The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed

>The right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Doesn't the 2nd amendment protect the individual's right to own nuclear weapons?

Attached: thinkstockphotos-136794881.jpg (728x425, 60K)

Other urls found in this thread:

supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf
supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-1521.pdf
gunowners.org/support/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>caring about laws

Nukes are fake and gay Jewish fear porn

Fully explained including the difference between nukes and AR-15 in the ONLY legally valid opinion:

supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-1521.pdf

Reading is just too hard so guess before learning?

I read the 2nd amendment. It says the right to bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. Can you read, libtard?

2A guarantees me the right to keep, maintain, design, prototype, and manufacture the absolute state-of-the-art in offensive and defensive weaponry. Any infringement of this. (NFA) Is an aberration of the constitution and shall not stand!

>Wasting time on settled arguments.
>ignoring the supreme courts role in the US Constitution.

You won’t donate $20 or more pussy

gunowners.org/support/

Attached: CF4328DF-B348-4241-82AA-33082844A6AF.jpg (1420x946, 64K)

Fuck you, libtard. Our rights come from nature and the Constitution, not fucking commies in the Supreme Court who want to take away our rights.

It sure does. Good luck making one.

I'm sure if you own a nuclear weapon you should be allowed to own a small portion of mass land to survive without being bothered by others.

Yes.
Next question?

>>ignoring the supreme courts role in the US Constitution.
Imagine being this fucking ideological that you dont understand the role of state violence in your life. wew lad

Yes, yes it does.

Yes. As long as you can afford them.

Take meds

Why even bother argui g with those fucking malaccas?

Yup.
Problem with that statist scum ?

Attached: Jeff.png (1052x563, 133K)

Nukes dont exist, silly

Bitchass conservaturd can’t even $20 to #defend2A. Republicunts on eptsteinacide watch!

Attached: AD44B93A-9F22-43AC-A73C-627225669A78.gif (250x250, 369K)

>Doesn't the 2nd amendment protect the individual's right to own nuclear weapons?

Absolutely! Just wait until I finish my backyard missile silo!!

On paper? Yes it does. In practice? You will be made to obey your government because they have proven the willingness to kill you for being disobedient. (Pro Tip: They will still have their planet killing nuclear weapons long after you can't even own a butter knife. So don't be too proud of your submission to authority.)

Yes, and so does the 14th amendment.

> implying munitions and a payload delivery system is a man bearable arm

This propaganda has failed so many times in the past, so are you just retarded or what?

Yes. But since that seems ridiculous, don't you think we should get rid of Nukes considering the absolute destructive power?

Yes we should amend it but it currently does. Nukes are so expensive that nobody could ever own one though. All the ones subverting it should be hung for treason