Is 5G the final stealth genocide weapon of the (((Elite)))?

sub-ghz is part of 5G retard, you dont even know what a dielectric lens is
>Ivan
literal kike shill

The threat from 5G is that it will lead to a world in which everything is hooked up to central monitoring systems, constantly. It already is, but imagine 10x worse. Ask yourself why China is pushing it so hard, even giving away high end equipment to third world shitholes. Why?

>sub-ghz is part of 5G retard
4G and 3G are also sub-GHz you fucking idiot. 5G is a standard. Your WiFi router isn't 5G just because it happens to share some frequencies with 5G technology.
>dielectric lens
Irrelevant. It's still not 5G.
>literal kike shill
Okay Ivan. Keep shilling.

It causes physical damage to life also

Lots of evidence to suggest this is coming out now

you're just a shit eating, cutidick, brain damaged shill.
go to die, do not collect 200 shekels

>desperately reaching for a "gotcha" on 5G being subgig
>brings up 4G and 3G as if it means anything
>gets really really shekelsore when pointed out he is a literal kike shill
where did rabbi touch you goldweinberg

Not an argument. That streetlamp is not using 5G, if you think it is I suggest you present some evidence to support your statement

>thinks something is 5G simply because it has an antenna and uses a frequency that some 5G technology also uses
>seething that his russian psyop is going nowhere
Keep saying it Ivan.

>not even denying he's a yid on a proxy
keep coping that pewdiepie is waking up the Aryan youth schlemel

Why are the hedges and grass fine then?

why would they aim the signal at the ground
think for a second idiot

Nice rebuttal, retard. You've lost this argument until you can prove that the antenna on top of that street light is using 5G tech. Keep deflecting by accusing me of what you're doing Ivan, it won't help your argument though.

Look at this 5g bootlicker. 3g & 4g have been used for centuries, 5g dangerous and untested.

>OY VEY GOYIM DONT OPPOSE 5G

Attached: e785a639cdce2c9c499eb3f8fc90921e.jpg (1588x1080, 369K)

as you've already said, 5G is just a label. the antennas on those lamp posts are scanning all nearby apartments with toxic RF radiation 24/7. the antennae were developed by a company called Harvard Technology that went defunct after whistleblowers started piping up about the 5G genocide that you kikes are planning. all information on this company was scrubbed from the internet.

cope jewcel

>3g & 4g have been used for centuries,
?
>5g dangerous and untested
Plenty of applications have been using the same frequency range as 5G for decades with no issues

These things are radial.

Literally just a virus spreading through the tree.

>making retarded posts and replying to yourself in a failed astroturfing attempt
lel

>These things are radial.
Wrong!

youtube.com/watch?v=4D4d6-YBRn0

youtube.com/watch?v=8A5cCKhbr4c

They can aim and shoot wherever they please with massive power to back them up.

>5G is just a label
No, it is a standard that lays out a certain cellular technology that happens to use a certain frequency band. That does not make everything that uses that frequency band 5G you fucking imbecile. As I've stated before, your router broadcasts at 2.4 & 5GHz and is not 5G.
>all nearby apartments with toxic RF radiation 24/7
It's the same frequencies anyone within range of a 3G/4G base station has been exposed to for years.
>the antennae were developed by a company called Harvard Technology
Proof that the antenna on that lamp post is a Harvard technology antenna?
>all information on this company was scrubbed from the internet.
>dude just trust me

>They can aim and shoot wherever they please with massive power to back them up.

If that were true stealing wifi would be impossible

>s-samefag!!!
LMAO cope harder you fucking slopehead

Attached: IMG_20190913_135550.jpg (720x298, 111K)

There is a weak enough signal to connect to the wifi and establish a stronger link which will be more direct.

Do this and sit inside that bush and you'll see it fry.

>They can aim and shoot wherever they please explain to me how you can achieve beamforming with a singular antenna. I'd love to hear.

>still going for the cringe 5G semantic "gotcha"
the jew stink gets stronger with every post
>it's the same frequency that you've been exposed to
the frequencies that the latest and biggest NTP study just gave clear evidence that it's carcinogenic? actually no, those signals were older, less powerful signals. therefore 5G safe!
>proof for harvard tech
it was a Leeds based company, the guy in the Youtube videos linked above named them in court

how dense are you? those antennae are not wifi antennae

>what is a dielectric lens
google it then watch these videos shlomo

youtube.com/watch?v=4D4d6-YBRn0

youtube.com/watch?v=8A5cCKhbr4c

>claims something is 5G because it shares a frequency with some 5G tech
>That's not 5G though
>JEW JEW STOP EXPOSING ME REEEE
>the frequencies that the latest and biggest NTP study just gave clear evidence that it's carcinogenic?
Who peer reviewed the NTP study?
>it was a Leeds based company, the guy in the Youtube videos linked above named them in court
That is not proof.
>google it then watch these videos shlomo
No, explain to me in your own words how a passive component and a single antenna can be actively aimed at a given direction.

