HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN!? Texas has more guns than any other state and still has mass shootings...

HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN!? Texas has more guns than any other state and still has mass shootings. It's almost as if now guns doesn't prevent mass shootings.

Attached: Republicans.png (2466x800, 549K)

You illiterate, communist fucking retard. What point of 'shall not be infringed" do you not understand?

How many threads do you chimps actually need?

>ar 15 and scar are two bars apart
Why. What the fuck is the difference between the two? They're both rifles and fire the same caliber round. One looks scarier? Jesus fucking christ. And you legaly can own tanks. Dumb fucking noguns liberal faggots I swear to god man.

Texas was full of guns one hundred years ago, and there were no mass shootings then. Therefore, something else is the cause.

>almost as if

Attached: carlos.png (350x350, 138K)

When 2nd amendment was written people were privately owning state of the art gunships and cannons

If Trump had done his job and deported the invaders, this wouldn't be happening.

Its because pharmaceuticals cause shootings

If people do not have a right, they cannot derive a lesser authority to grant to the governments they create.

I'm going to love to see how embarrassingly fucking easy it will be to COMPLETELY disarm all of the insecure Trumpcels once every state has red flag laws implemented.

They like to talk tough on the internet but once the cops show up at their door for real they quiver like little pussy bitches and turn in their toys without a fight. Anyone who stockpiles weapons will be raided before they have time to react. The handful who do try to pull a Waco will be promptly mowed down like wheat.

You will be disarmed. Peroid.

>HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN!?
CHICAGO Illinois has strict gun laws more than any other state and still has mass shooting deaths. It's almost as if LAWS doesn't prevent gun ownership

Hahahaha nice b8

>Americans won't fight back.

There's where you're wrong, kiddo.

Attached: EA7XSv7VUAAUHF0.jpg (499x401, 43K)

There are more than 100 million gun owners in america. You have a legitimate mental illness.

65,000 new guns were sold today. How many of those to new owners do you think?

Face reality. You lost. Find a new cause to whine about.

>You illiterate communist fucking retard. What point of ‘shall not be infringed’ do you not understand?

Attached: EDD20213-14A8-4CE1-89F6-5C43955EABD1.jpg (720x752, 89K)

No chemical or biological weapons.
No nukes or radioactive munitions.

If someone wants to own a tank, sure thing. Just make sure they have a valid drivers license.
If they want to own a fighter jet they need to be a certified pilot.

Shall not be infringed.

You try to implement shit like that, you get things like death squads.
>Memeflag
Ahh of course.

Attached: RWDS.jpg (1130x706, 472K)

>They're both rifles and fire the same caliber round
They're not though. The Scar in the picture is 7.62x51, you can tell from the magazine width/shape.

Chemical and biological weapons are not "arms" as they cannot be use defensively. Thus are neither protected by the second amendment nor could they could be considered reasonable to own. However, there is no reason to ban the ownership of basically anything else, from a moral, ethical, or even pragmatic standpoint.

Point is that they're not a different classification of rifle, just a different chamber. Is there any functional difference between a scar and an AR-10? None, except for the possibility of intimidating your opponents with the scar's superior aesthetics.

RPGs, tanks, and belt fed full autos should unironically all be fully legal and as easy to buy as a normal rifle