How authoritarian was Nazi Germany compared to the US and UK?
How much of a dictator was Hitler and how much of a dictatorship was Nazi Germany?
How much censorship was there, how much control, how were marginalized demographics treated?
Would you change anything for a Fourth Reich?
>How authoritarian was Nazi Germany compared to the UK?
Nazi Germany didn't confiscate butter knives
>authoritarian
>dictator
>censorship
none of these things are bad, you just have a negative perception of them because you've been indoctrinated with liberalsim. I don't care if burning transgender and pedophile shit is "censorship", it doesn't fucking belong in a functional society.
>how was it
We will never know for sure. too many lies surrounding the whole time. We can make assertions based on the things we do know however. We know, for example, that Hitler wasn't afraid to ride around in a convertible in Germany, whereas our glorious leaders hide behind bulletproof glass. (inb4 itz cuz muh guns, Hitler never took them and this applies to modern European leaders with cucked gun laws too).
>dictator
He was pretty absolute, but that isn't necessarily a bad thing. Dictatorship really just means "rule of one", the associated negative connotation is just a product of our time. I'd prefer a good dictatorship to a standard "democracy" (which in practice is really just oligarchy in disguise)
>how authoritarian
That depends on how you look at it, "authoritarianism" is not one singular aspect that can be measured equally across all things.
Did you have to bake cakes for fags in Nazi Germany? No. Were you allowed to "do whatever you want, cuz freedom"? No.
>censorship, control
Again, this depends on the situation/topic. Dissent was punished, but simultaneously calling a trans person by the wrong pronoun wasn't a criminal offense (as it is becoming in places like Canada today). Censorship has always existed, and it is alive and well today, just more covert.
>how were marginalized demographics treated?
Not well obviously, but they were also encouraged to leave which is how it should be. Germany should be for Germans, not for foreigners to feel comfortable. This should apply to all nations.
>would you change anything for a Fourth Reich?
perhaps, but i'd take a carbon copy of the Third Reich over anything we have now.
>Die Flut Kommt:
bitchute.com
Ameritards really pushing the envelope.
The thing about national socialist Germany was that they had the absolute freedom to be German. Not to be degenerate, not to be a neet, but the freedom to be German. People actually wanted to work. People wanted to contribute to their society. Why? Not for the benefit of the "state" but for their fellow Germans. I pray that the west will someday embrace those philosophies.
Is pic related true? Sounds like a paradise. What would we be saying about Germany today if they hadn't gone on the warpath? or was that not an option?
Every "resistance" group that existed in France, Yugoslavia, Greece, late war Italy were communists. They are depicted in all media as freedom fighters and nationalists, but that's not the case. They were communists. The German occupation for most countries that they occupied was taken pretty well by the locals who weren't bolsheviks.
>How authoritarian was Nazi Germany compared to the US and UK?
Very.
>How much of a dictator was Hitler and how much of a dictatorship was Nazi Germany?
He wielded absolute power.
>How much censorship was there, how much control, how were marginalized demographics treated?
Books were burned, the marginalized were sent to concentration camps.
>Would you change anything for a Fourth Reich?
No.
>How
>How
>How
Read a book, you lazy mutt.
>How much of a dictator was Hitler and how much of a dictatorship was Nazi Germany?
By today's standards not really. Germany is in many ways less free and more authoritarian today than under Hitler. Hitler relaxed many things like gun laws in Germany.
Of course it's true. Any post on an Anonymous message board that you really like has to be true - regardless of whether it cites any sources our not.
>gay jewish garbage was burned, the communist agitators were sent to concentration camps.
ftfy bud
Of course it is
Leaders riding around in cars like that was commonplace during that era. It didn’t really change until Kennedy was assassinated.
Regarding “Germany for Germans”, “France for French”, “Poland for Poland”, etc.
This formula is literally what was used for all of human history and virtually guarantees conflict because at some point country A is going to need something from country B or country A is even going to claim country B’s territory (like Hitler did) and we will have conflict.
For this reason institutions like the UN, NATO, EU, etc. were created, and since then there has been no conflict amongst member states of EU/NATO, only non member states.
As Nationalism dies it’s pathetic and backwards supporters will lash out just like all movements in their death spiral but globalist policies will ultimately prevail.
We are patient and we will get our way.
>What would we be saying about Germany today if they hadn't gone on the warpath?
