Home of the free

>Home of the free
>Judge can order you to cover up a tattoo
Nice first amendment you got there

Attached: Screenshot_20190910-135138_Brave.jpg (1437x1518, 684K)

Other urls found in this thread:

latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-audit-judges-misconduct-20190425-story.html
transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1904/25/sn.01.html
transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1904/26/sn.01.html
transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1904/29/sn.01.html
apnews.com/271e363764854fb58c5c3d9142231963
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Not freedom from consequences

Your constitutional rights are a complete joke. Just look at any gun law to see how your 2nd amendment is treated.

This doesn't make any sense.

Can't blame him for trying to avoid a mistrial. I wonder if his lawyer is a jew.

ignore the retard

>NOOOOOOO THE JUDGE CANT ORDER HIM TO COVER A SYMBOL OF HATE THAT CAN OFFENDS MILLIONS OF PEOPLE!! THATS A VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDEMENT

Attached: 1566425457018.jpg (196x250, 7K)

Why is National Socialism so popular among criminals?

It isn't. Neo-Nazis like these don't even know what National Socialism is.

How is contempt of the court illegal?
What kind of organization requires respect at gun point?

Nice try mahamood

Attached: 1520619479288.jpg (1200x1120, 138K)

>Contempt of court involves an individual showing a lack of respect for the court, or for the rules and procedures of the court, or who defies the court’s authority.
Now I'm not up to date on US court proceedings, but how does this apply?

So many Nazi threads today. Isn’t there a Nazi website somewhere else? Why are they here

So your example backfired completely. The judge ordered the tattoo covered up so that it doesn't prejudice him in front of a jury. So literally yes, 'home of the free'

A Neo-Nazi is going to be prejudged in front of a jury anyway. I'd say it should be up to the discretion of the defendant to display himself in a manner he is most comfortable in seeing as though it's him on the firing line.

isnt there a jew website somewhere? why are you here?

Because they're dealing with scum all day. I'm sure you wouldn't tolerate disrespect from some hood-rat all day.

With that said, yes it is abused sometimes.

most faggots on here don't have a problem with National Socialists. Go and kvetch on another site

They can't possibly be prejudged if the jury doesn't know their political beliefs. Likely, the trial will exclude all references to the defendant's beliefs or anything that didn't have to do directly with the crime and was very relevant.

Also, if the defendant went ahead with the swastika on his face, he could then file an appeal claiming he was discriminated against and that's why he lost the case, thus restarting the whole process.

where do you think you are?

Well seeing as though he has it on his face, as well as the fact it's now known he was ordered to cover it up, everyone and their dog knows his political beliefs.

Attached: where do you think we are.png (644x644, 936K)

One with a fake authority. See school teachers.

>respect us or get shot
same logic as "hate speech" which is to say its just pilpul

You still don't understand.

The jury can't know who he is, or that he covered anything up. They will know nothing about him, except what the trial states. And in that trial, any evidence that he's a nazi or whatever, is excluded by law to not cause prejudice.

We've got competing and theoretically imcompatible constitutional rights here. One, the right to free speech. Two, the right to a fair trial. The judge is choosing a fair trial here - which is the right that the defendant dumbass has. It makes sense to temporarily suspend the free speech right so that this fucktwat doesn't expend more resources than necessary on multiple trials.

Without looking it up at all I'm assuming it was to prevent prejudicing the jury against him and him getting off on appeal because of it.

I was under the impression the jury would be present for all proceedings.

Legally this is incorrect. Judicial legislations need to end.

he should carve a new one into his flesh in front of the entire courtroom, just to make a point

>Isn’t there a Nazi website somewhere else?
No.

Judge is trying to make the jury more sympathetic by covering daddy hitlers tramp stamp

what a libshit

No, the jury is not present for preliminary matters, like what can and cannot be presented to a jury to ensure a fair trial.

well why don't you fucking learn how things are done in America before you open your hole next time, eh pal

the judge is trying to protect him, you idiot. He is trying to protect his right to a fair trial by preventing his tattoos from biasing the jury against him

this

They aren't present for pre-trial hearings.

