why does simulation theory trigger pol so much?
Why does simulation theory trigger pol so much?
Leo Reed
Cooper Rivera
Because it gives no moral guidance and is therefore useless
Ayden Morris
Because its freemasonic propaganda, retelling Genesis but void of any divinity, spirituality, purpose or God.
Its the nihilistic and materialistic version of creationism.
Evan Brooks
>pol
Which synagogue do you attend?
Chase Collins
To expand on this, its gnosticism (which is a bunch of different sets of believes, but Masonry fits into the category) and gnostic propaganda
Gnostics think that there is the Monad, the one, the true God so to speak. From him comes Sophia the spirit and somewhere down the line Yaldabaoth. Yaldabaoth is the So called Demiurge that created this fake reality, depending on who you ask out of evilness or confusion and is the cause for our limitations and ultimately death and traps us in here through rebirth LARPing as the real God.
However now comes the hook up. While these seems like an obvious hint to Yaldabaoth being Satan, being the cause of death, the reason for our fall (entrapment in this reality) and ruling this world through lies, fear and temptation Gnostics now claim that the God of the OT is this Demiurge, and that Jesus is Lucifer is the Serpent in Eden send by the Monad/true God to free us from the Demiurge that wanted us dumb (forbidding the fruit of knowledge of good and evil) and oppressed us and was a tyrant with his "unnecessary" strict law. Its an effort to seperate the OT from the NT but Jesus himself says
>17Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them, but to fulfill them.
So why would Jesus, send by the real God want to fulfill the law and prophets of the OT send by the false God? Obviously this doesnt make sense and shows OT God and Jesus are on the same side, the serpent even gets identified in revelations as Satan
>2He seized the dragon, the ancient serpent who is the devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years.
Its an effort to get rid of the commandments and guidelines of the OT, watering down the traditions and ultimately make us fall from the right path by promising liberation much like SJW do, introducing moral relativism. (Cant say often enough that Satan will come as a SJW promising freedom from Gods oppressive and useless laws)
Christian Diaz
Now if you read carefully here you may picked something up.
>created a fake reality we are meant to escape.
Now how many out there of the celebs are currently pushing the Simulation theory? This theory is basically the same as Bibles Genesis with a few major changes.
>makes the creator (the all mighty God) into some pleb outside the simulation denying him divinity and us purpose
>substitutes the spiritual realm/heaven with another layer of the material one outside the simulation
>depending on the branch of Simulation Theory you get instead of Satan wispering temptation, lies and fear into your mind Saturn casting this fake reality.
Its basically admitting to the creation story while trying to get rid of any purpose or divinity turning us into materialistic, hedonistic or nihilistic consumerist drones.
Gnosticism additionally says this "pleb outside the simulation" is basically Satan. As such you now know where the Simulation Theory push comes from.
Incidently the Freemasons think of the universe as a machine, purely mechanical and a simulated one would be exactly that.
Kevin Richardson
> people need moral guidance
Okay, but they don't. It bothers people because they consider computer programs to be not people. But if someone had developed computer programs that had consciousness and experienced emotions like we do what's the difference? Of course we aren't in a simulation, because it's just naive to believe for a second that a society could become that advanced without imploding on itself.
Zachary Turner
psuedo-intellectual horseshit, just because we don't have answers doesn't mean you get to fill in the gaps with made up shit
Ryan Kelly
Caleb Bell
>pol
Lurk moar faggot
Grayson Rivera
>The Universe was created...
>Let's say it is a computer simulation instead of admitting a higher power exists
Michael Evans
>trigger
This is a meaningless term at this point, anytime someone disagrees with something they are "triggered"
Jaxson Peterson
the concept requires an actual white-level IQ so Jow Forums spergs out at their monkey brains short circuiting
Jordan Taylor
It's just a certain form of theology dressed up in the language of modern science
Andrew Perez
Because what should change if this retarded and unprovable hypothesis were somehow the truth? Should we not strive for anything then because nothing is real? It’s dumb.
Andrew Wood
Oliver Lopez
Nathaniel Robinson
Kayden Parker
Simulations are man-made, a simulation would imply that a man or group of men are behind it.