Impossible, since their whole economy and ideology was literally a warpath.
>the communist agitators were sent to concentration camps.
You mean accepted into SA?
>Books were burned
As a kid I always thought the implication was they were burning science books, school books, mathematics and history books etc. I didnt realise they were burning communist propaganda and books by jews about the wonders of trannys and gays
It's overall true, yes, which is why you virtually never see any real criticisms of NatSoc economic or social policy. NatSoc Germany was probably the highest point ever reached by human civilization. The only way to criticize it is by referring to the "holohoax" and "racism". That's it. Ask someone to critique Nazi Germany without referring to those two things and watch them term into braindead mutes.
>how bad
Huh? How is authority bad? Stop arguing from the Jewish framework that having beauty and order is a bad thing.
Jew.
proof`?
>You are subhuman and will die because your skull does not fit my arbitrary made-up norms
>Peak of human civilisation
>(inb4 itz cuz muh guns, Hitler never took them and this applies to modern European leaders with cucked gun laws too).
Totally beside the point. If you wanted to assassinate Hitler, there is a 100% chance you will find a weapon, even an appropriate one like a sniper rifle.
>Hitler never took them
I always heard this, just looked it up now. I'm surprised to find out now, he only took them away from jews. I'd say I've been lied to my whole life, but that's quite obvious.
We were the baddies. God willingly we can repent our sins of WW2 and have another chance.
Small minded, narrow vision. You have repeated the words of your jewish overlords. How oh how do we explain away Hitler's extreme successes economically, especially when his economic position was based on getting rid of jews and jewish institutions? Oh, I know. We make the bullshit claim that without going to war, the economy was 'bout ready to collapse! Just like the German economy wouldn't resurrect itself under National Socialism in the first place. Let's listen to the lies of the same people whose conventional wisdom told us that the Germans could never recover, much less recover quickly and believe them when they say that without going to war the German economy wouldn't have been able to thrive.
>muh MEFO bills
>muh war production
Spare your time, juden. You are a lost mind.
This
>making stuff up
oh my sweet summer child.
by the way, germans with polish descent were considered aryans, and polish was listed as an accepted ethnic background in the aryan certificate guidelines.
>which is why you virtually never see any real criticisms of NatSoc economic policy
Except Nazi's economic policy only worked if you were raising an army that never stopped conquering its neighbors and was unsustainable at peacetime?
for more information about the right to bear arms in Nazi Germany, see this article by William Pierce which covers the years 1928 to 1945.
ironlight.wordpress.com
that's an accusation not a critique.
that was a beautiful read
>Fund your "miracle" by robbing Jews
>Fund your "miracle" by robbing Austria
>Fund your "miracle" by robbing Czechoslovakia
>Poland says "no" to Hitler "modest proposal"
>War
Also
German budget deficit in 1936 - 3,7 billion reichmarks
German budget deficit in 1938 - 8,1 billion reichmarks
Economical "extreme success" my ass
>by the way, germans with polish descent were considered aryans, and polish was listed as an accepted ethnic background in the aryan certificate guidelines.
Yeah, they divided population into five categories, of which only two had relative safety of not being scheduled for disposal in the near future.
And they stole babies which were deemed "aryan" by their looks.
Nazis were literally worse than gypsies from the worst gossip and tales.
Let that sink in.
Nothing compared to right now
>He actually trusts the (((credible sources))) who come up with those numbers
The eternal Pole.
>robbing Jews
The same Jews that ransacked the Germans? I'd say they were reclaiming their lost possessions.
>robbing Austria
The country that voted in favor of Anschluss and greeted the Germans with open arms, flowers, cheers, kisses, and never ever resisted anybody?
>robbing Czechoslovakia
The frankenstein nation that inherited their industrial might from the investments of ethnic Germans during the Austrian empire, and spent the interwar period subjugating Germans in their territory as well as the slovaks?
>Poland says no!
Polish politicians, stupid as they were, believed in a guarantee from the British and French, received zero help, got invaded by the Soviets with not a peep from their "allies", had thousands of intelligentsia murdered by Soviets, a murder pinned incorrectly on the Germans for decades, and in spite of being the original reason for this world war were offered up as a prize to the invading communists without their consent or much of a struggle in 1945. They did this for what? Oh, refusing to exchange rightful German land for actual Polish/Slav land because Poles were a NARROW MINDED and SHORT SIGHTED people who got themselves ASSRAPED for the benefit of international jewry.