Dehenerate drugdealing nigger tier skinheads give oi the shot rep it has instead of the logical counter to contemporary faggot “punk against trump” nonsense today

sheesh, calm down bucko.

got it

Wow, you have freedom of speech but not freedom from consequences. You're totally free to say what you like and then get fired, blacklisted, deplatformed, silenced, have your children taken from you, your house sold by the bank, your family harassed, your life ruined. But you're totally FREE to say whatever you like.
That's free speech.

are you trying to lose your case? his lawyer should have suggested as much.

Because 8 is still offline

Reminder that Hitler was against tattoos and faggots with earlobe plugs would be the first to get purged.

It's a trial. Show real flaggot.

>Not freedom from consequences
That could apply to every regime in any nation ever.

Judges are basically tyrants and there is nothing you can do about it. What are you gonna do? SUE THEM? You’d have to go before another judge.
Judges are lawyers who bribed a politician who is also (most likely) a lawyer for an easy job ...also lawyers are just people too stupid to get into medical school

Correct? I'm getting a mixed message from you here.

It's less about freedom of speach and more to do with not wanting to fuck around trying to find an impartial jury pool

Racism is high test and so is crime. Put two and two together.

Kike

That's... right. Not sure if you're being sarcastic or not. But that is absolutely right.

They've got power, that's for sure. But, 99% of them are at least trying to be fair and do what is right and just. Judges can be removed for misconduct or behavior unbecoming of a judge. In most (all?) states, they can be removed by the electoral process.

It was probably more like something along the lines of a request, and the defense complied.
As in, the defense wanted to hide the swasticka tattoo because they didn't want the jurors to see it and give an unfair trail, along with just wanting to keep him from looking like complete ghetto trash. It's why lawyers sometimes loan out suits and dress shirts with longer sleeves and high collars.

all you are doing is advocating locking up anyone who disagrees, fascist
the point of free speech is that there WONT be punishment for speech via the government
the public can punish you by ostracization but can't lock you in a box at gun point

This is absolutely illegal, I hope his lawyer challenges it because we're slowly turning into Europe.

Based Mahmood

....well said???

Free speech just means you can criticise the government without repercussion. Nothing else.

And yet they aren’t

>99% are trying to be fair
yeah and 99% of FBI agents have no idea what's going on dey just gud pepol
> Judges can be removed for misconduct or behavior unbecoming of a judge. In most (all?) states, they can be removed by the electoral process.
lol good luck in order to do that you'd have to first find the buried incidents of judicial misconduct
then you'd have to convince the AG (who wants to become a judge) to expose the shit storm that is our judiciary to start an investigation
then they would actually have to run a complete investigation (fucking lol)
but they would also have to re-evaluate all the decision that judge has made
At some point someone is gonna think about doing somethings

Plus freedom of expression, even if it has nothing to do with the government -- at least in the USA. Probably more restricted in Britain.

Yes, people are generally apathetic.

Not true and I'm to tired to argue.
Leave America.

Wait what?

You're full of shit. I'm tired of these bootlickers astroturfing the board. "DA BAD APPLES MAKE ALL DA COPS & JUDGES & LAWYAS LOOK LIKE BAD GOYS BUT 99% OF DEM DEY GOOD GOYS".

No.

You can't protect any part of the bill of rights by removing any other part. People are misrepresented in court by their court appointed lawyers all day every day, get denied speedy and fair trials, and are now being jailed for things said online. The whole bill of rights has been comped. The government only gives lip service to these things until posters like the above have completely cajoled the populace into giving up all pretense of their rights. Posters unironically defending the system here are the apex of cuckery.

Attached: 1561248773213.jpg (790x767, 157K)

Left cant meme left also steals memes about them.

Nazi's are the most well known and dangerous "racist" group.
They also have a nice aesthetic.
So in a hyperracial and violent environment like US prison whites adopt the symbollism.

latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-audit-judges-misconduct-20190425-story.html

Attached: ca-times.brightspotcdn.com.jpg (840x473, 37K)

Lol... someone got the joke. The Nazis didn’t get it.

I see your point but realistically covering it will probably give him a better chance of being treated fairly by the jury.

Good judge, doesn't want the jury to immediately hate the guy.

