Why dont we just kill all non whites? It would solve all the worlds problems...

Why dont we just kill all non whites? It would solve all the worlds problems. We are the only race that cares about liberty and is capable of empathy and is hardworking and intellegent. Theres no reason not to besides "muh morals".

Attached: the turner diaries.jpg (325x499, 35K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=4QOItneBVHw
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>nb4 glownigger
this is a darker corner of the internet with less restrictions on free speech and accussing someone of being a federal agent is a demoralization tactic used to make everyone too paranoid to actually accomplish anything in the real world. So shut the fuck up.

Attached: 1523286664381.jpg (1024x544, 60K)

and the boomer has arrived...
like clockwork

youtube.com/watch?v=4QOItneBVHw

once they ban guns...

Ok unironically no sane person wants to "kill all browns". The real enemy is not brown/black people, but COMMUNISTS and the leftist mind. Ironically, white people contain the most far left Marxists ideas nowadays. We must kill all COMMUNISTS.

Attached: 1560639005955.jpg (2560x1440, 3.09M)

Im not a boomer I was just joking lel

another boomer...
please go talk to your grandkids or something

Go ahead. Start at the top of the financial pyramid.

Apparently, mass murder is illegal. Also, Jow Forums is a board of peace. Take your glownigger shit somewhere else.

You're the one who sounds like a boomer. The real threat is Marxist ideology. Its that simple.

I read this book for the first time last year. It is truly interesting. My biggest takeaway though is the idea that red flag laws are a slippery slope. See the guy in Oregon that was relieved yesterday of his guns just for saying he would defend himself against Antifa. Next will be anyone that says something racist. Then psychiatrists will back up the hardcore belief that racism is insanity.

Holy shit, how come nobody has ever thought of this before?

normalfag

>Jow Forums is one person
idiot

Because there are too many weak brainwashed whites who would die for niggers

>Care about liberty
>Advocate for tyranny and genocide

Stop trying to coheres violence against blacks on this board.

Attached: jew.png (800x764, 225K)

Fuck off, glownigger.

Fuck off, kike. Your day is coming soon.

Attached: KikeDeaths.jpg (992x744, 125K)

Jow Forums is a board of peace

We should replace all wh*tes with blacks&Asians as there is nothing a wh*te can do that a Asian or Black cant do better

blacks have disgusting nappy hair though

no its not you fucking coward

That’s intellectually bankrupt and nigger tier. Blacks are terrible at everything but being an SJW or athletics where they are paid millions.

Fuck off you sociopath.
Fuck glowniggers and all fedposters.

bitch ass nigga

This thread is a perfect example as to why it will never happen. You can't even hold a conversation without immediately breaking into petty bickering. It's the same reason why the alt-right collapsed in less than a year.

yeah, seriously

the alt right didnt collapse though

The Turner Diaries was a really interesting book. It wont do anything for the uninitiated though.
But for racially aware whites the parallels to the modern day are stark, including Bernie Sanders saying he'll "go to war" against "white nationalism and racism."
Hunter attempts a greater "introduction" and to why certain things are the way they are, in regards to the jews. But at the end, it still assumes a generally racially aware reader. Anyone else simply wont get it.

But neither book as as simplistic as "Why don't we just kill all non-whites?" In the books they died because of the circumstances that put them in a fight to survive against us. And William Luther Peirce would not have reacted to non-whites leaving whites countries by attempting to hunt them down and kill them. It's not that he wanted them dead, it's that he wanted us alive.

non whites should purchase more firearms

>Why dont we just kill all non whites?
Because we physically cannot do so.

>We are the only race that cares about liberty
Then why don't we fight when our liberty is threatened?

>Theres no reason not to besides "muh morals".
Yes there is.

>Because we physically cannot do so.
ahem what are nukes?

Attached: 02_10_2014_romeo_nuke.jpg (800x600, 65K)

Humanity would be best served with each Race being Separate in their respective Homelands.

Logistics
I mean, people talk all about final solutions, but I'm more of a practical man, I'm looking for a scalable solution

We might be able to, but we're not willing. Nor do I believe that Dr William Luther Peirce or nearly anyone is willing unless they were to truly fight us to the last man.

>Then why don't we fight when our liberty is threatened?
I think we can can conclude that liberty is more important to whites than any other race, the love of liberty and the willingness to fight for it is still no where universal amongst us. And it's one of those tough situations where the people who do want liberty believe that those who don't want liberty need to be tolerated and allowed to exist, in the name of liberty, and have an effect on our societies, which ultimately reduces liberty. This is why it is said
>the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants

Attached: Bigger-vs-Smaller-Government.png (678x375, 17K)

- First, remove yourself from what I call the “Death Zones” which are simply the metropolitan areas of the country. In these places not only is Big Brother’s grip the tightest, but the lowest-common-denominator genetic miasma has you badly outnumbered.

- Let the cities go to HELL, right where they came from!

- …you must have all set-up and ready-to go independent sources of water, food, and heat. At the same time you must have weapons and sufficient stores of ammunition with which to defend yourself.


