What would happen if he invades back former Soviet territories

>>Belarus
Already basicly a satelite. It would fly under the radar and would be swift and mostly bloodless.
>>Ukraine
Already tried it, took what could. The terrain and forces required to fully capture Ukraine are somehow not available.
>>Balkans
How would he even get there?
>>Caucasus
Already tried that, took a few bites of Georgia.
>>Central Asia
Can steamroll former soviet Stans and nobody will give a shit, especially the people in stans.

Not sure he wants to. What he needs he takes. What he doesn't want is the expense to maintain these regions. Ukraine was becoming weaponized as a region, one that he felt represented Kikes too much.
But, the USSR breakup didn't neccesitate the return of the Russian Republican States. Those were there prior to the Bolshevik Revolution. What made their return to autonomy mandatory was $$$$, and the fact Moscow didnt have any

All of them at once? A clusterfuck

Only one?
>Belarus

Could technically just annex like crimea, the population speaks like 90% russian. Lukashenko Has a big army tho so who knows

>Ukraine

Already invaded

>Balkans

too far, how would it work?

>Caucasus

Already conquered Chechnya and rekt Georgia

>Central asia

Population too different, muslims, Asians,shit infrastructure. Propably Afghanistan 2.0 Not reccomend

Attached: fall-of-rome_2184860b.jpg (620x388, 38K)

That's the plan.

In the coming years, when europe succumbs to its suicidal ideation and falls into civil wars and civil unrest, Russia will annex belarus, ukraine and soft-annex the baltics.
It will be primarily to create buffer against the fleeing europeans and the armed jihadis and africans that will start roving, plundering and raping en masse.

Russia will not be able (and it won't be in its best interests) to take in the europeans fleeing extermination. The US will move in to play, China will move in to play, turkey will move in to play, and the jews will unload 11,000,000 africans into spain, italy and greece.

2023 will be a hell of a year. Get guns, ammo and rations. Avoid the cities. Spring-summer of 2023.

>Caucasus

Tried that, failed in Georgia

>Ukraine

Tried that, failed at Donetsk

>Balkans

The Soviet Union did not have territory in the Balkans

>Central Asia

Good luck taking over Muslim dictatorships that have been in power for 30 years, US bases there as well and China would have a word

>Belarus

Why? They became independent for a reason, also the EU wouldn't stand for it

>It will be primarily to create buffer against the fleeing europeans and the armed jihadis and africans that will start roving, plundering and raping en masse.

Poland and the Visegard nations are already a buffer

Russia has enough oil and gas to have a decent standard of living without military conquest, which would just bankrupt them and threaten their stability anyway. Putin tried to re-assert Soviet Boomer nostalgia dominance to their neighbours and failed, so they will just quieten down and try to become first world oilniggers for the time being. Their military is already falling apart due to lack of actual conflicts and the youth are Americanised/Europeanised and their population will decline, a likelier scanerio is they just become like Iran and isolate themselves while posturing constantly to scare rivals away from their natural resources

>balkans
>former soviet territories
angloeducation as is

Only Belarus would go willingly.

Probably meant Baltics

v4 will form unironically. Everybody has been setting ground work for it to happen at moment's notice. The politicians are scared of being outed as the mafians they are, but they are more scared of repeating gommunist takeover, because by large their careers started with democracy, and would end with Russia.

Balkans are fucked if russia has a path way there though lol

You will get weird situations like all the baltics being incredibly redpilled about russian infuence and fighting tooth and nail to stop it, but being also at a poor position to actually defend themselves from the 'friendly support' of the east.

>Balkans
Go down to your local tax-office, and demand back every penny you have paid to the American school-system. Taxing Americans for their education is like collecting to a pyramid scheme, after it has already collapsed in on itself.

Nothing we can really do outside of him invading the Baltics.

Attached: russia desired borders.jpg (600x523, 58K)

If Russia tried to invade the EU, nevermind Ukraine which they wouldn't dare, you better believe that not only would it be Stalingrad x10, but Chechen rebels would be equipped with high grade weaponry and ISIS would make it to Moscow within a few weeks. Nevermind trying to hold onto them, what are they going to do, build another Berlin Wall kek?

Daily reminder Russia has a lower GDP than Canada

They aren't a threat to anyone.

get it into your thick curry addled skull

russia isn't going to "invade," they will be welcomed in to meet opposing militaries or mysterious [insert region] springs

Russia wouldn't make it a mile before getting rekt

Most of the Russian youth in the Baltics are being assimilated, why would they hold onto useless Russian passports instead of getting EU passports? When the Soviet Boomers die off, Russia will have no leverage to invade the Baltics and they would be invading the actual EU, not some psuedo-Soviet buffet state like Donetsk. People in neighbouring St Peterburg see Baltic nations as a model to emulate, not the other way around.

>hurr what is MAD
>actually thinking two nuclear powers will ever go to war

it's all so tiresome

Oh yea, the Hungarian Spring where the English speaking youth come out begging for Russian military support lol

It's just a threat at this point. Nobody wants to rule over a pile of ash.

>thinking nukes exist
lol no sweetie, nukes aren't real

dirty bombs, super active heavy element fulminate explosives, but not nukes

big confrontation with nukes and other stuff, where NATO will make an easy win, becouse Russia has no nukes, only fairytales

ever notice that foreign [insert spring] protesters always have signs in english?

makes ya think, maybe a big think

That's mostly what I meant, they can't do with the baltics what they did with Ukraine, because the population is far less retarded, and you will never spin the optics right. At the same time though, if it came to open force, they can't even slow Russia down.

MAD resulted in the decline of Russia because self-contained Socialism without military invasion requires constant money to support, which is hard to find without free-market Capitalism. Russia will just hold onto their natural resources and try to live like oilniggers, they won't be bothering anyone.

