Traditionalism is the only true threat to Progress.
Introductory Reads:
Traditionalist: The Decline of the West - Oswald Spengler Revolt Against the Modern World - Julius Evola Insights into Christian Esoterism - René Guénon Dark Right: Batman Viewed from the Right - Greg Johnson
I have no problem with accelerationism. I see it as coming full circle back toward trad. society, and enchancing those qualities within capitalism, without giving up hi-tech culture. Neo-reaction is compatible with traditionalism.
Joseph Murphy
You can be a traditionalist and accelerationist, as was Julius Evola:
"...the apologists of what is "concrete" should not be told: "Stop!" or "Turn around!" or "Wake up!" but rather: Go ahead! Achieve all your goals! Break all the dams! Faster! You are unbound. Go ahead and fly with faster wings, with an ever greater pride for your achievements, with your conquests, with your empires, with your democracies! The pit must be filled; there is a need for fertilizer for the new tree that will grow out of your collapse." Revolt Against the Modern World
We rebuild, we create and build, build something new. Constantly. If there was no creation of the new, there would be nothing that traditionalists could refer to as 'tradition'.
This. Accelerationism only works if it's instantaneous, otherwise it's like waiting to hit the bottom so you can kick off up to the surface of the water, but in the Atlantic ocean.
you used tonnes of buzzwords and trends that classic satanists use. you exposed yourself you edgy bitch
Aaron Turner
this. listen to their shit on the franklin s andal as well as the one on laurel canyon. the laurel canyon one has jay dyer as a guest
Dylan Wood
Traditionalism doesn't mean we don't create anything new. Just that new things should have traditional values and without them they have no meaning or value.
Like see how modern art goes against the traditional values of Beauty, Harmony, Balance & Order? Buildings with crooked walls, sharp angles, asymmetric shape, and purposely unusable space.
Traditional architecture doesn't have to be made of stone or marble, but it should be modelled after traditional values, the way that Gothic, Roman, or East Asian architecture is.
it's not breaking tradition so much as downright disrespecting tradition.
Tradition is acknowledging the things that our ancestors have learned, so that we can learn even a little bit more, and then our children can learn even a little bit more than that, etc.
But now a days people just outright piss on everything we've ever believed as a culture. Just look at those girls, look at how they are dressed, and look at how they treat the memory of the woman in the painting. She was a far better woman than anything they will ever be. This is social backsliding and degeneration. Next thing we'll be back to living in caves and beating our chests like apes
In order to have the right to break with tradition, you must be worthy of it. You need to respect it and treat it seriously, understand it, know what's worth preserving/removing, know the consequences, etc. The Greek heroes who defied the gods were respected by the gods and considered worthy.
The superficial normie view that: monarchy is bad because equality, paved the way to being ruled by bourgeois elites, demagogues and unelected bureaucrats. They don't understand tradition, so they saw not the consequences of breaking with tradition.
Just use Firefox you can right click and hide threads for nudity or any other reason.
Noah Ross
Yes, but then it's too late, your brain registered the tits and ass, and started processing. You can't unsee what you've seen. This blur will protect your lizard brain from even waking up.
