Please sate my autism, Jow Forums

You could be right, but I don't see it.
Looks can be decieving.

If Brittany is mostly Anglo, I could live with that. Still wish they could've moved to the US instead.

Yeah, it's not easy being an ethnic purist these days. Thanks for your concern.

Attached: Martin_Sellner_(Porträt_Buchmesse_2017).jpg (1696x2192, 1.68M)

Nah; it's the phenotype of "Early European Farmers". No problem with him thus.

>If Brittany is mostly Anglo, I could live with that.
I wouldn't worry about it, with her clear anglo traits she's more white than him.

Identitarianism is pro jew? How?

he´s a bit jewish

I care more about if they are Austrian, rather than just "white". Just caring about whitness is an Am*rican thing.

Define what is Austrian then? By your standard some random guy comes to Austria he suddenly become a type of Austrian.

Example. If a Russian mutt comes to Austria then he might be considered as an Austrian with some slavic blood in your eyes.

Don't you know anything about it? Use google.

they both look kikeish

not every big or hooked nose is jewish, in fact most of them are not and the ones that end horizontally and have flesh on the end are probably not jewish. Sellner is obviously not a jew. I don't know what you think germanics look like but hooked noses are common

>t.yes i have a big nose

I meant ethnic Austrians. A (mostly) Germanic people.
Which is why Brittany's unclear ethnicity bothers me.
If she's mostly Germanic, fine. She's of similar blood to Martin (presumably).
If she's some Franco/Anglo/Spanish/Scottish/Russian/Subsaharan mutt, that's no good. Even if she is "white" then, she would still help dilute the Austrian bloodline.

Why are you making an OP about "germanic bloodlines" then? I'm sure they're Austrian if they're from Austria.

Ah you probably mean that their leaders are philosemites but I thought you meant the concept as a whole was pro jew hence the confusion

I think I made it clearer here

Jew and jew

>you actually expect me to explain myself?

>t. Probably part jewish and insecure

So how do you define you own race? Germanic?

> white

No white please. Half negro, light skin Latino, Arab without beard all can be considered as white here.

Many Germanics have big noses. Very few have the semitic style wings that curl up into looking like a 6. Most Germanic people with large/hooked noses still have straight wings, more akin to the Roman nose. But it's not completely unheard of either, I'm just saying what he looks like to me. To really know for sure with people you usually have to do genetic testing.

The concept of distinct nation states without supra national identity only began with the treaty of Westphalia and reached its peak in the 19th century.
European civilization has always been a cohesive entity encompassing all "white" people in Europe.
Saying "whiteness" is just an american concept is ignorant of your own history

He is correct. Look the old death camp photos. Most of those Jews don't have typical large nose. In fact many of them look no different from average German today. (Many German people can't pass Hitler's Aryan standard to be honest)

No, I don't really get it. You don't care about their race, but you somehow care about their Austrian "blood"?

Is this thread about the rank and file, or Sellner and Pettibone? Also, they said that antisemites aren't welcome. How could there be antisemitism in the rank and file?

>t. Big nose crypto kike

I am ordering a 199 $ 23andme king test package now.

That's not a good idea. If your family is from Germany I'm sure you're germanic. In either case, why worry about it? Be a good person whatever you are.

She looks like a fat Anglo.
He looks like a French monkey.

>giving Jews your dna
Dont do it dude

Sellner studied in a Burschenschaft (German-type student frat "known" to often be center-to-far-right) that various big names of European right-wing activism (and sadly also terrorism) have been socialised in throughout the years. As Burschenschaften of that particular circle tend to at least make sure your parents were ethnic German, I likewise don't assume that this guy is a Jew. What is true is that many Jews have similar features as a result of interbreeding in Southern German-speaking and Northern Italian-speaking territories during the late middle ages.

what do you mean by germanic
teutons? celts? modern germans? nordic?

what can be considered german is:
Dinarid
Alpinid
Nordid
and probably a few more it has been a while since i've last looked at this stuff. It just stupid how every armchair-anthropologist knows exactly who's a jew and who not and germanics (what does it mean) are obviously all blonde blue eyed or nerdy looking specimen. There's a science behind it, even if it's not really pursued anymore

Attached: 906932D4-220D-4B5E-8654-FDE175AB0FA8.jpg (500x455, 55K)

Right, but I am not talking about nations here. I use Austrian as a shorthand for the people who have lived in Austria and evolved there for a long time.

I do care about their race, but their specific ethnicity is what is really important. Norwegians, for example, are not the same as the French and the French are not the same as the Swedish. To me, it is very important that ethnic groups remain intact overall. If you only care about being white, it seems like you are losing out on something.

I did Google it, I don't know what you mean. Is it ethnopluralism you have a problem with?

>I do care about their race, but their specific ethnicity is what is really important. Norwegians, for example, are not the same as the French and the French are not the same as the Swedish. To me, it is very important that ethnic groups remain intact overall.
Well, in that regard I think you've got some problems with your e-celeb couple because as I say none of them really look particularly Austrian in the historical and ethnic sense.

