being killed.
But you need sequels because the real fun starts afterward with Alexander conquering the world basically.

0% or 100% which ever makes people think about the absurdity of not putting 0% in it.

Attached: Eternal Anglo.jpg (900x900, 54K)

Attached: EVERYONE.gif (366x156, 1024K)

The better question is how many whites should be in it?
>answer- none

Wow. I did not know this.

Attached: businesscatstar.gif (500x500, 2.01M)

>It is not meant to be realistic, I'm thinking about having Greek gods and magic and stuff like that.
Make everyone a gay robot

>How many blacks should I put in it?
Well all of Egypt of course. Alexander should be Somalian. Anyone winning and to hand combat need to be nigged...so everyone should be nigged except for the pajeets, they're now white until the British invade in which case they go back brown.

Attached: nigger_caesar.jpg (375x600, 44K)

Just remember if you have 50% it actually equals 13%.

Make it so he never knew his dad

>Alexander was a child of WHITE Olympias and some random negro, let's say an olympic runner or something, who abandonned the child and later got adopted by the cuckold Philip.

Don't give them ideas

Attached: 1566756343970.jpg (499x481, 26K)

YES

Oh, better idea
>the negro father didn't abandon the child
>instead evil racist WHITE greeks got jealous of his powerful KANG skills in running and lynched him

Attached: 1499087930106.jpg (637x940, 86K)

I read one book on Alexander and it actually clearly stated several times he was a really fast runner.

Make his tutor, Aristotle, look like Tyler Perry.

When I learned Hercules was black, somehow it felt right.

Attached: 265px-Herakles_Farnese_MAN_Napoli_Inv6001_n01.jpg (265x464, 32K)

I think Alexander claimed descent from Hercules.

I was enjoying the Asha Logos videos until that part to be honest, because there's just no fucking way Hercules wasn't black and that lineage didn't make a whole lot of sense. It's possible though I guess, that ancestors can look wildly different. Alexander wasn't exactly white.

Thinking about it I think Asha Logos was talking about someone else though, but he said he had blonde hair or something like that.

Attached: Hercules my boy.jpg (850x1024, 299K)

Does anyone have those painted warrior statues with the bronze skin? That was another one that just seemed right to me. Those mostly naked jacked warriors with curly hair and helmets.

Attached: Hercules (Heracles), head of Roman statue (marble), 2nd century AD, (Portland Art Museum)..jpg (375x500, 47K)

one of these guys on the left

Attached: Memnon with Two Youth.jpg (500x375, 55K)

He was part-black, he was descended from Andromeda, who was black.

make it very serious but just have literally everyone be black

Found it

Attached: p05vg2y5.jpg (624x351, 26K)

put this dude in it

Attached: madman.jpg (800x1237, 209K)

I like the idea of blonde Greece but there's not a lot of evidence of it

Attached: Memnon2.jpg (800x1200, 127K)

Attached: p05vg18n.jpg (1280x720, 115K)

At least 3/5ths worth.

Just his dickwasher

all of them. make the voices range from "based black" to "ghetto nigger"

>after winning the civil war

The state of modern education

Attached: 1565376871971.jpg (452x582, 42K)

2%

Thats in effect what the revolution was but I don't think its what he means.

If you think about it. The Revolutionary War, was pretty much a civil war.

Yeah but I dont think its what the other poster was meaning. He just confused presidents.

Martin Sheen as Martin Luther King

Attached: martin-sheen_sc_768x1024.png (768x1024, 1.08M)

Ethiopian ELITES were white.

>How many blacks should I put in it?
how many pople die ?

>How many blacks should I put in it?
how many people die ?

there's one right herehow fucking retarded do you have to be to believe Ethiopians were ever white

Attached: tightly coiled curls and thick hair over the ears, the individualized expression, and the absence of (575x867, 83K)

>How many blacks should I put in it?
All of them.

Just put black at the end for the credits to go on

niggers?

>How many blacks should I put in it?
Enough to fill the slave pit.

As much as the Greeks themselves:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Aethiopians
>muh curly hair = black
WE WUZ KANGZ N SHIET

Also, even Ethiopians today are "black Caucasians", not Negroid.

alexander should be a black tranny with 2 dicks

Oh you're talking about Ethiopia as in the ancient name for Africa, and not modern day Ethiopia. Carry on then.

Attached: socratesz.jpg (423x497, 103K)

"Aethiopia" might've referred to all of Africa, but it even referred to parts of Asia. Point being, the Ethiopians/Horn Africans are Caucasoid. Not negroid.
White Ethiopians only confirm that there were such people all across the known region of sub-Saharan Africa, north of the equator.