Don’t know if it’s been said yet but the defense REQUESTED the tattoos be covered to avoid prejudice against the defendant. This is a pretty common practice. Each state has different rules but in AZ it’s criminal rule 401b which basically says things of no evidentiary value can be precluded from the jury’s purview if they might be considered prejudicial.

This is a GOOD law because it prevents crooked shitty prosecutors from using every bad thing or *internet post* you’ve ever made from being presented to a jury when they have no bearing on the crime you’ve been accused of.

t. Lawyerfag

Attached: 8A949DB6-901D-4792-BCF2-5BAD64A993B7.jpg (1021x680, 69K)

Sounds like easy grounds for a mistrial

>Dehenerate drugdealing nigger tier skinheads give oi the shot rep it has instead of the logical counter to contemporary faggot “punk against trump” nonsense today

Can someone translate this into English for me I don't speak American.

>This is considered white in burgerland

Based and checked. Notice how they have zero creativity, so they literally steal all of our characters, pepe, wojack, npc, basedboy etc.

Big fucking surprise
transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1904/25/sn.01.html
transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1904/26/sn.01.html
transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1904/29/sn.01.html
nothing on CNN would look for other sites but reading through these sucks

Bullshit, you commies are still crying about McCarthy slapping your peepees in the 50s

This is a NatSoc board faggot. Dont you forget that.

Attached: 1560518349012.jpg (2048x1438, 683K)

Hitler would have gased this motherfucking degenerate first. Even if it meant there wasnt enough cyklon for a few hundred Jews

Attached: 6545278234.jpg (650x366, 27K)

Fuck niggers fuck spics fuck kikes and fuck jannies

Damn. Honestly there are so many shills and reddit fags here its hard to tell whose joking and who isnt anymore.

That was the most kike ben shapiri neo con faggot nigger kike thing u could have ever said. Take that back

>having a swastika tattoo in court

That will surely help your case

No one said it's a perfect system. What system would you want to see? Mob rule? Dictatorship? Star chamber? Tribal elders? Or are just one of these people that says "the system sucks, man"

>Your constitutional rights are a complete joke.

During WW2 citizens had their property confiscated and were thrown into concentration camps because of their ethnicity. That was clearly unconstitutional, but they wanted to do it so they did.

The constitution will not protect you.

Or what? The dude probably already has life. He should just refuse to go to trial

>No one said it's a perfect system

Actually, people say that all the time. Visit the South sometime.

Youre a fucking retard

Judges can do whatever they want in their courtroom. Even openly disregard the law to get a trial outcome he wants. Though he's open to disciplinary action for doing so.

Nobody want to look at tattooed degenerate.

I'm sorry, you need to go back and read the constitution. He is going to court and a judge is ordering him to cover up. That is PROHIBITED by the constitution. Now if you said a job wouldn't hire him because of that, you would be correct. And while I dont agree with tattoos especially of that kind, he has a right to do that

This

Attached: 541b1dbdb0c06641c0757ca58b2e79aa9293936c651257249d6ef78e0006b8dd.jpg (566x564, 60K)

This.

It literally is, faggot.

Interesting, then there must be no protections from companies, businesses, and other private entities discriminating against people for being black, mexican, jewish, gay, trans, disabled, etc. Right?
I mean, these are private entities we're talking about. You can choose who you rent your home to, or who you give a loan to, or who you provide services to based off of anything you like, right?

And yet you post a pic of a guy who got plastic surgery.

Because prison is literally Jow Forums except you're there in person and you can't escape?

No you.
This is you

Attached: tard.jpg (199x253, 4K)

But jew, this is the Nazi website

It's not a punishment you retard.
>The Las Vegas Review-Journal reports that District Judge Richard Scotti decided that Bayzle Morgan’s tattoos should be concealed in an effort to get him a fair trial.
>It comes after an entire group of potential jurors said last month that they couldn’t be impartial after seeing Morgan’s tattoos. A new group will see him in makeup starting Monday.
apnews.com/271e363764854fb58c5c3d9142231963
Would it be better to try him using a jury filled with people who already said they won't give him a fair trial?

What a waste of good genes. If only he hadn’t gone down the path of crime.