Depends who you believe. It's widely quoted that they add "< 0.1% nigger" or jew when it's actually 0% to "screw with racists", however if you track back the source of that quote you find it's an anonymous interview with (((Cracked.com))), who don't even tell you what specific company this allegedly real person supposedly works for: archive.is/NrMkX
It could well be that it's just statistical noise, inherent in the fact that this shit is complicated and has error bars, pic related. It's particularly difficult for pasta bros who are likely to be told they have Ashkenazi taint if they have any southern ancestry at all, it's difficult to separate real southern Italians from the jew population that lived there for centuries at a time when they also actively sought converts and intermarried.
The guy admitted once that they put 0.1% African in there, specifically to troll white nationalists.
Nathan Gray
they're disingenuous in the way theyre determining ethnicity.
they're comparing your dna with the genomes of populations from different geographical regions. if you cant see why this methodology is flawed: i'll break it down for you.
they're trying to imply that because you have some similarity to the sub-saharan africa, one of your ancestors was sub-saharan... this isnt true. perhaps some colonizer interbreeded with that population and left a genetic gift in their population.
its not that you're related to them in any way. its a stupid way to determine ethnicity :2
Its just noise. At a certain point we all feature a basis human dna. Humans evolved in africa/far east, so this basic dna gets labeled african.
Besides americans and jews are obsessed with heritage, thats the reason for these dna analysis companies. And i think they track down old nazis with dna cataloge!
Lucas Fisher
i have no black in me and im less of a mutt than you are but apparently im the inferior one because you are whiter than me.
Josiah White
The fact that you pay to send in your DNA to a company is enough proof you are not white, sorry.
Adam Powell
Good point, you need a dna from a person that you know is "pure" from that country or has a basiv dna makeup. What if they compared sme british african gene or south african dutch with you. Suddenly you are african.
Adam Roberts
They didn't do that for me, maybe you're just a nigger OP? It's sad that the last pure Anglos only exist in Australia now
That's the retarde4de, why not label us 1% Chimpanzee while you are it.
Robert King
Its anonymous. How tf are they going to know a WN submitted the test?
Leo Davis
You can determine where the SNP originate based on how common it is in ethnic groups, the real reason why the test is flawed is because it only samples a fraction of the SNPs related to ethnic differences and then does a statistical estimate based on the sample taken
Isaac Perry
Because only WNs would whine about 0.1% nigger DNA.
Aaron Harris
Neither Britain
Jason Turner
>Is this pure innocent statistical noise it is, basically they want someone who got pure european to feel somewhat mixed when they give you a 0.1% Congolese. What that 0.1% says is that you have some fragments that basically all humans share.
James Wilson
Personally, I don't think they have an agenda because there is proof that human civilization came from niggerland. As proved by this nog wearing a shirt.
These companies are all run by Jews. They are literally building a DNA database to use against the population. DO NOT GIVE THESE FUCKS YOUR MONEY
Leo Allen
I had a 23&me from over a decade ago get "updated" they sent me an email and everything saying so, the only change was adding a 0.1% SSA mixture.
They didn't resequence my DNA, they just fucked with their algorithm to spit out a nonsense result which is so borderline they can never be called on their scientific professionalism.
Landon Kelly
depends on which version they have you on in the new beta I'm no longer 100% European because of (((trace))) ancestry
Is that at a 50% confidence level? When you put the confidence level to 90% trace ancestry usually goes away, no idea why people take the results which admit they're only as right as flipping a coin as their ancestry
Eli Gutierrez
What about Ancestry.com? Heard it's run by Mormons.
Ryan Reyes
yeah, that's at 50% which they say is speculative seems like increasing the confidence interval just increases the percent of unassigned in my case
Brody Martinez
What if the admission itself was also a troll?
>this basic dna gets labeled african. Then we'd get 99.9% African for everyone.
The truth of the matter is that people wander around a lot, racism has NEVER been universal, and the nature of race/outbreeding tabus has varied a lot. You get people who engage in interracial sex BECAUSE it's forbidden - the English fetishized the French as much as Estonians fetishize Africans, for instance. You get cultures like ancient Rome, where social power was reserved specifically to ethnic Romans - not imperial subjects, but people who could convince everyone else that their ancestors came from this ONE SPECIFIC CITY IN ITALY - but a key part of social power was being able to fuck everyone else, so there was an awful lot of Roman blood in members of the subject races. Upper-caste slaveholders in the American colonies made interracial marriage illegal - and bred with their black slaves to the extent that those English who'd never SEEN an African before they came to the colonies could tell that the house slaves were the children of the upper class.
Gabriel Ramirez
They’re attempting to get normies to believe they have a commonality with niggers, thus making miscegenation with niggers more likely
Charles Morris
It’s an instrument of satan used to root out descendants of Abraham and the northern tribes of Israel.
Thomas Reyes
Daily reminder that if you don't have any Baltic ancestry youre not white.