Adam Gutierrez
Alexander Brown
it's just scientism flavored creationism. these people mocked those who believe in a god created universe yet believe in the same thing except worded differently
Easton Scott
John Clark
well, one... technically a higher power would still exist, second- there is a potential we would be the original creation point- but by probability it is unlikely
you have no idea what psuedo means you retard, simulation theory is based off of probability
Blake Scott
Carter Ward
ITT retards with no knowledge of physics whatsoever deny the possibility of a simulation
Samuel Gonzalez
Aiden Gutierrez
Zachary Price
No, you would continue to live your life as fundamentally nothing would have changed. If you need to believe in Jesus Christ as the lord and savior to continue to live, then you're the problem.
Ayden Fisher
Jonathan Price
Hunter Murphy
the word 'simulation' is misleading.
we live in a dimension, similar to a radio frequency in application.
The theory itself doesn't trigger Jow Forums, it triggers kikes. The idea that there is a place where they either don't win, or do not exist at all scares the shit out of them; and that's a good thing.
Tyler Sanders
It seems like mental masturbation. What difference does it make if we live in "a simulation" with a creator or "reality" with a Creator? What functional difference is there? We can never escape the "simulation" so for all intents and purposes it is is reality. What is the significance of these being all a simulation? Its stupid
Samuel Diaz
Ethan Sanchez
it's an amazing IQ filter, the entire concept is lost on the majority of Jow Forums who have 90 IQ medieval peasant intelligence levels
Oliver Rodriguez
Aaron Morris
It really is just a nihilistic argument of creation.
Sebastian Long
its a way for atheist to rationalize there being a god without actually admitting it.
Julian Rivera
Nicholas Powell
I know the concept of truth is damaging to your 50 IQ life, but knowing the essence of our reality is important to many people.
Blake Roberts
Nicholas Phillips
I have a graduate degree in a physics based STEM field
it's not that it's not a possibility, it's that it's structurally/logically identical to a transcendent god.
it doesn't answer any philosophical questions, it just moves the goal post
James Edwards
Oliver Wilson
Noah Bailey
David Evans
Connor Barnes
except there's no faith in the simulation theory, it's about probability, it doesn't have any religious essence, it's about probability, why is this concept so hard for rogan mongoloids to understand?
Andrew Myers
You dodged the question. I dont see why you should waste any time thinking about it, if it changes literally nothing. Reality and simulation are labels applied to concepts. You can swap the label as many times as you like I dont care, what it is that it describes remains the same. What are the practical ramifications of us living in a simulation?
Dominic Cook
Elijah Hughes
Thomas Roberts
Tell me what's the practical difference between
>simulation theory
and
>God created the universe
Anthony Brooks
Austin Rogers
Cameron Cook
Oliver Williams
Nothing. Atheists always try to take the narrative and twist it towards their viewpoint.
Nathaniel Turner
Matthew Jones
It's just coping
Kayden Lee
It's a waste of time. All that shit was entertaining before extreme feminism and the migrant crisis, but now there is just too many real problems to focus on imaginary ones.
Jackson Anderson
It isn't a theory at all.
Eli Ortiz
because morons don't want to know the truth.
Leo Campbell
Because it would mean everything Jow Forums believes is meaningless
Isaiah Fisher
Because admitting we don’t and can’t know the origins of existence upsets people and trying to replace their made up load of horse shit with yours causes further upset.
Connor Jenkins
enjoy the ban
Michael Kelly
Pretty much this. It's like when people talk about other universes, outside of our own, that we have absolutely no way of ever interacting with.
Just seems like some pseudo-intellectual conversation piece for Neil Degrasse Tyson to talk about on CNN.
Ethan Ross
I honestly think these people are so wrapped up in their own worldview they don't understand the real-world implications of what they're doing.
Jeremiah Gutierrez
Because it's just deism for retards
It's philosophically shallow and completely pointless to explore
Jace Green
I agree with you on that.
Logan Foster
Because if that is true then they have to accept that their christfag bullshit is just make believe
Logan Roberts
because then it means we're just npcs too.
Zachary Turner
Speak of the devil
Jaxson Jones
start with the Greeks
Isaac Miller
because it is pushed by certain groups to induce nihilism in the populace
Nolan Barnes
I find no problem with combining 8D holographic universe theory with panentheistic orthodoxy.
They go together quite wonderfully, desu
Jordan Thomas
If life were a simulation, then politics would be completely pointless. Therefore, posting on Jow Forums all day would have no meaning.
Joseph Martin
"simulation theory" is a completely useless view on reality. At best it is a retelling of age-old philosophies with a comp-sci mask
Owen Gray
Nice picture of a kike. Did someone pay you to post that?
Joseph Foster
>muh morals are more important than truth
Gee, that sounds familiar.
