E. Michael Jones says porn is a form of societal and political control. Do you agree?

E. Michael Jones says porn is a form of societal and political control. Do you agree?

Attached: coomer4.png (587x280, 28K)

You guys give way too much credit to porn.

Stop listening to that civnat cuck. he has nothing to say that hasn't been said before.

His contributions to awakening people on the jews is pretty good. Gotta take the good with the wack

Attached: rxfmzgpr1adx.jpg (680x600, 52K)

Porn has different effects on different age groups. Certainly men in their 60's have no compelling reason not to watch porn. Men in their late teens and early 20's have every reason not to watch porn. Speaking about a topic in generalities gets us no where. If men in their 60's can't watch porn, they will pay hookers, and human trafficking will increase. Crime will increase. If men in their 20's can't watch porn, they will overthrow our jew fuck government and have babies.

...

No. Porn doesn't control shit. It's just another thing some individuals get addicted to.

guys I really hate niggers

Absolutely.
Anyone who denies this is a fool or a liar.

You have to be quite a low minded individual to not (or pretend not to) understand what porn does to people who consume it.

It is a net negative for humanity.

>>Addictive substances dropped on a population for free isn't a from of control...
>>Flag
Why do you faggoys come here?

Welcome to the epiphanies from the last decade

Already committed to it.
Hey faggoy leaf.
Guess how I know that you are a low energy individual?

Who else puts it as clearly and succinctly though?
The man is a raging Catholic apologist, but you cant deny that he has great research.

I don't even watch much porn. I don'tcare about it.

there is a reason why Porn is free.

He's catholic but I don't think he ever wrote extensively on apologetics

>Religon condems sex as form of control
>Porn is a form of control
Which is it?

This, look at how much social engineering porn has already caused
>Normalized anal sex among heterosexuals
>women remove all their pubic hair
>Obsession with dick size to match what is seen in pornography
>BBC/cuck shit
>Traps aren't gay
>Women bleach their anuses

None of this shit would ever have been memed into being normal if it wasn't for porn.

People have fapped long before nudity/pornography was available anywhere in media because you don't need that to fap. If pornography is truly a psychological weapon that Jews are using to enslave people, then they've managed to get to virtually everyone (including themselves) and it hasn't harmed the consumers but has harmed people involved in the production. Being aggressively fucked on camera, used up, and then dumped by the industry is demonstrably harmful but is missing from E Michael Jones's criticism of pornography. He's laser focused on the Jews involved and misses 90% of the harm done and makes it into a Catholic victimization thing.

Porn is a business based on male attention span.

Male attention is extremely exploitable as you faggots by now should understand. Women know this.

Beware of who or what you give your attention to. Understanding this is power.

There a 2 type of men. Men who fuck and men who watch other men fuck.

If you watch porn you belong to the second group. You are a bonobo. They seem to have the same type of society as we have. (Open) cuckoldery and degenerate.

Although most of you faggots watch porn or at least have watched it a good ammount, I think that you aren't watchers/cuckolds/bonobos by nature.

The rebellion on this board screams repressed chimpanse. They are a different animal.

Chimpansees are a bit nuts but seem to have good morals regarding their women.