>The researchers found that individuals with weaker emotional abilities — particularly emotional understanding and management — tended to score higher on a measure of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation.
this explains why its easy to bait on here.
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtu.be
twitter.com
>emotional-intelligence
basically being a woman or a faggot
>emotional intelligence
Not a real thing
>Psychology
Not a real science
>jews say if you defy them you bad
thanks op
>this explains why its easy to bait on here.
Bait? What are you talking about? Don't you know anyone with a BLM flag like me is actually black? Figures a dumb cumskin would doubt that.
>emotional intelligence
Blah we’ve all heard this crap before. We know, conservatives are mentally ill and only 10 years of deep therapy with a Jew analyst can cure us.
Got it.
>emotional intelligence
>>Liberals are somehow stronger
>>Triggered over a sharpie
>>Believes Communism will work... THIS time
sounds like what somebody who can't control their emotions properly would do when faced with information they don't like.
>irony
Most of the discussion here is a pretty good example of how retarded right wingers are, yeah there's a few high IQ posters, but most are baboon tier. Go to a more left leaning site and the jump in intelligence levels is palpable.
yes, the point and laugh at snowflake liberals threads on here are very ironic, i agree.
(((Emotional Intelligence)))
spam goes in all fields
emotion is the vaginal lubricant of the brain
Psychology is infused with leftist ideas.
Social psychology was literally kickstarted by kike milgram to research muh holocaust.
In theory it's a valid subject, but it's safe to ignore these days because in practice it's nothing more than a thing leftists manipulate to make people do what they want.
Emotional intelligence in this case means that you understand what the fuck you're feeling and how you manage your emotions (like anger, etc), though, which is something I don't think many right wing people spend time thinking about, so on the surface there's nothing inherently wrong with the article. It's easy to spot the jew behind the curtain though- all that headline is meant to convey is "look! all the bad goyim are retarded!"
It's nothing more than something kikes and leftists can use to lord over right wingers.
> “One cannot discredit any ideology on the basis of such results as those presently obtained. Only in a distant future we will be able to look back upon our times, and then we can maybe judge which ideologies were the best. Cognitively and emotionally smart people can make wrong decisions as well.”
Is pretty neutral though.
What they don't mention is the right wing's in-group preferences, which on a sociopsychological level explains much more about the ideology than this relatively useless study.
Nope.
If you are intellectually honest, find one thing that you believe Trump did right or a policy that he's correct on. Then go to a mainstream leftist subreddit, forum, or whatever and say that you agree with him and provide a logical explanation.
Watch how quickly they yell, and how they will have 0 counter-argument, 0 logic, etc. whereas the right wing community will concede points fairly.
Just try it.
>What they don't mention is the right wing's in-group preferences, which on a sociopsychological level explains much more about the ideology than this relatively useless study.
It actually does go a little bit into that the in-group preference is described in the article as "hostility towards other groups" and manifests as one of the defining characteristics of right-wing authoritarianism. So there's still the correlation. It's hard to say which comes first though kind of a chicken & egg deal going on.
sage
have sex
Out.
Liberal science shows that liberals are always right.
>in-group preference is described in the article as "hostility towards other groups"
Huh, I missed that then. It's wrong, by the way. Literature has made it quite clear there is a defined difference between in group preference and out group discrimination. Someone with high in group preference isn't necessarily barbaric to an out group. It's probably the editor of the article fucking around though. Most moderate right wingers, I think, have a higher interest in improving the in group than destroying the out group. So it seems, at least.
Tell us more about weak emotional intelligence and ease of triggerening, I can’t make that connection.
im going to break it down in a manner you can understand, no spoon having, split-toothed island nigger.
>be daily /lurker/ and /poster/
>have discussions about certain NatSoc policies, political/technological events, and Escoteric-Hitlerism
>be (you), a newfag
>can't lurk for 1 fucking day to save your miserable shill life
>spurt the first things that rolls off your adopted "Migrant" sons cock into your mouth onto this board
>do this over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over
Hehe c u c k
>Tell us more about weak emotional intelligence and ease of triggerening
Not that guy obviously but it comes down to mind over matter. If you're "emotionally intelligent" then you can control your emotions. For example you read something that you disagree with that. Somewhere deep inside you it feels like a confrontation- you get angry. However, you don't have to act on it. Someone with low emotional intelligence will allow himself to get angry without assesing whether or not this is rational. Emotionally intelligent people can sepparate impressions like that from their actions, take a step back and actually think about what is happening and prevent being compromised by peabrain impulses. People used to call this not being weak willed, but pseuds needed to rebrand it as the cool new academic term.
So, in the former case, if you post "trannies need to die" then an emotionally unintelligent person who disagrees with this will sperg the fuck out.
Note the example I used: it's mostly leftists that are the dominant group of people who behaves this way- ironic considering the result of the study. The same goes for
>Go to a more left leaning site and the jump in intelligence levels is palpable.
Except there isn't a jump in intelligence levels. We spend half our time reading screencaps of "discussions" on more left wing forums, so you aren't fooling anyone, we all know that the average leftist has a room temperature IQ
True enough., also some of that might just be how I read the article too. Glad to hear thoughts on this that weren't from the typical nu/pol/fag just flicking spittle at the screen.
sage
Who hurt you?
you guys are working soo hard to figure out why people are flocking to the dissident right, but you won't stop trying to push trannies on our kids long enough to actually figure it out.
>HRRRRRR ITZ MUH EMOTIONS@@!!
no, nigger, it's what leftists have done to society.
if psychology is a science, then you should be able to show me a single shred of Freud's data.
I'll wait.
underrated post
I am not sure about everyone else here, but I thought left wings were delusional?
>A new study suggests...
>n < 1,000
This explains why you studied 'humanities'.
