He's saying drivel like this to appease his audience of retarded boomers isn't he? It's intellectually dishonest but he does this shit a lot.
He called the Koch Bros 'leftists' for example when they're unironic lolbertarians
Either way it's a retarded thing to say and he's doing it to try to make the right into something it isn't (aka, good)
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtu.be
twitter.com
>"There was not a human problem John Bolton wasn’t totally convinced could be solved with the brute force of government," Carlson said. "That’s an assumption of the left, not the right."
This is just such bullshit. As if the right isn't as happy as the left to bring in the gubment, especially the evangelical conservative christian right which Bolton loved and loved him back.
>call myself one thing
>act like another
There's no mystery here
Yeah, that's the point of conservatism. If you are pro big government you are a leftist.
Plus Tuck himself, (rightly in my view) has argued about bringing in the brute force of mean ol big gubment when needed to. Such as on the subject of automation.
Infact magatards are calling tuck a communist more and more for the fact that he's said corporations are not your friends.
Bolton wants endless war and unaccountable government rule.
Koch brothers wanted illegal labor and lobbied for impossible government restriction for entry into competitive markets.
None of your shit makes sense with even terse inspection.
/rm3gvRS
1488
Check the library out.
Good videos
Good speeches
Great art
>If you are pro big government you are a leftist.
LMAO
Conservatives are huge fans of big gubment just as much as anyone else. Every conservative who gets in LARPs the opposite and then runs up a giant bill as much as any leftist, if not more. As well as enhancing the military bloat which is the worst example of big gubment overreach the planet has ever seen.
>Bolton is a leftist if I just randomly decide to reinvent the definitions that everyone uses!
Koch Bros were outspoken lolbertarians, and cheap labor is a fundamentally lobertarian thing (open borders are the extreme end of it, so it is logically consistent)
corporations are made up fictions with special privileges created by the government and regulated by the government
neocons, who are communists under a new cloak, like it
Bolton is a neocon, neoconservatism is the ideological successor to Trotsky's brand of international communism. Notice how those like him are in favor of unending war around the world understand that is a continuation of permanent revolution as described by Trotsky(Bronstein) A lot of these people running around claiming to be conservative are just superficially different from the left in their rhetoric. Policy wise they are identically to the marxists in the Democratic party.
>>act like another
Ah yeah, Reagan, the darling of the right to this day must have been a commie too!
Your definitions are not agreed to by 99% if not more, of all conservatives and right wingers of any other name in America.
Unless you are willing to say basically everyone in the GOP, and every conservative administration and President was 'secretly leftist' for the last half a century or more. Aka your point is nonesensical and moving goalposts to redefine well accepted terminology because you want to define 'right wing' to be a very specific and niche version of what you call it.
Do you consider the Democrats to be 'leftist'? The bulk is neoliberal if nothing else
I consider the majority to be useful idiots lead by an non visible entity that's machinations tell them to be in order to cause destablization. They tell themselves that full communism is bad but possibly socialism has some redeeming characterists meanwhile they either unknowingly march towards the goal of full communism. Same goes for the vast majority of those who think socialism has some good in it, they don't understand what lies at the end of that road. Even the true believer has no clue what hell awaits them under communism.
> your point is nonesensical and moving goalposts to redefine well accepted terminology
Welcome to politics, my fellow “progressive” “liberal”
>Unless you are willing to say basically everyone in the GOP, and every conservative administration and President was 'secretly leftist' for the last half a century or more. Aka your point is nonesensical and moving goalposts to redefine well accepted terminology because you want to define 'right wing' to be a very specific and niche version of what you call it.
that is kinda what im saying post 60s they slowly got ahold of the republican party with it peaking in bush admin
The majority of everyone, I don't mean dems and gop, I mean literally the majority of people in America and most of the world support some level of 'socialized' programs. (Different to Socialism as a form of government).
The right wing does a tremendous amount of damage by calling 'socialized' programs as if they mean a country is now 'socialist'. For example, Norway gets called fucking socialist by Ben Shapiro because he's either a dummie or a conman who is pushing an agenda.
