Use facts and logic to debunk Yang's policies

Look at those photos all major blow hands or loons to the person.

Musk is the only one who is not useless batshit crazy.

Attached: F202BCE8-93B8-4B9C-A9E6-096413B815F4.jpg (576x768, 79K)

>Stop all deportations
I agree with this. There should be executions. Death is a pretty good deterrent.

What are his policies? I don't know anything outside of $1000/mo for those not on benefits, and if you're on benefits it's taken out of it or something. Anyone got a link I'm fucking lazy

youtube.com/watch?v=QlsaQZz6418
youtube.com/watch?v=otEbT0l_Hbg&t=2205s
youtube.com/watch?v=6kOuHR8GUVo&t=139s
youtube.com/watch?v=KClh_EiOzig
youtube.com/watch?v=kl39KHS07Xc
YANG2020

Attached: D91B1EE8-C507-48F0-9603-2F214DEADFF2.jpg (845x325, 24K)

yang2020.com/policies/

CHING CHONG
PING PONG

A CHINK OUTSIDE A RICE FIELD IS WRONG

(you can't)

Yang is a dumb nigger who was 40 years too late. The economic system of the US has moved from industrial capitalism to global financial capitalism and all of those jobs in threat of machinization have been replaced or moved to other countries. Yang's solution is a solution to a problem that has self corrected.

>Yang's solution is a solution to a problem that has self corrected.
Are you like... completely retarded?

Yang
>We need UBI because automation will eliminate all jobs
Reality
>unemployment at record lows

Easy. Yang gives everyone 1,000 dollars then rent adjusts accordingly because everyone has +1000 dollars to spend on an apartment.

Wrong flag

Haha. The problem is just beginning. In the past we've been able to make each human more efficient, so we need less for higher output (which is why shit is so cheap).

We are now moving to not needing the human at all.

unironically niggers.

YANG IS A DISCORD TRANNY
YANG IS A DISCORD TRANNY
YANG IS A DISCORD TRANNY

Are you fucking retarded? The reason for the UBI is because he thinks that many jobs are going to be replaced by machines. I'm saying he's too late because the jobs that were directly at risk have been replaced in the US.
>muh truck drivers
>muh pilots
>muh receptionists
No

No point when you can move menial tasks to China.

Cenk Uygur is literally brain damaged. You should throw whatever he approves into the trash.

Attached: 18EF1AA7-9D21-4CD9-8ED5-1D3073538E24.jpg (570x587, 40K)

Dude the new jobs being replaced are white and blue collar jobs thought to be unautomatable

Attached: 15618149-01D0-4AF8-9A71-7891D35A2B9B.jpg (255x198, 17K)

Muh dik is bigger then his. I make it a point not to heed nobody that gots a smaller dingaling than I do. This includes you, OP. I also dont take kindly to commie scum millin about in my Jow Forums so fuck right off, OP. Go on. Fuck off naow.

/thread

UBI will cost more per year than the entire national tax revenue collected last year. Buying votes is not a platform.

/thread

Automation is going to eliminate many of the good jobs and already has. Most of the jobs today dont pay well and ubi will drastically help the personal economic situation for the millions of Americans.

>ubi will drastically help the personal economic situation for the millions of Americans
Especially McDonald's shareholders

Nice argument Mr. Homosex
And those are? Trucking is the industry I hear about the most but I doubt federal law will allow you to use a truck autonomously without anyone behind the wheel on top of lobbyists preventing that.

Automation is really a meme. There are robots on factory assembly lines but that's about it for now.
We're still a very long way from automation being a viable excuse for labor shortages.

How is that an argument against his UBI policy, you fucking dumb nigger?

He dislikes Warren beacuse she plans to ban nuclear energy

>plans to ban nuclear energy
>muh global warming

Basically this. The idiots in the media talking about that are like the redditors who drool over "science" articles
Get some reading comprehension you doublenigger. Moving jobs to China + Menial tasks being paid minimum wage + federal regulations == No mass automation

>Not knowing Yang's plan at all

Attached: Climate-Change-Timeline.jpg (2048x932, 259K)

Yang's Freedom Dividend is a bad version of UBI which is a retarded version of Negative Income tax.

Trials of these programs show that they don't work. Negative income tax might still be better than our current system. Freedom dividend definitely is shit.

