Gun owners

The Brady Bill states that for the following people to own a firearm it would be a felony:

1.) Has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;

2.) Is a fugitive from justice;

3.) Is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance;

4.) Has been adjudicated as a mental defective or committed to a mental institution;

5.) Is an alien illegally or unlawfully in the United States;

6.) Has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions;

7.) Having been a citizen of the United States, has renounced U.S. citizenship;

8.) Is subject to a court order that restrains the person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner or child of such intimate partner, or;

9.) Has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.

Does anyone agree with this? Here’s what the SA states:

>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

>shall not be infringed

No exceptions. Only liberals and reactionary conservatives like the NRA agree with this.

Attached: ECBE0B6A-F956-4D5E-A3A6-153AF2FDB2B1.jpg (466x466, 15K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/Hx23c84obwQ
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>Is an alien illegally or unlawfully in the United States;
How problematic! We need to repeal the brady bill immediately for those undocumented citizens!

>>shall not be infringed
>No exceptions
This.

>2.) Is a fugitive from justice
Here is the back door. Simply trump up some bs charge, pullled from the long list of violations to chose from, issue warrent, bingo, you are a fugative. Oh you have guns? now they kill you.

People in category (5) and (7) don't meet the criteria of "the people" anyway.

>still crying about scawy guns
>reddit spacing
Stop shitting up the board, faggot. You're never going to disarm America.

youtu.be/Hx23c84obwQ

Attached: anarchy reigns.jpg (680x621, 43K)

>reddit spacing

What even is this meme anyways? Reddit spacing is two spaces instead of one space. Plus it’s to separate paragraphs so you don’t have a wall of text.

Pay no attention, you didn't demonstrate reddit spacing imo. Your only real sin here is being a memeflag, and pretending you might be an American.

Reddit spacing is technically two lines instead of one but it is also used a a catch all for attention working posts. There's no need to have a space between someone you are quoting and your own writing.

t. the Jow Forums police force

The yellow form makes no mention of "domestic violence"; just any misdemeanor conviction. checking "Y" = no sale.

>The Brady Bill

Expired in 2004. Dead laws have no bearing.

>I'm so fucking stupid that I cannot differentiate between paragraphs and reddit spacing: the post.

go back to your home board

>9.) Has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime
Fucking hell. A misdemeanor!?!? Everything else is at least somewhat founded in reason- if faggot reasoning ignoring black crime at that- however that's a step too far for sure. It's like saying 90% of the US military and LEO can't be trusted to have a gun- since they are almost all pathological thrill seekers who commit minor misdemeanors on a constant basis

(OP) #
>9.) Has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime
Of domestic violence you cunt. Not just any misdemeanor. But you don't get to bitch and post if you don't take It out of context.

Bro I had a moment of dyslexia. I read that as misdemeanor crime OR domestic violence. with that in mind, my only other objection would be that I don't believe marijuana use should be a lifetime disqualifier.

Even with all that government deep-dicking to get a gun, libs think we need “expanded background checks”. What the fuck is there left to check? Do they want a DNA test to check for a genetic predisposition to shooting and stabbing behaviors?

Attached: F3D57640-459F-4B9F-AB41-63B41101FF49.jpg (760x443, 51K)

show your flag, kike.

uhh no... these questions are still on the 4473 form for the NICS background check, retard.

Cold dead hand nigger
Cops are testing the waters in very blue states and are getting the SHIT sued out of them for trying to enforce it.

Its not about the check, its about making hoops for people to jump through. If you can get gun owners to accept that their rights are being taken away then you can keep encroaching on those rights until their are none left.

Words of truth here

18 USC 922(g)(1) includes all misdemeanors if the crime is punishable by up to 2 years incarceration. The (g)(1) prohibitor assumes only felonies are punished with over a year in jail/prison so it's technically the felon disqualifier. Even though states like Massachusetts have 2.5 yrs possible incarceration for DUI even though it's a misdemeanor so anyone with a DUI in MA can't own a gun. Meanwhile, in my state, you have to have 3 DUIs (felony) to be barred and the concealed carry statute expressly states can't have a license if you've had more than 2 DUIs in 10 years (yeah because you're a felon).

0: Is now or ever has been a registered Democrat, socialist is communist.

>in any court ...
>8.) Is subject to a court order that restrains the person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner or child of such intimate partner, or;
these are easily abused

>9.) Has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.
>1.) Has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;
these would be somewhat ok but im still getting a feeling they can be abused

Brady Bill, NFA, FOPA, etc should all be stricken and used as an example as to what NOT to do when it comes to the 2nd.
I hope we get can get a guy with balls in office.

This. I hear reactionary cuckservatives on Jow Forums say that we should ban the mentally ill from owning guns. The reality to that is that even if that were to prevent mass shootings (CNN says otherwise), it would still lead to a domino effect of other rights that should be limited/restricted, including the furst and every other amendment after that. These are the types of people that will get ALL of our rights taken away. It’s better to just let them have their guns. Even the niggers. As Mark Marek of BestGore fame once said “only thing worse than a nigger state is a police state, because at least in a nigger state you can defend yourself.

Arguing about the constitution seems a bit spergy. We are in an extralegal conflict.
Like pointing out the guy next to you didn't dust the bannister properly as your house burns down.

Attached: crystal-charging.png (702x960, 1.02M)

>>shall not be infringed
>No exceptions.
When you are convicted of a crime, you lose a lot of your rights. Hence why prisons exists and why prisoners don't have the right to protest or vote or bear arms. Or do you think that "shall not be infringed" means that prisoners should also have the indisputable right to an AR-15?
Beto's gonna take your guns, and there ain't shit that you're gonna be able to do about it.

Attached: 1454385534472.jpg (1920x1080, 1.64M)

The majority of Texan voters are nonwhite like CA. White Texans seem to be in a fantasy world where they are still the majority. Beto is a good fit for the voters.
Democracy has failed the white race.

Attached: 1568428064102.png (480x480, 84K)