Quantum can't even explain this

>S-stop looking at quantum materia, goy! I-it's not like there's a god there or anything, Baka!

They literally say it in the video its the refraction of the sun on the atmosphere.

no thats plato's cave story. is there some body holding up some puppets and the light is making shadows?
no explain light.

Attached: 1544208102714.jpg (640x556, 209K)

>why has the world wasted their time on this quantum mechanics? or general relativity for that matter.
I don't understand the question.

Because they are provable properties of the physical world?

i mean, the sun is not shadows on the wall. explain the sun, stars, light..

i asked you to show 1 explanation. explain the picture

Explain the sun? Why it's there or how does it work or what?

Are you high?

your explanation of what it is. using all that quantum intelligence or general relativity intelligence youve got. is the question too hard for you? you see it right? do you know what it is?

Have a (you) user

Attached: 1565836040211.jpg (750x721, 364K)

High energy reactions like fusion emit all kinds of radiation some of which your eye can see.

durr it didnt happen you cant prove it now show us somethign you can explain and we can tell, its a phenomena. not what you just claimed.

Just because an inequality can be expressed as aneobolic mathematical expression doesnt make quantum mechanics valid. Anything can be cut into two equal halves of the same mass. Spooky Objects are categorically fictional observations of a universe bound by relativity.

So, your question is: What is the sun?

>fiction= made up
your telling me we make up things about made up things...
can you explain the sun you retard
yes tell me again 2nd time ive asked, what do you think the sun is.

2d lizinigger detected
Auto sequence 3 engaged

explain the sun

sage the slide thread and move on.
Don't answer this fool.
>How do magnets work? - OP

But how does gravity work?

>don't slide my election threads
fuck them they condone this quantum shit.
how do magnets work?
gravity?
torsion of the rope.

magnets i havent grasped it but no ive not thought it thorugh yet but its the rope single thread spinning out.

here before someone spits out muh double-slit experiment as proof
youtube.com/watch?v=yOwTV-HgDUo

You drop something and it falls.

explain vision!
how do we see what we see?

youtube.com/watch?v=JL88omsU5dU

Attached: montano asuka.png (1113x668, 878K)

>what do you think the sun is
Please put this at the bottom of your original post next time. Dumb fucks like me don't know what you want. Thank you.

I know I will waste my time because you write like a 7 year old, but ok:

The sun is a very very big ball of gas (75% hydrogen, ~24% Helium) that creates a lot of heat via nuclear fusion

How do we know this:
>very very big:
Newton's gravitational equations give us the mass of earth and the sun very precisely. It's absolutely settled science since the 17th century.

>ball of gas (75% hydrogen, ~24% Helium)
we know the light spectrum hydrogen and helium emits and the sun sends us this spectrum to 75% and ~24%. Every spectrometer proves this.

>via nuclear fusion
this is a bit harder and more complicated: Pre-quantum theory and nuclear theories there were many hypothesis on how the sun burned for centuries, but all were simply not logically sound, e.g. the sun wouldn't be hot enough, would've burned up in a few thousand years, would've to be EVEN bigger etc.
Quantum theory is provable in experimental set-ups both extremely simple and mindboggingly complicated. It's a fact and had at first nothing to do with explaining the sun, but with weird contradictions we found when looking at properties of light itself in different (theoretical and real) set-ups. The first discoverer of quantum phenomena Max Planck didn't believe in it at first himself and only the mounting amount of evidence convinced him after many years.
The groundwork of quantum theory and nuclear theory suddenly explained all the contradictions in explaining the mechanism of the sun. The mathematics made sense, experiments and observations further confirmed it.

i posted a picture with teh title explain this. how can you not get it, why does it have to be baby fed to you. explain what you see when you see the sun

You are low IQ retard. Fuck off and die, stupid ass.

I'm backing what this guy is saying below.
Otherwise I don't look at the sun because it hurts my eyes. I don't know anything about quantum physics so I appreciate that you took the time to baby fed me. Thank you for clarifying your original post OP. Your doing really well

Quantum mechanics doesn't have an explanation of light ? What are you getting at ?

