Second amendment exists to prevent tyranny

>implying the rest of the constitution dind't lay out exactly what your rights are

Attached: irs-burning-model-train-kit.jpg (3264x2448, 574K)

Well for our ancestors, tyranny began when their government taxed the hell out of the people for simply existing. But that isn’t going on right now goy so shut the fuck up and keep with the program.

Sure thing faggot...Try to enforce that and see what happens. Not everyone wants to rely on daddy government to protect them, you must either be a leftist faggot or a woman...

>Gee if only there was a way to solve it!
Secession

SHALL
NOT
BE
INFRINGED

Ok that's a great slogan but the founding fathers would have had multiple revolutions by now. Without a legal definition of when people must start killing politicians it will never happen

We can take your guns in 2 days.. you gun nuts are paper tigers and just have guns to feel like 'big men'. We'll take your guns and kick you out of the country!

It's not a slogan, it's the law.

It's a God given right.

The more powerful the government becomes the more powerful weapons we should have access to.

Attached: 1567281063882.png (500x395, 359K)

We defined the tyrant.

>second amendment exists to prevent tyranny
It doesn't. It is primarily intended to protect against an invading army, the tyrrany part is secondary.

>How will gunfags know
They won't. Otherwise you would have seen them act decades ago.

Attached: tyrants.jpg (800x450, 91K)

tyranny has a pretty cut and dry definition. government limiting the size of magazines for example, is blatant tyranny, although it's already going on in some states without a second glance.

>government limiting the size of magazines for example, is blatant tyranny
how? does the 2A forbid that?

Pettyfogger

Yes faggot, so when an armed ape enters my apartment looking for gibs, I can pellet it with a 22 against his non-22.

Without a legal definition it doesn't mean anything

it's infringing on our right to keep arms equal to our own government. it's a lot easier to oppress an armed populace when the government stooges are better equipped than them.

does the 2A say you have a right to keep arms equal to your government?

Basically, you're legally allowed to shoot the president. Supreme court will confirm it if you do.

were gonna give you a pass because youre not american and dont understand the history of the constitution and the founding of the USA

the original idea was to not have a large federal army and instead have armed militias that would vastly outnumber the federal army thus ensuring freedom from tyranny, of course all of that now has been flipped upside down and were living in clown world but that was the original concept, arguing about magazine capacity is arguing ridiculous semantics

a militia is not well regulated if it does not meet the modern standards of weaponry.

if that is the original idea and indeed was an important idea at that then why isnt it written down in the constitution?

nah you dont have to leave the union, just use state nullifaction, if im correct Alaska has already done it with many of the ATF's naughty items (silencers, short barrel rifles), Alaska basically said were not going to enforce your retarded laws so come and take it

I know you got to be trolling at this point because someone so retarded couldn’t make it onto the internet.

>NO DON'T LEAVE WE NEED YOU!
>Why?
>UH UH...DRUMPF?

Attached: Loose.png (666x375, 219K)

except it is

"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

>forgets to define tyranny
If there wasn't so much autism running thru you and so many others' bodies we wouldn't need to define everything under the sun. You know what fucking tyranny is, and if you don't you're mental.

you have delusions of grandeur if you think any state is going to break away from the union at this stage of the game, the federal government has become too powerful(exactly what the founders feared) and they will exercise that power to keep the states in line

we aren't looking at a civil war 2 scenario, there simply are too many people that dont want to get onto the 2 way rifle range with the feds just so that their state can break away

Great post. I’ve been banned from breitbart for spamming this very question. According to the bootlickers only if they confiscated guns will they fight a revolution. Until then the police the irs can fuck ass all into oblivion and they won’t do shit.

interesting
i guess it comes down to how literally you interpret the constitution, as i believe constitutional scholars exist for this very reason. to take the constitution and apply it to contemporary times

Tyranny is never defined in the constitution. It's up to the people.

as a pacifist legal immegrant living in a 98% white state, i love that my friends and neighbors have guns. They train diligently, are kind and reasonable people, and I get to know they outnumber the few who would use guns out of desperation. there are always more armed people who arm themselves to be responsible over the ones they care for than armed people who will harm or threaten others out of desperation. also the former will have better training. even though i'm not a fan of weapons in general, i may move to the mountains in the next 5 years, after becoming a citizen, and with no close neighbors, i will need to be responsible for the protection of those i live with. the only people afraid of gun ownership are under the delusion that most humans act out of desperation with no forethought. which may be true amongst nonwhites or asians.

>americans actually believing they would be able to prevent tyranny with their tiny cute little guns in 2019
lmao at your whole life

theres really nothing to interpret, we gave the corrupt supreme court that power (even though theres nothing in the constitution that gives them the authority to do this) and even they declared individuals have the right to keep and bear arms

sorry if the founders didnt have the foresight that the english language would change over the course of 250 years and people would be too stupid to read

i meant that whites and asians usually have more forethought. aka niggers and sandniggers. i'm white, lucky enough to leave europe when it was going full socialist 13 years ago.