Wasnt france settled by Norwegians?
What even are Germans? Are they swabian, lombardian, Frank, Saxon, bavarian?
The problem with ethnic division is that it can always be reduced further.
Race is a spiritual idea, and all the minute ethnicities of europe culminate in totality at the point of White.
As the above mentioned people became "German" so to will Germans, French, Norwegians, Irish and Spanish become White.

As I said, I can concede if Brittany is majority Germanic, it won't alter the Austrian gene pool too much. It is not a perfect situation, wish they'd move to the US instead, but I can live with it :)
Not sure what you mean with "historical sense" though.

She mentioned her ethnicity in one of her videos maybe a year or 2 ago. But ill be fucked if I'm gonna find it for you.

I don't like the concept of white.
Are those Greeks who look no different from turks white? Are those southern Italians who look and behave different from northerns white?

It's nonsense at all. Let alone the hell white concept in America. Its connotation has reduced to people with vested interest who has pale skin now.

Race and ethnicity is not a spiritual idea. It's a physical reality. What you call one group and which defintions you use and how they're practical and not is an opinion at the end of the day but to say that there's no difference is very wrong. Every country is also made up by different ethnic groups. What one may call mixture and what another calls pure is just the historical definition of race, whether that's practical or not is another question. It is practical for someone who tries to muddy the water and confuse everyone to the point they think that there's no race because "everything is a mixture"

colchestercollection.com/titles/chunk/I/imperium/chapter45.html

Here is a good piece on the subject. Yockey's book "Imperium" is pretty good
You read as well. Turk occupation of Greece has severed it from the European spirit
>The great Emperor Charles V had a German father, a Spanish mother, grew up in the Netherlands, was educated by a Flemish churchman, whom he later appointed Pope Adrian VI, spoke French as a native tongue, was King of Spain, and Holy Roman Emperor. Spaniards had dukedoms in England, an English queen was married to the King of Spain, the English King was Elector of Hanover. Armies consisted of men of mixed nationality, and commands changed often among generals of different nationality. It suffices to mention Maurice de Saxe, Prinz Eugen, Marshal Conde, Montecuculi. Dynastic-politics cut straight across nations, just as nationalistic politics cut clean across dynasties.

You wont win an argument regarding racial idealism by appealing to zoological materialism. They're literally contradictory ideas.
The European race was held together by supra national, spiritual bonds. The disintegration of spirit is followed by exactly the disintegration of Europe.
Our culture, our art, our heritage, our architecture, our world outlook and way of life cannot be defined only by molecules

There have been Norwegian settlers to France, but France has been settled since Gaulic times and derives its modern names from the German(ic) tribe called the Franks. Traditionally, a German is a person with ethnic ties to the nations that historically settled the area known to Rome as Germania, speak German and aren't part of what one might consider our descendant nationalities (such as Anglo-Saxon Brits, Frankish-descended French, Dutch people and German-Americans).

Well, that's true. But when people say "germanic" I just assume the predominant historical type. Which for Germany would be the subnordid, a semi-stable blend between alpinid and nordid.

you are royally fucked in the head

I know it's not as easy as I might have made it sound like.

But those divisions exist today still, even though the differences shrink every year due to increased movement and travel. If we do not care enough, one day there will be no more German, French or Norwegian. Are Bavarians that inexchangable from Saxons? Is a Norwegian just a Frenchman with a different accent?
I do not see that as a win. It's an irreplacable loss, this genetic diversity disappearing.

Thanks, I will.

However, the example you provided above is just the reality of the royal politics, it does not reflect the common man. Most people throughout history only mated with their own people.

Okay, Chink-Italian-Irish-Anglo mutt.

>Rationalism saw a nation thus as a political mass. But why just this mass and not another? There had to be some visible, mechanical, determinant of nationality. This was found in — Language. If a man spoke French, he was French; Italian, Italian. What determines this? Where he was born. It does, or it should. Allegiance became something owed to a language and a piece of ground, not to an Idea or the dynastic symbol of the Idea.
>The populations of the Balkan countries were a reflection of the school-policies of the preceding generation. It reached a grotesque height when it was employed in theory at the Versailles conference, 1919. Language was supposed to be the indication of the presence of a nation. The principle was of course only used where it suited the political purpose, but nevertheless everyone paid lip-service to this materialistic stupidity.

>This concept of the Nation-Idea had many important consequences. The Italian Wars of linguistic Unification created what never had existed before, a political unit Italy. The Austrian nation was annihilated by this concept, and the attempt by extra-European forces to resurrect it as a nation after the Second World War as a part of the general plan to Balkanize Europe was doubly ludicrous,for a new Nation-Idea was coming.
>But the Nation is always an Idea, it can be nothing other. Only one’sconceptof the Nation can change, but the Idea is something in the blood and soul, and not merely in the mind. It permeates a man’s way of understanding what a Nation is, and what everything else is. Even though, say, French and English Rationalists had agreedpreciselyon what the Nation is, each would have behaved in his distinct national way.

Sellner looks like a balkan cuck or from romania. What's german on him?