Anyway, the Dems and Gop , outside of a few on the fringes of their parties, are largely Neoliberals, the same as Reagan and Thatcher were (also the ideology that is wrecking the West, Neoliberalism is 'globohomo' as Jow Forums says).
Conservatives want govt as limited as possible. If everyone loses their iob that is bad FOR US ALL
A better way to frame it would be internationalism being increased vs isolationism.
There is always going to be a balance of these things to some degree. Although I agree that the neocons are pushing a form of utopian thought based around 'Democracy'.
However, propping up dictators is also a long standing tradition of the US, and still is today (The KSA for example).
Then conservatives are doing an unbelievably bad job by backing the GOP aren't they? Since the government has only been increased and increased on every possible metric under GOP administrations.
At least the dems don't LARP like they want smaller gubment.
Just fucking kill yourself, you worthless subhuman.
Neoconservatism was created by Trotskyists. Libertarianism is obviously left-wing. He's 100% right.
He's trying to say John Bolton works for the jews. Let me break it down for you
Leftism=Liberalism=Socialism=Bolshevism=Talmudic Judaism
tucker is a main stream media fucking actor
Not an argument.
Libertarianism is demanding the opposite of 'more government', so by Tuck's (broken) logic that means that it's a right wing philosophy.
Everyone gets very confused by the fact that political compasses are more than just a linear thing apparently.
He isn't trying to say that though is he? Since by this logic he should be calling the entire Republican party 'leftist'.
You can't say 'more gubment always = leftist' and then call libertarians 'leftist' too when they want the opposite thing.
If Tucker really means that then I would have respect for him for being intellectually consistent in his positions. But he will never ever do that because it would require him to go way off the plantation and call Ronald Reagan a 'leftist' by his own logic.
These extremely confused definitions are things virtually no one abides by either so it does nothing but muddy the water.
As I say, he's saying this because his audience of Fox News geezers need to be told everyone Trump fires is a 'leftist'. Which is ironic given that, by a much less stringent definition, Trump himself is an oldschool Democrat of the 90s.
Tucker is redpilled but he is constrained by the need to appeal to the retarded Boomers who make up most of Fox News' viewership.
Well either all that or you're over analyzing a jew funded media personality
What you're not understanding is that Tucker sees the opportunity Trump has laid before the Republican party to break away from the two party system. That is why both the left and the right are trying to destroy the reemergence of the Paleocons/Reform party and have the GOP be dominated by populist race realists.
The "left and right" have both been against the American people, in particular white working class people for the past 50 years.
What Tucker meant, but couldn't outright say to his Fox/boomer audience, is that traditional republican establishment types, in concert with democrats, don't give a shit about anyone but themselves and their donor class interests. We all know this is true and you're shilling won't put the genie back in the bottle.
Nice memeflag, boomer kike faggot.
>OP doesn't know where the neocon movement came from.
Government's during wartime are universally stricter than when not at war. Thus, by pushing for endless war you justify that strictness permently
I'm overanalyzing for the sake of argument but yes probably.
I stand by my original point in OP that he's doing it because his job is to tell Fox News viewers that everyone Trump has fired is a 'leftist' in some form or another. I've seen this get said unironically by qcumbers in comments on youtube, 'oh such and such was fired because they were secretly DEEP STATE and working for Clinton' etc.
I know where it comes from.
Is Tucker going to call Pompeo a leftist? Or the acting nat security advisor? Kupperman, a life long neocon much like Bolton.
Bolton became a meme figure just because he had that moustache and got a lot of press for being loud about wanting war.
I have no confidence that Trump will appoint anyone better. The acting national security advisor is the same as John Bolton except he isn't a cartoonish meme man.
>leftists are traitors who want to destroy the country
>Bolton is a traitor who wants to destroy the country
>Koch bro(s) are/were traitors who want to destroy the country
It's a distinction without a difference, OP.
This might irritate some people, but I believe we'd be better off not attaching any hope to media personalities.
Play jew games, win jew "prizes"
>muh horseshoe theory
Fucking kill yourself you memeflaggot kike rat
Cool image
>Is Tucker going to call Pompeo a leftist? Or the acting nat security advisor? Kupperman, a life long neocon much like Bolton.