Glad you're not breaking the cycle of stupidity, Wojtas
funny how the libtard jew propaganda is never specific, and never tells you what is important in their attack narratives
>had thousands of intelligentsia murdered by Soviets, a murder pinned incorrectly on the Germans for decades
...
Seriously?
You literally deported our university staff from Kraków to concentration camps during Sonderaktion Krakau.
For fucks sake, Germans had Einsatzgruppen operating behind the frontline from the day one of the Polish campaign.
The einsatzgruppen was attempting to help purge your lands of the same parasitic forces which had descended upon the German people. They were not interested in the eradication of true Poles, but rather your jewish masters. They obviously failed. You have conveniently ignored the rest of what was stated. Let's recap:
>Polish politicians, stupid as they were, believed in a guarantee from the British and French, received zero help, got invaded by the Soviets with not a peep from their "allies"
>in spite of being the original reason for this world war were offered up as a prize to the invading communists without their consent or much of a struggle in 1945
>They did this for what? Oh, refusing to exchange rightful German land for actual Polish/Slav land because Poles were a NARROW MINDED and SHORT SIGHTED people who got themselves ASSRAPED for the benefit of international jewry.
Stay simple minded, Kowalski. It's helping your masters control you.
Calling a trans person by their wrong pronoun is not illegal in Canada you Amerimutt
By the way, Stalin literally walked to the Kremlin every day with 1 body guard.
Leaders didn't start hiding behind bullet proof glass until Kennedy got fucked.
They considered certain science, school and history books to be " Jewish propaganda "
Anything they disagreed with was " Jewish or Bolshevik propaganda "
How gullible are you?
The Germans literally wanted to kill all Poles, all of them. They hated the Poles.
Meanwhile, only 10% or so of Russians, Ukrainians, Balts and so on were meant to be left alive to be slaves.
>There was resistance to Anschluss, before, during and after.
>Every state you don't like is invalid.
>The Soviet Union didn't invade Poland, Poland didn't exist as a state by the time the Soviet Union entered.
I mean the US and the USSR both had rationing, legal action against fascists based on their ideas, censorship of political speech, racially motivated internment camps (if you dont know about this with the USSR look into "german expolsion from eastern europe"), bombings of civilian centers and various war crimes against civilian and military populations throughout the war.
The only difference being that the nazis killed six gorillian jews so completely that it has to be illegal to reasearch it in every nation it was supposedly perpetrated in.
Yes it is.
You still have loved leaders today who don't have bodyguard surrounding them.
Kennedy got shot about 50 years ago that's not relevant to Merkel
LOL who can actually believe this.
Shill detected.
They went around raping and killing Slavic villagers, they were the scumiest of scum.
Show your flag shill
>The Germans literally wanted to kill all Poles, all of them. They hated the Poles.
kek.
Show flag nigger
Name one leader who doesn't have body guards surrounding them at all times.
.
Hitler.
>They were not interested in the eradication of true Poles, but rather your jewish masters.
You are completely delusional.
OK
>Jose Mujica
>mark rutte
I gave you an extra one because I heard jews love free.
Who "the world would have been better off if Germany won WWII" here?
>Posts a photo of Hitler in a car full of his bodyguards, with other uniformed men around
They were able to change his bodyguards into a whole Waffen-SS division, user.
Stop being stupid on the internet.
>meanwhile he's surrounded by civilians at handholding range
All it takes is someone taking out a revolver instead of wanting to hold his hand.
Funny how that doesn't apply to Israel though eh?
Litterally could have been shot by anyone in the crowd.
So authoritarian that most of you basement-dwelling failures wouldn't survive in the third Reich for more than a day.
FPBP
>>authoritarian
>>dictator
>>censorship
Every government has these, the only question is what they are applied to
>Authoritarian
Hitler legalized gun ownership and expanded worker's rights.
>Dictator
Didn't USA vote for a wall and Britain for Brexit? Hitler gave the people what they wanted while western governments don't. This makes him more democratic than them.
>Censorship
Hitler forbade "defeatism" during ww2 to keep morale up, otherwise there wasn't any censorship. He also got rid of all the tranny and commie propaganda too, but we can all probably agree that's a good thing.