>Three contingencies we can look for will be the following:
(a) once major and widespread revolutionary violence starts – no matter from what quarter – the System can be expected to detain all known revolutionists as a matter of precaution;
(b) once the economy starts to fall rapidly, the System can be expected to begin mass foreclosures and confiscations while it feels it still can;
(c) just like what’s predicted to happen when the sun itself is about to burn out, the System, when it senses its time is
about up, can be expected to begin taking a great many extraordinary steps and, in general to really begin overstepping its bounds as they are vaguely defined today.

Or hadn’t you thought of any of this?

Attached: ds.jpg (1014x606, 29K)

in evolution, the superior organism is supposed to win and supplant the inferiors. Only by this can life evolve in a positive direction over the long term. If a strong organism feels bad for a weak one and sacrifices his own resources to help them succeed, he's just hurting the species in the long run. Altruism is meant to be within groups.

We don't really want or need all these nonwhites, it's our duty to replace them for the good of mankind.

Arabs and middle easterners are fine, they've proven they can create great empires in the past. But even within these countries, we should promote the more white and civilized elements to reproduce over the trash they have. Same in India.
Asians are not inferior at all, but they are more of a direct threat. Either we can live with them or we can't. If we aren't their superiors in this relationship, we need to wipe them out.

>The Left-Right Spectrum.

Even as Commander Rockwell was saying twenty years ago, classifications of "left" and "right" were becoming then and certainly are by now obsolete and meaningless. To place this into perspective, by referring to left and right, one only expands the context of, whilst remaining at the same point as those extremely foolish ones who still think in terms of party politics, Democrat versus Republican, Labour versus Conservative. The point being is these terms are all equally SYSTEM terms because in reality at the core of each of their programs they all support the system and are part of it.

What has been missing up until now is a clean DIVIDING line, an actual BREAKING POINT, where all pretense of working within the system by its rules are dropped once and for all. In short, the complete break from time passed.

"What is the solution ? WHITE REVOLUTION IS THE ONLY SOLUTION."

As has been said earlier in SIEGE, those who control the system by having ultimately succeeded in attaining total control over every aspect of society (government, media, business etc) have LOST control over the course of events through having done away with competent legitimate opposition that can conceivably step in and take over in an orderly manner as Hitler's NSDAP did in 1933.

An incredibly dangerous and explosive situation this is, for it is becoming clearer each day that those in control and their minions are losing the ability to hold the pieces together yet there is no relief, there are still no answers seen coming from any reputable direction. This of course spells total collapse, total anarchy, total destruction and it shall result in anyone babbling about conservative this or liberal that one day being rewarded with a bullet.

When the mess collapses the obvious will become clear: There is only ONE CORRECT WAY to go about handling elemental human problems, not by further compromise but through Universal 卐 Order.

Attached: 1550438362445.jpg (736x457, 67K)

>what are nukes?
Weapons that you don't have access to because you are not in control of your own nation.

>liberty is more important to whites than any other race
Probably... but then, why is it that American Whites refuse to defend our own liberties when they are being trampled upon by corporations and politicians? Why is it that a suit makes you invulnerable to bullets and bombs?

I agree.

>why is it that American Whites refuse to defend our own liberties when they are being trampled upon by corporations and politicians?
The fact that we still have a standing second amendment even when it's under constant attack is pretty much only due to whites defending it.

I think I made my case on why our defense is not absolute in my previous post.

I see you have read the book too. Based and siegepilled.

To summarize, the expected pattern for a revolution against the technological system will be something like the following:
A. A small movement, a cohesive cadre of committed, hard-core revolutionaries, will build its internal strength by developing its own organization and discipline. This movement should have branches in several of the world’s most important nations or groups of nations; say, the United States, China, Western Europe, and one or more of Russia, Latin America, and India. In each country, the movement will prepare the way for revolution by disseminating ideas—ideas that will be chosen for their soundness and not for their popularity. The movement will take pains to demonstrate the most uncompromising revolutionary integrity, and will strive to prove itself the most effective of all the factions opposed to the existing system.
B. A large minority of the general population will recognize that the revolutionaries’ ideas have some merit. But this minority will reject the revolutionaries’ solutions, if only through reluctance to change familiar ways of living or as a result of cowardice or apathy.

C. Eventually there will arrive a crisis, or a failure of the system serious enough to enable the revolutionaries to create a crisis, in which it will no longer be possible to carry on with familiar ways of living, and in which the system’s ability to provide for people’s physical and psychological needs will be impaired to such an extent that most people will lose all respect for and all confidence in the existing social order, while many individuals will become desperate or angry. Their desperation and anger will soon degenerate into despair and apathy—unless the revolutionaries are able to step in at that point and inspire them with a sense of purpose, organize them, and channel their fear, desperation, and anger into practical action. Because these people will be desperate or angry and because they will have been energized by the revolutionaries, the risk to themselves, however great it maybe, will not deter them from striving to bring down the system.
D. Even so, the revolutionary movement will probably be able to gain the active support only of some fairly small minority of the population. But the great majority will be either hopeless and apathetic or else motivated merely to save their own skins, so they will not act to defend the system.
E. The established authorities meanwhile will be disoriented, frightened, or discouraged, and therefore incapable of organizing an effective defense. Consequently, power will be in the hands of the revolutionaries.