I would not be surprised if he did .
>I have no confidence that Trump will appoint anyone better
I agree with you here.
>The acting national security advisor is the same as John Bolton except he isn't a cartoonish meme man.
He is just a puppet of Bolton, much like Pompeo.
He's just a disinfo agent, one of many.
Neocon ideology has its roots in progressivism, going back to the ideas of Woodrow Wilson.
The idea that you can use government force (ie. the military) to create utopias in far off lands is at its heart a left wing notion.
Just [redacted] 'em all desu who gives a fuck what anyone said
globohomo is the left and neocons are commies.
I thought so at first because I think he copped shit saying neo con earlier with a pic of his face up.
But then he talked about neo cons directly after saying Bolton is a leftist. Tucker just hates him, as should anyone that is sick of wars.
It is doing the opposite because this kind of talk puts everyone firmly into the left vs right memeology.
> Tucker sees the opportunity Trump has laid before the Republican party to break away from the two party system
That's the opposite of true.
Trump being a pressure release valve for anti establishment sentiment has made everyone firmly back on the two party psyop.
He should call him a traitor then.
And what about the other neocons? Pompeo? Abrams? Trump hired Bolton and all these people, and as I've mentioned, right now there is another neocon as national security advisor.
I'd put money on it that he'll get replaced with a permanent but lesser known neocon too.
Trump's hired a lot of traitors and yet guys like Tucker seem scared to call them 'traitors', because doing this means he has to logically call Trump a traitor for hiring traitors to run the country.
>but I believe we'd be better off not attaching any hope to media personalities.
Tucker gets a lot of credit for some things he says which are good and usually different to the standard Faux line, but not all of it is good.
I see Fox as being gatekeepers of the two party psyop.
For all the good Tucker has said in the past it doesn't matter when people are being kept on the plantation.
Most people in America unironically have a warped version of what 'leftist' is to the point that the word has hardly any meaning anymore.
The left of today is also to blame by being a walking contradiction too and being hypocritical. The right wing are to blame for being full of conmen who talk like they're patriots but only really care about $.
The neocons obviously know that their plans for 'Bringing Democracy' are all lies though. You know Bolton wants the MEK to run Iran, a terrorist group. He knows that if they got in charge they'd make it a failed state, and that's what he wants.
An unstable ME keeps energy costs high too.
That doesn't make you right wing the neo-con and neo-libs are left-wing capitalist
>Trump being a pressure release valve for anti establishment sentiment has made everyone firmly back on the two party psyop.
Explain the rise in white consciousness then and Republicans openly celebrating the death of John Mccain and laughing at Mitt Romney for being a faggot?
>He should call him a traitor then.
And what about the other neocons? Pompeo? Abrams? Trump hired Bolton and all these people, and as I've mentioned, right now there is another neocon as national security advisor.
Well, they are certainly neoliberals economically (virtually identical to neocons), the entire system is based upon liberal values (implying) so calling them leftists isn't much of a stretch, though I agree there's much better terminology to use.
Link to Tuck actually calling Bolton a leftist though?
>Republicans elephant faggot flag
Lemme see that hexagram Chomstein
Bolton was a neocon, neocons are Trotskyites. Bolton is a leftist.
He's not wrong.
Wanting big government = Leftist
there is no right further than bolton
Libertarians are leftists. Undeniable.
Bolton and most neocons descended from literal Trotskyists who were against Stalin.
Leftists in America are pro establishment. They are the establishment
>He called the Koch Bros 'leftists' for example when they're unironic lolbertarians
Can you be any more of a lying kike? Might as well just show your israeli flag and be done with it.
Yeah...cos Nazis are leftist in tbe dipshit paradigm of suffering the last 14 months of the presidency of Darth Oral....
he is right, only leftist start war all over the world
He's not wrong and he actually made a good argument for it. Bolton is obsessed with a nanny state that intervenes at every turn
Bolton is a Straussian/Trotskyite faggot neocon and OP is a fucking retard. Herbed this faggot thread and this faggot larping fuckwad OP.