>low intelligence
>weaker emotional abilities
It's hilarious seeing far-left extremists talk about that when they are the biggest example.
Sage
It seems to be progressive leads to being regressive beasts.
Based Kripplekikechan refugee.
Hey look it's some emotionly intelligent people
the kikes, user. It's fucking tiring to argue with these fucking soul-less demons
Apart from his ideas about the ego, id, and superego, which are tenuously accepted, Frued is completely irrelevant in current psychology.
This is like trying to debunk astronomy by invoking some ancient dude who thought the earth was set into the firmament and the sun was a hole that showed heaven.
There are psychological experiments that are replicable and produce data. Milgram's obedience experiment for example. Psychologists themselves are acutely aware that there is a lot of muddy water when it comes their subject, but just because there is a lot of work to be done doesn't mean you can handwave it entirely. Clinical psychology, criminology, biological psychology, etc. have all been proven to be effective when applied in the real world. Simply knowing that the amygdala controls fear, for example, indicates that there is truth to be found in the subject.
So if I say "what a load of shit" to you then I am classified as an emotional dumbass rather than someone who isn't easily suggestable?
I find it hilarious when retards try to pretend EQ isn’t a thing.
EQ is street smarts, common sense, and understanding how to not be a sperg/get people to like you.
It’s abundantly clear why most users here would like to pretend those aren’t real things, because they are things that they are sorely lacking.
Rather than screeching about it y’all should actually try to improve the things you tell you are lacking in.
Who the fuck am I kidding though, this is Jow Forums. Self-improvement? What the fuck is that?!
That wholly depends on what your emotional state is, which I explained earlier. You don't seem to get it though, because someone defined to have low emotional intelligence is exactly the person who is easily swayed by suggestion.
These are the same types of (((studies))) that make people realize global warming is fake as fuck.
Thanks fake study maker. You are red pilling people by the millions. Keep up the good work
>Frued is completely irrelevant in current psychology
except he's not. You like shooting? Enjoy your tiny pee pee. Work or hunt in the FL swamps? Your truck tires are big so your pee pee is small. Freud's direct intellectual descendants provided everything wrong with modern anthropology, endeavored to upend civilization with the Frankfurt School, and hacked brains for the sake of judeo-capitalism.
You know who had low "emotional intelligence?" The greatest men to ever have walked the Earth. The Previous generations that made the US a great country. Oversensitive faggots have literally never done anything positive for humanity. They've merely stroked their own egos, and became totalitarian when challenged.
Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Marx--these are your emotionally intelligent men who sought to make the world better for those whom they professed to care about. They wiped out a significant portion of human life on Earth.
Yeah nobody in psyche uses that much of Freud unless its to talk about how he laid some groundwork despite being wrong often.
this.
>because someone defined to have low emotional intelligence is exactly the person who is easily swayed by suggestion
is that why liberals believe everything they see on TV?
>tl;dr lefties are emotional women
What else is new?
>except he's not. You like shooting? Enjoy your tiny pee pee. Work or hunt in the FL swamps? Your truck tires are big so your pee pee is small. Freud's direct intellectual descendants provided everything wrong with modern anthropology, endeavored to upend civilization with the Frankfurt School, and hacked brains for the sake of judeo-capitalism.
Those are laypeople, and also retards, doing that. Or just people baiting while you bite the fuck out of it, matey.
and what is their reasoning, where is the evidence, or is this just another headline to an article filled with buzz words?
>Those are laypeople
as opposed to "professionals"? interesting allusion to religion, o emotionally talented one!
Retard
>tfw youve lived to see the rise of 'sharpie in pooper' to the sharpie becoming a symbol of white nationalism
I fucking love every bit of this timeline, thank you CERNfags.
LMAO REAL COMMIES WILL THROW THAT DYSFUNCTIONAL CUNT ONTO THE TRASH HEAP.
>Moral Foundations theory was first proposed by Jonathan Haidt and Craig Joseph
>Haidt was born in New York City.. to a liberal Jewish family
>proves that right-wing people are the only person who can be called people
>ooga booga dont be a whatever you are , be a libtard
Fuck you kike
...
>or is this just another headline to an article filled with buzz words?
it's an article filled with buzzwords written from a pseudo-understanding of a loosely-defined "academic paper" wherein "scholars" are rhetorically throwing spaghetti against the wall in an earnest attempt to figure out why people are going "right wing." They just cant . . . figure it out :]
>You like shooting? Enjoy your tiny pee pee. Work or hunt in the FL swamps? Your truck tires are big so your pee pee is small.
Nobody except dilletantes and political cartoon artists think this is credible. A case can be made that men are attracted to masculine hobbies (involving competition, endurance and or interacting directly with an environment like woodwork) but that is about it.
>Oversensitive faggots
Did you read my post? I literally made the case that oversensitive faggots are the ones with low emotional intelligence.
>You know who had low "emotional intelligence?" The greatest men to ever have walked the Earth.
Well, if they had low emotional intelligence they would start crying the moment something went wrong, had fits of anger, etc. I really don't think you read my post.
>Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Marx--these are your emotionally intelligent men
I don't know about marx but the other three aren't necessarily emotionally intelligent. I don't know much about their personality, but their actions show they weren't exactly in a rational relationship with their ambition.
But since you're fond of historical figures this might interest you: Marcus Aurelius, widely regarded as the best roman emperor ever, can basically be described as having high emotional intelligence.
I called out liberals in my post for accusing right wingers to do exactly what they themselves display the most. I don't get your point, but the answer is yes.
>as opposed to "professionals"
If by that you mean people who are relevant in contemporary psychology then, yes, professionals basically don't give a fuck about Freud.
Based Bruce
The differences between male and female brains are hormonal. This is a physical aspect of brain makeup and function... Literally a hard wire