Devs Sep 15 >Turkey is building fortifications in the safe zone >Adrian Darya 1 docks in Syria >SAA stationed in Khan Sheikhoun target with artillery shells and rockets the town of Hass and village of Sheikh Mustafa south of Idlib in conjunction with the flight of Russian reconnaissance aircrafts overhead >Karnfrabel, Termlaa also shelled by SAA >Tal Abyad Military Council meets with representatives of the Global Coalition to coordinate the mechanisms of the proposed safe zone, to fill SDF trenches, and to explain the importance of coordination between the U.S., Tal Abyad Council and Turkey >>Syrians in Idlib came out into the streets to demand the downfall of the Assad government despite ongoing shelling & airstrikes.
GOD BLESS BOLTON AND GOD BLESS ISRAEL DEATH TO RUSSIA, DEATH TO SYRIA AND DEATH TO IRAN
Easton Rivera
Assad will be judged for his crimes. Even if he dies without relinquishing power, he will be tried by the Court of God for all the shit he has spewed and the murders he allowed and committed. Those complicit with him are doomed to the same fate. >inb4 kike, neocon, wahhabi, turk, etc.
>there are constraints on how much the United States can export because oil ports are already near capacity. >reuters.com/article/us-oil-opec-capacity-explainer-idUSKBN1W00V9 >Crashing the world with no survivors. If no one cared about Yemen burning, then maybe this might make them care.
SG is ded. Going to sleep. Something better happen when I wakeup. It's the final battle that will result in new era for the region if it happened and depending on winners.
Nicholas Cox
A stark warning of what will happen in a real war scenario. Will it wake people up or just escalate things?
It doesn't really matter if its true. If that's the angle they are pushing then they want a war.
Robert Hill
How could the Saudis not detect all that movement coming from Iran? How could the most heavily monitored waterway not see anything flying over it?
Zachary Brown
Don't ask questions.
Easton Sanders
they replaced every occurrence of the word "proxy" with "territory" and "Houthis" with "IRGC" Honestly I've no clue what they think they're achieving
Jason Gonzalez
>@WalidPhares
>#Kuwait is mobilizing its defense and security systems after drones originating from #Iraq, crossed its airspace into #SaudiArabia airspace. It's not a #Houthi affair. It is an Iranian pincer movement.
>I have warned months ago that the region was to witness a mass #GameofDrones
>Honestly I've no clue what they think they're achieving Casus Belli
Asher Wright
Majority of American politicians wouldn't mind an American response because they view this as an attack on their ally, with the hawks screaming "Iran" in the due process. They're hoping the population stays war ready so a smoking gun (like 9/11) is easy to coordinate.
Understand that 9/11 didn't just happen, there was more than 10 years of build up. When you 'feel' attacked or see your allies get attacked, you will respond in an emotional way before using rational logic. Hence why the politicians (who unsurprisingly are war-friendly) are forcing down the Iran angle DEEP before it's even Monday so the majority are still looking at this as an attack on US instead of SA.
Naturally, experts would project a win for US higher technology over Iran's less advanced weaponry system, mostly acquired from North Korea, China and Russia. However, in what I call the "Game of Drones" the equation is not only about technological superiority, but about geopolitical conditions. Here is why.
Iran's regime has been developing and acquiring missiles, anti-missiles missiles, and long-range rockets for a few years, particularly since the Obama Administration released billions of dollars in frozen assets based on the Iran Nuclear Deal. Tehran has been boasting about its new "strategic capabilities," claiming it has reached a strategic parity with Israel, the Arab Coalition and the United States. It has asserted that it has a combo of unmanned flying weapons which can inflict high level of destructions on its enemies, particularly American forces in the region.
Thomas Long
2/3 Last year, Iranian drones pierced Israeli airspace. For many months, the IRGC was flying weaponized drones in Syria and Iraq's airspaces. But more importantly, the Khomeinist regime equipped their allies in Yemen, the Houthi militias with all sorts of missiles, from ballistic ones to drones, which were fired on targets in Saudi Arabia, including airports and oil installations. According to reports, one Houthi missile targeted a US Navy ship in the Red Sea more than year ago but was downed in time. The Iran controlled Yemen "missile force" seemed to be the platform threatening Arab Coalition and US assets in the region. Hezbollah's missile force in Lebanon has been the oldest deployed robotic army also commanded by the Pasdaran.
The US military presence in the Middle East has always been equipped with missiles and drones, as well as the Navy equivalent deployed in the region. But with Iran's escalation since the designation of the IRGC as a terror entity and the biting economic sanctions on Iran's regime, Washington deployed additional assets, including battleships, an aircraft carrier, B-52s and Patriot missiles batteries. The US deterrence force, though impressive, has one mission so far, that is to deter Iran from attacking US forces in the region. It does not have a task to destroy Iran's military might, because of domestic political opposition. The Ayatollahs' strategists understood this equation and thus have apparently adopted the "Game of Drones," strategy.
From Yemen, they coordinate Houthis drone attacks on Saudi Arabia and potentially ships in the Red Sea. In Syria and Iraq, Pasdaran's drone force would eventually target US military bases. In Lebanon, Hezbollah's drone force is on reserve to act. But the main body of the Iranian unmanned fleet would operate in the Gulf area against US and Arab Coalition targets. Tehran's drone game is to harass US deployment and show deterrence against Washington.
