Lel

Ur a fagget. Love you user

how can you be sure the anti fish eye lens works at all?

So much effort for a simple pic in a schizo thread in a schizo board.

Because I use it all the time in my shoots, and specific filters remove the lens distortion from any fish eye lens

naw I was already removing distortion from a shoot yesterday on some GoPro footage, I just saved, dragged dropped, and added the correct filter. Took more effort to type this out.

Good I was fearing for your mental health...

holy shit

I just want to see a normal photo, not a fish-eye. Im not even a flat earther, I just dislike photos that are altered in any way. I just want to see the original!

flawless. tax dollars worth it.

Attached: 5751263943_e252eae442_z.jpg (514x361, 43K)

I’m not a flat earther either but after watching a couple of documentaries but together by one idk man. I’m not gonna be a flat earther but I also no longer laugh it off. Am I 100% certain were on a globe just as (((they))) tell us? No I’m not.

Gayest planet in the s*lar system.

There is no computer on earth capable of rendering such lifelike cloud formations.

Attached: 1566854150814.png (940x720, 383K)

Attached: FE_Hitler.jpg (960x827, 68K)

Attached: FE7.jpg (791x1024, 233K)

Attached: FE8.jpg (1280x720, 139K)

look at all those chemtrails that stop right at the water's edge. beautiful.

Attached: FE9.jpg (2352x3081, 2.15M)

Attached: FE11.jpg (960x954, 123K)

it's called a wide angle lens

>using a specific lens is alteration

aight peace niggas

Attached: FE14.jpg (480x480, 72K)

you fucking mongoloid

youtube.com/channel/UCqY8z0dAp-7dK5VKgUzo0WQ/videos

Cgi

The fucker is 100% flat

wad gind of fugget r you :-DD

Attached: 1501915060430.png (350x284, 80K)

Fisheye lens.
Go to sleep now, granny.

defend this one too achmed

Attached: Nasa Guy Vanishes.webm (1280x720, 1.57M)

Attached: ISS.webm (1280x720, 2.95M)

>hey, guys, we're going into space and this is pretty much the furthest mankind's creativity and ingenuity has taken us, we need to share this with the rest of the world
>good thinking, wachowski, load that thing up with fish eye lenses, no telescopic. I fucking mean it, only fish eye lenses!

Holy shit there are flat earthers on this board?

okay so that hurricane is just like hundreds of miles wide or what

yees

Attached: NASA Animation.webm (1280x720, 2.89M)

Its fake because the earth is a cube. Anyone who disagrees is a NASA shill.
youtu.be/n_Ln4itFeDc

I don't know jack shit about cameras. I just want to see a photo of the earth as if I was the one in the space station, observing it with my own eyes.

you're right, it's altered: there's a transition between scenes. that doesn't mean anything.

Alot of them it's really sad

Attached: 1499713451739.png (1024x1024, 49K)

But lets film the narcissistic cunts inside all the time doing silly shit with their big hairdo's.

IS THERE A SINGLE CAMERA IN FUCKING SPACE THAT ISN'T A FISH-EYED GO PRO

Attached: Cellarius_Harmonia_Macrocosmica_-_Planisphaerium_Braheum.jpg (2918x2468, 1.86M)

Attached: G15JD3.jpg (1300x1205, 456K)

here. with a regular low-angle lens you can't fit much of the earth in shot.

Attached: ISS-52_Peggy_Whitson_contemplates_in_the_Cupola.jpg (4096x2726, 1.42M)

No, just jews trying to make legit conspiracy theorists look stupid and insane by association.

this is still quite a wide angle lens but ok

Attached: Tracy_Caldwell_Dyson_in_Cupola_ISS.jpg (4288x2848, 1.24M)

I am not a flat earther but i do believe that shit is computer generated look at when it crashed live and people recorded it...

