The fuck? Is Botswana actually based? Do they not kill each other there?

the fuck? Is Botswana actually based? Do they not kill each other there?

Attached: botswana safety.png (771x836, 798K)

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seretse_Khama
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

we wuz frens

20% of the population has AIDS

/end

And Namibia

>safest country in Africa
Literally means nothing. Every country in Africa is a war torn hellscape, the only difference is whether it consumes 100% of the country or only 70%.

They kill each other, they just don't record it.

Ah of course. Kek even if niggers becomes kangz n sheit they will always have AIDS due to their monkey genes.

It’s the best Africa has to offer. The founding president wasn’t a corrupt idiot. He was educated in England and married a white woman. Decent leadership makes all the difference.

>Botswana is a country located in South Africa.
>a country in South Africa.
>in South Africa.
>South Africa.

there's a distinction between countries in south Africa (being the southern third below the Aequator), and the Country of South Africa, you know Burger?

Botswana is literally a one-tribe ethnostate that's why

Google the IQ to verify if its safe.

Based

oh
what could have been

>racism spreading across africa
Even niggers hate niggers.

Attached: 1519106868551.webm (400x220, 1.82M)

The southern portion of the African continent.

Actually this. Ruling elite was bleached through some British twat back in 50th so they couldn't go full Mugabe.

Not when it's capitalized like a fucking proper noun as "South Africa", you goddam mong. It should be "south Africa" or "southern Africa". Not "South Africa". "South Africa" is a country.

I know what you're going to say next, you generationally beat-down fuckwit. You're going to say, "What about North America or South America?". Right? That's exactly what you were going to say. Let me help you before you hurt yourself again: "North America" and "South America" are also proper nouns because they refer to FUCKING CONTINENTS. There is also no country called "North America" or "South America" or even "Central America".

For fucks sake ...

FRENZ N SHIEEEEET

Yeah, its sloppy writing but it is in southern Africa right up by another country named South Africa which happens to be in....you guessed it the south of Africa

I'd love to see Africa. It doesn't seem realistic but the dark continent is huge there must be so much of the natural scene to enjoy. Shame we let the horses out of their natural habitat and let the whole world rot and decay with the introduction of niggardish genetics. I mean just look at the middle east and the poor north Africans. Used to be big movers and shakers on the historic stage... Now just shit skin with African admixture.

Attached: Screenshot_20190908-133318.png (1200x1920, 76K)

American reading comprehension meets autism.

there are countries that actually are "in" South Africa though, swaziland and lesotho

>Botswana boasts a GDP (purchasing power parity) per capita of about $18,825 per year as of 2015

Impressive really.

There are actual countries *in* South Africa. That's why it makes a difference. I grew-up there. No one refers to "southern Africa" as "South Africa" for exactly those reasons. That's not "autism" or some reading comprehension failure. That's common sense.

Attached: screenhunter_364-dec-05-22-58.jpg (303x451, 24K)

Exactly and I just replied to someone else with the same. That's why no one would ever say that let alone print it.

Isn't most the population pajeets white's and mixed?

Damn Botswana was founded by a pimp: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seretse_Khama

Nigga looks like Andre Nickatina

Attached: Seretse_Khama_photo.jpg (513x477, 25K)

Look I know all that, I'm not ignorant of African geography especially near European holdings and yes the fucked up with capitalization or what not but not was easy as shit to infer their meaning based on the text as a whole without getting autistic about it.

Attached: Screenshot_20190915-123506.png (1200x1920, 433K)

80% Tswana
10% Kalanga
2.9% Basarwa
3.1% White
4% Other (including Shona and Kgalagadi)

Attached: Screenshot_20190914-011110.png (1200x1920, 809K)

Someone add Benny hill music over this

Seems to be proof IQ doesn’t really matter for development to be successful

so maybe don't go as a sex tourist

That's Western SA, and it's not pajeets it's Malaysians and the native khosian blacks

Attached: africa-map-2019.jpg (1000x990, 82K)

As far as sub Saharan Africa goes, Botswana is top tier.

Its still a shithole compared to the developed world, but relatively speaking, they've really got their shit together.

They're the only country in Africa not to chimp out upon independence. They kept all of the old British institutions, laws, economic system etc, kept the railways and telegraph lines up and running, and didn't purge the 3% of the population that was white which meant they never fell into starvation like Zimbabwe. With the population fed, housed and employed they were able to avoid a civil war.
Botswana is basically what Rhodesia would've been if they didn't become socialist and chimp out against whites.

Based kraut
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Namibians

You know what? I'll take it step further since you want to insult me.

You want know why we're even having this conversation? It's because moronic Krauts like you started WWI and lost. And you lost your African colonies. Which explains why your grasp of *SOUTHERN AFRICAN GEOGRAPHY* is so tenuous.

What you did next, though? really sealed the deal. Because you were so fucking butt-hutt over losing WWI, you went ahead and started WWII. A war that cost so much and had such an enormous impact that *EVERYONE* lost or starting losing control of their African colonies and territories.

If it weren't for people like you, we'd still be calling "Botswana" the "Bechaunaland Protectorate". If it wasn't for people like you, I'd still have a fucking country in *SOUTHERN AFRICA* and maybe I'd be able to go holiday still in mother-fucking Repbulic of South Africa.

But, no. Instead we have mass African and Middle East migration all over Europe and North America. And all because fucking mong Krauts can't get over losing German East Africa and German South-West Africa.

But, please, continue to educate a stupid "Burger" about where I came from.

