Attached: 69304749_393416231356966_3860928144563240960_n.jpg (350x494, 26K)
Problem?
Aaron Hall
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Ayden Williams
Infinity is not a rational number, therefore π =/= 4
Zachary Miller
>>>/plebbit/
Logan Sanchez
Infinity is why random number generation is flawed
Jack Perez
Exactly
Easton Myers
I thought it was because Timers aren't truly random.
Noah Martin
based, than k you straya
Austin Young
Google why they aren't truly random
Cooper Perry
Faggot You wrap a circle with 4 inch square, not a circle being 4 inch square.
Levi Ramirez
> pi = circumference of a circle
Wow, that's news to me.
Ryan Hughes
C=2πr
2r=d
Brainlet
Jose Sanders
Lot of fucking brainlets in this thread lol.
Christopher Jones
It is just a very small zigzag
Austin Ortiz
>how 3d modelling works
Robert Davis
the process doesn't change the length properly to approximate the circumference
>I know it's a bait
Owen Richardson
um, no sweetie. that picture proves pi equals 4, therefore pi is rational.
Andrew Howard
You would need to add the pythagorean equation to get an approximation if the circumference.
Grayson Gray
It's already well-known among top-tier physicists that pi is 4 in kinematic situations. This is just another way of arriving at the same thing. It's called taxicab geometry:
en.wikipedia.org
Christian Rodriguez
The universe has no shape except for -> in and out -> directions, everything else is subjective and informational
Charles Jenkins
Well yeah, if the circle is of diameter 1, tard.
Connor Campbell
Everything wrong with modern math and mathematicians in one image.
>Number system is assumed
>Projection system is assumed
>Arithmetic axioms assumed
>Geometric axioms assumed
In Terms a programmer should understand: Modern mathematics must learn to declare variables. This isn't the 1,600s--we literally have thousands of math systems and functionally most of our world isn't base ten.