Question to the monarchy fanboys: why is an absolute monarch uncorruptable?

i see people making this claim in every thread when it comes to monarchy. but havent seen anyone give a reason.

Attached: tsar-Nicholas-II-Nikolai-II-Aleksandrovich-18-May-O-S-6-May-1868-17-July-1918-celebrities-who-died-y (841x950, 144K)

>why is an absolute monarch uncorruptable
Because the Monarch can legally do anything and therefore there is no such thing as illegal activities for him.

Its benign dictatorship that we need.
Kings are easily corrupted by shiny things and gold.

Because when he fucks up he can't turn around and go "w-w-well you voted for me so it's your fault! brb gonna go make millions at a think tank fuck your nation lol"

>why is an absolute monarch uncorruptable?
cuz its easier to take out one corrupt person than a whole bureaucracy of corruption... *cough* *cough* Americuh under its foreign rule through a rigged system called democracy.

Attached: 1554960356213.jpg (1024x719, 91K)

Monarchism is retarded and the best forms of monarchy are always those that are the least monarchic. like in your countrys history for instance.

What is his incentive?.

This happened in Portugal.

Monarchy always have a court of professional ball lickers with them.

They're not incorruptible, but they're a safer bet than any other form of government, because there's nothing you could offer them that they don't already have, or couldn't just take. Plus, they have to pass everything on to their heir, and paternal instincts are a safe bet as well.

>germany
>least monarchic

Think of it this way. A democracy is a lot like an apartment that you rent. You have no real ownership or stake in it besides general upkeep.

In a democracy if someone bribes a politician to subvert the interest of his country. There is very little incentive for that politician to not do so.

However in an absolute monarchy. You own the country. It’s general well being has a direct effect on your wealth and your influence and power.

The other aspect is that if you’re say the cousin of the king. Your job isn’t only about the good of the Country or of the people. But it’s also about being loyal to your family and all of your friends. It’s about valuing pride and honor over other virtues.

A monarchy will continue to fund its police department while a democracy might make cuts during hard times. A monarchy knows that during a downturn an increase in police is needed to keep order. A democracy let’s crime and drugs fester and grow as an acceptable way to save tax dollars on police.

A monarchy will value its own citizens and landowners over any foreigner with money. A monarchy will value its nations future and security over short term gain. A monarchy will make the effort to keep its population healthy so that the aristocracy doesn’t get sick as well. A monarchy will provide jobs programs like military service in times of economic hardship. A monarchy will champion great works of architecture and sculpture and reinvest in its cities and infrastructure during hard times. The power comes not from wages but from owning the mean of production. Lords can provide housing and food for citizens who can work. The monarchy doesn’t have to make every single decision based on finances or taxation. It can circumvent these rules in order to conquer certain societal tasks.

>Monarchy always have a court of professional ball lickers with them.
As well was its share of usurpers and back stabbers.

Attached: 1379715211112.jpg (683x1024, 289K)

The same could be same about the current ELites, yet it doesn't work.

This retarded redneck doesn't know how government spending works.

>A monarchy will make the effort to keep its population healthy so that the aristocracy doesn’t get sick as well.


Hmm, lets take a look at history

Nicky II a good boy, he dindu nuffins

Attached: 1567552003513.jpg (1024x577, 80K)

It couldn't, because they have no stake. Nothing to lose. They have no attachment to the nation, and just need to stripmine it then escape.

>why is an absolute monarch uncorruptable?
The social order relies on a hierarchy that begins with God and then proceeds to the monarch, below which the nobility, peasantry, spiritual class, and commerce class exist as co-equal participants in creation. The monarch must remain incorruptible for the system to function.

The monarch is the father of the nation, rather than a caretaker; he has a vested interest in preserving and improving the lands he leaves behind, rather than pocketing the wealth and hope of her people every election.
>t. Burger loyalist

Came here to say this.

>ball lickers
Soooo.. Just like any other form of government?

a historical example that isn't from eastern europe because a country full of slav's will usually be ran like a land full of slavs.

>i see people making this claim in every thread when it comes to monarchy
Really?

>why is an absolute monarch uncorruptable?
It's not, but the checks and balances, when implemented properly, ensure that a corrupted monarch is far more easily deposed than an entire government of corrupted individuals.

In a monarchy you are, more or less, trying to grab the good grace of one person/family, everyone knows whose the top dog to court so it's a bit more overt as opposed to now where it's a bit of a cluster fuck and everyone is out for themselves. Kinda.

He's not. But he can't put it under the partisan carpet of "well the opposition does it too and worse". If he fucks up the economy, he fucks up his life and dynasty. If he yields sovereignty, he fucks up his life and dynasty. If people are mad at him or at each others, he fucks up his life and dynasty.
Monarch are born and raised for only one thing and that's not: suck dicks and backstab people until you get a shot, smear the opposing candidate, pay back to people that gave you power and 4 or 5 years later, retire with the same "friendly" people that will keep you comfy.
Power is embarrassing to these people when it means responsibilities, monarchs OTOH embrace it. Not because it's the next step in their career, but because they received it from their parents and pass it to their kids. This concept alone explains why monarchy is so awkward to the modern man.

>Monarchy always have a court of professional ball lickers with them.
yea those are the ones that ice them when the time comes anons or others, its the ones closest who do it. Hence why its alot easier then when a system is corrupt like in any nation with a democracy which is used to usurp the governing power to a foreign nation.

Attached: 1554960356211.jpg (566x566, 22K)

And who provides those latter two objects, dare I ask?

Peasants and black people.
By their toil.

Attached: 1528338370746.jpg (830x1123, 177K)

Fuck off commie the correct answer was "Joden"

He's 100x the man you will ever be.

Because his position isn't dependent on anyone. Parliamentary representatives are no better, but they will do the bidding of evil people if it helps them to rise to the top.
Worst case scenario in monarchy is that the monarch is a thief, but in an oligarchy everybody is usually a thief (because of competitive advantage). Better one thief than a 1000. Democracy is just an oligarchy of the demagogues, i.e. the media, but since those are owned by money in today's society, you might just call it plutocracy - which is another form of oligarchy.
The monarch also passes his position down to his children/family, which makes it in his self-interest to look after the well-being of the country, whereas an elected official doesn't need to care what happens to the country after his tenure, only if he has enriched himself while he had the chance.

can you make this a chad and a basedboy format please. like this pic

Attached: 1567683212557.jpg (900x626, 267K)

Jews that collect coins