Dumbest shit I've ever heard. Being a small govt libertarian is now being a leftist....fucking retard. Eat shit, you fucking imbecile.
Tucker is a kike who defends mutilating little boys. He and everyone who posts about him here should be strung up
Fuck off faux jews watching faggots
enjoy your president for more year
Yeah. National Socialism is a retarded leftwing ideology that wants a daddy instead of a mommy like a communist. Go fuck yourself.
Fuck off AIPAC shill
Its 5 more years ahmed
I love hitler! Thats why im voting for Bernie Sanders and pro immigrant policy
The left has been historically anti Capitalist, so 'left wing capitalist' is an unusual distinction.
Neolib / neocon are just fundamentally internationalist positions which are all about 'free trade' 'lax regulations' 'movement of labor' and other things that a lot of people are fucked over by.
>rise in white consciousness
Trump has done nothing to stop the mass censorship of Big Tech which is currently the #1 issue of our times. Silicon valley is using its tax subsidied businesses to be a workaround on the 1st amendment. The FCC should have stepped in as soon as social media companies began acting like publishers but they won't, and Trump isn't doing shit about it.
Trump has also done a lot of damage by making the left even more extreme than before, they beat up Trump supporters in the streets and get away with it routinely now.
On top of that, he made 'the wall' and nationalism in general into a meme issue to the point that it has made it politically suicidal to push those things in the future.
If Trump loses 2020 the MSM will say it's because he was 'too nationalist and hardline for America' when in reality the opposite is true.
If They are already damage controlling against Tucker, Tucker might be on to something
>not defending mutilating kids makes you a jew
You are literally defending jewish evil shit you retard.
You gay nigga
I thought you planned to make him emperor ?
Tucker is saying 'promoting big gubment = leftist'.
Libertarians are the opposite of promoting big gubment, Bolton however is happy to have big gubment, much like basically the entire GOP by the way, so his logic is faulty.
No one uses this definition of 'left' or 'right' anyway in America or elsewhere.
Calling someone a 'leftist' has become the stupid mans way of trying to insult them without actually having to think about what the word means. Hence unironic Fox viewers doing it.
It is good for the left being more extreme ?
How do you think nazy rise to power and popularity ?
"hint" comunism behaving like dog and attacking people in the street
That comes in 2024 when it becomes clear there's no alternative to third term Trump.
"Stop calling me what I am, which is a slimy leftist kike"
Left and right has next to nothing to do with the size of government. Even if you were to posit that it meant that in America, that hasn't been true since Goldwater's era or longer.
Every single libertarian policy implemented honestly would lead to the fulfillment of leftist goals. Immigration, corporate governance, degeneracy for profit. People with money like the Kochs know this and support all that. Useful idiots in the Republican party attribute all social ills to the Democrat party itself, and ignore the role of business and trade in it.
Hoppe is not a libertarian either. He's a fascist, bless him, who wants to attach himself to another ideology for reasons I don't comprehend.
You didn't address anything I said. Trump has lead a rise in white consciousness because of the censorship, and boomer republicans being beaten in the streets, not in spit of.
>On top of that, he made 'the wall' and nationalism in general into a meme issue to the point that it has made it politically suicidal to push those things in the future.
Lol, what?
>he proved how to win but noone will use that in the future because cnn made fun of him
You're retarded bro.
faggot
I miss the emperor trump comic of bjorn something like that there were quitte nice for a leftist
I wonder how can people can reddit space that much, it hurt my eye a lot.
>500 billion to protect the world from command economy totalitarian nations is BIGGER GUBMENT dan over 2 trillion in Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid alone!
You are a memflag who must be killed.
Neoconservatives are quite literally the intellectual heirs of Trotskyist communism.
the whole big gubment thing is such a forced meme! its just so they can privatise more things and have even more monopolies. can believe so many ppl on here fall for it.
he is a leftist do you really expect leftist to be somewhat inteligent. I mean if you follow this kind of ideology right now when you see them even more in america you need to be complainly brainwashed.
I am always scared when I see how brainwashed some commie are, and that they can shut down any kind of logic and just follow the media.
lol at this pillow guy. how come yanks can stomach watching the same ads every 3 mins?