Logan Green
Im not denying its poaaible, its just very very veey unlikely
Nathaniel Mitchell
Id rather believe genisis happened literally.
Charles Lopez
>Just watching this now
Bostrum is full of shit.
Worst thing is he's been paid at least £2million by the British State to talk or write pure bollocks and an Oxford head of department.
Now I know nepotism and stupid theories are push on purpose to distract us.
Adam Adams
its interesting
and also hopeful
Gabriel Gonzalez
the real question is, what is being simulated if we live in a simulation?
Ayden Morris
If.
Isaiah Reed
It's bollocks
Carson Ortiz
How is simulation theory not semantic garbage? It's just shuffling the word "reality" with "simulation" with no new meaning being conveyed.
Ryan Baker
Why do brainlets believe in simulation theory, which requires a programmer, while at the same time denying God as Creator?
You deny the truth found in the Bible and replace it with the first stupid crap you hear on a podcast.
How many of you are sodomites?
Ever read Romans chapter one?
Jace Bennett
Everything triggers Jow Forums.
Charles Wood
>How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?
Fuck off unless you've got tangible evidence.
Jacob Ortiz
This.
Also Bostroms original paper came out after the matrix.
>Hey goy don't look at the central banks enslaving you here look at this simulation theory shit.
I'm not saying it couldn't happen, but there's no fucking way this world is simulated because home brew crew would have hacked the shit out of it by now and kikes would be in the oven
Jack Brown
So can anyone actually summarize the "simulation theory" of reality?
Jacob Price
and you are trying too hard to refute it which only makes it more interesting
Alexander Jackson
>simulation theory is based off of probability
Aha, you so you must agree with this as well, then, since it is also based on logical probability:
>More humans have died than live right now
>Current humanity represents about 7% of all humans who ever lived
>Therefore, there are more than 9 dead humans for every live one
>Statistically, it's more probable that you as a human are dead than alive (statistical FACT)
>Therefore, it's statistically unlikely that you are alive right now (again, a statistical FACT)
When did you discover and accept that you're already dead, user?
Jack Jones
Maybe the plebs who accept simulation theory are opposed to the traditional idea of god being a perfect infallible being which religion almost always takes as axiomatic.
Simulation theory opens up the idea that god is a slob like us, maybe on a much higher level of existence and intelligence but he or she might be the super entity equivalent of a tendie eating Jow Forums shitposting autistic faggot. All powerful to us? Maybe. Someone we need to blindly follow because they 100% have our best interests at heart? Maybe not.
Connor Cook
There's several, Bostrum's paper is the most famous (2001). There's also the holographic principle in the 80 early 90s all of it is psychotic /x/ tier bollocks.
Dominic Lopez
This theory isn't good for my paranoia
Daniel Brown
It's all just a screensaver running until the User returns from break to resume His Great Work (data entry), erasing us all .
Leo Barnes
>Someone we need to blindly follow because they 100% have our best interests at heart? Maybe not.
That's retarded, and akin to arguing that your web-browser isn't obligated to follow your commands because you're a loser weeb.
We don't get a choice in the matter, we're code.
Asher Rodriguez
>If we ever create a computer that can simulate a universe, that universe will contain entities that create computers that simulate universes
>Those universes will have entities that create computers that simulate universes
>etc.
>Therefore, it's more statistically likely that we live in a simulated universe than a real one, since the number of simulated universes are near infinite if we assume that this goes on forever (since apparently the initial computer, that has to provide calculation power for every iteration, has no limits, because.. reasons)
Something like that.
Oh, oh, "how do we prove it?", that's.. you, you don't. It's a statistical thing, it's not provable. It's like which statistically proves that it's likely that both of us are in fact dead right now.
Caleb Powell
Simulation theory is honestly just a creation story sprayed down in video game juice. Instead of saying god created the world, we say a programmer created our simulation. Was this actually a productive exercise or are we actually arguing semantics and terminology?
Oliver Green
I just watched 30mins of the Bostrom clip and it made me pissed off. I thought this man was a genius back in 2001, the way normies talked about him. BUT he has no cogent congruent argument just a polemical fudge. His argument isn't even scientific and is a shiitier version of Greek Philosophy advanced by Plato etc.
Parker Carter
I'm more keen to believe I just started playing some dumb virtual reality game, which erases your memory and gives you no way of logging out. It's pretty boring, but at least I didn't chose hard mode, like a tryhard and weren't born in Africa, or something.
>yfw when blacks are actually progamers