F. By the time revolutionaries have taken power in one nation—for example, the United States—globalization will have proceeded even farther than it has today, and nations will be even more interdependent than they are now. 73 Consequently, when revolutionaries have brought the technological system to an abrupt halt in the United States, the economy of the entire world will be severely disrupted and the acute crisis that results will give the anti-tech revolutionaries of all nations the opportunity that they need.
G. It is extremely important to realize that when the moment for decisive action arrives (as at C, above) the revolutionaries must recognize it, and then must press forward without any hesitation, vacillation, doubts, or scruples to the achievement of their ultimate goal. Hesitation or vacillation would throw the movement into disarray and would confuse and discourage its members. (We will return to this point in a moment.)

Anyone who's red TD and Hunter needs to read Siege imo. I'm no national socialist, but it's got too many good perspectives that need to be considered.

because no whites need to out breed us goy

I want to kill all browns and kikes you faggot.

Attached: 1461427369202.png (705x950, 376K)

I have read all the 3 books. Right now, I am looking for another book. Any recomendation? It can be obscure, I'm looking for more perspectives.

>We are the only race that cares about liberty and is capable of empathy and is hardworking and intellegent.

>kill everyone who is darker than me because i saw a scary one once

lmao

i bet op isnt even being ironic

Attached: women-laughing-and-having-fun.jpg (600x399, 60K)

>The fact that we still have a standing second amendment even when it's under constant attack is pretty much only due to whites defending it
I agree with you. However, this "defense" has all been passifist in nature. What White people need is an armed wing which we do not denounce when they go against the (((law))).
The law is irrelevant when it does not benefit us and must be destroyed when it harms us. Denouncing violence is the most bizzare aspect of clownworld. What kind of insane world do we live in when the most "radical" of political movements (we're actually centrist but nevermind that for now) in large part denounces our own people over and over and over for fighting back against a literal genocide and for killing "people" whom we know are the most pure of pure evil ever to exist?

You electionfag retards don't even understand that meme.

Never going to happen and we don't want it to. We just want them to go home and let us live in our homelands, peacefully. You are an anti-white or a low-IQ psycho.

Read how to make a time machine and save Dr Pierce's life.

I found an article that I think is worth reading, search ADL: 100 years of hate.

Past that I don't have any specific recommendations right now, I've also been wondering what to read next.

Whites are still under a spell. Your average white person genuinely wants to "move past race." Which is a stupid notion. One does not move past evolution and biology. That's why it would be really helpful if non-whites were rioting again. Seeing their cities burn might convince a few of these less intelligent whites that their notions of moving past race were juvenile and stupid. If non-whites started acting out en-mass, some anons need to take the risk and go out filming it. Showing the worst to the public that the media might try and sweep under the rug.

While non-whites are already acting very poorly, as we know from crime stats, it's not organized enough and explicitly racial. Which is, apparently, what we need for your average white to see the pattern. At least not with the media and leftist "education" brainwashing.

>If non-whites started acting out en-mass, some anons need to take the risk and go out filming it. Showing the worst to the public that the media might try and sweep under the rug.
100% agreed.
I miss BLM. We need more Baltimore Race Riots. Or better still, more LA 1992 race rioting.

Attached: Rodney king dindu nuffin.jpg (1180x681, 305K)

BLM protests that blocked entire freeways were a real missed opportunity. Your average white person was pissed they blocked roads like that.
>Idiots need to get off the damn road
>Someone should run them over

If bubba had decided to drive his cement truck thru a sea of BLM, it could have been a turning point for this country.

>Read how to make a time machine and save Dr Pierce's life.
Well, fugg. This won't do, but i get the point. Thanks anyway.
What book i was Reading was "fry the brain", but i dropped it, because it have so much boomer shit in it, that a cringed hard.
I also read (((David Galula's))) counterinsurgency book, but I'm afraid it alone is not enough. I was thinking about reading that "liber someshit" from O9A, but I'm in doubt if it's useful knowledge, or just satanist propaganda.

*that I

>Being so weak willed you fall for the easiest example of lame, US, White supremacist propaganda
Leave your basement.

Ah, that would have been sweet.
BLM and their actions is what turned me into a racial nationalist. It wasn't everything but their actions and their obvious anti-White hatred convinced me that co-existence with them was impossible. They don't want co-existence. They will settle for nothing less than total domination and extermination for their competitors. So why should I continue being a chump and fighting for equality when they spit on the concept.

Kill them all.

Dawg, 10 hours... you think I'm going to listen to all of that?

yeah ok boomer, White Juche when?

Attached: 9E0C6948-B099-4926-885F-6C73163D5092.png (555x720, 778K)

>stop giving gibs
>half of shitskins and every nigger is starved
>problem solved

We are a race of moralfags who worry too much about being good people rather than making logical decisions.

Its a good idea, but too many people would be kvetching about genocide

Great idea. Let's do that.
Oh wait. We have no power over the gibs. That's the jews.