Neocons are 'leftists' AKA 'progressives.'
> to try to make the right into something it isn't (aka, good)
The actual right, the 'alt-right', is good. It represents actual America and white culture.
>Bolton is obsessed with a nanny state that intervenes at every turn
Much like the entire GOP.
You know who loved the nanny state? Reagan.
Guess who's a darling of the right wing to this very day? Reagan.
So the majority of right wingers do not agree with the definition.
See, to me, I don't care, because I don't call myself any of these words. I'm not invested in defending the words or holding them dear to me.
Is Trump a leftist?
Hannity sure doesn't think so does he?
Well the rise of white consciousness isn't going anywhere then is my point.
Plus I don't really see it as being especially true.
Look at comments on Hannity videos, they're just generic GOP types spewing the same old same old rhetoric about 'the radical socialist dems hate Israel!'. 'The dems are the real racists'.
user, the majority of people are stupid and always have been, so convincing a bunch of rubes that you're on their side when you're just a big tv conman isn't going to help them in the long term.
Everyone is now firmly back on the GOP vs Dem wagon, everyone is memed.
>Lol, what?
Trump has made the wall into a meme issue, there was wall getting built over the last few Presidents and no one made a big deal about it, but Mr reality TV (and the media being hysterical) has turned into this stupid big thing.
One GOP senator voted against the unconstitutional anti BDS law.
Rand Paul.
ONE.
>1
>!ONE!
Kavanaugh, the man who helped Bush write the patriot act, now a judge.
BASED!
But no one was talking about that because of that stupid smokescreen about Ford.
Man people are so easily led.
I'm not a leftist.
You will never convince the donald posters and faux jews watchers. They dont work in the real world
>military bloat which is the worst example of big gubment overreach the planet has ever seen.
over half of all fed spending is on welfare you dumb nigger
whitetrash.jpg
lets see who these people work for, assuming they aren't southerners living off the teat of the US government
You're right, Trump should have made that woman a judge instead, then she could have accused Ginsburger of molesting her to take her out.
you think and argue like one
>Tucker is a kike who defends mutilating little boys
Did he really do that?
Sadly true.
It's more than just federal spending.
7 trillion dollars on the war on terror.
The US military is the biggest example of big government overreach in all history. Especially when it comes to defending a corrupt government that has demolished the constitution. Heard of the patriot act?
>Well it has 'patriot' in the name so it must be good!
Are there no judges who are any good in America? Not one?
Are the only choices unironic communists or neoconservatives who actively have helped tear up your rights?
Do you think it's okay to have the constitution shredded to 'own the libs' or something? Or that shredding the constitution is a 'lesser or two evils' situation? Because it isn't, it's all 'evil'.
The military budget is a joke if we can't even win wars against actual sand people in Afghanistan
>whitetrash.jpg
Warmonger for the kikes=left. Dur. Have you seen the left spurging out because Trump won't attack Iran? The jewcheckmarks were kvetching like crazy at first.. Then it's also like they thought (oh wait we aren't supposed to be happy about war) and they backed off. But the jewcheckmarks are still getting their licks in. They lost it briefly and exposed themselves when Trump fired their last great hope.
>Look at comments on Hannity videos
For fuck sake, you're a Q boomer without a home aren't you? Keep this cringe and gayshit on nosebook please, you're a retard and will never be redpilled. This is a nazbol groyper board oldman.
>The US military is the biggest example of big government overreach in all history
wrong. that's the income tax and the welfare state that it funds. better luck next time, nigger
>we can't even win wars against actual sand people in Afghanistan
we can, but the faggots who are afraid of """""civilian""""" casualties prevented us. we should have simply glassed the entire region as a warning to never fuck with us. instead we tried that faggot "hearts and minds," "stand-up their government" bullshit.
I'm saying the qcumbers are the problem.
They're easily led rubes.
Did you read my comment?
Yes. He also falsely said that it somehow wasnt as bad as female (which is wrong in nearly every case besides the astronomically rare kind of fgm).
I can't even watch it. It makes me too angry..
youtu.be
7 trillion and endless illegal war and destruction of the constitution isn't a big enough example?