QUANTUM PHYSICS: A TLDR;
QUANTUM particles make up subatomic particles. These particles tend to pop in and out of existence. If you don't want to know why, you might just be a ZERGling

you are saying that helum and hydrogen are light?
you havent shown nothing and you convinced yourself with a bunch of mumbo jumbo .
confirmations doesnt explain.
you've shown nothinga nd i dont believe it.
>muh gibs
tldr read what i said, zealot
well, i can
read>
>magic dude
HAHA
theres no atmosphere of the sun. how can electric or energy survive in it? the sun isnt a fireball. you cant have
1.) electric
or
2.) fire
in space.

space.com/17160-sun-atmosphere.html
dont give me this shit either. it all reads like baby story fantasy crap. nothing they even say coorelates with their own claims.

makde up shit.
explain the sun thats all i want, to know. quantum cant do it so go fuck off.

Attached: delet-this.jpg (442x442, 97K)

>you are saying that helum and hydrogen are light?
No, i didn't. ARE you light because I can see you and measure your spectrum? You are a brainlet.
>you havent shown nothing and you convinced yourself with a bunch of mumbo jumbo .confirmations doesnt explain.
Called it. Wasted my time on an absolute brainlet.

>the sun isnt a fireball.
Because it isn't fire, retard, it's extremely hot gas.

>creates a lot of heat via nuclear fusion

now explain the "heat" part of this one, particularly how the surface of the sun is not as hot as the corona.

my suspicion is that the fusion does not directly generate heat but rather some combination of em and light energy that somehow combines to create heat. watched a john lear video a long time ago and, while i think most of what he says is crazy, he mentioned something about "the sun doesn't quite work the way we think it does. it's an em machine and isn't hot at all." i'm paraphrasing, but i specifically remember "em machine" and since hearing that i haven't found a source for the temperature of sun's sfc that doesn't rely entirely on calculations based on guesses.

>[spoiler]can you shed some light on this[/spoiler]

>teh suns hot
hahhaha
hot is light.
light is hot

ok, calling me a brainlet.
hahah. oh man. no wonder college professors hate me

Nuclear reactors produce electricity, right?
Nuclear FUSION, is the opposite of that, it is a reaction caused by massive pressure from a sheltered gravity well
Debate on

It can be explained by op eating a bullet

Helium and hydrogen are gasses, and what do you know, so is atmosphere

nobody besides your mental illness ever claimed "the sun is light".

>light is hot
>hot is light.
not always, but often. Ever seen the wire inside of a light-bulb, it gets hot and emits light because of it.

Why are you debating things if you have a lower grasp on basic physics than most teenagers?

>how the surface of the sun is not as hot as the corona.
I think (I am not certain though) that the corona is partly made out of eruptions from further inside the sun (see the "flare" in the picture) and those are hotter than the surface.

Aaaaannd, the core is hotter than the surface becaaaaause....?

Look kid, it's sad you don't know much about the cutting edge in quantum, especially since most of it went down in Germany, but as it turns out, quantum particles maaaaybe don't follow the same laws of physics as we do for some reason, to be explained upon further experimentation

I'm studying physics are your scientifically illiterate op

>now explain the "heat" part of this one,
sorry forgot the heat part itself.

Nuclear fusion produces an extreme amount of energy and the most basic form of energy is heat.

ok nuclear fusion extremely (!) simplified is pressing 2 nuclear cores into one, which results in energy (mostly heat). This only happens if the pressure is gigantic. Imagine for example trying to press 50 tennisballs into the size of a rice corn.

The pressue in the sun comes from it's immense mass and we know from Newton that the bigger the mass the more it pulls. The closer to the core the gas atoms are, the more pressure is on them. so more cores are forced to fuse, creating more energy.

No just underread and under the oppressive thumb of the UN
Have you seen their TV? I mean oh my shit their tv makes our fluoride seem like extra flavouring.

>thinks he is on the cutting edge of quantum physics
>doesn't know why the sun is hot

>2dubbs1thread

i know enough about the corona to tell you it is a constant feature. i may be misunderstanding what you mean, but temporary flares would not explain a permanent halo around the sun that's actually hotter than its surface, no matter the frequency of the flares. however i don't know enough about the corona to say that its temperature is consistent over its circumference, so it may be influenced by the flares causing variability in the temp.

my thinking is the corona is actually the "hot" part of the sun and heat radiated from the sun comes from the corona rather than the sfc. implications would be huge for understanding nuclear fusion and how to harvest it, potentially even from the sun.

it's not like my question matters in any way though, was just hoping you could solve a years-long riddle that's been bouncing around in my head.

