Gun Contr

wsj.com/articles/texas-shooter-had-been-banned-from-buying-firearms-because-mentally-unfit-11567540321

Attached: 1567565045492.jpg (768x1033, 339K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=jthXZCnGx2A
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Just like that one shooter shouldn't have been able to get a gun because of a dishonrable discharge but the air force never filed the paperwork

Liberals think "ban guns" means all firearms are permantly removed from the country, except of course those in the hands of the more qualified and totally not racist police

>,being necessary for the security of a free state,
means more to me than
>muh fearfulness and multiple jew attackers

This

Oh no, how convenient to drive an agenda

Attached: F45CDA72-BB3F-4E2D-9194-B2370121056B.gif (500x282, 1.96M)

> air force never filed the paperwork
and im still convinced they did it on purpose

Gun control... Will never work. Criminals will always find ways to obtain them. While law-biding citizens will always get systemically raped by the government for merely wanting to protect themselves, their families and their properties from the criminal element.

>Democrats demanding that Senate pass legislation that bans private sales when they come back from summer vacation this week
>Mass shooting happens with gun purchased in private sale
WOW

yeah this. even if gun manufacturers were banned criminals would still be able to "bootleg" firearms in secret. it not like gun are a magical mysterious tech that a gang of thugs couldnt figure out how to mass produce. then we would have an even bigger problem with underground arsenals being produced all over the country.

Attached: 1552013581531.jpg (828x651, 68K)

Just checking another box. They want to ban person to person sales. Its all a controlled ruse. Don't fall for this shit.
Another shooting. Another box checked. It's literally impossible for them to cover each and every aw they want banned in a single shooting so each one exploits existing laws to draw emotional attention and get pull to have them banned. It's statistically impossible for people to be doing this organically. Every. Single. Time. It's a new aw being brought up. Bump stocks. Ammo purchasing. Person to person sales. Each and every shooting is and new set of events. It's all by design. Wake the fuck up.

>through private sale
see goyim? We told you those "universal" background checks were necessary, it only took us 20 attempts fishing for crazy people to find an example

And? So they didn't follow the law as outlined, the police stood by while parkland was "happening"

People don't understand that. I had to explain to someone that assembly lines are only the final stage for the product when some retard was talking about how the auto industry isn't that big.

>it not like gun are a magical mysterious tech that a gang of thugs couldnt figure out how to mass produce.
The hood is full of CNC machines.

Hell yeah brother

Attached: B9BD8DE6-24DC-46B3-ABD6-379EA37EFA6B.png (738x466, 627K)

>neighbor reports shooter was threatening her
>with a firearm
>calls police
>welp we can't seem to find you on GPS
>sorry, since the advent of GPS technology we can't seem to find our way around without it
>opportunity to prevent this shooting is gone

Need to fire every single cop on that force.

>private sale
Ok, require a paper trail. If you sell a gun to someone who shouldn't legally have one, it's on you.

We just need to ban guns

>authorities looking into whether he bought it from private sale
>other news agencies are reporting the private sale as fact
dishonorable

>OY VEY, SETHY, WHY DO YOU GOTTA MAKE THE GOYIM NOTICE THAT WE DO MOST OF THE MASS SHOOTINGS?!?!

Attached: 1497715928900.png (183x232, 14K)

One can make a firearm with like 12 bucks and a trip to Home Depot.

You can also make gunpowder for about $7 and a little knowledge.

No, they don't. Stop being a fucking idiot with these ice cold boomer takes.
They know full well what they're doing. They want the people they don't like to be disarmed.

Ban sale

They are fully aware of this. They don't care.
The goal is to disarm YOU. They're not stupid, even if they pretend to be.

>The goal is to disarm YOU
As it has been since 1776.

But also what the fuck is going on and why are they all pushing so fucking hard for outright confiscation now?

Just how fucked up and heinous IS whatever it is that’s lurking just over the horizon?

They are under a time constraint: they have to disarm the slaves before society collapses and the slaves come hunting for (((the guilty))).