How's your Jow Forums and /sci/ permaban going by the way? Still seething about that?

>Who peer reviewed the NTP study?

LMAO you are literally monitoring Jow Forums to damage control for telecoms corporations. you're the same shill that's been here for MONTHS on end doing this shit.

cope you're getting exposed and your paycheck is going down. seek new employment.

Wow.
Check out the big bяains on this guy

>LMAO you are literally monitoring Jow Forums to damage control for telecoms corporations.
Proof?
>you're the same shill that's been here for MONTHS on end doing this shit.
I'm not the one starting these threads though. You're the one actively shilling false info and then reeeing like an autist when people ask you to explain yourself.
>cope
Why don't you post on Jow Forums or /sci/ anymore?

which hidden Jow Forums API do you use to trawl the site for 5G threads

And why would they need to be stealthy? If you all believe 5G is a secret death weapon, what is stopping them from just shooting you in the street?

Gentle reminder that OP is a literal discord tranny
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/216583385/#216593256

Attached: F3F27EA47A3740FC8723A9EE62728F9A.jpg (3264x2448, 2.62M)

It's called the search function sweetie

So?

The 5G issue has to be pushed hard ya spoon

>accuse others of being a discord tranny
>when your IP literally just switched
5 posts by this ID

>Why yes, I do love my new GoyPhone XVI and it's new high speed 5G technology! How did you know?

Attached: Jason_Bright.jpg (800x571, 119K)

OP isn't mentally stable, he's been overdosing on HRT
It's called switching to mobile data when you leave the house (something you probably never do). I'm using 4G right now by the way ;^)

cringe
dont make me get the threads where you dumped scat on /sci/

>people who have wireless VR head heads are exposed to a transmitter right next to the

>/sci/
How come you don't post there anymore? Or Jow Forums? I thought you said I was going to get banned and that you'd continue posting there? How'd that work out for you?

Mate you sound mental anyway so aye alright buddy

Cope

I literally mindraped this weirdo tranny so hard on this topic on Jow Forums and /sci/ a while back that I've been living rent free in its head for months

it dumped scat in a thread trying to slide and get the topic banned, can't link it atm because /sci/ archives are down

I honestly don't care at this point. Just get on with it.

Attached: Iapetus.jpg (4000x4000, 3.34M)

best goy

>Jow Forums and /sci/
How come you got permabanned? I thought you said I'd be the one who got banned?

Attached: spammerdiscord.jpg (544x501, 82K)

tranny, you are literally IP switching right now. you know permabans dont exist on this site.

is this a cute last ditch attempt to claw back any succour left ITT after I meticulously demolished your garbage posts point by point or?

And what have you done dad, except export international jewry to every continent on earth? If my indifference qualifies me as best goy, I shudder to think of the accolades in store for you.

you still have guns, dont give them up fat kid
also come and liberate us

cut the fucking thing down, the transmitter that is. just get rid of them. Thats what africans did when they try to put up ugly or harmful bullshit, they just go there are night, tear it all down,a nd burn it. Ultimate redpill.

>you are literally IP switching
I already told you, I left my house. Do you understand what that means? Leaving your house?
>you know permabans dont exist on this site.
I know rangebans exist and you spammed those two boards so much you probably used up all the available IPs you could get from your mobile provider. Why else would you suddenly stop posting since a few months ago after swearing up and down that you were going to "expose" the telecoms indust
>after I meticulously demolished your garbage posts point by point
I don't recall you explaining to me in your own words how a passive component and a single antenna can be actively aimed at a given direction.

Done and done. I'm glad we had this little talk.

Attached: nod.gif (496x385, 949K)

No, if they're gonna get exposed to 5G too then no

where's the scat already

I don't know, why don't you post some on /sci/ to show that you still know how to evade bans?

so this is the power of ashkenazi IQ

>zooms into grass
>notices grass isn't dead
>zooms out
lol, it's like he found out he was a retard at that moment.

5g has a extremely short range Moshe

I'll be waiting for you over at /sci/ if you manage to squeeze out one last unbanned IP from your mobile provider

scat at the ready I presume

Wafflenigger gets it. Anytime something pertinent gets brought up, they automatically start shilling bullshit like flat earth that only a retard would believe to discredit the original claim

It's only natural take advanced leaps in technology. Even if it was dangerous some how, we only evolve from here.

yeah like thalidomide was just a natural advanced leap in technology nothing wrong with that

>Is 5G the final stealth genocide weapon of the (((Elite)))?
yes and to show how effective the elite are 5G does not work unless you keep trees and brush around the towers cleared

>also come and liberate us
who gonna pay?

