Thoughts on Mao? Have the more bigbrained guys among you read his stuff "On Contradiction" and "On liberalism" and shit like that? I genuinely think you natsoc types who are interested in Lenin as far as the mechanics of revolution goes could find Mao pretty interesting and rewarding to read since he practiced revolution in a really different environment than Lenin and Hitler. Mao was btw originally a nationalist. He also wrote some national romantic poems which were pretty beautiful and based. Have you history-fags even read about the High Tang dynasty? user, please. Don't listen to liberal propaganda about Mao, it often oversimplifies him and doesn't adequately represent the intellectual depth of the dude.
Mao
Isaac Morales
Michael Butler
commie
Nathaniel Diaz
Noah Clark
>reads lenin and mao
>thinks yeah the guys on pol could synthesise this into fascism
Either tryingto convert Jow Forums in a shitty way or you have read those people and are really stupid.
Dylan Nguyen
not really trying to convert Jow Forums, i just know that fascists are interested in ways of practicing revolution and i thought it would be fun, yes fun, to see if any fascists here on Jow Forums had studied the chinese revolution, and i was also looking forward to the more dogbrained retard responses such as yours, thank you, user
Jacob Ramirez
>such as mine
Yeah no. I have read these people. And your big brain supposedly has and instead of being convinced, has said how can I synthesise the anthithetical ideologies of Communism and Fascism. You don't even know much about fascism. Fascism often uses many parts of revolutionary ideology from socialism/communism in order to influence the masses. It already acts faux-revolutionary. Nice original idea you got there.
Tyler James
If they were smart enough to read books they would already be communists
Justin Morris
also
>Mao was a nationalist
Mao found that using a nationalist identiy combined with communism to help fight the imperialist japanese was a good, progressive idea. But if you've ever read his writings you would know he was not a nationalist and that nationalism is not conducive to internationalism.
Michael Wilson
More like LMao, amirite boys?
Carter Howard
1) I know that fascism uses revolutionary thought from socialism/communism though, that was why i posted this thread.
2) You don't know how much I know about fascism
3) You don't know whether or not i have been convinced by Lenin or Mao
4) This wasn't "some grand idea" I had, i just wanted a thread on Mao
5) You are a resentful paranoid piece of shit lol, relax, sit down. Maybe read Nietzsche
Carson Bell
>uses revolutionary thought
No it doesn't. It uses faux-revolutionary phrases and optics to appear as such. It is not.
>don't know much about fascism, been convinced by lenin or mao
If you knew much you wouldn't be saying stupid stuff and if you had been convinced you wouldn't be attempting to convince Jow Forums of it in a shitty way.
>read nietzsche
how old even are you?
Grayson Powell
mao's good at warfare but terrible at running the country. him along with the CCP founders were super good at fighting against the japanese and let's not forget that had chiang not ease up on the pursuit of mao all throughout china they would have caught up with the red army and completely wipe out the ccp.
what mao is good at is using chaos to his advantage to brainwash a bunch of nobodies to willingly throw their bodies for him. hence he's good at warfare. but when it comes to governing he knew there were smarter men in the room. he's the type of man who would succeed if there's just endless warfare but once shit gets well people like him dont know what to do except to start more revolutions and fight more wars.
Alexander Clark
Why hello there
Alexander Peterson
>terrible at running the country
Depends by what measurements we use. Some mistakes were made but not entirely attributable to Mao. Under his rule wealth and land inequality became much better. Education, life expectancy. quality of life all shot up.
Wyatt James
mao knew liu shao qi can run the show better than him. all of mao's achievements in my opinion is completely canceled by the cultural revolution. and it was unnecessary. mao kicked the whole thing off himself because he was afraid. had he stepped away from power gracefully like Washington history would have had better things to say about him.
Luke Barnes
>Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution
important part of Maoism and very fundamental. It is absolutely necessary. It is an attempt to purge the superstructure of everything that is bourgeois or against the proletariat to help defend the socialist country. Defence of the country militarily and cultural revolution is needed until the end of capitalism.
Jack Sanchez
it was to cause chaos and erase the culture of a people so you can fill the void with your own ideology and assert maximum control
Jason Morgan
No. Socialist revolutions have a history of being attacked by counter-revolutionaries in their country. In order to combat bourgeois ideology, which was helped to form by their control of the mode of production, items and artifacts that reinforce bourgeois thought or other hostile ideologies must be got rid of. Mao was a determined Marxist and it is absolutely necessary to do.
Mason Thomas
kike puppet
Adrian Martinez
Jacob Bailey
He was too mean to the sparrows.