Well I've been looking at all their presidencies since Independence. All but one seem to be educated in the UK, I think current guy was born there, the one not uk educated excelled academically and was schooled in South Africa.
Current guy is also mulatto from the first post independence president.
They are also relative homogeneous. It seems aids and murder rate are from the iq but effective stewardship and opportunity is from the educated elite at the top.

i was there comfy country (Walvis Bay) compare to the rest africa

Sounds most plausible.

economic freedom, due to the fact that the name is so niggerish that leftists assume it's already a shithole so they don't bother them with their crazy doctrines. Don't worry, they gonna find it and ruin it soon anyway.

Wtf? That's pure evil. No one deserves to be tortured like that.

Basically Communism fucked Africa look at neighbouring Zimbabwe. Mugabe's troops were trained by the Soviets and when he gave the white farmers land to the "war veterans" they didn't keep up the farms business. I heard one story where the guys who were given the farm dismantled all the buildings on the farm and sold the bricks and then they ran out of bricks and had nothing. Basically socialism doesn't work in Africa because the people who wealth gets redistributed to are depending on how you look at it too stupid or too uneducated to be productive. The average wage in Botswana is like 17k gbp and it's because they didn't get fucked by idealistic socialist policies

It's GDP per capita is actually comparable to Greece, which is fucking insane considering that it's a landlock sub-saharan nation centred on a desert.
It just goes to show you that not destroying the farms, hospitals, schools, rail road, and telegraph lines that Britain left you immediately upon independence actually allows you to live a pretty good life. Who knew?

Pretty much this. Botswana has a very strong, free capitalist economy and the locals are very proud if that. Pretty much shows how left policies can ruin countries. All of Botswana's neighbors are impoverished socialist countries.

Pretty sure it has to do with economic freedom and the president not being a fucking retard. The wonders of education.

Came here to say this.
They don't have to share their clay with a bunch of other tribes.
Their common culture makes striving for a better future together effortless.

I mean that pretty much confirms what the centre-left has been saying about Africa since the early eighties

Mugabe's group, ZANU/ZANLA, was backed by the Chinese. ZAPU/ZIPRA was backed by the Soviets. That
is an important difference that had decades-long impact.

Implying they don't want to keep niggs noggin so they can flood into white countries

Botswana is a nationalist country. They began with a socialist model, then moved onto capitalism. They built up their country with socialism, now run it with capitalism, and it is united in nationalism.

Yes, they are based.

Botswana and to a lesser extent Ghana are both pretty good countries.

>t. has traveled extensively in SS Africa

niggers just can stop having sex with monkeys

Also, Botswana and Oman are proof that the revolutionary (read: Soviet) decolonization was one of the worst crimes in the history of the world. Worse than colonization itself.

lol

I'm by no means an expert would you care to go into more detail for a pleb what the implications of soviet vs Chinese backing?

Imagine being against Hitler. Couldn’t be me senpai baka.

Gambia is also OK.

Have looked into this and there are records of the first europeans noting that these botswanian tribes were notably more organised , cohesive and peacful than the rest of the idiots in the region.

...

Botswana has a fuck ton of whites. I've met Serbs and Greeks while I was there back in 2013

Oman is a decent country. But thats because have a mountain range acting as a natural border between them and the rest of the crazys. walls work.

could a mosquito transmit AIDS?

If you look at it that way, then we all basically lost twice.

Yes

The difference long-term was that by the time Rhodesia was winding down, Russia was still engaged in Angola after having their hand pushed (again) by Cuba (who had been pushed out of Congo by that time). It was also engaged in Afghanistan. Combine that with the US arms race and the USSR was stretched thin in terms of how much it could commit and where.

China, on the other hand, had a vested interested in gaining a foothold in Africa. First Tanzania, then Malawi, then Mozambique, finally Rhodesia. The Mutare diamond fields in Rhodesia went to them for their support and money, money, money into Mugabe's ZANU-PF. They couldn't get into Zambia; too much Soviet and East German there. So, Rhodesia was the map into South Africa and holding control Tanzania was the map into Kenya. Same as they are today.

The Soviets just couldn't justify the support. East Germany was on the edge already. Poland was on the edge. They had no need of either diamonds or chrome. And they put their eggs into one African basket after that: Angola. A lot of people don't really get or understand the importance of that war. In all respects, it was the last hot war of the Cold War. After the New York Accords, well, the rest is history. The USSR collapsed a few short years later.

China, still playing the slow and steady game, year by year has crept across eastern Africa and is most dominant in Zimbabwe today. It's brutal there in the back country. Makes Tanzania look like a holiday spot in comparison.

He is 100% right though, they should have written southern Africa or south Africa. They wrote "a country in South Africa" which would be Lesotho, not Botswana

Botswana is the most ethnically homogeneous country in Africa. Of course, with Africas fucked up borders that isn't saying much, as it's 70% Tswana and there's a significant part of the population split off by the border with South Africa, but it's a whole hell of a lot better of a situation than everyone else.

They say it, but they don't actually believe it or want to do anything about it.

>Sweden
Holy shit didn't know it was that bad.

It's not. Sweden is like 1 per 100k. That graph is bullshit

So true.

Fun fact: I went to the post office once and tried to send a package to South Africa. The nigger behind the counter told me I can't address the package with "South Africa" because that is a continent, not a country.

It made me wonder about niggers and Jews. Jews got the niggers very angry at White people by constantly complaining about Apartheid through the media apparatus. This nigger-bitch surely hated Whites because of Apartheid, but had no idea there is a country called South Africa. This was in early 90's, btw.

Attached: 1568289310590.jpg (642x912, 143K)

No dude. WWII was an extension of WWI. The Eternal Anglo deliberately provoked Germany by splitting it up into two pieces. That was intolerable. The Brits sewed those seeds of war and even American textbooks in the 20's (before Hitler) were saying this.

I get that. But I won't let facts stop me from bashing modern-day Germans who casually insult people.