You learn what light is when you take any intermediate chemistry course but it's not worth spoonfeeding schizo brainlets

you have no fucking explanations then tell me im scientifically illiterate.

because you claim all these fucking things throw them 1 by 1 at me and want me to swallow it all and be convinced
its more like a cult or church i call them cults tho because you attempt to force eeverybody else to go along with it becuae so manyyy
the light bult idea involves 'electricity" too doesnt it?
u claim the filament gets hoot and that causes the glow.
but electricity is in their too. and anyway, what is light? and how did electricity do anything, not what makes it but how did it make the wire glow?

i am saying whne you look up into the sky and see the sun during the daytime, what is that?

So what do you want me to explain?
Now I'll admit for some reason modern physics isn't taught in education unless your someone that has a specialist interest so I don't think you're reatrded

you are just a zealot in the church of quantum mechanics and general relativity,
under the big funding by the government gibs of the world
causeing man to go extinct by perverting nature to uphold your claims

>Nuclear fusion produces an extreme amount of energy and the most basic form of energy is heat.

just to be clear, are you saying that all energy is in some part expressed as heat?

this doesn't make sense to me, but offhand i can't think of any contradictions. friction creates heat, electrical resistance, combustion...

>being this easily baited

Attached: 1544900790474.png (211x239, 6K)

Heat is the same thing as light in essence.
The sun is essentially a black body and will emit a range of light that fits a general black body emission spectar.
Also analysing the black body emission spectra was critical in the creation of quantum mechanics

Because we are hoping to unlock faster than light travel so we can ship, wave after wave of refugees to alien cultures to prevent them from succeeding.

Attached: refugees.jpg (3000x1800, 771K)

the light bulb glows because the filament resists the flow of electricity but is overloaded. it tries to stop the electrical current, but there's too much current so it keeps flowing through.

when you rub your hand on the carpet really hard, the carpet tries to stop your hand. you can feel the resistance physically. if you keep rubbing the carpet, your hand will get hot and eventually catch on fire. that would suck, but it would also make a lot of light because fire does that.

it's just like that inside of the lightbulb; the filament in the middle glows because it's basically on fire. it doesn't actually burn up though because there's no air inside of a lightbulb, and flames need air. next time you light a candle, put a lid on it, and eventually the candle will go out because it runs out of air.

electricity is just a form of energy and is used to produce heat in the wire of a classic light-bulb. You can create heat with other things, electricity is just the most convenient for that use.

>not what makes it but how did it make the wire glow?
It makes it very hot, which leads to something called Incandescence, which means it emits radiation, among it visible light.

>i am saying whne you look up into the sky and see the sun during the daytime, what is that?
extremely hot gas emitting light into space.

>just to be clear, are you saying that all energy is in some part expressed as heat?
Not all energ forms, I think. (Could be wrong though)

But in the case of many physical phenomena heat is the most basic form of energy "loss".

this doesnt explain what the sun is, or that made up atmosphere they made up about it. there is no atmosphere or any thing for electricity or fires to exist in space.

so this theory that its fire of some type or their descriptions of what its made of, the made up of part is pretty ridiculous as everytig they make up is contradicted and they cant make one single clear non-contradictory stateent about the sun.

again whats the sun?

am familiar with black body radiation, but just trying to get a better understanding of energy and energy transfer

heat is light doesn't make any sense because you can have an led or laser create a lot of light without heat and an electric stove on medium (not all the way up, as in not glowing) will create a lot of heat without any light

nobody besides you ever said: The sun is fire or electricity.
It isn't.

I take a steel ball, heat it to 3000°C (now it glows like hot steel tends to do) and put it in a small container and make a vaccuum in the container. The steel ball still is very very hot and emits heat and light. Is the steel ball made out of fire? NO!

It's not that difficult to understand. It really isn't.

Attached: 5c6f59ce5efd9b78b0013c1558f3a479.jpg (492x328, 22K)

the sun creates its own atmosphere. by this logic, the earth wouldn't be able to exist because it's in space

>most basic form of energy "loss"
i think i see where i went wrong. i was equating energy transfer with energy. any energy transfer (that we know of) is subject to friction and friction always generates heat. i assume friction is what you're referring to in the quote.

>please show and explain
QM and GR does not exist to explain anything to morons that do not want to know.
But both they give us tools that can be used to make precise predictions about how matter and energy will behave in given conditions. Including this big clump of hydrogen and helium on your image.
And the semiconductor circuits inside the computer you are using for your post.
And neural synapses that were firing and causing you to post this.
In essence - everything

Attached: person.png (360x360, 240K)