Why does climate change have to be a left wing issue?
Can't we all, as humans, come together to save our planet?
Why does climate change have to be a left wing issue?
Can't we all, as humans, come together to save our planet?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
nasa.gov
biocab.org
archive.is
archive.is
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
pastebin.com
archive.is
magaimg.net
pastebin.com
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
youtu.be
youtu.be
archive.is
un.org
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
archive.is
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
archive.is
magaimg.net
youtu.be
magaimg.net
archive.is
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
youtube.com
youtube.com
climate.nasa.gov
washingtonpost.com
edition.cnn.com
twitter.com
You can't stop climate change. It's a natural phenomena that is completely out of our control. All these "plans" for saving the earth are expensive as fuck and won't change anything. Sorry.
Because too many rightwingers dont believe in climate change or think that trying to stop it impacts the current order too much.
Because the environmental issues focused on by the left are the least probable most nebulous factors. Everyone can agree on plastic and chemical pollution of the oceans as having a negative effect on the environment. Why is this never mentioned? Because white people have largely solved this problem in their nations and India and China polute much more than anyone else. So the answer is of course to just reduce white productivity while subsidizing endless smog and shit from the third world.
If leftists really gave a shit about carbon emissions, they would push for nuclear energy, which is realistic and affordable, rather than meme sources of energy like solar and wind.
I do not deny that humans are contributing to climate change, but these fucking globohomo kikes are only trying to use it as a means of seizing control of the world economy.
Also, plastic pollution and ocean acidification are much bigger, much more pressing environmental issues that aren't being talked about - again, because the goal isn't actually to help the environment. The goal is to seize control over the life-blood of every industrial economy in the world.
Anyone that talks about climate change without mentioning nuclear energy as the best solution is either a disingenuous, power-hungry sociopath, or a hopeless, indoctrinated fool.
>save it
from what? Earth has a known climate history that goes hundreds of thousands of years before the thermometer record, so we know beyond any doubt that the climate cycles naturally, and that we had way warmer cycles than our current warming cycle. The Minoans didn't bitch and moan about their warming cycle. The Romans didn't bitch and moan about their warming cycle. AND BOTH those were warmer than our current warming cycle. And the Medieval warming period, everyone was dead by the time the next cooling cycle (last little ice age) cam around.
Put on a toga and calm down.
Speaking of the last Little Ice Age, it is a fascinating time in our history since it contributed to Washington's winter at valley forge, napoleon's devastation along the Russia front, and Mary Shelley writing Frankenstein while she was snowed in year round. But just because we are still warming up from the last Little Ice Age which ended in the 1800s, doesn't mean we are going to get as warm as the Paleocene-Eocene.
No, because:
1- The right is driven mainly by the rich cucking retards.
2- The left is driven by mainly by thinking.
Environmentalism is about preserving life. The rich control everything right now, and there is no advantage for the rich to preserve anything at all.
>Can't we all, as humans, come together to save our planet?
We can't save our planet because there is nothing wrong.
How does it matter if we believe
or not an issue.
Oh, wait.
You need our money, don't you?
Maybe try yelling at the people polluting the most instead of blaming the people who pollute less and stop coercing them for money. Also you can't stop climate change, it's not human caused or co2 based.
It's your fucking fault those glaciers started melting. Now give me money!
This
>the world is trying to kill us again
>better find a way to stop it again so we can hit 7 billion people
>better find a way to stop it again so we can hit 10 billion hungry people
>the world is trying to kill us again
>better find a way to stop it again so we can hit 20 billion starving people
Why worry about climate change when the pacific ocean is becoming a dead zone because of fukashima?
Because the movement has been hijacked by leftists.
Right wing climate change involves things like stopping mass immigration into high carbon footprint per capita countries, or food aid to countries with a 10 child per mother ratio.
Niggers arent people
Because man made climate change is made up or blown out of proportion, just like all left wing issues.
>"muh climate change!"
Duh, climate changes. In cycles. It doesn't mean its man made. If leftists took the whole global warming meme serious, they'd stop buying giant mansions and flying around so casually. But no, they just want the plebs to do without.
Because if mother nature is such a little bitch that a few hamburgers, muscle cars and wood stoves makes her shit the bed she can go fuck herself
why dont you do something about plastic ?
Oh right, because thats the way you fucking kikes earn money
Why dont you do something about the transportation ships that pollute the earth several times more than all cars on earth combined? Oh thats right, because it makes you money
Fuck off with your climate change shit
>lets unite all to save the planet
>lets all have one common goal to strive for
>lets all be okay with stupid laws that make jews more money because of this
>lets all be okay with the communist one world system that is the goal and one of the reasons why the kikes are pushing for this climate shit
the fact is was born from the left and stats were mucked with should tell you all you need to know when it comes to "climate change"
>muh climate change
yet all the champions including the swedish potato child don't mention how globalism (sending cargo ships across the ocean to supply north america with match boxes and toilet brushes) needs to be eradicated and also the fact they travel with a carbon footprint that is larger than a small city
every decade a fear mongering eco catastrophic is pushed so we be happy to live with less and pay more
*it
*catastrophic event
Western countries while having a better recycling system, also export their trash to asian and african countries
Reminder that it is the sun and highly complex.
