Entropy disproves evolution. Atheists can't refute that simple fact
Entropy disproves evolution. Atheists can't refute that simple fact
God started revealing himself to me recently. I think God is really pissed off at me for wanking so much.
Boys, I think I'm a goner.
Opiates were a mistake
Refute the fact fedora
>law governing heat energy in a system, somehow disproves life changing by natural selection into animals we know today,
where in the fuckity fuck is your proof christcuck
turn off the sun - entropy waltz in, life dies
sun itself is dying thus entropy marches on
I had a biology professor flip the fuck out on me when I figured out that shit, I wasn't even a religious person .
All natural systems seek disorder which is the opposite of evolution. It's ok fedora I'm sure Reddit will love to hear your awful opinions
Entroy doesn't state that states of high control and regulation can't exist, just that over time they won't. Life is fleeting
Local entropy can increase at the expense of higher entropy elsewhere. Thus the 2nd law of thermodynamics cannot refute evolution because the law cannot preclude the evolution of complex life
You are conflating two different concepts of disorder. Disorder in terms of entropy is speaking from the perspective of energy, whereas the layman conception of disorder has to do with the arbitrary humanistic view of what is orderly and what isn't. They are not mutually exclusive.
This is so true. Fags love to talk about atheism on plebbit and get upboats for it. He’s probably writing out his three page long essay on the subject right now and will have an AMA next week.
life actually increases the universe's entropy, so it's in accordance with the laws of thermodynamics
>what is methylation
no hes showing because you stopped taking your meds.
That’s why he wanted em’ to cut off the foreskin
the true redpill is realizing the archmedes principle disproves the globLIESit agenda
>All natural systems seek disorder
you don't understand entropy
hint: it has to do with CLOSED SYSTEMS
How the fuck would you know? Go back.
Logic as an evolutionary product disproves its validity except to help us reproduce. Logic exists because it's beneficial to humans, not necessarily representative of how reality functions. It's just how people interpret information.
Skimming science shit and mashing concepts together is not a prove of god. Life and evolution are not a counter to entropy. You see chaos increases in general - we are heading to the heat death of the universe. In the mean time within any system there could be bolts of complexity. We are leaching energy from the sun thus having excess in order to develop our complexity. The sun however is dying thus our bolt of complexity is not going to exist forever. It's like claiming objects within a car tumbling off a cliff can't bounce up in the cabin because of the fall.
Stop being retarded.
> be op.
> misuse science words to make argument against science in the name of skydaddy.
> Some other fagness.
When are they going to stop shitting up the board?
Plebbit fedoras SEETHING lmao
>Entropy disproves evolution
This is why the feds don’t take this place serious anymore
Many other realities disprove evolution as the origin of species. In micro biology, you can't have a cell membrane without DNA and you can't have DNA without a cell membrane. And think about the first sexually reproducing organism. According to the theory of evolution, genetic mutations are supposed to bring about new species, but how can random genetic mutations produce fully functional sex organs both Male and female in the same vicinity at the same time? It just doesn't make sense as an explanation of our complex world.
She is proof of God because she worships the devil and instantly became rich and famous
/thread
took me one second to google
A common argument against biological evolution is that the theory contradicts the second law of thermodynamics. The second law says that disorder, or entropy, always increases or stays the same over time. How then can evolution produce more complex life forms over time? The answer is that the second law is only valid in closed systems with no external sources of energy. Since the Earth receives continual energy from the Sun, the second law does not apply.