Overall best just to get rid of all welfare (including most if not all government jobs - time to get a real job and contribute to society soldier boy)

Attached: 3cb3b58af80a8950de1612091895d0ba.jpg (606x720, 68K)

youtu.be/QlsaQZz6418

Attached: 4175AE01-ADAC-4E9A-A0D6-9FB180C6CE5B.jpg (750x986, 916K)

Based and Yangpilled

source?

>lies
Okay buddy

being retarded isn't factual or logical

What is supply and demand? Can new housing not be constructed anymore? Does it happen in Alaska when everyone gets $1600 neetbux on the same date?

>Monitoring inventory, cleaning up spills
>in 173 grocery stores
Yeah, those "jobs" are invaluable to millions of Americans.

there is no arguments against Yang that arent strawman arguments or coming from room temp IQ mountain dew drinking 'masterrace' members
Occasionally a richfag will critique, but they are living on borrowed time under Zion Don

Attached: EDmTCrQWsAAAsgg.jpg (2043x1071, 389K)

Unemployment is a record lows because a record number of people are no longer in the workforce.

>get rid of all welfare
>All the poor people reliant on it to eat will quietly starve to death
That will totally happen you brainlet.

Attached: Screenshot_20190916-204011.png (1440x1524, 129K)

1000 X 150,000,000

Where will he get all that money?

Where's your math?

Attached: 1568599676604.jpg (1024x656, 91K)

Up yours, nigger

I'm with you buddy, but at this point I just want to see the shitshow as it triggers a societal collapse.

320,000,000($1000)(12 months)=$4,200,000,000,000/year

Even with sales tax recycling, the expense of giving everyone a thousand dollars will be more than the entire budget for the US this year.

Attached: math.png (644x553, 55K)

>A bad version of UBI
It is fucking UBI

If we're at the point where wages are so low that people need an extra $1000 a month, theres no reasons at all to keep the border open at all. Including for legal immigrants.

If Yang wanted to shut down all legal/illegal immigration, deport the 30 million illegals here, THEN, and ONLY THEN, would his $1000/month make any damn sense.

Counting minors, fucking retard

I'll use Thomas Jefferson.

“Never spend your money before you have it.”

“I own it to be my opinion, that good will arise from the destruction of our credit.

I see nothing else which can restrain our disposition to luxury, and to the change of those manners which alone can preserve republican government.

As it is impossible to prevent credit, the best way would be to cure its ill effects by giving an instantaneous recovery to the creditor.

This would be reducing purchases on credit to purchases for ready money.

A man would then see a prison painted on everything he wished, but had not ready money to pay for.”

–Thomas Jefferson to Archibald Stuart, 1786. ME 5:25

Attached: thomas_jefferson_spending_money_wisdom_quote_pos_poster-r8b9a8a4ac6b8416a956a52b2aacb3a5d_bcz_8byvr_ (400x400, 32K)

this

The issue is how do you determine where to draw the line for what constitutes job losses. From my job (product development engineer), I literally do the work of 2 people back in the '90s. That's just basic computer and autocad skills. You don't see construction workers or farmers complaining about the ever increasing machinery they use.

The world has been technologically changing for the last several thousand years. We went from mostly farmers to few farmers + tons of other industries. Most people adapt. Some get left behind.

As with any technology, the people who are prepared for it will reap the benefit (rich and educated). Hence the growing income disparity. I've learned that I can beg for handouts or be in the other side begrudgingly giving handouts.

Attached: skyrim_wallpaper_2_by_zakafein-d4iz9m1.jpg (1920x1080, 357K)

Agreed. Democrats want two inherently opposing things. A welfare state can only function when there is a net positive contribution from the average individual. By letting in random immigrants, we are lowering the average contribution.

Honestly I just want fiscal responsibility with our government more than anything. We're in a strong economy right now. It's embarassing that we can't balance the budget. Politicians are always worried about re-election and won't slash funds.

Attached: 1462003974599.jpg (2560x1700, 1.4M)

Even that's more complicated and long running than it needs to be. Starting right after the election, Yang puts in place a 10 year plan. The plan? 10 nuclear reactors start being built every year. Will cost 50 billion a year, but the savings would eventually be enormous. At the end of the 10 years, in 2031, there will be 100 new plants in America, and nearly all of America's energy would now be clean, for a total cost of 500billion.

Simple, easy, makes sense. The jobs lost from coal and such? That's where the UBI comes in.

Of course that plan makes too much sense for anyone to do it.