But I don't believe something made up by Al Gore
>Why does climate change have to be a left wing issue?
It is a left wing issue. Trying to change the climate costing trillions and requiring world government of some sort. Communism.
>Can't we all, as humans, come together to save our planet?
No. Because the planet is not in danger, climate change is natural.
Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Findsnasa.gov
Good news, the earth is greening. Climate change is good for the Earth.
Anything that requires broad and rapid changes freak people out. No nuclear power, no decrease in meat, no population control, no decrease in mass plastic uses, etc etc. The west makes most of the greenhouse gasses but they'll also be the ones to solve it. People complain about coal and fight over useless jobs when Indonesia and Brazil are going to pass America/China soon for emissions.
More CO2 and methane = hotter earth. Some hot isn't too bad, too much heat is bad since ecosystems don't do too well with rapid change.
Because people are afraid to admit that our lifestyle and society is self destructive and harmful to nature, and they prefer to just accept their commodities and fulfill their meaningless life knowing full well that they won't live to see the consequences
How much is too much heat? There is no rapid change, the average temperatures are basically normal.
Greenhouse gases do not matter because the greenhouse effect is not even real.
Well the icecaps melting is bad. So is the desertification of lands. No it isn't 'rapid', but it has increased roughly one Celsius in the past 50 or so years. The real problem is the climate 'biomes' that have separated regions will likely change meaning a need for larger planning via larger bodies like the EU and the UN.
Why does the Eocene have such a high temperature when it was reported to have record high methane and other greenhouse gas levels?
What desertification? Read this: Earth is greening, it doesn't need saving.
Doesn't matter, if you cannot keep the trash don't take it, such a bad argument. Just because they gave you trash doesn't mean you have to polute half the ocean with it, Chinks once more prove to be instects
>Why does the Eocene have such a high temperature when it was reported to have record high methane and other greenhouse gas levels?
I don't know and I would wager that nobody else really knows either. They can assume that it is the greenhouse gases but correlation doesn't mean causation amirite?
Do you happen to know what the sun's TSI was for that period? What about the electromagnetic particles hitting our earth at that time? Were the high-energy nuclei more or less abundant than usual? What did the electromagnetic waves look like? The electromagnetic fields? Also provide me with the measures of all high-energy protons/electrons, solar wind protons/electrons, IMF, Ultraviolet radation, and Xray Radiation. Finally, after giving me all that, then let me know what the NAO looked like, and the Pacific oscillation. Maybe then we can determine if it was solely the greenhouse gases that made us all hot and sweaty and not allll the other fucking variables that come into play.
That could happen.
But burger-land won't stand for it, since the employment of alternative and enviremently friendly source of energy would mean the end of the petro dollar.
What is an environmentally friendly source of energy?
Nope. You're about 30 years too late. Enjoy the entropy!
Smartest person on the thread!
foodaid hopingfully with an agent that sterilizes adults
Climate change threads are also so comfy when we start posting super grand solar minimum information.
The grand solar minimum is an upcoming period of sustained cooler global temperatures, reminiscent of the Maunder Minimum or Dalton Minimum. Typically we see a change of jet stream flow from zonal to meridional flow, which can lead to much more extreme weather events as teh jet streams push and pull air masses further than they normally would. We see more wet and cool weather in a minimum. We are already seeing heavy crop losses around the world and countries like China are already taking big steps to prepare. China is moving away from all mining operations worldwide and focusing more on food production and agricultural acquisitions. We are at the bottom of solar cycle 24 right now. The beginning of cycle 25. The super solar grand minimum isn't until roughly solar cycle 26 or 27 but we have been cooling globally since 2016, and we should not expect the globe to warm again until somewhere around 2100.
Of all the problems earth and mankind are facing they are picking out like number 100, the minimal acceleration of natural climate change by CO2, and act like its number one because it fits so well in the anti-capitalist anti-white left-wing narrative. Making the remaining 7% of western civilization responsible for every problem in the world and the people feel bad for just existing.
The actual number 1 is the still exponentially rising world population while its already overpopulated by a multiple. Then comes the high amounts of poison in the environment (CO2 and plastics arent) and the reverse-evolution of the human gene pool by upside-down birth rates.
Listen, whether you grasp it or not: money is just virtual numbers. It's about time, effort, resources and skills. Those things are real and it's still possible to at least avert the worst.
>implying there even is a chance to save humanity
Have pasta nigger
>It's the GRAND SOLAR MINIMUM, not global warming, like they've been proselytizing.
It's been over for ten years...
archive.is
First it was 'the ice age is coming!'
archive.is
Then it was 'global warming is going to cook the earth and melt the glaciers!'
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
But this was debunked spectacularly.
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
pastebin.com
And now the blowback on the perpetrators
archive.is
Muh arctic ice!
magaimg.net
But this has been going on for a long time
pastebin.com
It was proven that climate scientists doctored results, fabricated data, illegally erased data, prevented other scientists from using the data and verifying their conclusions, and knew that the results they got did not find the earth was warming.