China is the only nation that has still kept official State Communism and is establishing military dominance on top of opening to free-market Capitalism, they are the ones to watch. Russia is irrelevant in current year and Russians know it.

From a geopolitical perspective this map almost makes sense, as the western border would follow mountain ranges. But even Dugins most radical map didn't do that much. It propossed the anexation of Belarus, Moldova, Ukraine, Latvia and Finland (Finland not included in OP-map). The 100 kilometers of Poland before you get to the mountains are not exactly necessesary, as long as you maintain a healthy amount of mobile, compat ready units close to the border, in case of invasion (Stalin didn't, and he had that part of Poland already, which meant the mountains didn't do him any good anyway). Estonia and Lithuania are only needed territories during an active military conflict. In peacetime they may be liabilities, as they showed in the early 1990's. Moldova could very well be classified as such as well. They are only interesting in so far that you need to traverse it to make a defensive line at the Capathian mountains.

Due to the Baltics being in the EU, other EU states would send their armies to push back the Russians and make it not worth the effort, never mind American intervention.Russia would also risk losing Kaliningrad in the process.

Kaliningrad also makes Russia much more open to the EU than the other way around, military conflict is not in their interest

theguardian.com/cities/2018/may/31/kaliningrad-the-russian-enclave-with-a-taste-for-europe

>Due to the Baltics being in the EU

The entire idea of a russian push is pretty much based on the geopolitical scenario where EU proves itself completely useless at adressing threats and/or falls apart, which seems pretty much inevitable after how Ukraine went down.

>Belarus
They're already a puppet of Russia.
>Ukraine
They're trying.
>Caucasus
They will probably invade Georgia next year.
>Central Asia
Kazakhstan is in a similar situation to Belarus. But as for any states further south, the Muslim dictatorships there would probably rise against the USSR like the Taliban did in Afghanistan.

Well yea, since they are for asking for Anglo/globalist intervention. The opposite in Russian isn't going to happen, and even if it did, surely the Russians learnt their lesson in Donetsk that this isn't the 1950s anymore

>balkans
>former soviet
abo education...

WWIII basically

>China
>communism

not since the 70s. At this point all the "communism" in China is just LARPing.

Russia can take Ukraine in a day if it wanted to. Hell it can take it in hours.

If the EU fell apart, modern Russia simply isn't in a situation to fill that vaccum anymore. The states would isolate themselves further, as happened after the fall of the Soviet Union (eg. Armenia, Moldova etc.). Visegard nations would likely intervene against any Russian attempts at invasion of the Baltics since they remember the last time they were under Soviet domination (which failed miserably after just 30 years) reminiscent of the Lithuanian-Polish Commonwealth.

Also factor in the time the Baltics have been in the EU assimilating the remaining Russian population to be pro-European, there would be no internal support for Russian intervention and alot for Polish/Visegard intervention, even without the EU or the US involved.

Soviets were able to take over Eastern Europe due to the unprecedented bloodshed of WW2 and trying out the Communism experiment to industrialise those nations quickly. Modern Russia has no such justifications in the modern age.

Salami Slicing interspersed with sudden grabs like Ukraine.

lol

Outright taking land is some retard history shit. These days its about spheres of influence. You dont need to TAKE them on the map. You just get dominance over them.

The problem Russia faces with this is establishing spheres of influence requires cultural soft power that Russian culture doesn't have anymore. Communism was the last time Russia had any cultural impact on the world, trying to compete in the modern age and push Russian perspectives and culture in opposition to the overwhelming power of Anglo/European globalist culture (on top of other pseudo-western cultural trends, such as Japanese, Korean or African culture) is impossible apart from old Soviet Boomers who didn't really like Russian dominance anyway. The Russian youth themselves are becoming westernised, how will they push Russian cultural and political dominance when the Putin generation die off when they spent their youth listening to American music, watching Hollywood movies, playing western video games and visiting and working in western countries? Even Islamic nations are falling for it, how would Russia compete?

I don't think people realise just how irrelevant Russia is in the modern world and will be in the future.

Nobody would give a shit because those are all irrelevant countries.
Same reason nobody would give a shit if Germany were to annex us for Lebensraum.

Basically, Russia lost the Cold War, so they're done.

>if he invades
Half of russia is under americas control, so the question makes no sense. "he"

Why do burgers think we fear nuclear missles?

It's not the 1940's anymore and we aren't a small island nation like Japan.

We have 50,000 protocols to shoot down any rockets and enough satellites in orbit to deter any gps rocket tracking

Unless you want to shoot down some shitty mountin or something, why should we care about American nukes?

Attached: 64161bb89962a4c09d6c9025525bfdf64dc41b7445fa8bd06b4528596d7380d9.jpg (1280x1440, 519K)

It only takes one nuke to get through to ruin your city and economy. Also, nukes can be detonated from a hidden briefcase dropped by a spy if absolutely necessary, along with biological weapons. The very existence of those types of weapons stops any type of direct conflict that guarantees the destruction of the economy and world peace

Why the fuck would we invade them? Literally good for nothing.

This is what you fail to understand though.

We deal with terrorism almost everyday, to the point where it's not even reported half of the time.
At every stop, at every metro there are two armed guards and a metal detector

Unless you want to go nuke a farm village, go right ahead.

Attached: allah akbar.png (318x775, 24K)

If those states join the EU or world powers other than Russia then we might have some problems.

Brexit please!

Attached: brexit train full steam ahead.jpg (1000x485, 162K)

Stopping some retarded goatfuckers from blowing themselves up in a subway is different from a Russian CIA asset with espionage experience leaving a nuclear suitcase in a locker in a metro station during an all out war situation.

Hell, the Chernobyl incident may have been an example of this kind of CIA espionage intervention and led to the fall of the Soviet Union