>Everyone gets $1000 a month
>Landlords use their $1000 to offset mortgage
>Landlords raise rent because now the bills are covered and they can afford for it to sit empty

Quick answer, that won't happen
>medium.com/discourse/would-a-universal-basic-income-cause-a-major-spike-in-rent-prices-50fca12b06ab

Why don't people talk about UBE? Universal Basic Employment? A menial job repairing infrastructure or supervising robots

fact - in order to give each person 12k a year you need 12k a year
logic - in order to acquire those 12k per person you would have to collect them via taxation
fact - not every person makes enough to be taxed his own money to be given his own money back
logic - you will need to tax people making more money progressively more to compensate
fact - passing changes of that magnitude require massive support
logic - having this system passing through all the legal steps to become reality is not feasible
fact - people use false pretenses to get what they want
logic - Yang's is promising you shit he can't deliver

tl;dr - you are all stupid cunts believing the gook

Attached: 1300465530959.png (640x480, 215K)

One of his policies is to reinforce the southern border

Attached: EC0RukJWkAASfEr.jpg (1200x784, 175K)

Fact: he cried
Logic: he's a wuss.

Attached: yang give it a cry.jpg (750x537, 160K)

He will gibs the 1000 ubi

Isn't this the retard who wants gibs for everyone?
Where is that money supposed to come from, inflation?

Because that's retarded. If people can generate more value than it costs to employ them, then start a company and pay them to do it. If it actually makes any economic sense, then you can already do it right now.

>If people can generate more value than it costs to employ them, then start a company and pay them to do it. If it actually makes any economic sense, then you can already do it right now.
>what is literally all business

This son. Unironically voting yang to blow up this gay system of jew schemes. Plus niggers will quit day one i promise.

Exactly. The idea of "universal basic employment" assumes that there's some gigantic market out there for unskilled labour that just isn't being filled. It's completely idiotic.

>some gigantic market out there for unskilled labour that just isn't being filled
There isn't?

Where do we put the mutts? Hopefully euthanized peacefully. The ovens are for the jews.

Everything he's proposing has been tried and failed in lesser countries.

Attached: Yang'sDreamIHad.jpg (720x453, 48K)

/thread

Checked and wrecked.

Attached: TrumpChecked.jpg (700x512, 84K)

If there is, then fill it. Start a business for this shit rather than expecting the government to magically do it for you. If you're right, you'll become very rich.

I live on a cotton farm and work for myself. I'm just asking why people are suggesting giving $1000 a month to everyone for free is viable, when making them work for it isn't. There would be no excuse to not get a job. The bonus would be that infrastructure would improve at lower costs than contracted (((companies))).

Neither of them are viable.

Lesser of two evils

Fact. Segregate and allow each people to be their own.

>segregate
>the year is 2075
>after 40 years of segregation, 40 million whites live in the midwest and 600 million shitskins have taken over the rest of the country

Ok. Post his policies.
How dumb are you?
>please debunk something I can’t post
All I see from yang posting is crayon eaters.

baste

fuck you and fuck all politicians

He is a cookie-cutter dem. Nothing more. Nothing less.

Attached: IMG_20190309_232538_105.jpg (1024x576, 165K)

That robot (his name is Marty btw) does absolutely nothing except freak me the fuck out

Attached: Screenshot_2019-09-17-02-39-31-1.png (1080x1545, 1.4M)

Attached: marty.jpg (576x768, 111K)

Why am I anti-Yang? Because I want to succeed in tech while normies fail. Chads and Stacies bullied me growing up, I don't want my hard work to fund their reckless lifestyles. I want them to have no options while I rack in six figures.

Back up Yangs policies with logic first.

Your argument might have been stronger in my eyes if you listed a single person I respected instead of your very own set of celebrities masking as intellectuals.

you radical media faggots need to give it a rest

- Give all illegals amnesty
- Stop all deportations
yang2020.com/policies/support-the-dream-act/
yang2020.com/policies/pathway-to-citizenship-2/

- Make LGBT protected class
yang2020.com/policies/lgbtq-rights/

- Taxpayers pay for abortions
yang2020.com/policies/right-privacy-abortion-contraception/

- Fix the fake gender pay gap
yang2020.com/policies/fight-for-equal-pay/

- Social credit system ala China
yang2020.com/policies/modern-time-banking/

Attached: sairarao_yang.png (890x686, 319K)