This. So. Much

This. So. Much.

Attached: CF56BE5E-7614-4DAE-9BD2-FF6A97A4DF75.png (608x565, 362K)

I'd suggest putting all the spics in Wyoming and building a wall around it, but Wyoming is beautiful and based, so please keep those stinky spics away from Wyoming.

>thinking that's empty
California has more people than Canada

Oh.. Onions libertarian, again.

India? oh fuck
we have something call infrastructure here. This is old and falling apart, though sci-fi tech compared to India. People live near this stuff, the colored areas is where it is. Starting to see the actual picture emerging here?
Yeah

We're full too.

Next time they talk about overpopulation tell them to clear out California and New York.

Stop reposting this you fag. I’ve seen this four times now

I hate them even more than liberals.

>western half is mostly mountains and desert

We dont want to live on top of eachother like you street shitters. Perhaps if you niggers cant stop fucking at least get sterilized.

Having more than 1 person per square mile means that each person owns less than a square mile on average. Imagine being a poorfag that can't even own a tiny bit of land. It's not only full but completely swarming with people to the point where a purge is the most obvious option.

>POOS WITHOUT BREAKING STRIDE

What exactly is the point of this image? How spread out a population is has no bearing on its amount of resources an

Most of that empty area out west is Federal land, and everyone knows most immigrants aren't moving to bumfuck nowhere, they're settling in those red urban centers. If liberals are now in favor of bulldozing parks and sancutaries to put up tenements and McDonalds that's pretty gay.

What if we transport every person in the world to the United States because there is enough room for everyone, we can use the rest of the world to grow food and to put our garbage

usable farmland

Fuck off were full.

As if anyone wanted to live in a country that has the same population density as India, your country is a stinky shithole, nuking half of the population would be a good start to make it viable.

That's because nobody in their right mind agrees to live in Canada.

WTF I wrote "S/Y"

>Not understanding carrying capacity and land use economics/being a retarded faggot

Oh no not the terrible word that had to be banned due to its crimes against humanity: Söy.

Shit in your own nation’s streets, Pajeet, leave ours alone.

Same Poojet, same thread, same 1 post by this ID. Spiced.

Jej

Exactly. From where do these people think the materials for all the things in their lives originate?

How much land is needed for the food on their table, the clothes they wear, that phone in their hand, and so on?

POO

Attached: indian shimmy.png (1548x1534, 512K)

They honestly believe that cities produce value instead of consume it. It's terrifying that these people are allowed to vote.

Exactly Infact I'd say we're at least 10 or 15 million overpopulated the person who made this tweet would be hung in a just society

Attached: 1568365871709.jpg (460x797, 79K)

>1 post by this ID

Attached: letMeIn.png (480x360, 98K)

>(You)

No, the real plan is to put them all in California, build a wall around it, and then drop some nukes on the cities and water supplies.

>are they going to live in the woods?
>implying the only implication of citizenship is occupying a living quarter

There is no saving these people. Fact is, the only ones that care about the demographic decline, the large movement of foreign bodies onto american soil are those few conservative white americans which realise what this means.

All this does is prove that you lurk threads and let people talk while raking in (You)'s, faggot.