Was it really that bad?
Feudalism
If you were a serf
No, it wasnt that bad. It was simply an economic system that prioritized stability over growth. And it suited medieval Europeans just fine.
Also, hard borders weren’t really a concept as we know it today until the nation-state became established post-Westphalia.
Totally depends on your Lord and the local community culture.
Our Lords are going to be NWO kike billionaire luciferians and AI IngSoc.
In a way, yes. It came about from a recession as a result of the Roman Empire going belly up.
Huh, makes sense since we didn't even really have properly standardized systems of measurement for a long ass time.
It certainly did work and was stable enough, but it was also a lessening of what once was, and if not for Churches becoming bastions of knowledge few cared about or applied any more we would not have grown out of the dark ages for a lot longer.
Thanks to religious feasts most peasants had more days off than the average American wage slave.
The internet was much slower back then though.
This
>be medieval peasant
>work to feed yourself and your community
>the lord and knights were sworn to protect and look after you
>live with your qt wife and family in a multigenerational household
>eat fresh and organic produce
>1/3rd of the year was in feast and celebration
>no technology to interfere with your religious belief, no doubt that eternal paradise awaits for you in heaven
>be modern wagecuck
>work to fuel the system that is against you
>boss doesn’t give a shit about you
>wife will likely divorce you and take half of your shit, live alone in a high rent shitty apartment
>eat unhealthy GMO, HCFS Zog chow
>if lucky, get a few vacation days a year
>spend every day indulging yourself in technology, degeneracy and vices to fill in the void
Nothing that lasts for 5000 years is bad.
It varied from place to place and time to time across Europe, but no, it was not that bad given there was no war or famine going on.
Well, you did have to do combat duty for your lord at least in some regions. But that was generally limited to two summer months a year, and medieval war looks more like a mass brawl with some knights dueling at the sides.
Peasants didnt care about killing other peasants, and knights ignored them and tried to catpure other knights alive for taht sweet ransom money.
Meideval armies loss rates were generally somewhere under 5% , iwth most casualties being thanks to diease. It was only during early modernity that things got really fucked up.
It accomplished essentially nothing other than mere survival.
If you consider that acceptable, then it was fine.
This burger wants to be a burgher. Lange Messers for the middle class NOW.
Also, anyone have a pdf of The Martial Ethic in Early Modern Germany?
Unless you were in Russia no it wasn’t that bad.
>Russia
>Feudalism
Russia skipped feudalism and went straight to autocracy. No other land ever had madatory serfdom.
It was good to be the king.
It wasn't even bad if you were a serf. Serfs worked less than today's working class does and had happier, healthier lives because their lords had a duty to them.
it's the first result on jewgle m8.
can't link it though cuz spam filter.
Depended on your lord. Some lords somewhat valued their peasants, other lords squeezed them with harsh taxes, fucked their wifes and daughters and sent their sons to some pointless war.
This. Egalitarianism/liberalism is the greatest scam in history.
It was not as bad as it could have been because they were all ethnocentric.
Neo monarchist retards lack the imagination to conceive of a mornarch that hates you and his subjects so much he's terrorizing them with brown people.
Remember the true 14 words:
>The industrial revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
It wasn’t but we can’t go back to it.
the nobles read each other jewish socialist fairytales in latin while their slaves put food on the table. all socialist and communist systems usually end up that way
Its actually pretty astounding to realize how close feudalism and commune-ism are in end result
Of course not, thays why jews hate it
When we purge, we are going right back to it for good
No banks for profit etc
EVER
Well I assume it would depend on one's individual situation, but at least the average life expectancy, and standard of living was shit. I suppose to really know with any certainty you'd need a time machine.
Like they do now
Except Godless bureaucrats existed in small numbers and servd a Lord
No choice
The merchant satanists saw they could use bureaucracy to supplant fuedalism in places where it was being abused
Really, the greedy Lords who were jew like led to people replacing them
Nobles bred with rich merchant jews so they could gamble and rub lead paint on their faces
The nobles failed and were crushed by jews who had likely enabled it from the start
Then here we are a few hundo later and jews are a protected class
JEWS HAVE TO BE PROTECTED because of what they do
Do you even fucking till soil? Step aside!
I somehow doubt that claim when that claim when there was little surplus of food
Citation needed
Yes. It honestly was that bad. Because when you base political authority/national wealth/legal authority in a hereditary class? You form a disturbingly violent caste system. There's a reason the autocratic monarchies of Europe were torn down one by one. They sucked to live under.
If you were the ruling class you'd have amazing feasts all day. If you were the knight class or religious class you're life was pretty good. If you were a peasant you would work 6 hours in the morning (after breakfast), have sex then nap around midday when it was too hot to work, then work 6 more hours in the evening, then east dinner, have sex (in the communal room so your five other kids might have been watching, this was normal), then sleep. then wake up at midnight, have sex, then sleep and start over. So basically fuedalism was either eat a lot of food or have sex.
MOAR