They are negros(black skin) classified as Caucasoids because of what they achieved. In order to keep up the racist doctrine that had to happen. Ethiopia means "burnt face" as in blackened so the Greeks called Asians this too.

>White Ethiopians only confirm that there were such people all across the known region of sub-Saharan Africa, north of the equator.
Saharan Africa you mean. They didn't even know the place extended as far south as it does.

>They are negros(black skin) classified as Caucasoids because of what they achieved. In order to keep up the racist doctrine that had to happen. Ethiopia means "burnt face" as in blackened so the Greeks called Asians this too.
Yet they literally are Caucasoid, as are the Somalids. They have straight noses, skull shapes, etc.
It was even argued that the Tutsi were Hamitic.
>Saharan Africa you mean. They didn't even know the place extended as far south as it does.
Well yes, Saharan technically. Though the Horn is also south of the Sahara.

Being a caucasoid is like someone being weird. It has no objective reality. It's a classification with a loose definition. They're still negros -- they've always been called as such. When this word came about the people had literally no idea what a Bantu or Khoi person was, their only interactions were with North Africans and they were calling them all kinds of stuff relating to "black" words.
>Somalids. They have straight noses, skull shapes, etc.
Most east Africans don't really have the features you're talking about, and west and central Africans do have them sometimes, and I'm not just talking about the Tutsi.

Also before the Sahara desert, Africa wasn't so split like it is today. And that's where the "Hamatic" stock you're thinking of comes from. It's why you see similar phenotypes in some of the western tribes and vice versa.

>Well yes, Saharan technically. Though the Horn is also south of the Sahara.
It seems they didn't know about anything past Egypt but I'm not an expert, what do you think?

Attached: somalia2-0791.jpg (640x480, 105K)

50%

None.

Also you should not do Alexander the Great. Instead, do a documentary about Amina, the warrior queen of Nigeria.

And fill it with Whites, Chinese and Latinos

> When diversity comes to your middle class neighbourhood and you are trying to remember why your said it was a strength when you were voting to stick all the smelly brown people amongst the plebeians

Attached: Screenshot_19.jpg (354x253, 34K)

Put some black slaves.

do this one

Attached: BkIY1cUIgAAvFgj.jpg (599x631, 95K)

>Being a caucasoid is like someone being weird. It has no objective reality. It's a classification with a loose definition
It's literally just a skull shape.
>They're still negros -- they've always been called as such. When this word came about the people had literally no idea what a Bantu or Khoi person was, their only interactions were with North Africans and they were calling them all kinds of stuff relating to "black" words.
>It seems they didn't know about anything past Egypt but I'm not an expert, what do you think?
They had contact with Nubia and actual contact with Ethiopia, which was and is south of the Sahara.

Do a movie on the Mali empire, and fill it with white people.

>George Washington winning the civil war
Nigger

Attached: 2gpylg.jpg (326x523, 22K)

everyone should be black, its a great way of demonstrating the idiocy of modern film making, no matter what the fuck you produce and no matter the plot everyone should be pidgin or ebonic speaking niggers

Remake American Psycho only with ebonic speaking niggers. Set up shakespear plays only with niggers and go full "they dont think it be like it is, but it do"

EVERYTHING should have 100% black cast, documentaties about european royalties on the last 800 years should feature only black people.

Remake the fucking moonlanding with fucking niggers

If this one goes well I'm thinking about doing a Mansa Musa animation.

What skull shape is it? And more importantly, how are Somalians, arguably the worst African immigrants, not considered black?

Attached: 6494289187_4e28e99ebe_b.jpg (756x1024, 265K)

This is such an insult to my people. We’re not interested in honky culture. Nor will we pretend that it’s our own.

Dont be silly
The Enemy Leaders have to be White

>How many blacks should I put in it?
Do you want to make a good movie?
0.
Do you want brownie points?
All nigger cast.

> "Hey Jow Forums, are Italians white?"

Attached: Screenshot_20.jpg (465x174, 33K)

das rite we wuz caucasians n shiet

Attached: Bisharin girl.jpg (1023x724, 284K)

Make em all black. The fragile nigger ego needs to believe in was once a great man and not more related to gorillas. Poor fucking nogs.

ironic that you're talking about an ego while attacking a strawman

Attached: Louvre Black Roman.jpg (1200x1600, 280K)

Aleksandar Makedonski was Sarmatian like every of his warriors