A 5G flew over my house

i would love to see the conspiracy threads here when 4g was coming out

>puerto rico

>muh conspiracy
did you mean to post on reddit champ

There wasn't much cause for concern when it came to the frequency band that was utilised for 4G.

However, comparing the 5G frequency band to all previous generations absolutely fucking dwarfs them.

5G is gonna be using bands that military-strength microwave weapons use.

>OH NOS MY IMPROVED SPEED OF INTERNET WILL KILL US ALL

Did you have a heart attack when you switched from dial up to modem, gramps?

where did your irish flag go

>5G is gonna be using bands that military-strength microwave weapons use.
The fucking sunshine that hits your face has higher frequency than 5g, retard

the 5g conspiracy as the same problem the chemtrail conspiracy had: the "elite" won't be sheltered from it, they'll suffer the same fate as everybody else once it's installed ever where, so why would they do it?
It's a dumb conspiracy

Nice no argument

>I-I-ITS NOTHING GOY, MOVE ALONG

Makes me sick.

>he doesn't understand the difference in the type of radiation

So this is why you look so retarded

the "frequency" line is a red herring, what really matters is the modulation of the signal. 4G+ modulation is the basis for 5G. Dimitris Panagopoulos has done a good amount of research on this hard to understand area.

nature.com/articles/srep14914

>muh sunlight

humans evolved to use the sunlight idiot, not microwaves. microwaves are toxic to biology. the sun = water, microwaves = arsenic, especially when they are manmade and super modulated as we see in modern signals.

Your very phone or computer you are posting from gives off more radiation and frequencies. Holy shit what brainlets.

>he thinks my computer is spewing out mm microwaves

Why are you THIS fucking stupid?

twitter.com/hashtag/leafnut

Looks like it is 5G on the street lamp, also looks like the tree wasn't the only thing it fucked up. Whole fucking neighborhood complained about it.

5g is just begging for a catastrophic, Die Hard 4 fire sale and has little practical purpose. Only retarded suits think that connecting FUCKING EVERYTHING to the internet is a good idea. 5G is for the retards that poured $120 million into the fucking Juicero. Whats better than a juicer? AN SMART INTERNET JUICER OF COURSE!!!? SMART STREET LIGHTS IN EVERY NEIGHBORHOODD!! GIVE ME YOUR SHEKELS FOR INTERNET HIGH TECH STUFF GOY!!!

IOT botnets are already way more powerful and destructive than regular ones, 5G will just take it to the next level. Expecting government and telecoms to not fuck things up horrifically and leave massive security flaws is a really terrible idea. The negative health effects are just another reason to scrap it.

Attached: 1568110630867.png (680x456, 299K)

It's being deployed for all of those wrong reasons, user

Those microwaves just pass through your body

>BUT MUH ALL MICROWAVES ARE BAD MAYMAY

>twitter.com/hashtag/leafnut
no results lad

mm microwaves penetrate the skin through pores and do damage

they also fuck up your sperm

computers don't produce microwaves that are significant at all

>There's really only one study that's widely cited by anti-cell phone advocates as proving that cell phone radios are harmful to humans: a 2016 study performed by the National Toxicology Program, and widely cited across the Internet. However, what the advocates claim is actually not what the study found at all. In the study, rats and mice were blasted with extremely powerful radio signals in frequencies including those used by cell phones, intermittently for their entire lives. The only significant results of the study were just barely statistically significant — low enough that they probably just represented random noise in the data — and they were that the exposed rats lived longer than the non-exposed control rats. Yet the study was reported as proving cell phones cause cancer. Why? Because the other result was a barely significant increase in the rate of one type of tumor called a schwannoma, but only in a few of the male rats, and in no females and no mice. Even the authors themselves pointed out a number of other potentially confounding factors that could have accounted for the results. Yet the study remains the anti-cell phone advocates' go-to piece of evidence that cell phones cause cancer in humans — a claim that's in direct opposition to all the mountains of observational evidence that we have from a third of a century of widespread cell phone use. If this study was to be used at all, it's more appropriately used as evidence that cell phones make you live longer. But we don't use it that way, because it was one single outlier study with insignificant results most likely caused by confounding factors

FAKE NEWS

ehtrust.org/science/myth-vs-fact-national-toxicology-program-cell-phone-cancer-study/

ehtrust.org/expert-reaction-australian-centre-electromagnetic-bioeffects-research-criticism-national-toxicology-program-study-cell-phone-radio-frequency-radiation/

>calls other fake news
>posts commie envirowhacko website