Blackpill me on stoicism

blackpill me on stoicism

Attached: marcus-aurelius-2721712_960_720.jpg (482x720, 106K)

Other urls found in this thread:

gutenberg.org/files/45109/45109-h/45109-h.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

When some hairy Greek dude puts his dick up your ass accept it as fate.

Its literally "stop complaining and do what you have to do".

That has nothing to do with stoic philosophy and is what drooling retards from twitter, kikebook, Reddit, boomers, and Asians frame it as. Extolling virtues to aid in overcoming adversity is not the same as telling people to just deal with it, smoothbrain. If you read late Stoic works like meditations, they are almost like the Juden Peterstein crowd but with a determinate view of fate rather than the boomer/neoliberal pulls-themselves-by-the-bootstraps in any situation worldview. Fuck, if you could be bothered to not be a fucking nigger for ten minutes a day to read maybe Jow Forums wouldn’t be the shithole it’s become since stormfront stopped coming.

Attached: 4DEBE3B8-ED21-440C-A545-1060290F4C1D.png (1088x614, 729K)

Nietzsche said they were silly

>almost like juden petersrein
So dont complain and do what you have to do was spot on, thanks for the confirmation.

yet he stole from them things like amor fati

There is no inherent virtue in suffering. Without Jesus you have nothing and all your effort was for naught.

It doesn't matter what you believe if your actions don't match.

Attached: 1566807494557.jpg (640x708, 282K)

Its how a white man is supposed to be

I'm finnish.

based

Aurelius was literally a cuck and used stoicism to justify not giving a fuck

It's just Buddhism Lite.

The only difference is that Buddhism teaches that by letting go of all attachments you can achieve ultimate peace and tranquility (Nibbana)

Stoicism basically tells you to man up and play the Darwinian game, forge attachments such as duty to your fellow man, state, family, etc.

Otherwise they are almost exactly the same.

Attached: PlatosCave.png (640x556, 1.04M)

It's about passively accepting what happen to you and around you.
At least, it's what the radio told me.

Aurelius was a horrible parent to his children. This is due to his stoicism.

gutenberg.org/files/45109/45109-h/45109-h.htm

stoics rather want tranquility than having few moments of sadness after correcting the own son

They are cosmopolitans.

Epicureanism is the real based Hellenistic school

Attached: Aurelius.jpg (1201x629, 112K)

Attached: Aurelius2.jpg (750x679, 33K)

Attached: Seneca.jpg (687x650, 33K)

Attached: Seneca2.jpg (522x800, 17K)

>just be yourself

Attached: 1565223446644.jpg (674x505, 118K)

leaf tier post. allow me to explain. hedonism and the final form of stoicism, asceticism, are two sides of the same coin. they both have no end goal and lead to nihilism. in seeking meaning, you can try to find all the pleasure you can, or avoid it. either way you'll realize there is no point. but you can take good things from both sides. escaping nihilism is a whole different ball game, so you can go just read his book for that

Read the Enchiridion. It’s stoicism in bullet points.

>leaf tier post
For stating a true fact? Alright, just saying I agree with a certain point he makes: Stoics wish to live according to nature. How can you not live according to nature? Everything you do can be considered the nature of man.

Why would you want to live with indifference, and no aims, goals or intentions? Thats true nature. As barren or as fruitful as it wants.

most people dont see things for what they are as plato would say. some peoples view of nature is not rooted in any sort of common sense or reason; rather they go along with mass thinking which appeals to lowest common denominator of understanding

Well that misses the point entirely. It's not "dont complain just do what needs to be done" its "complaining is a waste of your time and energy which could best be served to fortify yourself for the tasks ahead." These have very different meanings to anyone with even the most basic understanding of english.

Stoicism & epicureanism are both based on pyrrhonism. Stoicism takes pyrrhonism and posits there is virtue and you should cultivate it. Epicureanism posits there is just matter and void, so you're done.

A pyrrhonist would ask each why they think that way, and how/if they can prove it.

Your pedantry is obnoxious

Stoics are boring.
Beta cucks are boring.

Stoics are boring beta cucks

>"lol just be calm bro. who cares if elected officials are selling this country piece by piece? take a chill pill before wanting to take action against those prioritizing foreigners instead of citizens, bro."
philosophy is for faggots that would rather "think" than act. so all you queers can sit at home and "think" while the real men go out and ACT.

wtf
pyrrhonism highly criticized both epicureanism and stoicism

massive brainlet strawman right there
why are you even on a political board if you have some grug grudge against philosophy?
stoicism is pretty much "fuck sophists" the school, there's nothing about letting things walk over you, rather the contrary, its about not being selfdestructive wasting time and working towards your goals and for your life diligently, go fucking die 80 iq boomer retard.

Are you a fucking animal or a human? Because that's what animals do, they act with no thought. They have no foresight, beyond some instinctual learning of behavior, they cannot consider past experiences in depth and they certainly cannot consider information out of the scope of their own lives. It's sad that you as a member of the human race look down upon your nature in such a way.

Meditations is the ONLY mandatory reading on Jow Forums
Everything else these natsoc soifolk suggest is an impotent tantrum by comparison

Attached: do-better.jpg (1680x1050, 264K)

Nice one.

Attached: pepeClownBoomer.jpg (720x360, 40K)