That they're getting more desperate suggests that collapse is near.

They realize that they aren't going to get their magic population wave.

The kids are angry. They're only going to get angrier, and they won't be satisfied with the acceptable targets soon. They're starting to lose their temper with their handlers as well.

Look at the figureheads in the left: They're trying to get control back of the children by sponsoring leashed Judas' like Greta and Hogg... And it's not working, because they're plenty angry, but the kids are angrier.

This is the last chance they'll have for a docile populace: They need to break our legs, because when the kids grow up and realize that their parents were just as angry, but had to hide it, either they're going to join us or we're going to join them.

And it's going to be beautiful.

>problem with underground arsenals being produced all over the country.
I don't see this as a problem.

Sub-machine guns only require 3 moving parts.

Attached: Luty.jpg (465x312, 58K)

No

Try it

This!

I WANT ONE!

Attached: 1559155655900.jpg (646x720, 19K)

>he doesn't know about slamfire shotguns

make one then.....in minecraft of corse.

But minecraft is hard. Especially on how to tame a horse...

>huuurrr duurrr
>only criminals will get guns so we shouldn't outlaw guns
Maybe we should legalize drunk driving because only criminals drive drunk. Let's just get rid of all laws, no criminals!

In my opinion. Any laws passed is not going to do a damn thing. Be it on paper or stone. It won't stop the deed from happening. Suppressing it or forbidding it will only make it stronger. Let it be I say.

>banning privates sales of property
lol
youtube.com/watch?v=jthXZCnGx2A

Attached: 4635211.gif (200x150, 2.11M)

This but the opposite. They got their wave. Millennials statistically deviate left compared to other generations. The problem is that they don’t vote, and the generation behind them, Gen Z, is both politically motivated and right leaning. The wave exists, but it won’t for very long. They have to do it now or they’ll have to wait another 50-100 years.

Every American reading this thread owns a rifle, right? You do own a rifle, right?
If not, why?

Attached: 1567535403608.jpg (910x1024, 174K)

rll

Attached: 1554480929072.jpg (646x595, 55K)

If drunk driving was legal they wouldn't be criminals, ad absurdam.
Why the constant comparisons of a constitutional right with driving and cars?
The 18th amendment created millions of criminals the instant it was passed. On strictly utilitarian grounds it created more criminals and less happiness so that after years of gangster crime and the public ignoring it, it was repealed.
Not a strawman. Many of the same people who want pot legal want another prohibition--of firearms--with the difference and legal, political problem being that one involves the necessity of repealing a constitutional amendment.

This right here read it. Read it twice.

I have a 1976 30-06 never missed a deer with that bad boy

>cant buy gun cause mentally unfit
>every violent nigger in chicago has a hi-point
what's this timeline? neat

Both wrists! You saved her! =D

What is really dangerous is how these people are cool with just ignoring the authority of the constitution when it is inconvenient. I find a very effective method when debating anti gunners is to just suddenly pivot to saying women shouldn't be able to vote. They always respond in total shock and say it is in the constitution. Funny how when I suggest ignoring a constitutional right they care about suddenly it is TOOOOTALLY different. But they get to run around the constitution any time they want.

Going

Second amendment is unconstitutional as it goes against the raise of taxes.
Of course citizens should have firearms but that should be agreed with the king. Only cuck countries wouldn't allow it, see the world isn't a labyrinth.
What kind of man actually would want to maintain a war with another one? The actual fun in fighting is neutralizing.
Even at the most ways you can dislike a friend you can't have a friend you want dead.

Governments should be a afraid of their people.

Don't worry; Give it another two regime changes and then let me know how much taxation you can stand.

>What kind of man actually would want to maintain a war with another one? The actual fun in fighting is neutralizing.
>Even at the most ways you can dislike a friend you can't have a friend you want dead.
What the fuck is this engrish supposed to be? Also, you're in no danger of getting killed if you don't try to get into fist fights with people who want no part of it.