Attached: 1498345141192.jpg (918x718, 59K)

how the fuck would you know

the government has been outright COMMANDEERING shipments of computer equipment they wanted since FOREVER

can anyone find that news story where yahoo admitted they had a truckload of server equipment on its way to their facilities and then they redirected it in transit to the NSA?
google is clearly trying to scrub it

look up focal length

Attached: BiugDWBCMAAP6jZ.jpg large.jpg (946x710, 104K)

Attached: 00000008.jpg (2000x1638, 535K)

it means its fake and gay

dumbest post I've ever seen

Attached: 1556947097044.webm (1280x720, 2.92M)

>I cant comprehend focal lengths

Attached: brainlet.jpg (208x214, 11K)

fuck off with your cherrypicking angles/lense bullshit nigger we know something is not right. you are too obvious

Attached: 1498447583177.jpg (234x250, 22K)

Thanks! The wide-angle lens gives me a false impression of Earth's size. It has always irked me.

No amount of computational power can generate that level of randomness and account for that level of enthalpy. If they could, they could run models on DNA/genetics and easily discover a way to give immortality and youth to the people who own the world.

But these people are still dying.

What is
>Focal length

God you people are mental midgets. How do you breath without outside assistance?

>im too retarded to know about different cameras, must be conspiracy

Goddamn, florida is massive!

Obvious cables and bitch's hair is styled up, its not waving around, its stuck in place

>i aint know a dang thang but i know shit aint rite
your ignorance is not an argument

Attached: _83554185_83554184.jpg (640x360, 45K)

its just some clouds and optical effects. how would you know if its accurate?
the whole point is they have a monopoly on information of that scale.

wise up

Thats a tranny

you cucks always have the same argument nothing else. I am not going to go back and forth with paid posters

Attached: 1483933574686m.jpg (1024x768, 71K)

seething

Attached: spacex1566944044381.webm (1280x720, 2.93M)

actually the point is they WOULD have a monopoly on information on that scale if it did exist

Have you ever taken pictures with different phones? They all have different levels of saturation. Some naturally have warmer tones and other have cooler ones. Different cameras capture detail in different ways. It's really not hard to grasp this man

Is this CGI? Why is it 100s, possibly 1000s of miles wide?

wise up you mong cuck

Attached: 53ksHFm.png (777x464, 825K)

Attached: Image1.jpg (1280x720, 114K)

because of your secret homosexual desires

what point are you trying to make

Attached: spacex1566948053120.jpg (1125x1792, 109K)

you see, i have not even started posting anything about the reasons that i know these photos and streams are bullshit. you are all using the same argument against me before i even post lmao. it's pretty obvious

Just reminded me of that.. I, I have no point.

Attached: dsf3.png (601x589, 424K)

FISHEYE LENS
FLAT EARTH

>Love you user
ahaha, he forgot to say "no homo".

Attached: No+homo+no+homies_1ff6f8_7243426.jpg (719x601, 76K)

Attached: srget6.png (585x543, 479K)

>"why country big"
>gets told it's because of focal length x distance
>"fucking shills"

Based and redpilled.
youtube.com/watch?v=umeHIxIdKxE

>geocentrist starts comparing the sizes of things on a mercator projection
hahaha classic m8

Attached: spacex1566990748265.webm (1920x1080, 2.88M)

Fish eye lens is making it look curved

with a fisheye lens things are more curved the further from the centre you are.

take a harder look at the lines in that image. there are nice big straight lines to compare. come on, this is easy.

There's this crazy fucking thing called google, but don't worry I got you.

Attached: dorianiss.jpg (3000x1688, 1.49M)

Fuck off redditor and go slurp some approved NASA jew cum

this has to be the one with the lowest effort put into it

a lot?

not my fault if round earth arguments suck

Attached: nasa jews.jpg (1285x1062, 976K)

Its obviously a fisheye lens. You can see the "space station" is curved just as aggressively as the earth

do you think parallel lines meet? do you think straight, parallel lines curve to meet each other? what's wrong with your spatial reasoning?

actually it's curved less than earth despite being further from the centre of the image. by rights it should be MORE aggressively curved than the earth. but it's not, because the horizon already curves.

NASA will literally fucking tell you those are computer generated you mong.
pic fucking related, shit

Attached: STS-90 Neurolab sunrise.jpg (1536x1008, 364K)

when habe they not been trolling us?

yep imagine that they still cannot put a satellite up high enough to take one solid, non-composite photo? you'd think that would be high up on our bucket list of space-related todo's.

I wanna fuck that storm hole and fill it's slutty stormpussy with my cum

>they still cannot put a satellite up high enough to take one solid, non-composite photo?
You mean like the Himawari-8?