Nathan Bennett
3/3
But aren't the Ayatollahs concerned about a massive US retaliation 'a la Reagan' in the 1980s? It doesn't seem that Iran's strategists believe that the Trump Administration would respond strategically to limited drone gaming. They may have been advised that the White House isn't in a position to wage a large size operation, hence pushing Iranians to pursue a brinkmanship strategy: attacking US assets, absorbing possible US retaliation, but winning the last round, as they think.
Let's see.
Isaiah Carter
Yeah but how much difference does it make for the average American if it came from a proxy or Iran itself?
Anthony Adams
>Walid "everyone I dont like is a Mullah shill" Phares
Hoveizeh Missile Iran is simply in a better position to fuck them up in any engagement. After decades of fucking with it and pushing for war, Iran finally said "checkmate faggot".
Camden Hill
>Iran is simply in a better position to fuck them up in any engagement. After decades of fucking with it and pushing for war, Iran finally said "checkmate faggot". Iran is basically toying with Saudi Arabia. They have turn on the war mode now and they're destroying Saudi Arabia gradually. It makes perfect sense since no one has the balls to attack Iran since it will utterly devastate them.
Grayson White
>A dozen cruise missile
At least make it believable ffs
Colton Jackson
But who in Iraq has drones? Were these the kinds of easy to make drones that the Russians keep shooting down in Syria? If so it could've been anyone. If the type used by real armies, it could've been some secret IRGC group.
Trump waiting to hear from Riyadh on oil attack culprit, US ‘locked & loaded’ to respond
US President Donald Trump says Washington has “a reason to believe” it knows the mastermind behind the drone strikes on the Saudi oil refineries and is poised to respond pending confirmation from Riyadh.
“Saudi Arabia oil supply was attacked. There is reason to believe that we know the culprit, are locked and loaded depending on verification, but are waiting to hear from the Kingdom as to who they believe was the cause of this attack, and under what terms we would proceed!” Trump tweeted Sunday.
Riyadh has so far not named a perpetrator, calling the drone strikes “terrorist attacks” aimed at disrupting the global oil supply. Tehran has dismissed the allegations of its involvement, calling the US claims “maximum lies” and saying that it is ready to protect itself if war breaks out.
>blah blah blah >but we are waiting So no war then. Good.
Joseph Phillips
>Locked and loaded
Nothing will happen. Looking at the timing, it is painfully obvious that it's a false flag
Luke White
Iran won’t win this fight they’re doomed for the same reason that leftist fuck tards main emotion is avarice towards rich and successful people. Because they are idiots. Saudi Arabia is fantastically rich, because they got educations and opened up to the west. Iran people stayed ignorant and closed, and now they are poor. So rather than engaging in self improvement they want to charge Saudi Arabia to drive boats through straight of Hormuz, and Europe and the US are involved because we run the seas and say, nope you can't do that.
Hudson Lee
>a mutt is spewing nonsense >again It's all so tiresome
Cooper Diaz
A yuropoor that cant refute an american argument. Yawn.
Hunter Nguyen
>a false flag >a false flag that the houthis took responsibility for
>Just how much are the saudis paying them? That's what they are currently working out
Dylan Morales
>Houthis took credit for the attack >Houthis already managed to strike deep into Saudi territory with drones before, multiple times in fact >"SHUT UP IT'S IRAN BECAUSE REASONS" Because that makes perfect sense somehow.
Evan James
Do you have a dog in this race?
Logan Jackson
>Tehran has been boasting about its new "strategic capabilities," claiming it has reached a strategic parity with Israel, the Arab Coalition and the United States. It has asserted that it has a combo of unmanned flying weapons which can inflict high level of destructions on its enemies, particularly American forces in the region. Based.
This reeks of our foreign policy 18 years ago > Saudis (definitely not backed by j*ws) Cary our largest terror attack on us soil > %53 army invaded Iraq instead I can’t wait to be enslaved by the Chinese and for the US and Israel to be erased by Russian H bombs.
Lincoln Rodriguez
>If Iran did launch scuds at Saudi Arabia that's casus belli >If Thats a big If buddy. Take your pills, we all know this is a neocon lie.
>Saudi Arabia is fantastically rich, because they got educations and opened up to the west. Iran people stayed ignorant and closed, and now they are poor.
in what way would iran profit from attacking the oil fields? its obvious to me that israel attacked saudi arabia. theyre the only ones who benefit from the situation
Jeremiah Butler
Yes, please.
Logan Moore
>its obvious to me that israel attacked saudi arabia Come on habibi, its better to accept reality, that Houthis were able to bypass the patriots and destroy the saudi facilities.
He was always part of the gang, it was only a matter of time
Levi Barnes
If solid evidence comes out that Iran attacked SA directly what is the proper response from the U.S. and Saudis?
Tyler White
If russia has a rocket. That we cant stop. And one can emp all of usa. Why dosnt russia use it? Watching usa and isreal war monger to a going to happen breaking point. Like is putin trying to be good? And hope fot the best? If ww3 starts, and if it ends in non humanity extinctionm would it matter who started it?
Brandon Hughes
Also. Obama is evil. So i only see him giving iran money because iran is evil? Irans allies are evil? Is this evil vs evil? Or is one side even good?