>please get rid of my rightz
Fuck you and everything you stand for.

an infantry campaign is still the only way to conquer territory in 2019, unless your goal is total annihilation.

>the colonials have no chance against the mighty british army!

history has proven you wrong countless times

Is that OC

>LEGIT NO ONE WANTS TO LEAVE
>ITS IMPOSSIBLE GOYIM

Attached: running flag.png (681x539, 166K)

No one is a constitutional scholar, it's a legal paper for people, lawyers and judges to interpret.

its not impossible just highly unlikely

We already have. It's called treading.

Attached: dont tread on me titty anime girl.png (741x457, 55K)

Do you actually belive that I should listen to a fucking capital 600 miles away that only ruins my life more and more?

That's great you feel that way but it doesn't stop scheming Jews from perverting the English language to piss on the Constitution

The last time someone tried not to it ended up very bad for them

>(((constitutional scholars)))

thats for you to decide, trying to convince a significant enough amount of people in your state to fight the federal government is pretty unlikely

Kek, the south is fucked.
We had a chance in 1812 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hartford_Convention

(((DNC))) (((GOP))) (((Federal)))

Cowardniggerfaggot. You're all for banning shit, but you yourself won't actually DO any-fucking-thing. You won't go door to door telling people they have to give up guns - give them to YOU specifically. No... you might get your shit pushed in that way. Bad Day for you. But you have no problem "empowering" a bunch of State Goons - armed with guns us poor plebs and proles aren't "permitted" to have - to go door to door. Complete with the authoritah to end us if we "resist"...

You're a fucking coward. Eat shit.

2nd amendment is the canary clause of the constitution obviously

I fail to see your point, all youre doing is saying that the government is zionist controlled, that really doesnt translate into forming an semi-organized group of hundreds of thousands of individuals to rally up and get into a shooting match with the federal government

> that the government is zionist controlled
>zionist controlled
>controlled
>zionist

Attached: 1563488410999.jpg (596x459, 71K)

>define tyranny
When you're in an argument with someone and they start demanding definitions, they're trying to take you down a rabbit hole of obscurity because they're losing the broader argument.
They're hoping that your inability to be specific down to the most minute detail will be proof that what you're advocating is either impossible or too vague to implement.
>What is white? Is he white, is she white? What about this person, are they white? Haha fooled you this is a jew with indian DNA!
>See, 'white' is meaningless, and therefore any policy related to it is impossible and nonsensical. I win.
>Also, we're giving Jaquan your job because you're white and he's not.

Attached: touch up enough gadsden don't tread black eyes.png (5552x3720, 724K)

This people decide what tyranny is. Not random fags on Twitter, but the people.

>people like us gather together, forming political group(s) that doesn't appear radical, but simply stands to uphold the constitution and the people's rights
>if the group is accessible and simply stands for freedom, not even any other political agenda, more people will join
>preach the ideals that formed this country
>show people how far we've shifted from that
>speak on policies that are infringing upon our rights, gun control, equality act, etc
>collect pollings on what people actually want and how this contradicts what (((they))) are proposing and the government is giving into
>voice your concerns with the government taking away your God given rights
>show people what Canada and Europe have become and what we're at threat for
>create an armed militia that stands for the people and their freedom, what gave birth to this country
>if the government dare defy that, stage a coup and this would spark a revolution

Attached: 1566987754544m.jpg (937x1024, 101K)

tyranny would be anything that attacks your constitution wouldn't it..so basically you have tyranny everyday now

When enough people with enough balls and firepower stand up to what they collectively agree is tyranny, then you'll have your definition.
Until then they'll just keep tap-dancing on that fucking snake.

>6Uk
Nice.

basically this, its also not a snake more like a leech

I guess the founders assumed people would have an iq above 60 and not need a 1,000 page book written in legalese defining everything

its literally line 1 in the 1st document
its an axiom

all men are created equal
>speech laws? equal
>courts? equal
>guns? equal
>taxes? equal
>who can you kill that occupies your property? anyone
>etc.

usa is a country where politicians, military, cops, corporations, rich, poor, minorities, immigrants, and more... all get special exemptions from the law and special laws with special courts, etc.

Actually, it says you can have more arms than the government, since they can’t infringe upon it

The second they demand a recall of civilian's guns is when tyranny is obvious to all.

Ah yes (((constitutional scholars)))
Reminder school segregation ended because of a very poorly designed experiment regarding black babies and black/white dolls. No, I did not make that up.

No, we have a second amendment because we believe in a separation of powers.
youtube.com/watch?v=ijaEVJ6LfnE&t=1s

Jow Forums says that a tyranny has to dilate and stuff so im pretty sure Jow Forums knows what it is

Attached: 1543439897302.png (500x500, 56K)

Good luck taking down fighter jets or stopping any nukes with your guns.

>the USA is going to nuke itself

thanks for the kek

If you love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.

Fuckin mong... the type of warfare the US military excels at is the exact type of war that won't be fought. Read up on 4G and insurgency warfare... Boyd... War of the Flea... You pig ignorant mouth breather...