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
pastebin.com
The official U.N. IPCC report was fraudulent too
archive.is
And the statistically fraudulent claim that 97% of scientists agree, was debunked too
archive.is
archive.is
archive.is
The Great Global Warming Swindle - Full Documentary presents it nicely youtu.be
CO2 In perspective
youtu.be
CO2 is actually greening the earth, according to NASA
archive.is
And now it's 'devastating man-made climate change!'
un.org
>And here are some of the environmental signs they say prove the earth is warming and the climate is changing.
Sea levels are rising and countries will be destroyed...
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
Temperatures are rising...
During the last hundred years the temperature increased about 0.1°C because of carbon dioxide. The human contribution was about 0.01°C
archive.is
And glaciers are disappearing...
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
archive.is
Think of the polar bears!
magaimg.net
So if it's not an ice age, and its not global warming, and its not anthropogenic climate change, what is it?
>It's the GRAND SOLAR MINIMUM
What is a grand solar minimum and what does it mean for us?
youtu.be
The sun has cycles
magaimg.net
In a nut shell here's what happens when the sun weakens and moves into a more dormant cycle:
· Increased galactic radiation hitting the earth causing increased cloud coverage globally
· Weaker jet streams
· Increased volcanic activity
· Increased frequency and magnitude of earth quakes
· More erratic and unpredictable weather
· Substantially increased precipitation and drought
· Shrinking grow zones for crops and shorter grow periods
· Massive crop loss and food shortages
· Significantly colder areas at the north and south poles
Even NASA admits it's a big deal archive.is
The great civilizations have risen and fallen on the backs of these grand solar cycles
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
US history has been significantly impacted by the last two GSMs
magaimg.net
>So here's what's happening now
The sun's total solar irradiance (TSI) is currently dropping off a cliff. Much faster and further than the devastating Maunder Minimum.
magaimg.net
magaimg.net
The earth's magnetosphere is weakening at an unprecedented rate thereby letting in the largest amount of cosmic rays in recorded history.
magaimg.net
Increased cosmic rays cause earthquakes, volcanos, and increased cloud cover thereby reducing earth's temperature further.
magaimg.net
Like the 'year without a summer'
magaimg.net
But this GSM will be far worse than previous ones
magaimg.net
More resources on current happenings and excellent lectures
Grand Solar Minimum Channel
youtube.com
Ice Age Farmer Channel
youtube.com
Jewish money making scam round 2. The 90s all over again
Because only retards believe in global warming, I mean man made global warming, I mean climate change, I mean man made climate change. Well whatever you retards want to call tour dogma. Mean while conservatives believe in conservation. We don't need fear mongering to know that we need to do a better job of taking care of the environment.
if the claims are real then it could be prevented by killing all niggers and replacing them with trees. i'll believe leftists are serious about saving the planet when they promote this as a pragmatic solution rather than airheaded schemes like seizing trillions of dollars, abolishing meat-eating, and implementing world government
It never was. Why are Canadians such brainlets.
When you understand that climate change is not the same as environmental protection.
That the climate always is changing and in flux.
That the environment has not always been polluted.
That conservatives have always been the guardians of the natural order and world.
Then you will have you’re answer. Not just post some fucking IN STORE PRICES cunt.
We have to stop the climate from changing guys. I'm super serious.
>100% sweetie
>It's a natural phenomena that is completely out of our control
There (((you))) are
Nu
Fuck off, zoomer. The world is not coming to an end.
Because being left wing is all about loudly telling the world what a good person you are and how you have all the answers to complicated problems and know exactly how to fix them. Climate change gives them the ultimate chance for backslapping. They are going to save the world because they know better than the rest of us plebs.
Right wingers tend to think there are no solutions, only compromises.
Left wing uses Climate Change as a mechanism to force more government control over industry, the economy, and citizens.
It is a power grab and a move towards socialism
Climate Change = More Government
This is why it is not a conservative issue
The only solution is nuclear power. The left doesn't like nuclear power, and the right doesn't believe in climate change, so there is no real hope of a solution. Why should I bother worrying about it when it's already a hopeless issue?
The only solution is nuclear power. The left doesn't like nuclear power, and the right doesn't believe in climate change, so there is no real hope of a solution. Why should I bother worrying about it when it's already a hopeless issue?
>Can't we all, as humans, come together to save our planet?
As long as niggers are allowed to breed out of control this world is doomed.
>All these "plans" for saving the earth are expensive as fuck and won't change anything.
Not exactly. It'll change a hell of a lot for humans in first worlds; like make us all poor as fuck.
Using time, effort and resources into something that does not create wealth ends up with us being poor and not being able to afford the expensive shit and investigation that leads to us having a smaller fingerprint on the planet.
Norway is full of electric cars, South Sudan is not. We should all be as rich as Norway.
>All these "plans" for saving the earth are expensive as fuck and won't change anything.
Not exactly. It'll change a hell of a lot for humans in first worlds; like make us all poor as fuck.