Are you mad jew boy?
You certainly wouldn't.
>Civilians
>on a crowded street
It is a nazi rally, user.
There is not a one person not in uniform on that photo.
>Polish politicians, stupid as they were, believed in a guarantee from the British and French,
I do not believe that Germans should rule over Poles nor vice versa.
I am a Nationalist, not a multiculturalist or a German chauvinist.
>resistance to anschluss
Absolute falsehood
>Soviet Union didn't invade Poland
en.wikipedia.org
If you're willing to lie about basic information that even your Jewish overlords agree is true, what else are you lying about?
>Luftwaffe commander Clemens Graf von Schönborn-Wiesentheid
>died in a flying accident at Sofia, Bulgaria on 30 August 1944
Another one because I'm nice
This my history class only focused on the holocaust and the racism and never the what the NatSoc ever accomplished.
>How authoritarian was Nazi Germany compared to the US and UK?
Aside from the one party state, Britain was equally authoritarian and by that I mean, we disciplined children and enacted punitive justice like any sane state would, upheld the values of the church, etc.
>How much of a dictator was Hitler and how much of a dictatorship was Nazi Germany?
I view this as a non-sequitur as democracy doesn't really reflect the will of the people. We voted to leave the EU 3 and 1/2 years ago and they're still trying to over-turn it 3 PM's later.
>How much censorship was there, how much control, how were marginalized demographics treated?
As much as was necessary to shut the lying Jews up, no more, no less.
>Would you change anything for a Fourth Reich?
I wouldn't go around invading neighboring countries and I'd expel the Jews immediately without compensation.
were white kids in Nazi germany forced to go to school with blacks at gunpoint?
I am pro-Polish, okay?
On your post;
Jews robbed Germans. Hitler took back stolen wealth.
Austria voted to join Germany. This was nothing like the invasion of Czechia or Poland. This was no more robbery than when Polish patriots revolted and joined the Polish Republic in 1919.
Sudetenland was German. However, I agree that invading Czechia was anti-Nationalistic.
I agree that invading Poland for non-German land was immoral and also a serious strategic mistake that cost Germany immeasurably.
And as a Pole, you should know better than to try to judge the quality of life in Germany by budgetary quibbles. It's the actual quality of life which interests me. I'm not afraid to admit that I'm still learning and have been for over ten years.
On each of those there are a lot of both SS and SA men.
What exactly are you trying to prove?
Total moron detected. Nazi Germany was less militarized than either Britain or France in 1939, and had a superior economy.
Hitler is literally surrounded by a cheering crowd that he is reaching out and touching with only a handful of bodyguards who aren't even on alert.
I shouldn't have to explain what should be obvious to someone of at least average IQ.
>Sudetenland was German. However, I agree that invading Czechia was anti-Nationalistic
Hitler never invaded Czechia. Their president asked Hitler to establish a protectorate over what was left of it since their country collapsed after being invaded by Poland, Hungary and Slovakia and Ruthenia seceeding.
Also the old "Hitler looted x country". He incorporated them after they invited him. Taking over a country's government isn't the same thing as looting since you actually have to pay for the region's expenses now, and Austria and Bohemia weren't treated any worse than any other part of the Reich.
Hitler could have easily been assassinated. Most of those people are not SA. Besides that SA are party members and this was before hitler got elected at least in 1930.
What can you disprove?
sure they did memeflaggot nigger, sure
What do you mean unsustainable at peace time? The economy boomed because work was easy to find whether it was in a factory, on a farm, building infrastructure, police work, business, etc. point being that people didn't struggle to find work and the economy was doing very well before war time.
>flag
ignored
churchill was not elected and suspended habeas corpus. plus the monarchy can do as they please in bongistan. Im explaining to boomers that im a nacsoc, unfourtunalty its too late for my nation. weve croossed the rubicon. soon we will be a mexico-brasil hybrid.
Based leaf
Compared to postmodern railing US? It was surely awesome. Compared to totalitarian USSR? It was surely awesome.
>How authoritarian
very, they forcibly circumcised infants and sewed the foreskins into lampshades. i was personally cock-gassed not thrice but in fact lice. the trauma still haunts me
Very beautiful, who made these?
The media censors already. You have to toe the line to get published, produced, airplay etc.
The only thing that would change is the line.
The kike is seething